In this case that houses without hurricane (or typhoon) securing ties are not safe.
Oh yeah? To protect against all the hurricanes in California? You are a tool.
What must it be like to be unable to respond to the substantive argument
You didn't make a substantive argument. Read your own argument and be critical of it the way you would be critical of other people's arguments. It's not coherent.
How well did that work out as a strategy against TV networks?
Apparently it was a virus, because all the TV networks are now mad as hell and not going to take it anymore. They used to try to be unbiased or something.
December, 2024, Atlanta, GA On December [XXX], 2024 at 5:48 PM ET a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Atlanta, Georgia made contact with the pavement at the elevated entrance to [XXX]. near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling south on [XXX] when it approached [XXX] ahead on its left. As the Waymo AV turned left onto [XXX], the Waymo AV's undercarriage made contact with the raised pavement of the side walk where [XXX] meets [XXX]. At the time of the contact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode, and a test driver was present (in the driver's seating position). The test driver in the Waymo AV reported a moderate injury.
Well it's not so much of a theory today dark matter doesn't interact with light:
Transparent aluminum. It's solved.
Sorry but
You're not sorry, you lied.
PPP is more often used by people like you, who don't understand statistics, and want to pretend they are right.
I find it more interesting to see you cut all the country people out of your equation. That is why China doesn't have human rights: because people like you don't care about your fellow humans.
"It doesn't much signify whom one marries for one is sure to find out next morning it was someone else." -- Rogers
