Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 


Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror
×
Businesses

Prince Harry Joins Silicon Valley Start-Up (cbsnews.com) 83

Posted by BeauHD from the new-gig dept.
Prince Harry will become chief impact officer of BetterUp Inc., a professional coaching platform based in Silicon Valley with a goal to "fuel whole person growth through individual coaching and custom support." CBS News reports: "As a true citizen of the world, he has dedicated his life's work to bringing attention to the diverse needs of people everywhere and advocating for mental health initiatives: from founding the Invictus Games, a platform for service personnel to use sport as part of their psychological and physical rehabilitation, to launching Sentebale, which supports the mental health and wellbeing of young people affected by HIV in Lesotho and Botswana," [CEO Alexi Roubichaux said in a blog post].

In his own blog post, Harry said he joined BetterUp because he believes "that focusing on and prioritizing our mental fitness unlocks potential and opportunity that we never knew we had inside of us." "As the Royal Marine Commandos say, 'It's a state of mind.' We all have it in us," he continued. He said during his decade in the military, he learned that "we don't just need to build physical resilience, but also mental resilience." "And in the years since, my understanding of what resilience means -- and how we can build it -- has been shaped by the thousands of people and experts I've been fortunate to meet and learn from," Harry said. Harry revealed he has worked with a BetterUp coach, which he found "invaluable."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Prince Harry Joins Silicon Valley Start-Up More

Prince Harry Joins Silicon Valley Start-Up

Comments Filter:

  • "Chief Impact Officer" eh? (Score:3, Funny)

    by Rosco P. Coltrane ( 209368 ) on Tuesday March 23, 2021 @06:32PM (#61191010)

    Never heard that one before. Following her mom's footprints I guess...

    • Re:"Chief Impact Officer" eh? (Score:5, Funny)

      by AmazingRuss ( 555076 ) on Tuesday March 23, 2021 @06:40PM (#61191030)
      A Chief Impact Officer evaluates percussive learnings to actualize self extrapolated value streams, and thereby grow synergies into impactful outcomes, silly.

    • Re:"Chief Impact Officer" eh? (Score:5, Interesting)

      by SirSpanksALot ( 7630868 ) on Tuesday March 23, 2021 @06:56PM (#61191080)
      Bullshit job given to him so they can use his celebrity to gain funds. It's like the SPAC craze where celebrities get tied in to draw investment (ex, Shaq and the dumpster fire that is WeWork)
    • I'm guessing it involves using the Impact font. Probably in large size, white with a black outline, on top of other people's photos.
    • Beats me why they think Diana was "good", she left nothing of her millions to charity when she passed.

      • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

        by Anonymous Coward

        Um, she was 36 when she was killed, I doubt she was expecting to die quite that young and so probably hadn't even formed a will at that point.

        She was divorced from Charles by then so all her money would've gone to her kids by default, because that's the law.

        I'm not a fan of the Royals or Diana, it doesn't really interest me, but attacking someone for not predicting their own untimely death and blaming her for her wealth being passed down to her sons due to the law is, well, weird.

  • 4d royal chess (Score:1)

    by Anonymous Coward
    This was a real life Queens Gambit, well played sir.
    • Curious how this is off topic. If this isn't a publicity gig, even if for the company, then nothing is. Or was the mod that marked this down some sort of British royals fan. And hey, I like Harry best of them all, but this isn't like a real job.

  • Change of Title (Score:5, Insightful)

    by quantaman ( 517394 ) on Tuesday March 23, 2021 @06:46PM (#61191054)

    He's gone from playing a ceremonial role for the British Government to playing a ceremonial role for a tech company.

  • Straight out of W1A (Score:5, Informative)

    by dskoll ( 99328 ) on Tuesday March 23, 2021 @06:50PM (#61191064) Homepage

    "BetterUp" sounds like something straight out of W1A [wikipedia.org]. Here's what I mean [youtube.com].

  • They're not getting a lot of love here on /. but I'll be hoping for their success. We need more people working for the genuine well-being of others.

