Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


Comment: Re:Still missing the point (Score 1) 206

by cpghost (#47390303) Attached to: New Russian Law To Forbid Storing Russians' Data Outside the Country
Right. However, if you're not a US Person (i.e. if you don't have US Citizenship or a Permanent Resident Permit), there's no due process for you as well: NSA can access your GMail account without a warrant, because, well, you'd be a foreigner in their eyes, and foreigners are NOT protected by US laws in this area. No FISA court for you, comrade! That's the point: in Russia, they may pretend to follow due process (even if they don't), in the US, they don't even pretend to follow due process if you're no US Person. That's why some States are considering encouraging their citizens to move their personal data out of the US cloud.

Comment: Host your data with your domestic spying agency! (Score 1) 206

by cpghost (#47390171) Attached to: New Russian Law To Forbid Storing Russians' Data Outside the Country
Seen from the outside world, most, if not all, US clouds are accessible to the NSA and other US state agencies. Especially if you're not a US Person, those agencies can request your data without a warrant at all. So what the Russians and Brazilians and soon to follow other nations are doing is this: they don't want you to post your potentially incriminating personal data on NSA-controlled servers when the NSA could use them to blackmail you should you work in an important position in politics, industry etc... They rather want you to post data on servers THEY, on only they, control. What's so wrong about this? If you are about to freely give your personal data to a spying agency anyway, it could as well be your own domestic spying agency, instead of the NSA. At least, that agency would be bound by your local laws w.r.t. the respect of privacy and protection of data of its own citizens, while the NSA is free to do what it wants with data of non US Persons, including selling them on the black market (not that they would do such a thing, of course, but in theory, they could). All this is due to the NSA overstepping its original mission that was code breaking and code development, and embarking on the Orwell program of TIA.

Comment: Relocate GitHub outside of the US (Score 1) 349

by cpghost (#47385761) Attached to: Qualcomm Takes Down 100+ GitHub Repositories With DMCA Notice
Would it be really so hard to relocate GitHub (servers, company and all) outside the US to avoid those DMCA take downs? Especially considering that it would also make life for the NSA a little harder too (no NSLs could force GitHub to secretly include backdoors here and there, and keep silent about it). Next question: what country would be most friendly to Open Source yet resisting the insatiable hunger of the copyright trolls?

Comment: Re: Wait a minute! (Score 1) 74

Is it really wrong to spy on the worldwide communication infrastructure, as long as you can? This ubiquitous spying can only spur the deployment of more encryption, anonymizing protocols and generally hardening the infrastructure. As long as that infrastructure is so easily vulnerable to snooping, why should the NSA, GCHQ and other spying agencies refrain from exploiting it? After all, it's our fault that we keep communicating in the clear, and that we keep trusting commercial companies that provide closed source products that we can't inspect (at least in theory).

Comment: Re:Too many secrets (Score 1) 74

Suppose the inquiry board wants needs the testimony of anonymous whistle blowers (NOT Snowden, he's known). How do you suppose the anonymity of those testifying can be granted, if the inquiry is being public? I guess the NSA through the BND wanted to know who was testifying there, and what they exactly said.

Comment: Backdoors will be added at build time (Score 1) 178

Unless governments can rebuild the released version of Microsoft products with said source code, they'll be fed a sanitized version of that source code, but not the original full code base needed to build the final binaries. Backdoors could still be added later at build time, so what's the point?

Comment: Use paper, CC the NSA later (Score 1) 143

by cpghost (#47371063) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: Replacing Paper With Tablets For Design Meetings?
Seriously... paper is the superior alternative here. It doesn't interrupt your and your coworkers' train of thought, it has backup, it is the fastest way to collaboratively design and modify designs... and it has the added advantage of being unspyable by the NSA, GCHQ, the Chinese, or other industrial espionage outfits who rely on ElInt. Prepare your designs on paper. There'll be enough time to translate your final design on a computer and CC the NSA and competition later.

Comment: Re:But I thought it was already dead? (Score 2) 71

by cpghost (#47351913) Attached to: Google Kills Orkut To Focus On YouTube, Blogger and Google+

Why not? The only thing that Google really does better than anyone else is search (and maybe free machine translation). For everything else, there's a better or at least equivalent option.

Gmail is actually doing quite a good job as well. What other mail provider does probably BCC every mail you receive and send to the NSA cloud for safekeeping and backup?

Comment: Don't depend on a social network (Score 1) 71

by cpghost (#47351819) Attached to: Google Kills Orkut To Focus On YouTube, Blogger and Google+
Google suspending Orkut is but a tiny example of why you better communicate with people by using e-mail directly. Or, if you must, go the old fashioned way (*cough* Usenet *cough*). But rely on a specific social network run by a single company, and you're sure that it will be shut down sometimes down the road. Even Facebook, not to mention Google+ will someday go the way of Geocities.

Comment: Re:I hope they get whatever they can for them (Score 1) 232

by cpghost (#47230589) Attached to: US To Auction 29,656 Bitcoins Seized From Silk Road

Selling bitcoin - or ANYTHING ELSE - at an auction in exchange for US dollars does not set ANY kind of precedent establishing that bitcoin - or ANYTHING ELSE - is now legal tender. In fact, it establishes the opposite.

You're right. It would make bitcoin legal tender only if you could pay for the auctioned bitcoins with... bitcoins. But then again, that would be pretty pointless, wouldn't it?

Comment: Re:Note to EFF (Score 3, Informative) 70

by cpghost (#47222727) Attached to: Egyptian Blogger Sentenced to 15 Years For Organizing Protest

How you get from a military theocracy to some sort of representative and stable government is a question that has yet to be answered.

Well, for Egypt, the question is rather to choose between an autocratic military regime on one side, and an autocratic theocracy on the other side.

Comment: Re:What? (Score 1) 70

by cpghost (#47222679) Attached to: Egyptian Blogger Sentenced to 15 Years For Organizing Protest
I very seldom agree with your islamophobic comments, but on this point, you're absolutely right. Autocratic rule is much better for minorities, but also for moderate muslims, than a theocracy imposed by muslim brothers or similar sects like ISIS. This, Obama's administration doesn't understand (yet), and keeps pushing islamism on muslim-majority countries that would better be left alone, as they know better how to deal with their demons.

"It ain't so much the things we don't know that get us in trouble. It's the things we know that ain't so." -- Artemus Ward aka Charles Farrar Brown