North Korea regularly attacks the south in some way or another.

Their rational plan will be to attack simultaneously with China, in a way that draws some attention, but doesn't fully start another war. For example, they might send commandos in to kidnap the president (been done before), or they might fire artillery across the DMZ into a low population area (been done before).

If China succeeds on the battlefield, then North Korea will escalate. If China does not succeed on the battlefield, then North Korea will turn around and go home and say, "They weren't bombs, they were bread baskets." It keeps happening.

ROTFL you lose the argument, so you threaten me. Well guess what, your money is no good here.

If you ever decide to not be an asshole boss/manager, this book is waiting for you. Go with God.

Ideally we shouldn't need to be independent, because we can trust each other to not invade each other. Europe has largely achieved that, hopefully the rest of the world will soon, too.

It might be better to be interdependent because it makes war harder.

He has relented to pressure from the Linux foundation at least a couple times since then (CoC and AI). The Linux foundation is a way for corporations to partially control Linux with money.

Which makes me admire Theo even more.

You should add North Korea to that list. A simultaneous attack by China and N Korea would pose a dilemma.

A military siege is a strategic way to approach the Iran situation. (NB. I don't claim to know what Trump is doing)

These things are all well-documented. From our past conversations, I know you are smart, certainly smart enough to use a search engine. So why are you suddenly talking like a Soviet operative?

Did your account get hacked?

It's a worthy question, Linux gets more use than BSD.

But also, companies do avoid using code that is GPL'ed.

How would sandboxing solve the problem mentioned in the article?

If you want your code to be used as widely as possible, then use an MIT/BSD license.

If you want companies to give back if they use your code, then use GPL. If you want to dual license, then use GPL.

Both licenses are good, just use the right tool for the goal.

If the resulting implementation looks too much like the original, then it will probably still count as a copyright violation in court. If you want to do a true clean-room implementation, then you need to keep the code out of the LLM's training data.

It's not that bad, if you have a half-way decent macro system tacked on top. M4 is good enough.

Some people use their agent to do this analysis for them, and report that it goes much faster. You might try that.

You might consider switching to matcha. Once you get the hang of it, you'll never go back.

Oh, a ruling of some kind is certainly could happen. But courts tend to not prevent this kind of thing entirely, usually they just impose monetary damages. The only question is how much.