    • Re: (Score:2, Troll)

      by BlackBilly ( 7624958 )
      Empathy? This is a nerd site, the requirement of which is being ASD which comes with the empathy deficient trait.
      Personally I think his wife has bought into the poisonous woke ideology which will only cause more suffering the longer it continues. So their demise will result in a net gain for society overall. How's that for empathy? I'm always thinking of the greater good.
    • While I do agree that people working for the genuine well-being of others is a good thing and ought to be encouraged, Harry Windsor is an upper class twit who won't actually "do" anything.
      Those stereotypes of inbred toffs? That is what Harry is.

      • Harry Windsor is an upper class twit who won't actually "do" anything.

        I'm a Brit which is to say I don't really follow much of anything to do with the royal family,. What makes you say that? Genuinely curious. I have no idea what his range of skills are apart from soldiering which he did once.

        Oh, except a funny and rather convincing GIF I saw on Fark years ago regarding this:

        Those stereotypes of inbred toffs?

        I think many people strongly suspect that he is not, in fact inbred.

        • I think many people strongly suspect that he is not, in fact inbred.

          I wasn't thinking of his father*, I was thinking more of his mother's family, who have been marrying each other for several hundred years.

          * Oh there is no way Charles is really his father.

    • Yes we do. They aren't them.

    • Re: (Score:2, Informative)

      by wyHunter ( 4241347 )
      The Sussexes are clearly working only for themselves. I say this as an American who has no skin in the game about the U.k monarchy either way.

      • Re: (Score:2, Insightful)

        by account_deleted ( 4530225 )
        Comment removed based on user account deletion

        • Re: (Score:2)

          by DarkOx ( 621550 )

          I blame my own nation the good old USA for this though. The sad fact is its our culture that enabled a no-talent gold digging whore like Markle to be successful enough to get herself across the pond and under the nose of Prince harry in the first place.

          If we were a better country Markles acting career would have left her waiting tables at the local Hooters.

      • I say this as an American who has no skin in the game about the U.k monarchy either way.

        My experience is that Americans care way more about the monarchy than we do. I mean they're there, and present at ceremonies and whatnot. Occasionally there's a royal wedding and all the pubs use that as an excuse to start selling booze in quantity at 10am and the general population lets them. Also it means whatever twat is PM isn't the head of state. Other than that they don't bother me, I don't bother them as it were.

        B

        • I say this as an American who has no skin in the game about the U.k monarchy either way.

          My experience is that Americans care way more about the monarchy than we do. I mean they're there, and present at ceremonies and whatnot. Occasionally there's a royal wedding and all the pubs use that as an excuse to start selling booze in quantity at 10am and the general population lets them. Also it means whatever twat is PM isn't the head of state. Other than that they don't bother me, I don't bother them as it were.

          But whenever I've been to America, I end up meeting strangers who on hearing my accent let me know how wildly interested they are in that bunch.

          I would ask you if you'd like to take them but I really don't want Boris to be head of state.

          Americans are fascinated by power, wealth, and celebrity, and the British Royals seem to be the culmination of all three.

          I don't think Americans particularly grasp the service part, and although hereditary power is weird I do think there's something to be said for insulating the national image from the political whims of the day.

          I never followed the Megxit too closely though I don't think she was prepared for the level of service required by joining the family. And when the UK tabloids sense blood they're u

  • random person gets a job.
  • Oohh... "Life coach". More New Age bullshit.

    Why would I want to listen to that weenie?

    Fucking idiot /. programmers. I can't even type an extended Oh with more than two o's or h's.
    • I have a group for this purpose we call ourselves "fucking off" we meet in the bars, most effective when practiced during work hours. Goddamn wankers! Can we still say wankers?
  • The Slashdot shortcut on my phone still has the title from when I first got this phone. It's "Ban Fortnite says Prince Harry". How did that go?

  • I'm sure there's a Game of Thrones angle in there somewhere but Prince Charles is not his biological father.

    Submit his DNA to 23andMe along with Prince William's. Prove me wrong

    • Re:Harry is a Usurper (Score:5, Interesting)

      by hoofie ( 201045 ) <mickey@[ ]se.com ['mou' in gap]> on Tuesday March 23, 2021 @09:25PM (#61191446)

      Really don't go there. There is a massive rumour in the UK that someone called James Hewitt [wikipedia.org], a Cavalry Officer who publicly admitted to banging his mum senseless, is actually his biological father. Apparently dates etc. don't line up at all but that doesn't stop it from being endlessly repeated - not in print as the newspapers aren't that stupid.

