Being anti-slop doesn't make one a luddite. There are definitely ways that AI can be brought in constructively as a tool, but using it for shitting out 100k LOC projects by someone that can't even read or understand what is being generated, then throwing it over the fence for someone else to deal with isn't it.

I have no idea what Biryani is on about, but if the goal is for the student to actually learn something, 50k for research and 5k for tokens would make far more sense.

And when will these American war criminals be brought to justice then?

Looks like someone forgot to turn off the hand brake.

Yes, but Orin is already an older part, and is widely available to hobbyists for cheap. Building a custom solution with a supply chain to match would certainly be more cost effective, but if they're simply looking to slap some basic vision algorithms and decision-making on board with standard Linux, and their volumes aren't in the millions, Orin is perfectly fine. I would also guess that based on their supply chain restrictions, sourcing something that isn't built around readily availably commodity parts would be far harder.

I wonder if you can report the top-level linkedin.com as AI slop

I'm surprised they haven't found a way to make the glasses opaque or to force you to watch ads when not on their subscription tier. When no one wants to pay for new features, the next step to enshittification is to charge them to access the old.

"The market will regulate itself"

Market shifts towards more competitive Chinese offerings

"No, not like that!"

Win stupid prizes

Now do over 16s next.

It's also ridiculously shortsighted. AI tools are great for some things, not so great for others. Most of the issues I would say are now largely process based. Legitimate bug reports/fixes are fine, so long as they have been reviewed by someone and the "bug" actually exists and isn't just hallucinated garbage. Also using LLMs as a targeted coding aid for an existing/competent developer using it as an extension of their own workflow should not really be an issue. Where the big issue and the massive waste of time for everyone comes in is when you have inexperienced/incompetent developers who would normally be submitting 1-line cosmetic fixes to get their name in the release notes are now submitting things they don't understand and are certainly in no place to evaluate. There's a huge difference between "here's a critical bug fix that was discovered and validated" and "here's a random 50k LOC subsystem I've just crapped out and have no idea how it works - evaluate it for me".

Some never grow up either. That baby still tries to sue for royalties all the time.

Even before clicking that link I knew he wasn't going to be white.

Wingdings would be keeping more in line with the current administration anyways

For that sort of wasteful spending I'd make an intentionally bad website that is sure to require additional funding and more billable hours just to bring it back to how it already was. Doing a good job within a reasonable agreed-upon budget is the worst possible way to make money as a consultant.