Comment Re: Not diversity hires (Score 1) 203
do you even know what the term 'circular logic' means? here: Circular logic, also known as circular reasoning, is a logical fallacy where the conclusion of an argument is assumed in the premises"
You seem to have failed to notice that is what you did. You (falsely by the way) concluded this is how to prove something. Then you said I failed because I did not do that.
no, you don't seem able to understand the simple concept of 'adding more information to a previous argument'. I first said "and I can prove it by quoting you". then, in my next post I added to it by saying "and if you could you would have quoted me. but you can't". no circular logic. it's unfortunate that you can't understand it.
Re-read your own pasted definition, "conclusion of an argument is assumed in the premises". The premise is that a quote proves something, then you used my lack of responding with a quote was evidence of being incorrect. It's logically flawed, and circular. By the way, my not quoting is nothing more than making my point a different way.
I say you didn't provide any argument. you say you did. then quote it.
I've explained what is implied, and why, numerous times. You are simply in denial. And your flawed gymnastics doesn't change that.
