Russian Firms Rush To Open Chinese Bank Accounts (reuters.com) 90
The Moscow branch of a Chinese state bank has seen a surge in enquiries from Russian firms wanting to open new accounts, Reuters a person familiar with the matter said, as the country's businesses struggle with international sanctions after its invasion of Ukraine. From a report: "Over the past few days, 200-300 companies have approached us, wanting to open new accounts," the person, who works at the Moscow branch of a Chinese state bank and has direct knowledge of its operations, told Reuters.
It was not clear how widespread Russian demand for new accounts at Chinese banks was, but the banker source told Reuters many of the companies seeking new accounts do business with China and that he expected yuan transactions by such firms to increase.
It was not clear how widespread Russian demand for new accounts at Chinese banks was, but the banker source told Reuters many of the companies seeking new accounts do business with China and that he expected yuan transactions by such firms to increase.
Buy Chinese, murder Ukranians? (Score:2)
Looks like it. Time to start looking for alternative manufacturing bases. Boycott iPhones?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Agreed. Unless it is government enforced they wouldn't last a week, the extent of their commitment is comments sections and putting flags in their bio.
Re: (Score:2)
Wow so cynical. What an achievement.
There are plenty of people doing lots to help people from Ukraine, sometimes at vast expense to thmeselves, including people paying for AirBnBs [theguardian.com] that can't be used and several million dollar crypto donations. Rather than trying to do them down, maybe you could find a way to encourage them and make their work more useful?
Re: (Score:2)
Lol, you expect all these virtue signaling pro-Ukraine folks are going to actually inconvenience themselves?
Yes. Many people have already donated actual money towards helping in Ukraine.
Re: (Score:2)
What good would boycotting iPhones do? (Score:2)
So long as China lets manufactures pour poison into the air and water and America doesn't we can't compete, even with factories that are almost 100% automated. This is one of those places were raw capitalism isn't going to work. Diplomacy might let us use Chin
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It's going towards that, but I must suggest that it would be wise to solve the Russia/Ukraine problem before jumping into sanctions against other countries.
Otherwise we will make the mistake Russia made in Ukraine: jumping in on too many fronts, and being successful on none of them.
Re: (Score:1)
Swift (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
STOP buying their freaking OIL!!!
Re: (Score:3)
It would seem that people are. [nytimes.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Aaaaand we are back to square one. Blocking them from Swift does make more sense now.
Lukoil is crying uncle [9gag.com]. They're probably on the list to get a Chinese bank account. Won't help though. No one is buying [marketwatch.com] Russian oil, at any price [nytimes.com].
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The Chinese have setup there own "SWIFT" alternative called "CIPS".
China is an enemy. You can pretend all you want they aren't, but eventually, inevitably, you will be wrong.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You are right. And Clinton gave them the opportunity to grow with his favoured nation status (after he said he wouldn't do it). I'd bet cash money that he did it to satisfy his benefactors, fellow Arkansas folks, the Walton family. As in, owners of Walmart, the second biggest importer of Chinese goods in the world, after the USA as a whole, and in front of any other country. The business where Hilary Clinton worked as a corporate counsel, and sat (maybe still sits) on their board of directors. If you buy fr
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Not really. China's trying to be neutral in this fight, but they're going to be dragged into it whether they want to or not. Basically if this turns out to be true, the Chinese banks might end up being severely restricted from SWIFT. And then China will need to make a big decision on which is better - the world, or Russia.
China won't get involved in a true boots-on-the-ground war, but they are quite capable of an economic w
Re: (Score:2)
China will get involved in a true boots on the ground war when they think they can get away with taking Taiwan. Free Chinese are anathema to the CCP which needs to see every Chinese under their boot in order to feel good about themselves.
Re: (Score:2)
China won't get involved in a true boots-on-the-ground war
Too late, they are involved: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Too late, they are involved: [link to Wikipedia article on fighting between India and China]
Where do you think the Ukraine is located, again?
Re: (Score:2)
The question was whether China is involved in a "boots on the ground war" or not. The answer is yes, they are.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
There has been precisely one incident with fatalities
More than that. The Wikipedia page has a list.
