Comment Re:Give me the goods (Score 2) 13
No, but I would download a car.
No, but I would download a car.
There was also a time when Main Street business buildings featured business on the ground floor and residence on the next floor up, where the small business was a sole-proprietorship and the owner lived above the store. In other configurations it was a front/back divide, with the shop on the front facing the boulevard and the home on the back facing the side-street or the alley.
The modern shopping-center doesn't generally seem to cater to that, and cities don't seem to zone for that kind of arrangement much anymore.
It stuck me as someone watched Snowpiercer and saw the class-divide among the length of the train and thought, "that's a good idea, we should build a city like that!"
And in some ways for social control it makes sense, basically if no one is allowed outside without express permission and oversight and subject to summary execution if caught out there, then any attempt at revolution from the unwashed masses at the bottom of society would be very difficult to bring to bear. The city itself makes it difficult to advance from their end to the elites at the extreme other end, and if the elites maintain sufficient forces to attack anyone outside then there's not a practical way to get to the other end without outside assistance.
Because it's just so damn easy to commit that much law enforcement time to irresponsible electric bicycle riders.
I don't have a problem with this. Where I live, there are engine displacement and horsepower rules for older moped-type gas powered bicycles, laws that need to be updated for the e-bike phenomenon. Honestly I would class anything with the equivalent or more power of a typical 100cc moped as a motorcycle and start mandating registration.
Did you ever consider that perhaps police wanted much more definitive laws that cover things like licenses to make enforcement actually work?
Because AI doesn't require anything more than a text-prompt, while other methods of producing images or videos require individuals to apply their own creative efforts to the process.
There are lots of situations where a post-event or post-display scrutiny reveals something to fail to comply or to otherwise be in-violation.
The simple solution is to blacklist the individuals or companies that violate the rules if their violations are discovered, and to enable to event organizers a reasonably wide latitude in responding to complaints made and making their decisions based on how a given accused violator responds.
Anything created with aesthetics in mind is art, even if it's shit.
Disallowing AI generated art is perfectly valid though, it's their show.
I have to disagree with this sentiment.
As an example, John Cage's 4'33" is not music. Even structured under the trappings of music, it is not music. There is no musical performance. To even call it music is laughable. Likewise Cage's As Slow As Possible is also not music. The latter is at least purposefully-made sound, but it the timescales of what a human being can directly observe to appreciate (and given that it was written by a human being for human beings) it is not music. Likewise duct-taping a piece of fruit to a canvas or paving a floor of a room with peanut butter isn't art either. Of course people are free to do these things but we should also be equally free to reject their works from even the set of what constitutes art.
We do seem to have hit a perfect storm, employers were basically insisting on college degrees for jobs that should not have required or even preferred a college degree, prices spiked because suddenly even to be an ordinary office worker or admin assistant or the like one basically had to have one, to the spiking prices dooming many who went to school with debt that their work would not readily let them pay back, to a revulsion against the system itself.
And this is all in the last say, 30 years. This happened very fast.
What poor schmuck of a ma-and-pa computer company did Acer include in their lawsuit within the Eastern District of Texas in order to bring their lawsuit in that particular court?
District-shopping has been a thing for a long time and that particular district has been popular with IP trolls.
It was probably invented by the mail-clerks at Exact Sciences. They were tired of the mishaps when receiving Cologuard return-samples whose patients didn't understand the packaging instructions.
I wonder if anyone's going to revive that old hacking tool, "back orifice".
Training AI to recognize feces? Why? Never mind, I don't want to know.
Cheech and Chong could have benefitted from this technology.
If the pictures were encrypted so the company couldn't decrpyt them wtf would be the point of sending them in the first place!? Its a service, not a personal file server for poo pictures.
Thanks. Now you tell me...
If the camera is poorly aimed, it puts a whole new meaning to end.
Fortunately, this will lead to revival of nuclear energy. However, until these come online, this will lead to hardship where high electricity costs will severely impact poorest.
If one changes how electricity is billed, ie, the more one buys the more expensive it gets, that would help a lot. Particularly when those huge-demand customers would end up paying for the development of the very power plants that they require in the process.
Demand-surge pricing is already common in many places. I see no reason why it shouldn't be applied to industry.
Keep your boss's boss off your boss's back.