Comment Re:the same way we did decades ago (Score 1) 84
1 - because someone I know told me about the shop
2 - because I walked down the high street and saw it. Of course window dressing is a form of advertising.
1 - because someone I know told me about the shop
2 - because I walked down the high street and saw it. Of course window dressing is a form of advertising.
I can't demonstrate it here because
But electricity demand for air conditioning will match sunlight pretty closely, so it will work for a sigificant chunk of the energy mix.
Try ish, which gives you Alpine Linux on an iPad.
As far as I can see, there is a build of gnucobol for it which you could install. I haven't tried it so I don't know if it works.
It isn't in the apk repository, so you would need to install it manually.
You can run Windows 95 in a Javascript/Webassembly emulator in Safari by visiting a webpage that has it.
Performace is OK, probably faster than a computer from that era, but not great. However trying to move the mouse on the touchscreen is not so good, even if you use a mouse with your iPad, because the Windows cursor moves at a different speed to the iPad cursor.
Uploading is copyright infringement which is illegal under civil law, not criminal law.
It becomes criminal if you sell the copies.
WeChat pay and AliPay, which work a bit like PayPal, are their defacto solutions.
I’m not really sure how a government run alternative would be any better, apart from not having the risk of those private companies going out of business.
I have a pi-hole that uses DoH for its upstream server. If Firefox were to talk to the DoH server directly, it would circumvent my pi-hole blocking.
Opt in is required for tracking.
DoH is not necessarily tracking.
Using your ISP's DNS server is not necessarily not tracking.
Google has tried several times to compete with FaceBook, and failed.
They are allowed to not supply a specific product if they don't want to, eg the cake with the picture of a prophet on it. That's different, it is about the product not the customer.
Even if Twitter were found to be biased against conservatives, he wouldn't have a case, as they are allowed to be.
What he is asking the court to do is violate Twitter's first amendment right not to be forced to carry speech they don't want to publish. In less democratic countries, companies are frequently forced to publish things praising the government. That is not permitted in the USA.
I'm pretty sure that everyone who hasn't been under a rock, or in prison, for the past 20 years, knows that email providers scan emails for spam and viruses.
Yes, even in remote African villages. They have email there too, generally via a cellphone connection.
This was a supply-chain attack, so phishing training won't help.
That was yesterday. A load of Iranian websites were blocked by the US government.
The reason why worry kills more people than work is that more people worry than work.