you've made up an absurd analogy and then incorrectly said "this is equivalent" A phone company executive would be sent to jail if they ignored a national security letter about terrorist activity on one of their lines.
I'd mod this funny if I had not already posted.
Obviously a gun can be used as a weapon without killing or even being fired, both offensively and defensively, so this doesn't capture the whole picture of gun use as weapons; nevertheless the data shows that what people think guns are for is not in fact what they are primarily used for.
They can also be used to kill animals rather than people. Most guns by far are used for killing paper targets. It irks many of the anti-gun people greatly that shooting is part of several Olympic sports.
The toll company goes to the rental agency and says, "this is your car, pay up!". The rental agency pays the toll company, and then bills their customer. This is the sane way to handle things.
Should the ISP pass everybody who feels they are owed something's bills along, or just the MAFIAA? Should they be liable for bogus bills? You seem to want them to be liable so it would be sensible for them to independently verify them first. Of course that would require metering end examining everyone's usage, in which case you might as well just make them the internet police straight up. So was that your plan, or did you not think many steps ahead here?
the broader implications of this are huge. are automakers responsible when someone breaks the speed limit and kills someone? after all they're the ones who make vehicles that are, from the persepective of many, unnecessarily powerful. what about guns? or any other product & service that can be used for harm or theft?
I think SCOTUS answer in this case can be safely extrapolated to all those things. Tool makers are not responsible for tool abuse. That this is even a question to begin with makes me shake my head.
See what happens if gas prices keep increasing.
Same thing as last time I expect. It is a temporary thing.
Did you even read the headline? That "when it works" means "this is the fantasy, not the reality".
Yup, read the headline. Also applied the fantasy patches, which leads me to believe it is getting better much faster than you are.
Bullshit. Plenty of countries in the EU won't allow the cybertruck due the ability to injure pedestrians.
Pedestrians and vehicles don't mix. I've often likened this to putting dogs and cats in the same kennel and considering muzzles a eminently sensible compromise. It's not as bright as you think it is.
So, for example, they fail miserably at...subtle problem debugging.
You are mistaken.
https://aisle.com/blog/what-ai...
I suspect the idea is that nobody would ever have to read the code for it... if you wish to update/maintain it, you just ask the AI to create you a fresh new one from scratch.
Also, from a security perspective, even though these apps may have exploitable bugs, if everyone's app is somewhat unique that changes the overall attack surface considerably. A million people running a single identical app is a huge score if you find a bug. A million people running a million slightly different apps is a totally different problem, and while they may be even more insecure individually the collective security may actually improve.
Do you know for sure we only live once?
Are you suggesting there may yet be additional porn, gambling and drugs?
Well...if it could, it would....so it's safe to conclude the technology just isn't there yet.
No it's not. But if it improves as fast in the next 5 years as it has in the last 5 years it may well be then.
Their idea of an offer you can't refuse is an offer... and you'd better not refuse.