Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Businesses

Amazon Ends Testing Most Employees For Marijuana, Will Lobby For Legalization (npr.org) 104

An anonymous reader quotes a report from NPR: Amazon will no longer test most job applicants for marijuana use in the latest sign of America's changing relationship with pot. Amazon, the second-largest private employer in the U.S., also says it now backs legalizing marijuana nationwide. "In the past, like many employers, we've disqualified people from working at Amazon if they tested positive for marijuana use," the company said in a blog post on Tuesday. "However, given where state laws are moving across the U.S., we've changed course."

With the shift in policy, the only job candidates Amazon will screen for marijuana are those applying for positions regulated by the Department of Transportation -- a category that includes delivery truck drivers and operators of heavy machinery. The company says it will handle marijuana the same way it deals with alcohol -- and it will still test for all drugs and alcohol after any accidents or other incidents. Amazon is also acting on the political level, throwing its weight behind the push to legalize marijuana in the U.S. and expunge criminal records for nonviolent marijuana-related convictions.

The company says its public policy team "will be actively supporting" the MORE Act -- the Marijuana Opportunity Reinvestment and Expungement Act -- a move that adds momentum to legislation that was reintroduced in Congress on Friday. The MORE Act would remove marijuana from the list of drugs in the federal Controlled Substances Act, making its status similar to alcohol and tobacco. It would also tax cannabis products, directing some of that money toward investments in communities that have been harmed by marijuana's criminalization. "We hope that other employers will join us, and that policymakers will act swiftly to pass this law," Amazon said in a statement about its support for legal marijuana.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Amazon Ends Testing Most Employees For Marijuana, Will Lobby For Legalization

Comments Filter:
  • Can't be because of some altruistic moral reason. I think we all know better than that...
    • Re:Why? (Score:4, Interesting)

      by JaredOfEuropa ( 526365 ) on Wednesday June 02, 2021 @03:56PM (#61448306) Journal
      Probably some data mining that shows toked up employees being less inclined to unionize...
    • Re:Why? (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Major_Disorder ( 5019363 ) on Wednesday June 02, 2021 @04:20PM (#61448368)

      Can't be because of some altruistic moral reason. I think we all know better than that...

      I think we will hear shortly about Amazon buying a pot company and now you will be able to purchase online. With same day delivery for 420-Prime members.

      • And when they spark up a big bowl of beautiful-looking "nugs" made from receycled carpet, or vape a fat hit of "shatter" that's actually bearing grease, they'll be getting everything they deserve.
        • ...they'll be getting everything they deserve.

          ...for supporting the likes of Bezos, not for wanting to get high.

        • by MrKaos ( 858439 )

          And when they spark up a big bowl of beautiful-looking "nugs" made from receycled carpet, or vape a fat hit of "shatter" that's actually bearing grease, they'll be getting everything they deserve.

          Why do they deserve it?

    • The people who are willing to do the kind of work Amazon wants done, under the conditions Amazon puts in place, for the amount of money Amazon wants to pay, would have to be smoking something.
    • Re:Why? (Score:4, Funny)

      by 93 Escort Wagon ( 326346 ) on Wednesday June 02, 2021 @04:21PM (#61448372)

      Bezos' girlfriend finally got him to take his first toke.

    • Re:Why? (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Dutch Gun ( 899105 ) on Wednesday June 02, 2021 @04:27PM (#61448400)

      I'm not sure I'd read too much into it. Washington State legalized marijuana approaching a decade ago, and as it turns out, society didn't collapse. All that happened is that law enforcement no longer wastes time and money going after pot growers, dealers, and users. I figure Amazon just doesn't want to bother with something as minor as marijuana use, especially since it's legal in their home state.

      Obviously, you can't come to work under the influence, but it doesn't affect anyone else what you do in your off hours, especially in moderation. It's really no different than alcohol in that regard.

