Comment Popular Mechanics and The Guardian? (Score 2) 47
People take this drivel seriously? Two tabloids of the "Bat Boy has love child with Hillary Clinton's horse" school?
People take this drivel seriously? Two tabloids of the "Bat Boy has love child with Hillary Clinton's horse" school?
You can elect to be on Facebook.
No, you really can't.
Note that article is eight years old.
Nothing new here at all.
Upload a random photo to Facebook and see how many people it tags for you.
That barn door has been wide open for a long time.
Covert and able to be owned by any asshole and used as a marketing point.
How is that different from any camera bolted to the side of a building? Or any dashcam?
Hint: It's not.
Copy & paste, right? I mean, really, it's trivial to close a bot.
Look at the pretty stock certificate. Isn't it pretty? You should buy a whole bunch of them. No, we don't have anything else to sell. Why would we need anything else to sell when we have these pretty stock certificates.
GIVE US MONEY!!!
Don't forget the titanium cubes. Which are free.
The bad news: it was an asshole boss.
So it was trained to act just like the tech bros who developed it? Who probably considered that aspect as part of the good news.
Is there a link somewhere to the subpoena? Without that, there's no way to know what's being alleged (and probably not even with that, the details will come out in a hearing).
Without those details, it's all speculation, and revenge fantasy, all blinded by TDS and MAGA insanity.
The problem is that when one side has truly become corrupt, they frame their opponents as corrupt, especially when they're taken to account later.
And when both sides are corrupt, they're playing the same game.
Go take a look at how the Biden administration threatened the news media to not cover Joe's dementia. And let's not forget how many criminal charges were made against Trump to no avail, except on in New York, one of the most corrupt lefty places in the US (after California).
After Trump one the first time, he did not prosecute Hillary Clinton for the email server, despite conclusive proof that it seriously damaged national security, presumably because his advisors told him it would set a very bad precedent for the winner to jail the loser. But the Democrats set that precedent, so Trump is playing by their rules.
No, I don't care if you don't care. If you call over and point to the computer and say "box thing, nothing", then what do you want me to do?
Your job, but that's apparently to much to ask.
It's mostly the way they keep trying to shove it down everyone's throat, as relentlessly as any spammer who ever lived. That, by itself, is of offensive, it really doesn't matter how well or poorly it works.
When people are too stupid to figure out something with some effort, basic effort, I don't care. I gave up years ago, either your trying to be an incompetent idiot, or, you're special needs.
Which makes you like the IT guy supporting a store we bought a few years back. Everyone in the store wanted to light him on fire. The first visit, I could have literally punched an employee in the face and the would have liked me more than they liked him.
Which is to say, he doesn't work for us any more.
Welcome to grown up land, where "I don't care" means "I'd rather collect unemployment."
Easier, friendlier, simpler, and more inviting than KDE, or Gnome? No.
But more familiar, certainly. And that matters at lot when you have people with little or not technical aptitude trying to get their job done so they won't get fired. Most users rely on motor memory, with little to no conscious awareness of what they're doing in terms of interacting with the user interface.
If you worked in tech support, you'd know that.
Have a grown up explain to you what "supposed to" means, dumbass.
You have agreed with me that LinkedIn is shit, and you're too fucking stupid to know it.
The rule on staying alive as a forecaster is to give 'em a number or give 'em a date, but never give 'em both at once. -- Jane Bryant Quinn