McDonald's Ice Cream Machine Hackers Say They Found the 'Smoking Gun' That Killed Their Startup (wired.com) 80
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Wired: A little over three years have passed since McDonald's sent out an email to thousands of its restaurant owners around the world that abruptly cut short the future ofa three-person startup called Kytch -- and with it, perhaps one of McDonald's best chances for fixing its famously out-of-order ice cream machines. Until then, Kytch had been selling McDonald's restaurant owners a popular internet-connected gadget designed to attach to their notoriously fragile and often broken soft-serve McFlurry dispensers, manufactured by McDonalds equipment partner Taylor. The Kytch device would essentially hack into the ice cream machine's internals, monitor its operations, and send diagnostic data over the internet to an owner or manager to help keep it running. But despite Kytch's efforts to solve the Golden Arches' intractable ice cream problems, a McDonald's email in November 2020 warned its franchisees not to use Kytch, stating that it represented a safety hazard for staff. Kytch says its sales dried up practically overnight.
Now, after years of litigation, the ice-cream-hacking entrepreneurs have unearthed evidence that they say shows that Taylor, the soft-serve machine maker, helped engineer McDonald's Kytch-killing email -- kneecapping the startup not because of any safety concern, but in a coordinated effort to undermine a potential competitor. And Taylor's alleged order, as Kytch now describes it, came all the way from the top. On Wednesday, Kytch filed a newly unredacted motion for summary adjudication in its lawsuit against Taylor for alleged trade libel, tortious interference, and other claims. The new motion, which replaces a redacted version from August, refers to internal emails Taylor released in the discovery phase of the lawsuit, which were quietly unsealed over the summer. The motion focuses in particular on one email from Timothy FitzGerald, the CEO of Taylor parent company Middleby, that appears to suggest that either Middleby or McDonald's send a communication to McDonald's franchise owners to dissuade them from using Kytch's device.
"Not sure if there is anything we can do to slow up the franchise community on the other solution," FitzGerald wrote on October 17, 2020. "Not sure what communication from either McD or Midd can or will go out." In their legal filing, the Kytch cofounders, of course, interpret "the other solution" to mean their product. In fact, FitzGerald's message was sent in an email thread that included Middleby's then COO, David Brewer, who had wondered earlier whether Middleby could instead acquire Kytch. Another Middleby executive responded to FitzGerald on October 17 to write that Taylor and McDonald's had already met the previous day to discuss sending out a message to franchisees about McDonald's lack of support for Kytch. But Jeremy O'Sullivan, a Kytch cofounder, claims -- and Kytch argues in its legal motion -- that FitzGerald's email nonetheless proves Taylor's intent to hamstring a potential rival. "It's the smoking gun," O'Sullivan says of the email. "He's plotting our demise."
Now, after years of litigation, the ice-cream-hacking entrepreneurs have unearthed evidence that they say shows that Taylor, the soft-serve machine maker, helped engineer McDonald's Kytch-killing email -- kneecapping the startup not because of any safety concern, but in a coordinated effort to undermine a potential competitor. And Taylor's alleged order, as Kytch now describes it, came all the way from the top. On Wednesday, Kytch filed a newly unredacted motion for summary adjudication in its lawsuit against Taylor for alleged trade libel, tortious interference, and other claims. The new motion, which replaces a redacted version from August, refers to internal emails Taylor released in the discovery phase of the lawsuit, which were quietly unsealed over the summer. The motion focuses in particular on one email from Timothy FitzGerald, the CEO of Taylor parent company Middleby, that appears to suggest that either Middleby or McDonald's send a communication to McDonald's franchise owners to dissuade them from using Kytch's device.
"Not sure if there is anything we can do to slow up the franchise community on the other solution," FitzGerald wrote on October 17, 2020. "Not sure what communication from either McD or Midd can or will go out." In their legal filing, the Kytch cofounders, of course, interpret "the other solution" to mean their product. In fact, FitzGerald's message was sent in an email thread that included Middleby's then COO, David Brewer, who had wondered earlier whether Middleby could instead acquire Kytch. Another Middleby executive responded to FitzGerald on October 17 to write that Taylor and McDonald's had already met the previous day to discuss sending out a message to franchisees about McDonald's lack of support for Kytch. But Jeremy O'Sullivan, a Kytch cofounder, claims -- and Kytch argues in its legal motion -- that FitzGerald's email nonetheless proves Taylor's intent to hamstring a potential rival. "It's the smoking gun," O'Sullivan says of the email. "He's plotting our demise."
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Boycott American multinationals.