      • Probably some simpler explanations, too. There is somewhat of a labor shortage right now. In the past, you could pay $12/hour and the problem that you had was 100 people applying for every opening and it was expensive to screen the candidates. Indicating that there was drug testing might reduce the candidate pool and be worth it, even though its costs a few dollars to do. Now with labor shortage and looking for more applicants, the requirement gets dropped.
    • Re:Why? (Score:5, Insightful)

      by iikkakeranen ( 6279982 ) on Wednesday June 02, 2021 @05:52PM (#61448640)

      It's most likely because they're having difficulty finding workers who will put up with drug testing. Occasional pot use is ubiquitous in Washington because it's been legal for years now. It's not just "stoners" who use cannabis, but probably the majority of adults here have used a cannabis product within the last year that would show up in a test (for some number of days afterward). It's an entirely normal thing that's no more frowned-upon than alcohol. What do you think would happen if you had a hiring policy that prohibits workers from drinking in their free time?

    • by nagora ( 177841 )

      People with holes poked in their brains by smoking this shit probably won't be motivated to unionise.

      • It's overuse of MDMA that leads to the physical damage you mention but seeing your attitude on the matter, I bet smoking would improve your intelligence especially on matters of EQ.

        • by nagora ( 177841 )

          I was referring to the memory loss I always find with people who have been smoking MJ for long periods, not literal holes.

          We've nearly got rid of cigarettes; I don't want my world filled with the smell of 2-day-old cat piss instead. I mean, seriously, can pot smokers not smell that rancid stink or something? Does it burn out your nose before your memory?

    • My guess is one of: They bought shares in weed companies.. Or. And more likely. They plan on becoming a major supplier and distributor of weed. Obviously this is about money and not freedom.
  • Given that Bezos is probably a pothead himself anyways.

    • by fazig ( 2909523 )
      Rich people can afford cocaine.
      • You know the interesting thing about this, isn't just that they can afford it but they prefer it. Like you give a sociopath a choice between a psychedelic and a stimulant, and it seems they always prefer the stimulant... But hey Freud thought we should all take it, so that would be a Brave New World.

        • by fazig ( 2909523 )
          To be fair a lot of people prefer stimulants.
          Just look how prevalent caffeine has become with all the coffee and tea (black, green, and mate) drinkers as well as tons of other caffeinated beverages. Prefering stimulants doesn't have to mean anything on its own.

          From personal experience, if there's a deadline ahead and a lot of stuff still needs to be done, I'd also always go for cocaine. That helps to get stuff done. The other things are for when stuff has been done.
          • Fair enough. I guess my point is for many people in leadership positions, there is never a moment when "stuff has been done". It's like they are always trying to burn more oil for the next objective.

            Your point about caffeine is good though. However, in drug communities they always like to talk about "micro dosing". For me the use of caffeine as we see in drinks is totally "micro dosing". Try a caffeine pill, and you will quickly see the difference. Also, this goes back ritual too. Humans love ritual. You as

            • by fazig ( 2909523 )
              Difficult to say what drives a person's behaviour that way without knowing more details. There's a lot of disorders that can make a person act in an anti-social fashion that are not anti-social personality disorders (severe cases are colloquially called sociopathy or psychopathy).

              ASPD people usually understand that what they're doing and how they're treating other people is considered to be bad, but they are convinced that they have the right to act that way and will invent reasons to justify not feeling
  • I guess this excludes AWS, drug testing is written into these contracts.
  • Honestly, the reputed working conditions at Amazon is probably already leading to their workforce needing chemical help to get through the day.
  • Even if Amazon were successful and get pot legalized at the federal level companies can still set their own policies and hiring practices. Personally I could care less if someone wants to get high at home on their own time. But I sure don't want people high at work. And what about work from home people? What's to stop them from rolling up a spliff between meetings? :-)

    • by MrKaos ( 858439 )

      But I sure don't want people high at work. And what about work from home people? What's to stop them from rolling up a spliff between meetings? :-)

      They don't want to look baked on a call. Maybe if the focus was more on productivity and less on control you really and truly would care less.

    • by narcc ( 412956 )

      The same thing that keeps them from getting drunk between meetings.

