The sinking of a ship or plane can apparently attract sharks, with 150 people dying from sharks in one such incident.

It would have been better to project it on the windshield if they wanted to be cool.

Even with a screen and nothing else, it shouldn't be difficult to adjust the mirrors or air conditioning.

Arguable at startup, they should remind you, "Would you like to adjust your mirrors?"

Sadly, some of the most valuable software companies in the world don't write good software. IBM, Oracle, Microsoft, etc. Being good at sales is more important than writing good software. Maybe because consumers have no ability to evaluate.

The Chinese government doesn't obey the law.

Only a small fraction of the people who apply to join the CCP are admitted. This is different than in most countries, where anyone who wants to can join the party.

That doesn't surprise me, you talk like a party tool.

These are the kinds of questions that already exist in copyright law, and in law in general. You can't write a law in a way that it covers every possibility, because reality is fractal. There are always more details.

Fortunately the legal system has ways of dealing with these problems when they arise.

OK, ask the LLM to create some known exploits. If you're agentic, you can have it submit the patch automatically. Then if the kernel team is sufficiently agentic, they can approve the patch automatically and get it integrated. They are not quite there yet, but we don't need to do anything.

These problems all have solutions.

Should be extremely simple, right? Just ask the LLM to write an exploit. Should be easy in an agentic chain. Too bad LLMs can't actually compile code.

That is the smart way to be. Joining a political party and being loyal to it is a sign of mental incapacitation.

I think you're right.

I would guess they are ignoring some expenses there as well.

In fact, you did.

I don't automatically sympathize with pain, that will cause you problems in life. That is, people will be able to manipulate you by self-inflicted pain/harm.

Losing money, not projecting profitability until 2030.

I don't know, I would actually say this is a triumph. If you throw in a companion cube, I'll even mark a note down, big success.

There are a lot of questions about what actually happened.

A more rational approach is to say that authors cannot prevent derivative works, but they can be given a portion of any profits.