If they work, then why not use them as the first line of treatment?

Based on Trump's age, health, and actuarial tables, he better use that army really quickly because he doesn't have many years left.

You don't have to complain about everything. Removing plastic from the water is a good thing.

That's quite a lot of confidence in his intellect.

I've seen you write better comments.

I CAN cite the law that says so. One of many.
If you had bothered to read the summary, you could cite the law, too.

The law says they do owe me something.

Turn your brain on.

You do know that wasn't Bill Gates, right?

I worked for a company that implemented the "Right to Know" for the CCPA. I can assure you that the data they sent to users was not anywhere near everything that was required under the law.

Nice. Way to make the world a better place.

I want you to understand that your post makes you sound like an anti-science delusional nutcase.

Why? Because data about ivermectin side effects is available, but you decided to listen to the the self-comforting anecdote.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

A public company is going to issue more stock to raise capital.

It's been widely reported. You could find it yourself, but you would continue to lie instead.

It's an ok way to open a shell.

You are a liar.

It's Windows.

For years, Microsoft used revenue as a metric to know if a feature was good or not. This gave them customer feedback, and they could adjust accordingly.

Around the time of Vista, it stopped working as a metric because everyone had already bought Windows. By that time, corporate motivation had changed, and the motivation of managers was to backstab each other as they climbed the corporate ladder. So they never really came up with another metric to determine if customers liked their product or not, they were too busy doing other things.