Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:$80,000 per year for exclusive rights (Score 1) 55

It takes care with thread priorities and mutexes in various parts of the underlying system, to make fish swim smoothly.

Using threads and mutexes is a non-standard way to animate fish, and if thread priorities are causing issues, something has gone horribly wrong in your programming. Did you use AI?

Comment Re:The problem probably isn't the disks (Score 1) 87

Amateurs. 640k is more than enough for anything. I've been going the opposite way.

I've been making the website favicon 640 gigabytes. It's not easy to do with a 16x16 icon, but the heft is worth the extra effort. You can feel the heft, the weight of the GB pixels flowing through your cable (if you didn't cheap out and get the wrong cable). Nothing beats that feeling of luxury.

Comment Re:Special case (Score 1) 68

That said, on my Debian/Devuan installations all these accounts with "*" and "!" have /usr/sbin/nologin or /bin/false as shell, so a login should still not be possible. Does anybody know whether that is a reliable protection against this vulnerability?

It should be easy enough to test. "sudo adduser a" then "ssh a@localhost." Carefully modify your passwd file to change the shell to /usr/sbin/nologin and try again. You should be logged out immediately.

I just tried it on Mint and /usr/sbin/nologin prevented logins.

Comment Re:The title seems kind of wrong (Score 1) 68

Look at the man page for crypt. Having it return a non-POSIX return value is/was configurable on some distros. This isn't a problem on OpenBSD, the true system.

BTW a lot of SV startups allow login with an empty password, despite a suite of unit tests. No one likes to write negative tests, so here we are.

Comment Re:Okay (Score 1) 68

The Linux kernel, ostensibly, follows the same philosophy of "you do not break userland" but in reality bugs happen all the time and this kernel philosophy actually doesn't help at all because Linux is the worst mainstream operating system for any kind of backward or forward compatibility--for some fucking reason you can't compile a static binary on most distros.

The Linux kernel is great for backwards compatibility. GNome is horrible.

IF you make a backwards incompatible change, you are giving millions of people extra work. Don't do that.

Slashdot Top Deals

As in certain cults it is possible to kill a process if you know its true name. -- Ken Thompson and Dennis M. Ritchie

Working...