Verizon To Begin Offering "Text To 911" Service 194
An anonymous reader writes "In a move that will likely elicit a 'why didn't they implement that sooner?' response, Verizon in the next 12 months will begin implementing a 'text to 911' feature that, as the name implies, will enable users contact 911 operators via text message to report an emergency. The feature will be particularly helpful for the hearing and/or speech impaired, and for folks who find themselves in dangerous situations where making a voice 911 call isn't advisable. Beginning in early 2013, Verizon will start rolling out the feature in various metropolitan areas before progressing to a nationwide rollout soon thereafter. In many respects, this move has been a long time coming, and something the FCC has been championing for a few years."
Great for reports of traffic accidents (Score:5, Insightful)
Now, instead of getting multiple phone calls about a traffic accident, the dispatcher can much more quickly ignore the duplicates.
This is an ideal way of sending information when you want to report that you saw something that may need their attention, but you personally don't need a response.
Re:Great for reports of traffic accidents (Score:5, Funny)
Now, instead of getting multiple phone calls about a traffic accident, the dispatcher can much more quickly ignore the duplicates.
This is an ideal way of sending information when you want to report that you saw something that may need their attention, but you personally don't need a response.
Yep. Now we can have people texting 911 about accidents caused by texting while driving potentially causing more accidents in the process.
There's an Xzibit reference in there somewhere...
Re:Great for reports of traffic accidents (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Getting details could be a problem (Score:5, Insightful)
This is an ideal way of sending information when you want to report that you saw something that may need their attention, but you personally don't need a response.
Presuming you can get sufficient detail in the message to make it useful. 911 Operators typically ask questions for a reason. I can just see a whole bunch of text like "I saw an accident on I-80" with no further detail in the messages. Then the operator may need to call to find out the details.
Re: (Score:3)
This is an ideal way of sending information when you want to report that you saw something that may need their attention, but you personally don't need a response.
Presuming you can get sufficient detail in the message to make it useful. 911 Operators typically ask questions for a reason. I can just see a whole bunch of text like "I saw an accident on I-80" with no further detail in the messages. Then the operator may need to call to find out the details.
You mean 911 operators cant find out exactly where your cellphone is and which direction you are traveling any time they want? Even just through getting a text message? But I saw that on CSI like two years ago...
Re: (Score:2)
The standard TAP 3.11, does include som information about your whereabouts, including tower(s?) you are talking to and aproximate location, but no GPS or direction.
Also, in Europe we have a lot of MVNOs (mobile virtual network operator), they are generally somewhere between 5 minutes and 6 hours behind current events depending on their contract with the network provider.
So unless the police has some backdoor installed in the land of the free, the 911 operator needs to ask some questions :-)
tl;dr - CSI isn't
Re:Getting details could be a problem (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Getting details could be a problem (Score:5, Funny)
Looks like this one didn't get over the ...
(sunglasses)
sar-chasm.
YEAHHHHHHHHH
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, the same CSI that made a Visual Basic interface to track IP addresses which turned out to be "275.3.9.64".
Re: (Score:2)
That might be the reason why it's taken so long to implement. E911 was mandated after 9/11 which basically means every 911 call gets GPS positioning information. Perhaps 911 texts get the same thing - sending a text via 911 grabs current GPS location and sends it out.
Heck, anothe reason is SMS is on
Re: (Score:2)
While I appreciate that September 11 is America's new national pastime, the seeds for E911 were planted long before 2001. I was working on systems to locate phones in 1994.
Re: (Score:2)
On this side of the ocean 911 operators drive porsches.
Re: (Score:2)
Except that it wasn't. Both phases of E911 were laid out by FCC rules adopted in 1996. Phase I was required to be in place by 1998. The rules for Phase II underwent minor tweaks in 1999 and 2000 and the first implementations were mandated for October 1, 2001.
Re: (Score:2)
Eeeeeyeah. I can play the pedantic game, too. The mandate wasn't made after 9/11.
This is fun.
Re: (Score:2)
Presuming you can get sufficient detail in the message to make it useful. 911 Operators typically ask questions for a reason. I can just see a whole bunch of text like "I saw an accident on I-80" with no further detail in the messages. Then the operator may need to call to find out the details.
Don't you mean "I saw an accident on I-8*CRASH*^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hcaused a second accident on I-80 by texting and driving"?
Re: (Score:2)
or even better "Please run your EPort app and point your devices camera at the incident"
hmm challenge for you coders write a good E-Report app for your platform of choice
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
I'm waiting to hear about the new type of multi-accident pile-up.
