Good luck to him, I hope he discovers things that improve humanity.

2001.
2012
2023
2001
1980s

I'm sure they have an innovation here, but it's not clear what, having been filtered through layers of scientific journalism.

Well, I think you are more reasonable than that.

There is a segment of the population who will never switch parties under any circumstances. They are the partisans. They are easily recognizable because their opinions always somehow match the platform of the party (which is silly, because a party platform is of necessity a compromise between people with different desires).

These people were not party loyalists. Note that not all party loyalists are braindead: some of them get real benefit from being loyalists, and they are thus making a rational decision. (That said, they are hard to have an interesting conversation with).

Probably not. Would you ever vote Republican?

No. It was stupid then, too.

Bad programmers write bad code, in the past and present.

How to recognize the true at heart partisan.

The funny thing is after Trump won and Democrats started claiming that the elections were rigged. Of course, somehow Trump fully accepted it that time.

How to recognize a true fact-denying partisan.

I see nothing in your link about communism.

They're overrated. Sitting at the airport eating mediocre "free" food and reading newspapers? Then walking a long distance to the terminal before the flight leaves...

Unless the airport lounge is right next to your terminal, or unless you really REALLY like being told you are special, credit card lounges are overrated.

Does it have bluetooth?

You really, really aren't.

It would have been shorter to just say, "I love Anthropic and will always defend them."

Tokenizing might be a problem for some neural networks, but more generally they fail at the balanced parenthesis problem (scroll down to the section "What Really Lets ChatGPT Work?" and scroll down to the pictures of parenthesis).

It's related to the clock problem.

If you ask a neural network to recognize "A" then all As will be tokenized the same way, so it's will be able to recognize it as well as anything else.

I can tell you are a fanboy, and not a person with a scientific background because you keep ignoring the main point:

The philosophical claim is a hypothesis that isn't supported by the evidence presented in the paper

Difficult is not impossible.

What I mean is, when you wrote this:

It's not even clear what you are trying to say.