Comment: Free market? (Score 1) 576
Comment: Re:Old is new (Score 1) 312
Comment: Re:Offer people what they want (Score 1) 980
What people want is to get the show for free and have it be really conveniently available all around the world. There is no possible business model of "release an elaborate fantasy television series for free."
Which is why you get torrents... people are willing to pay, just not the value the studios set on it. I suppose the argument could be "tough it's their show, they can charge what they want" to which I suppose people's reactions would be, it's available to me online for free... why pay that much when the internet reveals it's true "value"
Comment: This whole article could have been summed up with (Score 1) 594
Comment: Re:by comparison (Score 1) 589
Time to build starship: 20 years. Time to reach nearest star: 10,000 years (*)
Based on these numbers, wouldn't it be better to let technology progress a little bit further?
(*) IANAA, not an astronomer
Cost to build starship? I think that one should be right up there with the other two.
Comment: Re:Govt stimulus == Waste of money (Score 1) 295
Comment: Re:Counter-intuitive (Score 1) 113
Comment: Re:Counter-intuitive (Score 1) 113
How is this in any way counter-intuitive?
If I had to guess, I'd probably say with the recyclable nature of paper as opposed to the large amount of ewaste we create globally buying newer devices for the same purpose over and over, it would create the perception that creating a device to read the news off of would seem rather counter-intuitive than reading from a recyclable paper product.