China has attacked most of its neighbors, but can you possibly justify their ongoing military incursion into Bhutan? Do you think it was to protect national security?

You have a very strong emotional opinion for an admitted ignoramus. If you calm down, I'll be happy to discuss this point with you rationally, otherwise I'll just leave you stewing in your emotional ignorance.

China sees taking Taiwan as in their interests, and indeed, controlling the entire first island chain to be in their interests.

Currently the US is involved in two different wars. The US weapon supply is depleted, but it will be rebuilt, stronger than before. If China does not move militarily now, then they will not have another window of opportunity like this one for a long, long time.

Why would you doubt it? China has never been reticent to enter war in any way, and certainly has been provoking for the last couple decades.

In the Chinese worldview, peace can only come though the sword of the emperor.

Maybe link to one or several of those channels.

Google set its SEO guidelines to favor longer articles. So that's what we ended up with.

Google is responsible here. The could penalize websites that have too many ads. But they won't because that is how they make money.

It's a clear example of a monopoly making the world worse.

I bow to your superior research and data.

A lot of the older ones should either be discounted or adjusted for inflation, but even if you only take the movies since 2001, most of them have not been profitable.

In Russian, the word "soviet" just means committee.

They're trying to make a bipolar world. Well if China doesn't enter the war in the next few months, then all that will go out the window as Iran gets rolled up followed by Russia. Putin should have focused on his economy if he wanted deterrence.

If you are running JFrog Artifactory you need to put it behind a firewall immediately. It should not be accessible on the open internet. Jfrog has a giant target on their back now for hackers all across the globe.

Realistically speaking, you shouldn't have any ports open to the general internet except 80, 443, and 23.

Which makes sense, since if you give them instructions to decrypt it, they will have the decrypted version anyway.

You should have read the summary before posting...

A $45 million film with Nicholas Cage will almost certainly be profitable.

LLMs are good at interpolating but terrible at extrapolating. The only difficulty is figuring out what to omit so it can't interpolate to instructions for synthesizing cocaine. It's not magic. It's also fairly easy to verify for the provider, they just have to ask it to synthesize cocaine without the controls in place. If it can't do it, problem solved.

Incidentally, in my own experiments with ChatGPT I'm not convinced it can actually provide good instructions for chemical synthesis (at least, not without some luck).

[Citation Needed].

A neural network that has been trained to go from a chemical formula to a synthesis process can do this. If it hasn't been trained, it cannot.

GCC is largely complete. Moving quickly is not an important requirement, but maintaining stability IS an important requirement.

Sounds like a use case for an LLM lawyer.