Good point.

You can say that again.

I've seen it from both sides. People get rejected for bad reasons, for no reason, for nonsense reasons. I've seen an extremely competent rejected because suddenly the company ran out of budget. The poor guy had no idea why.

I've also recently seen recruiters reject people because they want a job too much. So act like you don't actually want the job or something.

Yeah, it takes a little while to understand his metaphor. The connection is this:

He doesn't care about bugs, and doesn't like people who care about bugs.
He also doesn't like Republicans.

Thus they are the same in that way.

Yeah, that's moronic lol.

If you leak data, that breaks the law. It doesn't matter if you looked at the solution and thought it was ok. Bugs matter.

Ultimately we'd have to ask the jury to know for sure, but he was definitely lying. Furthermore there were other witnesses who testified at the trial. You can probably get the transcript from the trial if it's really important to you, but I see no reason to believe justice wasn't served.

It sounds like you are using it as a kind of replacement for StackOverflow or Google. I use it the same way, and it does seem to work reasonably well at that.

Ok, what is that like? What do the cover?

His point seems to be that bad software is better than no software, an optimistic point.

Unfortunately, it's not a true point (code that generates 'rm -rf' might be worse than no code, for example). It would be interested to see a (relatively) unbiased analysis of when AI software is better than no software. Unfortunately this guy is a salesperson, and is biased.

That happened decades ago. "Bugs are not a big deal. Bugs are not a big deal! [Also, if you think bugs are a big deal, you're probably a Republican]"

There's no HIPAA software certification. There is no legally recognized certification process. As soon as your software leaks data, you are in violation.

The author is biased, since his company is selling AI produced code.

In this case study, they claim to have built a dashboard for a client that is HIPAA compliant. I don't know how you would verify that the AI had produced HIPAA compliant code. In particular, how do they ensure that it won't give data to people who shouldn't have it? What kind of prompt do you write for that?

That doesn't sound like a frequent occurrence.

The metaphor "when the stars align" is usually used to indicate something is quite rare, in fact.

ok, I read the article, and he admitted to having sex with the victim that night. Went to trial, the jury found him guilty.

If DNA is the only evidence in the case, how do they know it's not a false positive?

Oh yeah? And you don't think this is a sentiment, and audaciously wrong?

You are biased. Furthermore, I think you are an asshole. That is sentiment, but true.