You're assuming that passing a law requiring warnings is about showing warnings, rather than simple virtue signaling.

There isn't a politician in the US at the state level or higher that has a good track record on that.

Be sure to also compare the difference between a - in your words - "carefully-worded" email versus some dipshit rambling on in a stream-of-consciousness babble. Specifically, how long it takes both people to communicate that way, versus, one while writing the email.

In short, it depends on the subject matter that needs to be communicated, and you're both full of shit.

Makes perfect sense when dealing with someone who should have technical skills, or in a context of technical know-how, like an interview for an IT position.

For a job interview for non-technical positions, though, you're just showing that you know as little about people as they do about computers. Which is a definite red flag.

At a guess? Your inability to understand or accept that your view of the world does not define reality, or possibly even relate to it.

Give that the glitches are dependent on the quality of the connection, and the quality of internet service is depending on location, and poor neighborhoods with low quality internet correlates pretty closely to Not Being White (and being rural, but that's a much smaller percentage of the population), yeah, lawsuits are inevitable.

Where they are headquartered doesn't matter. What matters is if they have a legal presence in the state. If they do, that presence, at least, is subject to their laws, including all the various enforcement mechanisms, like fines (and seized bank accounts if necessary), and even jail time for contempt.

If they don't - of if they abandon anything that can be moved - then they're not.

"These measures amount to intimidation and coercion aimed at undermining European digital sovereignty,"

And yet so far. Trumps goal isn't to undermine European digital sovereignty, it's to undermine all European sovereignty.

Or ever will be.

Why would you believe that Republicans aren't already familiar with the story? Do you believe they would disapprove if they only knew?

You sweet, summer child.

He obviously is an AI. Not actual person could be that full of shit, so he must be. The self hatred means he's a bit more advanced than most, sure, but everything that comes from his is still slop.

And this hasn't been news for at least 10 or 15 years. Must have been a slow day with a deadline.

It's not even about the subscription fees for me. This produce (like virtually all internet connected appliances) simply does not do anything I want done. What the hell is wrong with people who want "special effects" on a fucking alarm clock?

"I think there are some grey areas in what 'opt-in' means to different people"

No, there are no gray areas in what 'opt-in' means to different people. Only one kind of person believes that: Spammers. No other kind of person would ever say such a thing.

Try posting a video there about Tiananmen Square. One that accurately reports how the government ended it.

Let us know how that works out for you. If they let you have internet access in the prison library.

The law does not agree with you. And most of the people who understand it think you're ridiculous.