Then allow me to annoy you more, asshole!

Not always, it depends on the situation. If you don't have stock in the company, if your boss doesn't respect you, if other companies in the region/industry are the same, then these factors weigh towards a union.

Again, it depends on the situation. If someone else is already forming a union, lending your support to it is lightweight.

Indeed, he may have better luck waiting a couple years and donating to the campaign of president Warren.

There are two rational responses to an abusive employer:

1) Leave.
2) Join a union.

Which one is best depends on the circumstances.

They're all motivated reasoning, you shouldn't take them too seriously.

That is, they start with the conclusion they want, then say whatever they think will confuse/convince you the most.

You can't patent an idea, you can only patent an implementation of an idea.

In America, that is fine.

That one is easy, it became a big enough issue that they thought it would give them cheap votes.

ok, even 30 years ago I never heard a local (or any) news station brag about harassment.

Sam Bankman Fried seems to lack understanding about a lot of things.

Which local TV news station brags about harassment? I've never seen a TV station brag about that.

Yes.

He doesn't have the money anymore.

Bowling? Mini golf?? 'Smores???

Most of his donations were to Democrats, so he has no chance for that. https://time.com/6241262/sam-b...