It's not at all clear if there's any way of enforcement of this. As in, who can do what when a student says... "Bugger off. I am keeping and using my phone."

Rust touts its amazing memory safe etc, but then it appears that to do much of anything (especially replicate existing non-rust code functionality) then rust reaches for allowing "unsafe" code. So, what was the point?

Rust was supposed to be epic because it was memory safe. But now it appears that rust code needs to do "unsafe" stuff to replace the "unsafe" stuff.

And where does it end up?

Stacking on more and more variations of autism. Little apparent idea on origins. Not apparently too much idea as to what is happening in the body. Not a whole lot ideas on what to do about it... except maybe some drugs.

I wonder if you knew that Redit could and would sell off all your data. Once more the users become the product.

I guess prices are going to go up a fair bit after this goes through.

Well, it does mention 46 countries, so...

Are these like those security blokes who all signed that letter saying that Biden Junior's laptop was some sort of Russian thing? When they knew they were lying.

Ummm, we completely buggered things up. No one really had any idea. Eventually, somebody worked it out. Good on you mate.

Is the 5% that might have succeeded or at least didn't fail too badly, is that enough to justify the expense? That being said, if AI keeps failing maybe electricity prices for regular folk might come down.

Mass immigration. And bugger all if any plan to increase or improve water supply in terms of quality and quantity.

Are they even in the picture?

Let's see how long they last now.

Well, AI has been progressively bolted onto/into SharePoint, so unless you're an on premise 2016 or earlier version, then your SharePoint is infested with some degree of AI. So, I am not sure what you are on about.