Does this actually mean 4% productivity increase was achieved by folk being so scared they were going to lose their jobs suddenly upping their game? Probably in an unsustainable manner.
It's not at all clear if there's any way of enforcement of this. As in, who can do what when a student says... "Bugger off. I am keeping and using my phone."
Rust touts its amazing memory safe etc, but then it appears that to do much of anything (especially replicate existing non-rust code functionality) then rust reaches for allowing "unsafe" code.
So, what was the point?
Stacking on more and more variations of autism. Little apparent idea on origins. Not apparently too much idea as to what is happening in the body. Not a whole lot ideas on what to do about it... except maybe some drugs.
Are these like those security blokes who all signed that letter saying that Biden Junior's laptop was some sort of Russian thing?
When they knew they were lying.
Is the 5% that might have succeeded or at least didn't fail too badly, is that enough to justify the expense?
That being said, if AI keeps failing maybe electricity prices for regular folk might come down.