Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Photographer should say "Go ahead" (Score 1) 630

Actually no. The fact of the matter is the image in question was on the homepage of her business. "A consulting agency specializing in Web marketing, SEO, social media and Web design."
As an attorney and an alleged expert on web marketing, she sure as hell should know that she was using that image intentionally on her site without proper licensing.
In fact, I would say she has a higher standard she should have to adhere to just because she has special training and expertise in the legal issues involved in publishing websites.
So it appears Candice Schwager is both deliberately stealing the images for her business use, she is also using crippled children as an emotional bullying tool to get away with her copyright infringement.

Comment: Re:Google bomb the mewling quim (Score 1) 630

Candice Schwager is apparently both a serial copyright infringer and someone intent on besmirching the photographers reputation. She seems to have no problems taking intellectual property and using it for her own purposes. And that blog post is bad enough I would even consider suing her for libel and defamation of character were I the photographer.

Since she is clearly lacking in ethics, I would be most curious to see what percentage of that "charity" actually goes to disabled children, and how much is eaten up by "adminstrative expenses" and salaries. I am going to guess its a scam.

Old programmers never die, they just branch to a new address.

Working...