Where are they getting the money? (Score:4, Interesting)
There are already runs on russian banks and this will only increase the runs. most banks only hold around 10% of deposits
Re: (Score:2)
There are already runs on russian banks and this will only increase the runs. most banks only hold around 10% of deposits
The European arm of Sberbank is already insolvent [yahoo.com]. That only took two days to happen. Imagine where things will be on Monday.
Also related to your question, where will the con artist [thehill.com] get the money to launder from? You know the sanctions are having a devastating impact when criminals whine they don't have access to their money.
Re: (Score:2)
Russia will find a way to fund that jack ass, it is bet on the next election for them. With that moron in White House, they can help themselves to the Baltic countries and cast eyes on E. Europe.
Re: (Score:2)
They still want to sell and have somewhere for the payments to go.
But if the sanctions work the way they should, sanctions should also be going up on any other bank that is filling the gaps and negating the effectiveness of them. I don't if they will.
Re: (Score:2)
There are already runs on russian banks and this will only increase the runs. most banks only hold around 10% of deposits
There is cash, it's just in Rubles, which nobody wants. The bank runs are primarily people trying to get US dollars, Euros, or GBP. Since the Ruble is losing value rapidly, and western currency is unavailable, they are switching to holding Chinese Yuan.
Re: (Score:2)
The Bank of Russia (their national bank) has plenty of international reserves in EU and USA ... that were blocked.
Some 600 billions of Euros owned basically by the Russian Federation are not usable right now.
Re: (Score:2)
What's the rush? (Score:2)
Didn't Putin share his CCP gifted American intel with his billionaire buddies? [youtube.com]
A Chinese Plan (Score:2)
Re: A Chinese Plan (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Russia is not communist since 20 years or 25.
Re: (Score:2)
Russia is not communist since 20 years or 25.
Read it again. I'm not talking about Russia.
Re: (Score:2)
For a country that claims to be communist, actions like this really make China seem hyper-captialistic.
About what country are you talking then in a thread about Russia?
Re: (Score:2)
China is hyper-capitalistic.
It's not very democratic though.
Re: (Score:3)
Trump tried to split NATO. Likely at the behest of Putin, for money.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
The U.S. didn't prod Ukraine or the Baltics. Those countries simply looked at the last 200 years of suicidal maniacs running Russia and decided they'd rather join Europe and the U.S. But keep groveling to your masters in Moscow, I hope you are getting paid for this.
Re: (Score:2)
Doing so would mean Ukraine likely wouldn't have been invaded anytime soon.
That idea only make sense if you buy Vlad's story about how NATO aggression forced him to invade another country. What "forced" him to invade Ukraine was not NATO — it was resources, and Russia's garbage economy. Which is whose responsibility again? Oh well.
Re: (Score:2)
If you think Ukraine has "resources" that Russia e.g. doesn't already have, I think everyone should simply laugh at you.
This has to be one of the more ironic things I've read on here. That's a pretty huge accomplishment.
Also, assuming you're the same AC:
If NATO had been dissolved, and the EU instead created its own army to defend itself. Would this have happened as well?
I'm not sure what branch of realism you are following where Russia perceives NATO as a threat but would not perceive a united European military as one, but I'd love to know the rationale.
(PSST: the EU was already talking about admitting the Ukraine before all of this)
Re: (Score:2)
The resources Russia is running out of are Slavs willing to be second-fiddle in the Russian Empire, and of wastelands around its borders.
Re: (Score:2)
Don't know if you're a Russian troll propagandist, or just fucking stupid. That's an inclusive 'or' by the way - it's perfectly plausible that you are both.
The ex-Soviet republics all ran towards NATO and requested membership for a reason. And yes, they REQUESTED membership, made reforms throughout their legal systems and government structures, and applied. And it's precisely because they've all been invaded by Russia before and didn't care to repeat the experience followed by a couple decades of authori
Re: (Score:2)
The worst thing was when Russia said fine, let me join NATO as well. US says no, you can't join, no negotiation, because of course NATO would no longer have any purpose.
