As long as people remember him he's not truly dead.
Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!
We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).
He quit smoking a long time ago and still got the disease.
Opsec is just a procedure you apply.
Invent one procedure that works only for your closed group, it shall only be known to all of you. What the procedures and patterns you have within your closed group will have to be seen as normal variations that to the casual observer don't look outside the ordinary.
A certain variation on how the clothing is worn might be your way of signaling to your group a certain message - or be part of the message when you casually meet.
Most of use are aware of not-invented-here syndrome, but the opposite problem is perhaps equally troublesome. We can get stuck in the mindset that there must be a product, library, or code sample, that already does what we want. Instead of just writing the code we need a lot of effort is spent testing out modules and trying to accommodate our own code. At some point we need to just say, “stop!”, and write the code ourselves."
Link to Original Source
Overpopulation is still a risk.
I'd say that there's a lot of false claims in that article about slow broadband in Europe.
Do a Google Search for "internet speed by country" and you will see that it's not bad at all in Europe. Some countries are better off than others, but it's not related to population density.
So the linked article is full of hot air and is actually funny for me living in Europe how stupid the claims are.
Link to Original Source
Link to Original Source
I'm not in a position of authority. I work in the Fab. This is NOT my area of expertise, although I care about the issue and try to be informed.
I was pretty bummed to find that Intel was on an letter with other companies against Title II regulation.
I also ran into a little piece on the company intranet about Net Neutrality, and emailed the author. It turns out he is, I believe, Intel's main lobbyist in Washington D.C.
He told me that Intel was FOR Net Neutrality. It seems everyone thinks that we're against it.
After speaking to him via phone and email, I got pretty discouraged. It really feels to me as if Intel is trying to say "Yay! We're for NN!" while doing everything it can to sink real regulation and oversight.
After talking to the guy for a while, It seems Intel believes that Title II regulation will slow growth. In addition, Intel thinks that the FCC has all the authority it needs under section 706, so the FCC shouldn't TRY for Title II regulation.
I think that's hogwash, to be polite. I hope it's the position of this one guy, and not the company? I doubt this though.
Frankly, I think that Intel will do well in a competitive environment. Without Net Neutrality, we WILL have a less competitive environment. I'm afraid of broadband companies strangling the next Google or Netflix because they don't want the competition for their own services. As a stockholder, I think this is a bad move.
I also don't think the Broadband companies will spend less under Title II. Oh, they SAY they will, but of course they do... What else would they say?
Frankly, I think broadband companies are simply afraid of unbundling. Back in the dial up days when most of us got our internet over the phone lines, there was Title II regulation and the ISPs had to lease their lines to competitors at sane prices. This gave us choice and competition. You could go get a mom and pop local company to be your ISP, and their service was AWESOME. I think the entire resistance to Title II is that the ISPs don't want those days again. Comcast has long been one of the worst companies in America in terms of customer service and satisfaction.
I don't know why Intel is following their lead. We should want MORE competition, not less. Why are we doing this?
I looked into section 706, and it seems to lack a LOT of teeth. Our main lobbyist said that the FCC could use section 706, but Title II would be tied up in the courts for a long time.
I read up on court cases from 2014, and the circuit court in D.C. said that the FCC gave up it's authority and that all it needed to do was reclassify to title II and it could have it back. The courts themselves seem to disagree with Intel's position. Section 706 is a mandate to report and vague permission to do something if broadband coverage isn't widely spread enough. It's very vague, and WILL be tied up in the courts.
From the court case...
“Even though section 706 grants the Commission authority to promote broadband deployment by regulating how broadband providers treat edge providers, the Commission may not utilize that power in a manner that contravenes any specific prohibition contained in the Communications Act.
I think it's pretty disingenious for Intel to say that we're for Net Neutrality while we try to sink it. I think Intel is lying to people, and I don't like it, as a customer, as an employee, and as a shareholder.
The FCC is voting to decide if we get Title II regulation BACK (We had it before and it was awesome) on the 26th of Feb, 2015. It's coming soon! I wish my company was on the right side here, but it seems they're not.
I wish I could change that, but it seems I can't.
Does anyone have any ideas? Should I be calling for boycott? Should I take to Twitter? Will that help?
I am also a little scared of being too effective. I LIKE my job, and Intel is good to me as an employee. I just wish we wouldn't be saying things are are demonstratively wrong, to ourselves and to the world.
For more information, please read up. This is IMPORTANT folks. The internet is our main communication channel now.
Cameras at ATMs.
I'm surprised that it's not the merchants that shall take full responsibility for fraud. That would raise the stakes on them to request photo ID or for online sales other means of supplementary identification.
It's still better than the magnetic stripe. But I agree - it's not as secure as it can be.
Compromised card readers are one item that can be used to spoof cards.
It's not the card that contains the PIN on the European solution, the PIN is validated by the bank.
The reason the US has opted for signature instead is because they think people will have problems remembering the PINs.
So this means that if you lose your wallet - tough luck because many shops don't check signature validity.
Add to it the stupidity that if someone matches the signature it's the signature on the card, not the signature on your photo ID.