Too hot, too humid, too hilly and junglely. I'd look at Minnesota or the Dakotas.

Show me a datacenter "in [a] neighborhood". Where do they go that's near any homes? I see them in industrial parks and on old farms.

A quick look at a map shows me that there is a lot of land near Hazle that isn't near any homes.

How do they get the orbit-capable rocket? It would have to be a big one, powerful enough to get somewhere useful. And then you'd need a mechanism to get the payload beyond just that area.

"He's worse than an actual Nazi because he supports Republicans"?

That's f-ing crazy.

Will a search engine provide me with your opinion on the matter? I'm interested in the thoughts of the people talking about it here, not what some unconnected person put in a blog post ten years ago.

I do that too, I'm just trying to think of a case where cating a log file didn't just dump the entire thing to the screen, word-wrapped and non-stop. The only time I've had any trouble like is when I've had a linux VM running in hyper-v and I'm connected directly instead of through ssh. In which case copy and paste doesn't work right at all for anything.

Does "have nothing monolithic" make any more sense than, "make everything monolithic"? What if extra complexity and combining functions makes more sense than keeping everything separate for a particular situation?

I'm surprised it took so long before someone brought that up. "Violates the 'do one thing and do it well' philosophy", was what I expected to hear most (though it was the only argument I knew of).

What made it a political decision instead of a pragmatic one? It's easy to blame incompetence and politics when a decision doesn't go your way, but that doesn't mean it's the case.

Are they including a tip?

"That's not what it said on the shelf". A common complaint at the register, and one of the top reasons I think that idea wouldn't work.

I'm not worried about the idea of personalized pricing. It just doesn't seem feasible. Implementation hurdles are abundant, the likelihood of complaints in-store is very high, and for not that much benefit.

True, but the dates still don't line up. They claim Apple reverse engineered a headset ordered in April 2017 and delivered the next year, even though Apple filed a patent in March 2016. Also, since that headset arrived in 2018, and they're claiming Apple violated the patents starting in September 2017, that doesn't make sense. They also seem to claim Apple was aware of their 2020 patent... in 2017?

Expect them to tilt towards whoever they need to persuade, which will be whoever is in charge.

First time I've heard it. Maybe an inside term in political journalism?