I think there may have been other concerns [theguardian.com] with the request.
Russia peacefully let go of its empire in '89-90 which should have given it some good will.
Erm, well:
Post USSR, Russia's economy was shit. It's army was shit.
Russia didn't 'peacefully let go' of anything, it lost the ability to hold onto it. This wasn't a humanitarian gesture. It wasn't some sort of olive branch to the world. Given the ability, they would have been reacting to the breakup of the Eastern bloc the same way Putin is now. You don't get brownie points for that. After your nation spends almost a half-century subjugating a large chunk of a continent, people get a little wary of
Re: (Score:2)
Trump tried to split NATO. Likely at the behest of Putin, for money.
Where do you get that fantasy?
It was Obama and Hillary who were trying to do their "Russia reset".
Putin bites off a chunk of Ukraine under Obama.
Doesn't dare to, under Trump.
Bites off another chunk, and possibly the whole thing, under Biden.
As always, since the early 20th century, Democrats and Russians are best friends, whether they know it or not.
Re: (Score:2)
And please, the very notion that Trump and Putin had anything to do with each other at all was a fabrication produced solely from the imagination of the Clinton campaign. A campaign which went on to directly collaborate with Russian intelligence in order to promote that lie. Or at least thought it did, they may have gotten ripped
I have some procedural questions (Score:2)
While I don't question the news (and TBH it was quite surprising), I have a few questions regarding the procedure and the intended use of the accounts. Could anyone who is familiar with the subject, or has any business account in any Chinese bank, answer them?
1. Which documents are needed for a Russian company (or, for that matter, any non-Chinese company) to open a bank account in China?
2. How are these companies avoiding the decree signed by Putin on February 28 which disallows transferring one's own mone
Re: (Score:2)
How are these companies avoiding the decree signed by Putin on February 28 which disallows transferring one's own money to one's own accounts opened abroad?
My understanding of this decree is ordinary people are prevented from transferring their money out of Russia - So Ivan can't transfer his life savings to Barclay's Bank in London to protect it.
Corporations - Particularly those already kicking up Tony-Soprano-style to Putin and is Oligarchs can still walk into a Chinese Bank in Moscow and open up a Yu
Re: (Score:2)
According to the summary:
"who works at the Moscow branch of a Chinese state bank and has direct knowledge of its operations"
Presumably they are not moving the money out of the country yet.
uhhh (Score:2)
Currency Exchange Rates show a Ruble to be .0093 USD [xe.com] .0574 CNY [xe.com]
Similarly, the Ruble to the RM is also in the tank at
What good does it do to open a bank account in China when your currency is worthless? I just did a quick lookup on a website named for a jungle and they have TP for $.28/100 sheets that means I could get 3 sheets of TP / Ruble. Literally shit.
Re: (Score:2)
It could be seen as a stop-loss kind of deal. Turn your rubles into yuan now, before the ruble tanks even further and you have less yuan later.
Re: (Score:2)
Sounds like the best time to buy Rubles. Russia will eventually come back, even if we destroy it. Heck, it may come back much faster if we do destroy it.
Re: (Score:2)
It might, but the value of the Rubles will not go back up.
The value of a currency is rooted in trust (Switzerland), economic strength (EU) and military power. After this situation, Russia will have nothing left of those three.
(military power = a mostly unopposed armored column against Kyiv takes a week for a 3-hour drive.... Russia still has no air supremacy over a much weaker army and nation left behind in the upgrades race...).
Breaking international treaties right, left and center means zero trust.
Economi
The Fantastic Mr Xi (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
You have to admit, Xi has outplayed everyone at everything for 20 years now.
That would be weird, since he hasn't been in power for 20 years.
Not all Russian companies are sanctioned (Score:2)
Re: Not all Russian companies are sanctioned (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
"Many companies are not, but of course they will have an issue doing international payments if their bank is sanctioned. "
Export of things might also be iffy, as Russian related ships start to be forbidden docking rights. Transport costs will skyrocket.
Cutting off one's nose... (Score:2)
To spite one's face.
Any port in a storm.
But this particular port is subject to monsoons, tsunamis and waterspouts.