"They" do. The Great Recession debt bubble was immediately proceeded by luminaries such a Barney Frank self-assuredly denying any problems, and characterizing the pesky noticers as misguided.

The AI bubble is end stage. LLMs are essentially next level search engines and, while powerful, their power is finite, especially since the training material is already exhausted. Further, there is little value in redundant implementations: there is no need for a dozen plus distinct tier 1 LLMs all exhibiting approximately the same performance.

So a shakeout is imminent. We will not be carpeting the country with nuclear reactors because Sam Altman. That's actually a shame: if a bunch of reactors were built for the wrong reason, at least we'd have the reactors when it's all over.

[citation needed]

Now you're engaging in a regression chain: If false positives are high it's useless. And if it's not useless, it helps attackers. And if it doesn't help attackers...

Do you have any rational basis for this claim? If there were 101 reports, and 51 were bogus, the discovery only 50 legitimate flaws in a widely used and mature code base is somehow an unworkable process?

I believe we're witnessing the emergence AIDS. AI derangement syndrome.

Past this BBC groomed narrative, there is plenty of details on your little firebug.

TDS suffering, Biden donating climate change alarmist. Standard issue privileged white boy in CA.

Crybully cop out. Naturally.

So nothing is changing here? Why the Parade of Horribles then?

Perhaps the two walls of text you've written (so far) belies your genuine thoughts on this: a crack has formed in the uniform feed of establishment group-think narrative to the tee-vee watching masses. The wine women limousine liberal voice may have lost a platform. How terrible!

The good news for you is that network tee-vee doesn't mean much any longer. The bad news is you're not doing great on the new platform(s) either.

They'll just make AI generated commies.

Of course. And why not? Priority number one is detecting all those interweb wrongthinkers. For that all you need is a laptop: you can "protect" establishment narratives from anywhere in the world.

The failed pseudo-science of psychology is still failed even when it affirms the commie inside of you.

What better time, then, to making importing H1Bs extremely expensive.

No, it won't. The numbers ultimately published are massaged by agencies run by political appointees. Formulae are tailored to fit narratives and ultimately what we get is propaganda.

Your scheme, for instance: Who will be participating, and who will be eligible for a reward? These calls will be made by political forces.

That number is not credible. The prompts I write for "personal" purposes are literally indistinguishable from what a worker might make: for all ChatGPT knows I'm an auto mechanic. Location isn't a valid metric either, given WFH, mobile devices, etc. They can't possibly distinguish between work and personal to a one digit of precision. Obviously they can see whether prompts are coming from commercial accounts, paid personal accounts or free tier, but even that gets fuzzy at the low end.

There are few wells of propaganda deeper than those of "inflation numbers."

That, right there.

Just as one minute example of many: did you notice or care that BLS disappeared ~1.7 million US jobs in less than 12 months? "Corrections."

You have no "evidence." What you have is your preferred propaganda. Failure to dutifully inculcate propaganda as "evidence" is the exact opposite of servile.