If you want to know what AI is going to do, you prompt AI. If you want to speculate you just make up what shit you want.

I don't see how asking AI how it would solve a problem is the wrong way to find out how AI will solve a problem.

You are not wrong. I asked Claude:

The average American adult reads at roughly a 7th to 8th grade level, so that's the target for accessible news writing.
Most major news organizations aim for 6th to 8th grade. The Associated Press and USA Today tend to land around 6th to 7th grade. The New York Times sits a bit higher, closer to 8th to 9th grade, which reflects a somewhat more educated readership.
The Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level formula is the standard tool for measuring this. Short sentences, common words, and one idea per paragraph drive the score down, which is what you want for broad accessibility.
So if you asked me to write a news story for the average American adult, I'd target 7th grade as the sweet spot.

There is no man made climate change, so why do we need laws like this? Instead pass a loser pays legal system. Then when these companies prove there is no man made climate change they can get their money back.

It's easy.

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that AI-generated artwork cannot be copyrighted because it lacks human authorship, reaffirming that copyright law requires works to be created by humans. This decision follows a case involving Stephen Thaler's AI-generated artwork, which was denied copyright protection by the U.S. Copyright Office.

Why sends friends there at all. Just sends weapons that kill eveything. What can 1 billion drones with .5lbs of explosives and facial recognition cost? Fly over, drop, profit.

Access to a consistent cost for healthcare as I age. Living in more walkable areas without living in a large city. Weather. Food.

I like the area's I have visited. I like the attitudes of the people you find in places expats end up. I do not like the modern shift in political climate in the USA and especially in my state. I do not like the cost of living increase to mitigate that climate 5-10% by moving to another State.

Lastly, I shoot sporting clays/FITASC, there won't be a problem anywhere I go with doing that. I have no need for any other firearms. Hell, I could even get better service when my K-80 or F3 need work. I just ordered $12,000 in shotgun barrels and it's going to take forever to get from germany to my local shop and then to me.

https://pluralistic.net/2025/1...

Sure you can do that, but then you are still a US citizen. Which means you get social security.

I'm happy to do that. But if you want me to 'leave' for real you need to make it attractive to give up citizenship.

Unless your net worth exceeded $2 million and you suddenly have to pay capital gains on everything the moment you give it up. Then you might consider paying the taxes to protect the growth of your assets.

I will 100% give up my social security if the US let's me stop paying all US taxes the moment I leave US soil. The tax cost of giving up US citizenship is way more than I'll ever see in social security.

So you make that happen I'll leave today.

It makes sense. The upper-middle and above classes are the only people with the means to leave.

The average american living paycheck to paycheck could never afford to pick up their lives and move states let alone countries. It's part of why we keep them that way.

There are also people like myself who have no restraints on where in the world we can work. I have the means to leave and the ability so my wife and I have been doing our research on which country to buy our way into residency. Once we do that we plan to work our remaining 8-10 years, retire, and never return to US soil.