Oh! I have a marvelous proof of this theorem which unfortunately is too large to fit in this margin.

Transportation safety is an issue, so I oppose it.

You lived in China for a couple years? Then you should be able to recognize this obvious example of using a car (and other things) as a status indicator: https://www.youtube.com/shorts...

You're not sorry, you lied.

PPP is more often used by people like you, who don't understand statistics, and want to pretend they are right.

I find it more interesting to see you cut all the country people out of your equation. That is why China doesn't have human rights: because people like you don't care about your fellow humans.

Job security

I would like more transparency on how often humans do take control of Waymos.

Liar. (I assume you're not too stupid to use a search engine, so the probably explanation is you are actively lying here).

Probably not. It puts on a good show, much like chatbot neural networks do.

A good percentage of regulations are made by grifters. The CEO of Simpson Strong-Tie was seen at NFL games in a box seat with the governor of California, and now suddenly all new houses need to have Simpson Strong-Tie hardware installed (not necessarily name brand, but they do have the patent). That sort of thing.

Technically, we're half unrepentant, not completely unrepentant.

There's only one weapon Russia has that worries anyone, and that's their ICBMs. If those are gone, then Russia can't win any war.

The strange structure/composition of the ribosome is definitely evidence that some other kind of life existed at one time. It's not conclusive by any means, but it's evidence.

"An argument about the world is interesting, an argument about a word is not."

Read the summary at least. They aren't concerned, they want someone to help them avoid lawsuits.

Yeah, that area from PA to NJ has the most annoying toll roads I've seen anywhere