Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Why homosexualism but not incest? (Score 1) 415

by GameboyRMH (#40143547) Attached to: 'Eco-Anarchists' Targeting Nuclear and Nanotech Workers

Well who says homosexuality is genetic? You're assuming that, and there's no evidence that this is the case AFAIK.

There are some theories that homosexuals would be advantageous to a society as surrogate caregivers though, which may explain why it hasn't been "corrected" by the evolutionary process, if that's possible.

I wonder what homosexuality rates are like in creatures that share zero child-rearing responsibility, vs. intelligent creatures that form societies and do share responsibility...

Comment: Re:Why homosexualism but not incest? (Score 1) 415

by GameboyRMH (#40143113) Attached to: 'Eco-Anarchists' Targeting Nuclear and Nanotech Workers

Yep, this is why I think it's hilarious when women think most men want polygamy and consider the practice bad for women and good for men.

Thank your lucky stars that polygamy is illegal in most places, guys, or all the women would be married to the richest guy in town. The rich lifestyle of the husbands cheating rampantly and the wives looking the other way is just the closest they can legally get to rich guys keeping harems.

Maybe it's backwards to say that I like that a form of consensual adult relationship is illegal, but don't kid yourself, it's good for all us dudes.

Shedenhelm's Law: All trails have more uphill sections than they have downhill sections.

Working...