How can something be both American and multinational? Then comes the question on how I'd identify anything as the product of an "American multinational". Many small businesses are just "renting" the name of some larger corporation. McDonald's has gained some notoriety for being more of a real estate company than a restaurant chain.
Re:Lol (Score:4, Informative)
It's headquarters are in the U.S., so American. It controls franchises in many nations, so multi-national.
Re: (Score:1)
If Wikipedia says that the company im question is an American multinational, then it probably is.
Re: (Score:3)
It's an American name, operating entirely within the USA, with American workers and Amercan shareholders and American executives.
But all the profits go to the Cayman Islands. Or Ireland.
Re: (Score:3)
As we can see from the smoking gun email & the fact that McDonald's outlets are pretty much the same around the world, franchisee's very obviously aren't "just renting" the name. Additionally, the vast majority of McDonald's aren't franchises, they're wholly owned by McDonald's, as well as your own comment that they are a more of a real-estate company than a restaurant chain, w
Re: (Score:2)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonald%27s#:~:text=Corporate%20overview,-Facts%20and%20figures&text=There%20are%20a%20total%20of,locations%20licensed%20to%20foreign%20affiliates.
Re: (Score:2)
Not all machines are broken (Score:5, Informative)
While it's fashionable to claim the machines are broken, that is not always the case. In some cases the machine has been used so heavily the ice cream mix won't properly harden because the tube is so warm.* In other cases the machine may not have been put together the night before after it was cleaned.**
While yes, there is a part which breaks, not all the machines are broken.
* Assuming the configuration is the same, there is a metal tube through which the mix moves through and it is at that point the mix turns to soft serve. If the machine is used continually for an extended time that tube loses its ability to sufficiently cool the mix until it's had time to cool down.
** I used to clean my local McDonald's ice cream machine during the graveyard shift when the place was closed. It's not a difficult task, but it required reaching into the cooling tube and removing five (six?) stainless steel blades which would cut you if you looked at them wrong. These would get soaked in a cleaning solution for a few hours. While that was taking place a bucket containing the same cleaing solution was hooked to the machine and run through to push out any remaining mix. After that, clean water was run though to rinse the system. Then the hoses were removed and put into their own small bin filled with cleaning solution.
Once everything was cleaned (including the outside), the reassembly took place. The hoses were drained then water run thorugh them to remove any solution. The blades were then rinsed under clean wate to remove any cleaning solution, then dried (without losing a finger). After that, you had to reach into the cooling tube and reinsert the stainless steel blades without leaving any blood behind, followed by the hoses being reattached.
At that point the machine was ready to receive the ice cream mix which was added late in the breakfast shift so the machine had time to cool down and make ready for the first cone to be pulled. If someone didn't correctly reassemble the machine it wouldn't work. This was usually the result of not aligning the blades which meant they were scraping the inside of the cooling tube. On the other hand, if there wasn't someone there to clean the machine the night before you do not want to use the mix which has been sitting out all night inside the machine.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Not all machines are broken (Score:2)
Itâ(TM)s not unusual at all for restaurant systems. KDS (kitchen display systems) run on embedded 486 chips with DOS, handles heat fluctuations and humidity, never dies, never needs updates.
I think the primary concern with third party systems bolted on top of a automated food mixing device would be liability, the concoction before mixing is not fit for human consumption, containing things like glycol and preservatives at potentially lethal concentrations, the machines according to investigations by thi
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Not all machines are broken (Score:5, Insightful)
That is nice a nice first person description, but does not explain how Kytch nonetheless appears to significantly reduce downtime on these machines. Even if all it is telling them is that they put it back together wrong that would still save them a service call apparently.
The big fear with a machine like that is folks don't clean it or something breaks and is undetected, some kind of bacteria starts growing inside, and suddenly a bunch of customers end up in the hospital.
So I'm guessing they probably shutdown at the slightest sign of a problem to avoid that happening.
If Kytch was circumventing the shutdown mechanisms, of even giving owners an easy fix when the manufacturer wanted owners to give it a full cleaning, then I could see a legit safety concern (for the public, but the manufacturer would never admit that). But from the emails it looks like it was simply the case the machines had crappy diagnostics and Kytch gave better ones, and the manufacturer was scared that Kytch would build this into a relationship with MacDonald's and threaten some part of their business (and they were too cheap to simply buy them).
Re: (Score:3)
The big fear with a machine like that is folks don't clean it or something breaks and is undetected, some kind of bacteria starts growing inside, and suddenly a bunch of customers end up in the hospital. So I'm guessing they probably shutdown at the slightest sign of a problem to avoid that happening.
