Then, and I *hate* to admit this, Trump was right, "It’s too much winning."

Though this premise makes me worried about his intent to force more winning on us. From his campaign:

IDK, maybe the winners and losers aren't the same people in all this ...

Wait until the U.S. starts making vehicles that run on "beautiful, clean coal".
China can't compete with that, they don't even have coal ... wait, what?

:-)

If it was in Fahrenheit it would a 3.6 degrees of warming, so another reason to switch to the Metric System: it'll be cooler. :-)

Or run for House / Senate. /s

Seven has always been a troublemaker, starting when it ate nine.

Agreed.

Especially the guy whose oath is literally to "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States". Didn't Trump repeatedly promise to be "the most transparent President" and have "the most transparent administration" in history? Maybe he and his minions were frightened off by the word "trans" ... :-)

Noting that OAN (One America News Network) signed it. From US news outlets reject Pentagon press access policy

The Pentagon has apparently backtracked a bit, saying organizations don't have to agree, just acknowledge they understand it. Not sure that's any better...

The genesis of many, many bad ideas: ", but on ..."

(Pretty sure the first part of that quote is dumb too.)

I'd settle for members of Congress getting that message: Oath to The Constitution, Responsibilities of Congress, Checks and Balances, ... -- you know, all the stuff we (should have) learned in high school government class.

For SCOTUS, I'd add: Don't pull and misapply stuff from 400 years ago to invent justifications for your agendas. If you're an Originalist or Textualist, then be that more than just when it's convenient.

This kind of stuff makes me feel better about keeping, and spending $$ to repaint, my 2002 Honda CR-V Ex, which only has 60k miles and is in excellent mechanical condition -- and has a manual transmission, which is almost impossible to get now. Same goes for my 2001 Honda Civic Ex, with only 130k miles. As a bonus, them being only a year apart, all the interior controls are nearly identical.

Newer isn't always better.

Nice. That's both adorable and annoying; I could get behind it if it weren't too loud. On the other hand, as one comment noted, "Imagine 30 of those in city traffic."

And if a user isn't interested in having that experience? Ditching/returning the unit seems like a bad sole option. Funny how forcing something unwanted on others is "part of the experience." (Hmm, that sound familiar now...)

This seems even worse.

Hopefully you'll be able to specify different sounds for different speeds. When rolling at a crawl, maybe the intro from Jaws?

The car also comes with a deck of cards and box of clothes pins for the wheel spokes.

Or... you can just let the car sound like it sounds. If you want it to sound like a V8, get a car w/a V8.

Given who owns/runs these companies, I'm thinking "Jerks in a circle" -- but... it seems a bit wordy. :-)