Could be a spy swap.

Putin isn't going to make a deal on Ukraine until China plays their hand, and China won't make their move until the US is entrapped as possible in Iran.

Code for, "we don't know who it was, but calling them a state actor will distract from our poor security."

Antibodies are used in research because they can be trained to connect to almost anything small. Once they attach in the body or in a petri dish, you can use western blotting or florescence or other techniques to find the antibodies, and you've found what they attached to.

There are a number of other uses: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

The question was what motivation Iran would have to attack a power plant in the UK. And there is the answer.

As for the rest of your post, I agree, it doesn't seem likely this was a hacking attempt, and attribution evidence is missing.

The recent trend in software companies is to fire middle managers, and the metric used to evaluate managers for firing is the velocity. So that's the reason.

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/12/2...

If you like your manager enough to help them, then break up tasks into smaller tasks that take an hour or so but still have 1 point of value.

They hit what they can. Iran has attacked or threatened many countries, including the UK.

It's understandable. If I were the head of the Islamist regime in Iran, I would be trying to build up nuclear weapons that could hit America as quickly as possible.

Paper heads! They're retractable! But not statistically waterproof, that's why they're getting sued.

Not many good programmers these days.

No point in it, managers don't care if you do a good job, as long as you close the ticket. For some managers, if you included bugs, that's a good thing. It's more tickets that can be opened.

Good job predicting that, you prophet.

Tim Cook thought AR (augmented reality) was the future, that's why he started putting in the beefy hardware. Turned out the future was in chatbots.

Now Tim is not in charge anymore, the things he liked at Apple are like old leaves flowing away in soft autumn wind.

By his second term, most people understood that Trump was a liar.

This wasn't a distinguishing feature since the other team lies, too.

The study is not sensational.

You should have at least read the abstract.

Maybe you should read the actual scientific paper instead of ranting. It will give you knowledge and improve your blood pressure. (In case you missed that last reference: ranting raises your blood pressure. There you go).

Man, if you're getting your science information from news stories, the problem is you.

We live in a world where the actual study is a click away. At least read the abstract.

Entangling multiple qbits is still tough