911, what's your emergency?
I was texting 911 about an accident when I had an accident.
911, what's your emergency?
I was texting 911 about an accident caused by the guy texting 911 about an accident when I had an accident.
911, what's your emergency?
I was texting 911 about an accident caused by the guy texting 911 about an accident caused by the guy texting 911 about an accident when I had an accident.
Re: (Score:3)
Now, instead of getting multiple phone calls about a traffic accident, the dispatcher can much more quickly ignore the duplicates.
The average person talks faster than he or she can read. What's more... most of the time when I call a traffic accident in, it goes something like this:
"911 dispatch, what's your emergency?"
"Yeah, got a car accident at highway 35 just south of the 17th avenue offramp."
"Yup, we know about it, Thanks."
*click*
Total call time: 15 seconds.
And my eyes don't leave the road while I'm making that call. On the other hand, having a bunch of people texting while on top of an accident scene is a recipe for disaste
Re: (Score:2)
Citation needed. ,for one, read much faster that I can talk.
I
Re: (Score:2)
You're comparing an output mechanism with an input one.
And I'm not sure it's true, at least for people who aren't horse racing commentators or auctioneers. It's certainly the case that most people can read a transcript of a lecture or interview in less time than it takes to listen to it.
Re: (Score:2)
It's just an option. If speaking on the phone is easier in your current situation, then that's what you do.
If the average person really does speak faster than they read, that's pretty sad. If I spoke as fast as I read, I'd sound like an auctioneer.
Re: (Score:2)
Now, instead of getting multiple phone calls about a traffic accident, the dispatcher can much more quickly ignore the duplicates.
You may want to look into emergency dispatch systems before commenting. First it is not a dispatcher that filters duplicate calls it is the 911 operators. Second, in large systems there can be a large number of 911 operators. The way most systems work is that when a 911 operator takes a call she posts a note on the system for all other operators to see. When a duplicate call comes in it is identified by checking the posted list. It does not matter if the call comes in by test or voive the list still needs t
Re: (Score:2)
Text to 911 could be useful in the following scenarios
You have a medical emergency that leaves you unable to speak or hear things
You are in a location where it is too noisy to hear a phone conversation
You have been kidnapped etc, and want to call for help without letting your attacker know
MMS along with SMS? (Score:5, Interesting)
They really need to support sending photos.
Re: (Score:2)
Email > MMS.
I've yet to use MMS (AFAIK, my current cell phone doesn't support them out-of-the-box, and I never bothered configuring them since I don't know anyone who uses them).
Email on the other hand, is pretty dominant on smartphones nowadays.
Re: (Score:2)
any camera phone for the last 6-8 years has supported MMS, you probably used it a dozen times with out knowing about...
anyone ever txt you a photo (hint:MMS)
ever part of a group txt from someone with a iPhone? (hint:MMS)
ever send a picture? yup MMS
a lot of older dumb phones actually sent anything over 160 characters as MMS
it all set-up by default on phones...
Re: (Score:3)
911@verizon.com and then forward it based on location of senders handset. It's not rocket surgery.
Re: (Score:2)
Agreed.
"accident on 405n @ wilmington"
"pics or it didn't happen."
Fantastic Reliability (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
The point you missed is that when one makes a voice call there is immediate feedback on whether or not the call got through. If it didn't go through one tries again. With text messaging, that feedback is not there. There is no way of knowing whether or not the message got through. It does not matter that text is not a replacement for voice. If the text message does not get through but the sender assumes it does the incident will not be responded to and people can die.
Re: (Score:2)
During really big emergencies the cell phone networks get clogged, the only thing that you can send out in those circumstances is a text message.
This is looking to supplement current capabilities, not replace them.
Re: (Score:2)
in such situations good luck getting anyone to take care of you - emergency services will be overloaded too.
Re: (Score:2)
I used to work at a cell phone company. Text messages use the same channels as voice messages and are of lower priority. If a voice call will not get through then a text message will defiantly not get through.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The issue is the immediacy of feedback. Do you think the following scenario is a good one when dealing with an emergency?
1. Send text message
2. Wait 30 seconds for response
3. Send again
4. Wait 30 seconds for response
5. Send again
6. Wait 30 seconds for response
7. Send again
8. Call 911
9. two hours later get three delivery notifications.
Text messages can be delayed and repeatedly sending texts is not a good idea.
Re: (Score:2)
Sometimes hours after the message was sent and read. Not really useful in an emergency.