      Anytime you hear an argument like this, substitute "pot" for "booze". It helps keep things in perspective.

  • and they will not complain about the crappy work conditions.

  • We finally put a stigma on tobacco smokers who stank and polluted the air for others, and cost the rest of us for their healthcare and dying care.
    Tobacco and lung cancer deaths plummeting, but now we legalize places to buy and smoke another plant, with carcinogens of course as any burning thing has.

    How stupid, no real doctor in last 30 years would say it's good to light something on fire and breath the smoke.

    • Re:Smoking is bad (Score:4, Insightful)

      by couchslug ( 175151 ) on Wednesday June 02, 2021 @06:27PM (#61448736)

      Smoking is for boomers. Edibles are popular for good reasons.

    • How stupid, no real doctor in last 30 years would say it's good to light something on fire and breath the smoke.

      OK, so what harm does smoking cannabis do?

      This is going to be amusing...

      • Smoke contains carcinogens. Cannabis smoke stinks, and the users are intoxicated and stupid. Smoking indoors is a fire hazard and puts other at risk.

        • Smoke contains carcinogens.

          Are you asserting that smoking cannabis increases your cancer risk? Because a UCLA study shows that it not only doesn't increase it, it actually reduces it.

          I bet you're one of those people who complains about the carcinogen warning placards in California, too.

    • by narcc ( 412956 )

      and cost the rest of us for their healthcare and dying care.

      Propaganda. The smokers saved money, what with all of the dying early and all.

      • except they don't die early enough nor quickly, that year plus they take to die is extremely expensive, and they cause other people problems with their smoke too such as asthma prevalence and severity in children of smokers.

        Stinking, being a fire hazard, and harming others while they live, being a money sewer as they die, that's the type of loser that is the smoker.

        • by narcc ( 412956 )

          Sigh... Here's some reality for you [nejm.org]

          • False, totally ignores the harm to others, especially children, and the other dangers I mentioned. don't link half-assed studies to make your filthy stinking dangerous habit look more attractive, you loser.

            • by narcc ( 412956 )

              Sigh... You can't argue with an ideologue...

              Enjoy the darkness.

              • You are the one destined for darkness, after a grueling bout of cancer or emphysema. It's not being "an ideologue", it's being a normal human in the majority who hate the stench, danger and death of your filthy habit.

                • by narcc ( 412956 )

                  So ... because you deny reality I must be a smoker? Reason is clearly not your strong suit!

                  You really need to get over this. It's not my fault that reality doesn't conform to your religious beliefs.

                  You're welcome to face reality and join the rest of us in the light. Or you can continue to spend your days bitter and alone in the darkness of ignorance and hate. The choice is yours, though I suspect that you're going to continue to wallow in your delusions.

  • medicate the population to ensure compliance
  • by ahodgson ( 74077 )

    Guess that labour shortage is for real.

  • If they push hard to get it legalized country wide, it may just appear on the store itself. They could even stick on one of their subscription options and grow it in their own warehouses.

    • > Amazon will no longer test most job applicants for marijuana use ...
      > Amazon, the second-largest private employer in the U.S., also says it now
      > backs legalizing marijuana nationwide.

      After all, what is good for Amazon is good for the country, Right?
  • I wish we could have the 70s music back ... instead of the inflation and pot.
  • If the job sucks... having employees self-dose with marijuana, at their own expense, to tolerate it seems like something the company would want to encourage, so long as they're not too stoned to work.

    Maybe they finally figured out that mildly stoned employees will be more complacent.

  • by MrKaos ( 858439 ) on Thursday June 03, 2021 @01:34AM (#61449644) Journal

    I am pro cannabis use. I mainly used cannabis for recreational use until I had a snapped Achilles tendon, at that point I started using it for pain control under the advice of my doctor. When I used it in that manner the amount of cannabis I consumed increased dramatically however the pain would no longer interrupt my sleep which allowed me to heal better. Once the pain subsided I found I was a bit sick of smoking it so I stopped.

