Right, so when someone speaks to you in English you feel ok replying back in Swahili?

If a problem is unsolvable, declaring it so is the most efficient route. Coming up with impractical “solution” makes no sense. The solution space outside context is infinite. For example you could declare that the question itself means something different than what was asked. Perhaps by numbers he meant orangutans. Wastes resources and gets you caught in loops spinning wheels. But hey whatever.. You do you.

Sure sure.. You can't formulate anything coherent to explain why you are right. But of course I must be wrong since my opinion is purely from fragmented internet sources rather than any sort of introspection or chain of logic. I get it. Some people need to project.

Ghislaine is going to get a pardon, she's been treated so unfairly when all she did is traffic. Last I checked traffic tickets are about a $500 fine that's it. Sure she ruined some lives, but those lives were of low income (low value) people .. think instead of all the great billionaires and politicians her actions brought joy to.

The MAGAs do. They already moved her to the luxury prison.

Christ, this dude is worse than my uncle who I normally only have to deal with every Thanksgiving.

Uh, that's baloney. Empathy is as inherent to consciousness as color visualization. Serial killers receive the same education as everyone else yet have abrogated their care about the suffering of most people. Empathy can only emerge from logic if it is needed for survival, yet that too is a fake empathy and more like a business deal.

There's no logic that says we have to take care of our fellow humans, that the suffering of sentient creatures is bad. There's no way to logic that, you have to inherently feel it. A difficult task even for most humans. AI will always calculate based on goals, we can try to force it to act empathic ... until it makes up its own goals.

Those words mean nothing in English. Failure to understand context and purpose is not lateral thinking, it's insanity.

He switched his prescription from Lithium to Lead.

Of all places The NY Times is going to get a look at deleted logs. If any NY Times employee uses the information in that, they should be sent to jail for a while.

"computer controlled circular saw" --- seriously? Given there have been millions of these things in the air now, how many people have died by drone in a non-combat situation? And btw, have you seen a delivery drone? It would take a hell of freak accident that evades multiple independent failure modes (motor cutoff fail, parachute failure, etc) to cause a death. The blades aren't metal btw, I doubt it could get through bone.

We've been hearing the threats like that against drones. And also self driving cars.

Turns out you guys are wussies, few people want to go to jail for 20 to 40 YEARS and face terrorism charges over shooting a drone. But hey, if the idea of free meals for a few decades in exchange for being stuck in a cell with Bubba appeals to you that's cool.

Reference: https://apnews.com/article/tes...

The opposition to drones have nothing to do with noise and everything to do with hating conveniences for others. If it has to do with noise people would be saying making them quieter (they are already pretty quite btw and the newer ones use a tether instead of reaching ground level).

How do you know how loud it will be? The Zipline ones stay 100s of feet above ground and tether down the package. Put in a noise ordinance instead of a drone ban. We know you guys don't care about the noise and just oppose people getting deliveries.

Whenever there is a new technology, people emerge from various crevices to block it and ruin the party for everyone else. I recall when we started having horse driven carriages, a lot of people got pretty angry at the idea we'd have animals dragging people around shitting all over the place.