New emergency line response... (Score:2, Funny)
"What is your OMG?"
The real question is: (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
That will be part of next-generation 9-1-1 services. Check out the NENA i3 specification and standards. But the rollout of next generation 9-1-1 is still 5-10 years in the future at a minimum.
Re: (Score:2)
Why hasn't someone created 911 video chat for mobile phones yet.
1. On freeways/highways during some traffic accidents, you can have more than 30 to 90 people calling 911 to report the same exact accident, thus overwhelming the 911 call center and sometimes the local cell towers also. Having some of those people place video calls would only compound this issue.
2. Phone cameras are front-facing and back-facing, and for most users that can actually do video chatting, it's far from having become second nature to them yet. For instance, there needs to be plenty of light, the
Re: (Score:2)
1. On freeways/highways during some traffic accidents, you can have more than 30 to 90 people calling 911 to report the same exact accident, thus overwhelming the 911 call center and sometimes the local cell towers also. Having some of those people place video calls would only compound this issue.
I am not sure why anyone would be streaming video to emergency services for a accident unless they were with someone who was hurt by the accident. That said, I guess there wouldn't be anything stopping that from happening.
2. Phone cameras are front-facing and back-facing, and for most users that can actually do video chatting, it's far from having become second nature to them yet. For instance, there needs to be plenty of light, the phone camera can't be moving too quickly, and the user needs to know where to point which end of the phone towards, while still being able to talk to it.
I doubt those people would even use the feature.
3. Bandwidth issues (not everyone has 4G service/high-speed wifi service, or even a mobile data service, and if even they did, it doesn't work everywhere the same yet)
While there could be bandwidth issues, I would assume the app would monitor the connection and fall back to voice with the option of sending pictures if the network is not fast enough.
4. Hardware issues (even among smartphones that can do video calling over 4G, all those 4G phones are not created equal. Some of those phones are vastly underpowered and will crash when doing video-calling. And the user may even have to pull out the battery and reboot their phone, before they can even make a normal phone call after that.)
It is better to have it for those that can use it than to
Future sample message (Score:5, Funny)
As suggested by a Facebook friend, Jordan Elliot:
"OMG! thrs lik sum GUY ty 2 brake into my house! DAFUQ!?!? LOL PLS HLP!!!"
Re: (Score:2)
As suggested by a Facebook friend, Jordan Elliot:
"OMG! thrs lik sum GUY ty 2 brake into my house! DAFUQ!?!? LOL PLS HLP!!!"
Facebook? I thought for sure I saw that posed on Chuck Grassley's twitter feed...
Re: (Score:2)
I shudder to think of the future additions to the "famous last words" listings.
How much like E911 will this be? (Score:3)
Will they be able to make the phone only talk/text to the 911 operator till they release the "line"?
Or perhaps turn on the audio, i.e. you text "I can't talk there is a burglar in my house", and they can turn on the phone/video and listen?
I suppose they could also make it take your picture to cut down on prank calls, otherwise how do they stop people saying "someone texted it in when I put the phone down" (yes they can cover the camera, but you know they will think of the feature)
Or turn on the video so you can show the 911 operator what is happening... which would be a cool feature for voice 911 calls as well.
I for one welcome our new smart phone overlords.
Re: (Score:2)
You know, anyone can pick up your phone and make the phone call as well. And it's a bit faster too.
I'd avoid leaving the phone unattended close to people willing to make prank calls to 911 on your behalf, for a start.
Re: (Score:2)
You didn't read what I wrote. I wasn't talking about someone other than the phone's owner making prank 911 txts, I was talking about the phone's owner making the prank txt and *claiming* it wasn't them to get out of trouble, because there would be no recording of their voice.
Re: (Score:2)
Interesting idea, but that only works if you use a phone with a forward-facing camera on a system that supports simultaneous voice and data transmission. Also, the flash might be an issue from a not-being-seen-by-ax-wielding-lunatic perspective.
How about real-time picture delivery? (Score:2)
How about a feature that lets you send pictures, videos, and live-camera feed to 911?
Of course you'll need both the phone and the 911 call center to have this ability.
In the interim, how about making a smartphone app that does all of this:
* call your local 911 by voice and/or send a text
* determine if the 911 call center has the ability to receive images or files, and if so, allow the phone user to send them
* determine if the 911 call center has the ability to receive live camera feeds, and if so, allow the
This is stupid. (Score:5, Interesting)
As a firefighter/aemt, we already get multiple, redundant calls with no information because the caller is "driving by the scene and thought you should know." So now we'll get a text message with no way for the operator to try and pull more information from the caller.
