You know, like being able to rapidly manufacture spare parts on demand if the need arises thanks to flexible lines, using zonal electrical architecture, replacing parts with upgraded replacement components, not strictly like-for-like, and a dozen other things.
I'm sure they will manufacture you parts on demand and FedEx overnight them for your old out of warranty Chinese EV LOL.
Not sure if making a new car model every 18 months is a good thing.
Unless there is a lot of carryover between models it sounds like an absolute disaster for stocking of spare/replacement parts.
You know what a "law" is, right?
Generally something to be worked around.
A full highway is a full highway, there's little in the way of magic or capacity to remedy that.
Well, not entirely. A highway has more capacity at moderate speeds than at high ones, because you need less space between vehicles.
And it has the most capacity when it is completely stopped, but throughput and capacity are not the same.
"Rewriting RoguePlanet to make it functional again drained my soul and I couldn't complete the other scenarios and for now it remains unclear if RoguePlanet is limited to LPE or there is some sort of way to turn it into an RCE," the researcher wrote.
Maybe try to get out more.
Their economic analysis is BS.
They should have hired you long ago. You could have prevented all that cheap clean power they already manage effectively.
At only 300MW each, they will want quite a few of them to make the economics better.
That is the plan, both in Ontario and hopefully by 2050 we have many of them across the country and around the globe.
The increased cost of waste handling and refuelling is not properly accounted for either.
We also have lots of uranium and you are clutching at straws. That is another potential supply chain and economic opportunity. OPG also already has 5.5 GW of operating nuclear, so they probably get a good discount
https://www.nwmo.ca/en/Canadas...
Just because some places are incompetent does not mean everyone is.
They are building a BWRX-300, for around $21 billion Canadian. It's a prototype, so high costs are expected I suppose......Good luck to them, but it seems very unlikely that it will be economically viable in the end.
Yes, it is the first of what is expected to be many if it meets expectations. Given OPGs successful track record orther provinces are already expressing interest in their own domestically built nuclear capacity. They have of course done the economic analysis beforehand.
https://www.opg.com/documents/...
OPG is a world leader in nuclear power, so no reason to expect this won't be successful like all their other projects. A big part of the first one is establishing the supply chains to be able to crank them out at scale. China is doing the same with heavy forge capacity for large reactors.
https://www.world-nuclear-news...
The first reactor is expected to take 8 years, but subsequent ones are expected to take around five. Of course they are building this project on the site of several existing reactors, which was done intentionally to minimize legal challenges and permitting times/costs. If those issues add substantial time to construction in other places, as is typical, then that is a societal failure specific to them rather the technology.
Is it going to be safe? How do we know?
We do have a functional regulatory environment here, so I expect it will be as safe as the rest of OPG's nuclear fleet. For people who still worry there is always Xanax.
A "tool" that lets one programmer do the work of 20 means that 19 will be laid off, regardless of how well they learn the tools. To say nothing of people working in other industries "disrupted" by those tools who will be laid off no matter what they do.
Such is the nature of tools all throughout history. This may be new to you, but it not new at all.
"Who cares if it doesn't do anything? It was made with our new Triple-Iso-Bifurcated-Krypton-Gate-MOS process ..."