Or a bot took over an old account. And you looks suspiciously like a sock for the same bot.

I wouldn't be surprised if you were, as your name states, a bot, possibly run by some foreign power and tasked with sowing any kind of dissidence possible in the US.

And that's exactly as credible as the nonsense you're spewing, based on the same nothing.

If the cops felt their time was wasted, there are already laws and procedures in place to deal with it. They apparently didn't feel that way, and they know what actually happened. You have nothing but a propaganda piece written by someone with, like you, and agenda.

There's a lot to hate about Flock. This isn't is, and you're making them look less bad than they should. One might even believe you're an AI bot run by Flock to generate sympathy for them.

And that, too, is as plausible as your nonesense.

The police disagree.

And they know what happened, where all you have is the propaganda article written by someone with an agenda.

You found it inconvenient, and you ignored it, because you approve of illegal acts against people you don't like.

When they misrepresent what their goods and services can do (and they do), while taking money from investors, that is exactly what Theranos did.

I notice you ignore that the people "going around the perimeter of their property" were given a trespass notice. That means they were on private property. I'd guess they were in the parking lot, circling the building. Given how many crimes have already been committed against the company, in an escalating pattern, to not call the police would have been criminally negligent regarding their employee's safety.

And in neither incident were the activists (and that's what they are, calling themselves journalists or not) arrested after the cops determined what was going on.

And he wasn't arrested.

Given the increasingly nasty controversy over the company, and how common road rage turns violent in general, it's not unreasonable to be concerned over being followed. Especially considering the hundreds, if not thousand, of crimes committed against the company('s cameras) already, as the controversy escalates.

Yeah, in neither of the cases mentioned was the filming the issue the cops were responding to. In the first, it was following the installer down the road, which is always suspicious. In the second, they were trespassing on private property.

And in both cases, the cops established what was really going on, and responded appropriately - with no arrests.

Nothing these people have ever said has been true.

What makes the think they're lying? Their lips are moving. It's Theranos all over again, only with multiple companies, and hopefully, the end result will be the same: prison sentences for fraud.

Not buy their products. And get rid of any you have.

Which makes the answer useless. Because if doomscrolling causes mental issues, you want to discourage it, but if mental issues cause doomscrolling, you want to encourage it as a diagnostic tool.

Plus, we've take it about as far as it can go, but we aren't ready to admit it yet because there are still marks to fleece.

Do any of those studies make any attempt to distinguish between teens having mental issues because they doom scroll and teens doom scrolling because they have mental issues?

In California, if there's a reasonable expectation of privacy (such as within your own home), recording without permission is a felony.

Being an AI bot, it would, of course, be more inclined to hack the web site and steal it.

Only it's a very broken, stupid AI bot from the 80s, and posting to /. taxes its CPU so much there's a real risk of fire from overheating.