Sure but that does not explain why other fast food joints are so much more likely to have functioning machines. I doubt they are all simply less safe than McDonalds.
Re: (Score:3)
McDonald's must really be behind the times if every other fast food joint has this figured out.
Re:Not all machines are broken (Score:5, Insightful)
McDonalds owns a large interest in Taylor, which is how the money gets to them.
Re: Not all machines are broken (Score:1)
There's some impressive speculation there, I notice. That doesn't preclude the possibility or even indicate any insignificant probability, but it would be good to know something more certain.
Re: Not all machines are broken (Score:2)
Thank you for giving the information from the trenches on how these machines are cleaned. I donâ(TM)t know what differences there are internationally, but there isnâ(TM)t a meme here in Australia about maccas soft serve machines/ milkshake machines being frequently broken.
It did sound like the machine you were cleaning wasnâ(TM)t well designed in terms of being easy to clean and maintain. It was possible to maintain, but insufficient thought went into making it solidly idiot proof.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Not all machines are broken (Score:5, Insightful)
Not to rag on MdDonald's kitchen staff, but they are not well known to be the type to be handling machine blades that "will cut you if you look at them wrong", nor should they be expected to have the kind of skills an auto mechanic has. :-/
All I can tell you is those blades were sharp. They were not like a spatula scraping down the sides of a bowl, these could have been used to slide roast beef. And as I said, it wasn't a difficult process, you just had to take your time and do things in the correct order with the biggest piece making sure everything was sanitized.
Since I worked graveyard and the place was closed, I had all the time I needed. While the blades and hoses were soaking I cleaned the machine then moved on to whatever came next which usually involved more cleaning. As the end of my shift approached I'd get some of the food ready for the breakfast shift such as the eggs or stocking frozen hash browns, getting the oil up to temperature (which I had both screened to remove bits of fries and added another block of fresh shortening or simpy removed to a grease bin out back and started fresh), making sure sausage patties were stocked, any bread products, and so on.
The nice thing was I was usualy done by 3 AM which meant I had two hours of nothing until 5 when the morning manager came in. When my shift ended I'd go home, get a shower and get some sleep, then repeat the next night. Got extra pay for working night as well.
Re:Not all machines are broken (Score:5, Interesting)
That's a load of horse shit. The machines are broken by design because of software. https://www.wired.com/story/th... [wired.com]
Someone adds mix too fast and the machine errors out and can only be fixed by a service call. That and every minor issue requires a service call that only a single vendor is allowed to perform.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Not all machines are broken (Score:4, Informative)
And then due to your contract for the franchise, McDonalds lawyers would show up the next day with a court order taking over all of your stores, seizing bank accounts of the franchise, and changing the locks, to then go through and audit everything, probably firing any staff that you had more than a professional relationship with (ie friends, family) and then finally going through the motions to permanently sever you from the business before finding someone else to sell it to.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If I was 'putting down' a Taylor machine, I'm already at that point of "Bring it on, bitches!"
7.62x51 FTW
Re: (Score:2)
And then due to your contract for the franchise, McDonalds lawyers would show up the next day with a court order taking over all of your stores, seizing bank accounts of the franchise, and changing the locks, to then go through and audit everything, probably firing any staff that you had more than a professional relationship with (ie friends, family) and then finally going through the motions to permanently sever you from the business before finding someone else to sell it to.
So McDonalds is basically evil then? Not like we didn't already know...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
McDonalds owns the restaurant itself. The franchisee is a tenant.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: Not all machines are broken (Score:3)
While it is clear that you have some first-hand knowledge of the workings of these machines, I would hazard that if this were the only thingâ"or even the most common thingâ"wrong with them, we wouldn't be seeing anything about a lawsuit. Nobody would have bought the diagnostic devices and the company would have died on it's own, no intervention necessary.
Re: (Score:2)
Jesus, that sounds like a chore. Can’t somebody design a self cleaning soft serve machine and/or a robot to do that? All the issues you mentioned sound like design negligence. For example that tube overheat issue can be avoided or at least reduced with some kind of procedural changes, warnings, sensors, or additional cooling (though that last one will increase cost).
Re: (Score:2)
Well of course it's design "negligence." Nobody else's soft serve machines have these problems!
Re: Not all machines are broken (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
After that, you had to reach into the cooling tube and reinsert the stainless steel blades without leaving any blood behind, followed by the hoses being reattached.
Of course you had to leave blood behind, how do you think the McDonalds vanilla sundaes are made?
Or an I giving away trade secrets there?
