Comment "Feel" incompetent? (Score 1) 32
Seriously, it's totally incompetent.
Seriously, it's totally incompetent.
The Meta[stasize] has infected the courts.
... that you can buy a judge that determines the course of your company.
Privacy Rapists only second to Meta[stasize].
Its podcasting network Quiet Please has generated 12 million lifetime episode downloads and amassed 400,000 subscribers -- so, yes, people are really listening to AI podcasts
But how many of the episode downloaders are bots (like the voices in the podcasts)?
Pretty sure this is all inflated in preparation for some future IPO. We'll heard about a Theranos-like scandal in the near future.
Crypto is Wildcat banking + techno-babble.
More like "Wildcat banking backed by techno-babble".
Agreed - Slashdot's "programmers" should come out of the 90s and learn to code already.
Correct, but there's a way around the above problem: hold down the 'apostrophe' key until you get a choice, and select the 'standard' one (plain looking ASCII one, for me it's the right-most) to use something that won't translate into that funky crap.
Same solution above for "
Slashdot doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode, the most common standard for text on the Internet. Nor does Slashdot support iPhone, one of most common devices used to access the Internet.
Correct, but there's a way around the above problem: hold down the 'apostrophe' key until you get a choice, and select the 'standard' one (plain looking ASCII one, for me it's the right-most) to use something that won't translate into that funky crap.
The iPhone maker commissioned Analysis Group to study pricing behavior
LOL - Apple hires its own PR firm to make claims it was right.
You're not writing to be compensated, you're writing to "scratch an itch".
True, but with many popular OSS projects, that "itch" becomes a permanent rash (constant demands for features/fixes, unpaid) that drive developers to burnout.
So then there's really only a few choices:
1. close the source, or also use a less permissive license that perhaps requires paid contract for commercial use etc.
2. large companies whose products depend on those projects help fund it, or,
3. dev burns out, leaving the project in limbo (or a bunch of proprietary forks) making it less popular/supported.
Google Project Zero policy announced in July that publicly discloses reported vulnerabilities within a week and starts a ninety-day countdown to full disclosure regardless of patch availability
What's tempting here is finding some 9.x-level vulnerability in some Google product, create a CVE, publish it and, in the same vein as Google, do full disclosure within 90 hours and see how Google likes them apples.
The company has set a goal of reaching 1 billion users, so it is less than 2% of the way there
You mean much of the world's population doesn't want their privacy raped by privacy rapist Sam Altman? What a surprise!
[C]ourts are starting to map out punishments of small fines and other discipline [....] Court-ordered penalties "are not having a deterrent effect," said Freund, who has publicly flagged more than four dozen examples this year. "The proof is that it continues to happen."
Disbar them then - they're not doing their fucking job properly, so why should they get called "lawyers/attorneys" then?
And if they do want to be a lawyer/attorney again, then I guess they'll have to re-enroll, study, and take the bar exam again. Without using any A.I.
Imagine if a plumber relied on AI to fix your massive water leak. Would you seriously pay for that?!?
Precisely. Algorithms don't have a moral compass.
Same as Meta[stasize] employees.
In case of atomic attack, all work rules will be temporarily suspended.