      Harry is not the brightest bulb but has been utterly destroyed and wokeified by his harridan and spiteful wife who got "royally" pissed when it dawned on her that she would always be second fiddle to the Duchess of Cambridge.

    • Re: (Score:1)

      by Anonymous Coward

      Prince Charles is not his biological father.

      At least he's got that going for him, which is nice.

    • Harry is a Usurper

      Not really because he's not trying to take the crown for himself.

      I'm sure there's a Game of Thrones angle in there somewhere but Prince Charles is not his biological father. Submit his DNA to 23andMe along with Prince William's. Prove me wrong

      Do you really think this is the first time that's happened in the last 1000 yeas of monarchy? If something like this mattered in the grand scheme of things for the crown, it would probably have fallen apart well, nearly a thousand years ago.

  • He belongs in the USA, frankly. I hope he never returns to the UK.

    • Damn it. I was hoping to send him back. We'd even pay the postage, and maybe the stamp tax this one time.

      • I was thinking Boris would deploy the SAS commandos to execute a hostage rescue operation on Harry and Archie, bring Harry to the Tower of London to have him "de-programmed", and then by Act of Parliament, annul the marriage.

        Or if this requires religious authority, blackmail the Archbishop of Canterbury into doing it.

        • The Queen is the head of the church of E, no blackmailing is necessary, she tells him what to do. Thats why Henry VIII started his own religion.

          • Doesn't Boris have a standing weekly meeting with HRM?

            Done!

            • Yes he does, but legally she cant tell him what to do. Queen E is also head of many other countries but she doesnt have freq meetings with the PM of Au, Ca, NZ etc.

              • From historical precedent regarding the Wallis Simpson matter, the PM can tell HRM what to do?

                • PM No, parliament yes.
                  Everybody in the UK must obey the law, and laws are made by parliament. As Queen she must sign all laws into being, she can reject, but the monarch has not refused a law for hundreds of years. She as Q can refuse but she cant make laws. The monarch has given the job of making laws to parliament, thats why they are called her ministers, because in a strange sor t of way they are doing the job of law making on her behalf.
                  In the cse of Wallace Simpson, she was not acceptable because
                • THe Prime minister cannot make any laws, he is head of the ruling coalition. To make laws a majority in parliament must vote yes to make a law, and the PM only gets one vote, but in practice everyone in the party always follows the same vote. Because if a coalition cant make laws they must call a new election because a coalition that cannot make laws is broken.

  • What sort of craven bootlicker airhead celeb fetishist cares and why would they pollute a tech site with their presence?

    It's too bad everyone fascinated with royalty doesn't drop dead. They add nothing to the world. Royalty are rich parasites and humans who view them otherwise are fools unworthy of respect.

    • I view it all as an example of a eugenics experiment gone dreadfully wrong. In the end, you see the results of breeding for some subjective "best" - a mutant family of craven monkeys dancing for the entertainment of supposed genetic lessers.

      Maybe that actually is the "best" of us, at least on average.

  • Comment removed based on user account deletion

  • It's just as real as Queen Latifah being an actual queen. He left, remember?

    • I think this is like the Superman sequel where he appealed to the Marlon Brando hologram to be relieved of his Super Powers to get married to Lois or some such thing, but he got his Super Powers back by the end of the movie because otherwise what is the point of the Superman Franchise?

    • Let's be honest, none of the British have been real royalty since the started paying taxes.

  • They had to allow Prince Harry to continue the relationship with Anna Chapman instead of banning her from England.

    Probably, she had some connection with an intelligence service but everyone falls short of perfection. Besides it was not something what could not be dealt with.

    This is how it ends when one interferes with young people.
  • How are africans with aids going to pay even a dollar for coaching ?
  • Who would want that buffoon onboard?

  • Who is Princeharry? Another one of those rap stars?

Slashdot Top Deals

If I want your opinion, I'll ask you to fill out the necessary form.

Close