Comment Re:LinkedIn? (Score 1) 163
Have a grown up explain to you what "supposed to" means, dumbass.
You have agreed with me that LinkedIn is shit, and you're too fucking stupid to know it.
Have a grown up explain to you what "supposed to" means, dumbass.
You have agreed with me that LinkedIn is shit, and you're too fucking stupid to know it.
PETA was never about animal rights. They have always been about virtue signaling and trying to control other people's lives. And nothing else.
They were shittified from day one.
So Sam Altman should be allowed to post multiple articles on LinkedIn about how AI is going to transform workplaces and society
Who says so? Certainly not me.
Since your premise is stupid, the rest isn't worth reading.
Correction: LinkedIn was originally just a job-and-resume posting site. And while the vast majority of its end users still treat it as such, the site's owners have been desperately trying to turn it into something else - more of a Facebook/Twitter hybrid - for almost a decade now.
EFF is only one of many contributors to the enshittification, including the owners. But they are certainly guilty of contributing.
EFF isn't dumping X because of any confusion over the line between politics and work. They're dumping X because nobody bothers with it any more.
Why do you supposed nobody bothers with it any more?
You'd know, being a broken, mid-90s bot yourself.
LinkedIn is supposed to be a job posting site. Political advocacy doesn't belong there.
So EFF is deliberately embracing the enshittification of the internet.
It's a pity, too. They've done some very important work in the past. But now, they're part of the problem.
This is the New York Post, the US equivalent of a British tabloid. Just because they don't have topless women on page 3 doesn't make them any more credible.
Loss of heads is part of. Economic collapse is another part of it.
You can't get rich anymore if there's no one with any money to spend.
Ultimately, way down there in the dredges, someone with not a lot of money needs to buy something that leads to money getting to you.
You can only hollow out the bottom so much.
Ah, but that's the ultimate wealth. If you own all the money, you also own all the people. As in, literal slavery.
And that is exactly the goal for some of these fuckers.
Then you'll accept it. And it is very much in their interest to determine that.
Just like it is very much in your interest to decide what that amount is. Which they have no say in whatsoever.
In other words, You're a grown up. Act like it.
to avoid a public backlash, then you are, in fact, an evil conspiracy.
Fortunately, the odds of them ever selling more than stock certificates is slim.
Why would these people (and I use the word loosely) care of poor people can afford their services? They're poor, and therefore inferior, and therefore disposable, and not even really people. If you're not rich, you deserve to die quickly. But we must do everything we possibly can to make our masters immortal, to ensure we're never without their benevolent control.
Just ask them. They'll say the words out loud. They really are that arrogant.
That's why it automatically sets up the old address as an alias to the new. Permanently, if I don't miss my guess (there's no reason it shouldn't).
Lets you take your time updating everything dependent on it, or not bother at all.
Nothing new about this at all. Pay for the business version with your own domain, and it's been possible for as long as I've run things. This is *exactly* the same thing, including using the old address as an alias. They just expanded it to free accounts.
It's not exactly rocket surgery, after all.
And when a company doesn't say they won't share personal information, they share it.
In other words, any company you give personal information to will share it. Whether they say they will or not is irrelevant.
And in other news, the sky is blue, water is wet, and politicians lie.
Why do we want intelligent terminals when there are so many stupid users?