"omg im dying plz help"
So we dispatch two ALS ambulance crews, an engine company and local first responders to find some idiot who broke his toe.
0_o
Re: (Score:2)
Meanwhile, people get hurt or die because they are unable to make a voice call to 9-1-1. The deaf, hard of hearing, and speech impaired are in a situation right now where they effectively have no access to 9-1-1 - almost no one uses TTYs anymore, and on wireless these TTYs do not work well anyway.
Re: (Score:2)
If you really are dying, you're probably not going to be able to send text messages very well.
Re:This is stupid. (Score:4, Interesting)
If you really are dying, you're probably not going to be able to send text messages very well.
If you really are dying, you'll probably call 911 instead of text. If you're in a situation where you can't call but can somehow text, then you're probably pretty glad that they enabled texting.
There are plenty of circumstances where texting is advantageous to calling, such as:
Additionaly, FTFA, they can send text and photos, which opens the doors to a whole new type of information that can be sent to 911.
I'm guessing the reason this isn't as easy as enabling text subscriptions for '911' is because they are adding a lot of other features. Texts to 911 will likely also provide the responder with detailed location and subscription information. I suspect they'll also have an infrastructure in place to correlate calls, texts, and photos from the same number together into one session.
This change looks like a huge improvement over the current situation, and I suspect that it will both save and improve many peoples' lives.
It's also the first legitimate use for texting ;)
Soon... (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
good idea (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
Virginia Tech. Columbine. 9/11. There are three examples off the top of my head where people would have been able to text emergency services without revealing their location to a lunatic on a rampage. In the latter example, as a matter of fact, people were using text messages to tell people on the ground about the hijacking. It's not a perfect solution, but it's silly to suggest that it's unrealistic to imagine feasible emergency situations where the ability to contact emergency service providers silently w
Put your phone on silent (Score:2)
folks who find themselves in dangerous situations
I wonder if those folks will remember to put their phone on silent before sending a text message to 911, in the heat of the moment. Otherwise the reply message might attract some unwanted attention.
Torn (Score:2)
THAT SAID, it is far more likely the system is going to be inundated with spam from, for lack of a more accurate descriptor, fucking imbeciles (who think taking 15 minutes to compose a 4 sentence message is somehow more efficient than taking 15 seconds to just call the person), which will cause it to ap
Re: (Score:2)
Black Hawk County in Iowa has been offering text-to-911 for quite a while. The public safety answering point says that call volume has not been a problem for them. In fact, they have been urging more carriers to join this program.
Re: (Score:2)
Black Hawk County in Iowa has been offering text-to-911 for quite a while. The public safety answering point says that call volume has not been a problem for them. In fact, they have been urging more carriers to join this program.
Sure, it's easy enough for a county with a population of less than 150,000; also, probably not a whole lot of trolls in that demographic.
That model begins to become questionable when implemented in areas with a greater population density.
The IT Crowd (Score:2)
Dear Sir/Madam:
I am writing to inform you of a fire that has broken out in the basement level of the... No, too formal...
Get Out of the Suburbs, People! (Score:5, Interesting)
In rural areas there is often as much "fringe" coverage where SMS works but a voice call can't complete as there is "service area". The best you can do now is to text a bunch of your friends with, "crashed in ditch on river rd, ovrtrned, brkn neck, pls call 911," and hope somebody notices.
This kind of 911 service could effectively double mobile 911 coverage in those places. That's quite sufficient a reason to put up with the whiny problems posted above.
So when will it (Score:2)
support Twitter too?
Lassie? (Score:2)
Siri: Ruff
Dispatcher: What is it girl? Is Timmy hurt?
Re: (Score:2)
While this is funny (well, it made me smile), it might be interesting to see how an Intelligent Assistant (insert your favorite) might work with this.
One example given above was a car accident. If you see one, you just say, "Hey, let the cops know there's an accident," and your Intelligent Assistant figures out your location and sends "Accident on 110N b4 Rosecrans" and sends it off.
Why does the FCC need to "champion" it? (Score:2)
How about the drunk texts you send to the wrong # (Score:2)
Me: Hey baby - I want to play put it where it doesn't belong.
911: Please state the nature of your emegency.
Me: I need to shoot my load reallly bad
911: Police are being dispatched to your location.
Standing My Ground (Score:2)
i c suspect in hoodie omg here he comes SMG!