    The withdrawal symptoms, for me, were mild, for the first week I had a bit of trouble sleeping and I was a bit grumpy. By the second week I was sleeping well and I had a lot of dreams. It took me a few years before I felt like consuming cannabis recreationally and my consumption has always been punctuated this way. It takes me about a 4-6 weeks to consume 1/4 of an ounce recreationally.

    5 years ago I suffered a head injury whilst defending myself from an assault (they were charged). I avoided cannabis use whilst I recovered because it was an inappropriate selection for pain control while my cognition was impaired. Simple math I would normally do was inaccessible. I even tested it by timing calculations I would do in my head, to which my doctor told me off and said "What part of DO NOTHING did you not understand? Go home and be bored.". I later discovered that you impair the parts of the brain you use during a head injury. Consuming cannabis in this case is a very bad idea. It took two months to recover from the head injury after which I was just fine.

    However the head trauma was masking an associated triple nerve root compression in C4, C5 and C6 in the neck which became exposed about a month after I returned to work from the head injury. The pain was excruciating, I consumed 200 paracetamol in a month while the doctors, who were somewhat embarrassed, were now overly cautious because they missed it. I lost a lot of muscle mass from one side of my body and the neurosurgeon told me I could stay that way or have surgery in which I also risked quadriplegia.

    I took the risk on the surgery and am happy to say I'm ambulant. However that was the beginning of 8 months of recovery on opioids (Oxycontin) and nervous systems suppressors. I was in no condition to do anything whilst I recovered. I realized how disconnected I felt using opioids so, again, I discussed using cannabis as pain control with the doctor and was able to sleep for up to 16 hours per day. I could not wait to get off opioids, I begged the doctor to prescribe me a lower dose however I was kept on them as they were still cautious.

    When I compare the withdrawal of cannabis to opioids, there is no comparison. I hated how I would wake up every morning with my autonomic respiration shut down gasping for breath, the visual hallucinations scared the fuck out of me, my reflexes were slow. Weening myself of prescribed oxys was, literally, a night and day mare. I still had nervous system suppressors to withdraw from as well. I used cannabis (in oil and edible form) to control the withdrawal from both whilst continuing to use it to control pain.

    For that 5 years I've had weekly physiotherapy (dry needling) and chiropractic which is very confronting but a necessary part of mobilizing my neck. Every week I have about 50x4 inch needles stuck in various parts of my body and the scariest part is when they are in my neck.

    12 months ago I reported to my doctor that I thought I was over the worst of the pain so I decided I would stop using cannabis. To my horror, the pain re-emerged and the experience of it has cost me employment twice because I've been in to much pain and exhausted to interact with people properly. The pain takes the form of headaches so bad that my nose bleeds and I overcome any fear of needles in my neck. Emotional intelligence is difficult when you experience those levels of pain. I resumed my cannabis use (oil only now) and was able to reduce it to once a week so that I get at least one decent sleep per week as I, mercifully, reach the end of my rec

    • Sorry for your hardship, and thank you for sharing. Having grown up in the Netherlands, a very pot friendly country, the only thing I think was seriously mishandled was the information about negative effects when below 25 (20) y.o. consume cannabis products. Some of my school mates turned into real potheads...
  • Well, expect the injury rate to go even higher.

  • They want to sell it. Expect, in a few years:
    "Amazon's "budding" new weed service is pushing out established growers. MindRoot, a 76 year old weed entrepreneur, complains that "Man, Amazon is forcing all us little guys out! We grow it for the spritual communion, they're just in it for the cash! Capitalism sucks the soul!"

  • Legalization is a done deal - just a matter of when. They're getting ahead of the curve (at no cost to them) so they can go ahead and be "leaders" in the move to commercialize the sale of weed.

    Not that I welcome our new drug overlords but I think it's inevitable. Amazon Prime Baked delivery?

  • Why do I get the sense that too many workers tested positive which lead to not enough workers or increased cost of constantly hiring new ones and training them?

Utility is when you have one telephone, luxury is when you have two, opulence is when you have three -- and paradise is when you have none. -- Doug Larson

Working...