Protecting garbage is dumb (Score:2)
Why is McD protecting their unreliable machine from potential competitors? The only reason I can think of is they want to charge franchise owners an arm and leg for repairs.
But how is it good for general business to keep having flaky ice-cream machines? Sounds like penny-wise-pound-foolish to me. Accounts don't know how to measure losses from pissed off customers so they perhaps ignore that factor in their profit estimation spreadsheets, so the "bilk franchisee for repairs" income figure stands out.
Re: (Score:1)
Correction: "Accountants", not "Accounts". (Stupid eyes! I checked 3 times! I want Bill's 6g nano-implant chip with GrammarGPT.)
Re:Protecting garbage is dumb (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
That is where kytch came in
They could install one piece of hardware and mansgers would have a human readable version of the error code so that they could just fix it quickly.
No waiting for 3 days for a $500 tech to puch a reset button.
It is also why taylor and mcdonalds are in lawsuits. I hope kytch can pull a win out of this. Break the monoploy
Re: (Score:2)
Follow the wedding procession (Score:2)
Johnny Harris (Youtube) did a great doc on this (Score:5, Informative)
Johnny Harris (youtuber) did a great mini documentary on the whole "why are the machines always down" and it was a fascinating tale that basically said that McDonalds corporate and Taylor were likely conspiring against those guys.. it was pretty good stuff - he even did some social engineering posing as a repair tech at one point.
Re: (Score:2)
Wrong move (Score:2)
Middleby's then COO, David Brewer, who had wondered earlier whether Middleby could instead acquire Kytch
At this point, McDonald's, who has probably suffered the most harm from this fiasco, should be looking at acquiring Middleby. Then taking it apart and only save the pieces needed to fix the McFlurry machines.
Re: (Score:2)
There's an older, under-the-table deal between Taylor and McDonald's founders ... and causes perceived harm by and to consumers
The consumers can always go down the street to Dairy Queen. They aren't being harmed.
The people who are being harmed are the McDonald's franchisees. Contract terms aside, if there were any such conspiracy in effect, they would organize and tear the parent company (and Taylor) a new asshole in court.
Re: (Score:1)
This should have been a "+1 funny," you were robbed. Apparently these Satanists don't understand sarcasm.
Re: (Score:2)
The consumers can always go down the street to Dairy Queen. They aren't being harmed.
Is it your claim that every single McDonald's as a Hair Queen just down the street? (There are three times as many McDonald's as DQs).
The people who are being harmed are the McDonald's franchisees.
But franchisees do appear to be being harmed more.
Re: (Score:2)
There are three times as many McDonald's as DQs
Or Burger King, Wendy's, Ben and Jerry's.
Re: (Score:1)
That the consumers can just choose another restaurant and that the real harm is being done to the franchise owners, I'm not arguing against either of those two points, I fully agree. What I'm trying to say though, is there is a conspiracy, believe it or not, but since it's not actually illegal, just unethical, (despite that it being also a secret makes people assume that it is illegal and waste more time on trying legal approaches to "fixing it" it than they should) there is no actual legal recourse for the
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Lol they iced em (Score:2)
Real Reason McDonalds machines are always broken (Score:2)
One quibble (Score:4, Funny)
When you talk about this particular McDonalds offering, "ice cream" really should be in quotes.
Re: (Score:1)
The three "E"s (Score:2)
Legally they may be right, but no one's buying it. (Score:2)
Franchisee agreements are strict with McD's. Even if they win, what would they achieve? You can't get a franchise to buy it - they're prohibited from doing so. And violating that agreement means you can lose your franchise.
And McD's is a landowner - they make most of their money leasing to the franchisee the land their restaurant sits on (over 60% of their revenue is from real estate). This means you violate the lease agreement, McD's the landlord will change the locks on your building, and install a new fr
Ice cream technology. (Score:2)
Oakland jury trial? mcd will get it moved to IL! (Score:2)
Oakland jury trial? mcd will get it moved to IL!
Basicly this is: ... (Score:1)
.. stop fixing our inferior broken product or be damned.
McD's should get new machines (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Planned Maintenance (Score:2)
mcbroken (Score:2)
I'll just leave this here. You're welcome.
https://mcbroken.com/ [mcbroken.com]
Taylor? Kytch? (Score:2)
Hmm (Score:1)
The root problem is simple... (Score:2)
The root problem is that McDonalds corporate makes more money from Taylor service calls out to restaurants to fix the machines than they make from actually selling ice-cream.
And they know that any other sales they loose because of the broken machines are also a drop in the bucket compared to revenue from the Taylor repairs.