Might take too long to use (Score:2)
While its good to have this as an option as in this case more options are good, calling 911 and leaving the phone off the hook ( prompting a police visit ) is far faster than having to sit there and actually text 'help me'.
Re:Indeed! (Score:5, Insightful)
Because 911 operators need people to communicate with them intelligibly?
Re:Indeed! (Score:5, Funny)
lol popo omw
HELP (Score:2)
OMG 911 PLZ HELP...ive fallen n i cant get up!
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
I see your point, but if you have ever listened to 911 calls you would see that just because it is vocal does not mean it will be intelligible.
Re: (Score:2)
So how are deaf people to do that without this?
Re: (Score:3)
With cell phones, you can use a TTY unit connected to the headset jack of a compliant handset, and I assume that some phones support using the built-in text entry capabilities to communicate with a deaf relay.
(More pragmatically, g
Relay services are inappropriate for 9-1-1 calls (Score:4, Informative)
Location accuracy isn't good enough just to make a voice call and hope for the best without further communication. A case like this was recently documented by the Seattle authorities, where the location was off by four blocks, and the disabled victim was only saved by the fact that the parents were able to call 9-1-1 and give the precise location.
Most deaf and hard of hearing people do not use TTYs anymore. Many now use video and captioned telephone relay services, but 9-1-1 calls through relay services suck, to put it mildly. Call routing doesn't work well for these situations, and there are many documented cases of introducing 5-10 minute delays before the call is finally connected to the emergency responders. Compare that to sub-10 second response times for the majority of voice calls.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3)
The problem is that we have 6200 public safety answering points in the USA under state and local jurisdiction. Many of these don't have the funds to upgrade their equipment to receive SMS, and for a fair number of them it likely is not possible to get the funds anytime soon. That doesn't leave many options. One of the possibilities that has been raised is to implement an SMS to TTY gateway, with all the limitations that this entails.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Indeed! (Score:5, Insightful)
It's funny how infrastructure gets privatized based entirely on how recent it is.
Water, sewage, roads, and postal service -- existed since time immemorial, or at least since before the Roman Empire. Today: run directly by the government, more or less competently.
Electricity and heating gas -- existed for a little over a hundred years. Today: run privately by a government-designated, very tightly regulated monopoly. Anecdotally, I have more complaints with my electric company than the city water bureau.
Telephone, cable, landline internet -- existed for less than a century. Today: privately-run, less regulated duopoly (at best). Consumer complaints: fairly high.
Cellular voice/data -- existed for a couple decades. Barely-regulated private kleptocracy; every provider sucks in an individual, unique way.
Re: (Score:2)
Anecdotally, I have more complaints with my electric company than the city water bureau.
Of course. If your water rates skyrocket or it starts tasting bad or the pressure is too low, you're going to vote the Mayor out of office. YOU are the water company's shareholder.
I'm pretty sure Jesse White got re-elected as Illinois Secretary of State because the lines at the licence bureau are short, the people are friendly, and the process takes little time (as opposed to the convicted felon who held the job before h
Re:Hope Springs Eternal (Score:5, Funny)
I dno. Les aks'm
Re:Hope Springs Eternal (Score:5, Funny)
User: theres a hijacker on the plane
Cop: Don't you mean "there's"?
User: thats what your worried about? cant you send help?
Cop: I'm sorry, sir. I can't help you.
Ridiculous (Score:2, Insightful)
User: theres a hijacker on the plane
Cop: Don't you mean "there's"?
Your scenario is absurd. There's no way a cop would be literate enough to recognize grammatical mistakes.
Re: (Score:2)
You need to get out more. Modern cops have a "GrammerNazi" app installed on their iPad.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
You need to contact 911 and you are worried about $0.25 txt charges?
Perhaps you aren't clear on the concept of a "true emergency".
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
No, it likely won't. The reason it works for voice calls is that the standards are established for "non-service initialized phones." There is no equivalent for SMS, and it is doubtful whether there will be any incentive to make this happen for a technology that already is on its way out.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You actually PAY for SMSing? I don't think any service provider here in my country actually charges for SMSs, they did a while back but not any more.
Re: (Score:2)
It will cost you one way or another... It may be indirect, but you can't "do more" and have it be less expensive...unless this is streamlining some process or something.
Re: (Score:2)
SMS to emergency services in Sweden is still alive. It has a registration requirement, though.
UK too (Score:2)
emergencySMS [emergencysms.org.uk]. Requires registration. Marketed to the deaf, hard of hearing and speech-impaired, but Mountaineers are recommended to sign up too [grough.co.uk]