Comment Re:hmm (Score 1) 41
Nah, April fools we just killed your business model Wordpress. Have a nice day.
Nah, April fools we just killed your business model Wordpress. Have a nice day.
My favorite part of my HiSense TV was turning it on the first time. It asked if I wanted a 'standard TV' or 'Google TV'. I picked standard and that was that. No wifi, no apps, just HDMI ports.
Although the Administration believes that training of AI models on copyrighted
material does not violate copyright laws, it acknowledges arguments to the contrary
exist and therefore supports allowing the Courts to resolve this issue. Similarly,
Congress should not take any actions that would impact the judiciary’s resolution of
whether training on copyrighted material constitutes fair use.
My argument. If it's ok to use copyrighted material without compensation to train an AI model. I am an AI model and those mp3s and H264 files are just training.
Unless congress doesn't agree with the White House. Then I identify as a pirate.
If you want to know what AI is going to do, you prompt AI. If you want to speculate you just make up what shit you want.
I don't see how asking AI how it would solve a problem is the wrong way to find out how AI will solve a problem.
You are not wrong. I asked Claude:
The average American adult reads at roughly a 7th to 8th grade level, so that's the target for accessible news writing.
Most major news organizations aim for 6th to 8th grade. The Associated Press and USA Today tend to land around 6th to 7th grade. The New York Times sits a bit higher, closer to 8th to 9th grade, which reflects a somewhat more educated readership.
The Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level formula is the standard tool for measuring this. Short sentences, common words, and one idea per paragraph drive the score down, which is what you want for broad accessibility.
So if you asked me to write a news story for the average American adult, I'd target 7th grade as the sweet spot.
There is no man made climate change, so why do we need laws like this? Instead pass a loser pays legal system. Then when these companies prove there is no man made climate change they can get their money back.
It's easy.
The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that AI-generated artwork cannot be copyrighted because it lacks human authorship, reaffirming that copyright law requires works to be created by humans. This decision follows a case involving Stephen Thaler's AI-generated artwork, which was denied copyright protection by the U.S. Copyright Office.
Why sends friends there at all. Just sends weapons that kill eveything. What can 1 billion drones with
Access to a consistent cost for healthcare as I age. Living in more walkable areas without living in a large city. Weather. Food.
I like the area's I have visited. I like the attitudes of the people you find in places expats end up. I do not like the modern shift in political climate in the USA and especially in my state. I do not like the cost of living increase to mitigate that climate 5-10% by moving to another State.
Lastly, I shoot sporting clays/FITASC, there won't be a problem anywhere I go with doing that. I have no need for any other firearms. Hell, I could even get better service when my K-80 or F3 need work. I just ordered $12,000 in shotgun barrels and it's going to take forever to get from germany to my local shop and then to me.
Sure you can do that, but then you are still a US citizen. Which means you get social security.
I'm happy to do that. But if you want me to 'leave' for real you need to make it attractive to give up citizenship.
Unless your net worth exceeded $2 million and you suddenly have to pay capital gains on everything the moment you give it up. Then you might consider paying the taxes to protect the growth of your assets.
Brain fried -- Core dumped