Comment Re:I have only... (Score 2) 72
OS/2 Warp 3.0 could technically run in I think 4MB, yes MB. "Run" being a euphemism for "boot and get to a desktop in less than 72 hours."
OS/2 Warp 3.0 could technically run in I think 4MB, yes MB. "Run" being a euphemism for "boot and get to a desktop in less than 72 hours."
... so their advertisements play smoother.
True digital sovereignty means having the resources in-country to manage your digital infrastructure. That means having the source and the skill-set to maintain it.
Not even the United States has that, not completely anyway.
But, like hand grenades and horseshoes, close actually counts.
>It's cheap and easy to audit OSS for malicious code with AI these days.
Economically feasible, perhaps. Cheap and easy? Perhaps for a sufficiently loose definition of "cheap and easy" but not by my dictionary.
If the AI model is trained on public-domain material or "commodity" material that doesn't contain real creative content along with creative content developed in-house or with the blessing/license from the creator/owner, that's fine.
But if it's importing creative and unique content from elsewhere without permission, that's a lawsuit waiting to happen. Probably lots of lawsuits.
Plus, a significant fraction of the game-buying public is looking to support creators financially, rather than just "buying a game."
Data wars YOU!
"Police officers in cities across the U.S. are quick to extol the virtues of [strike]real-time crime centers[/strike] [insert] panopticons[insert] as a game changer that helps them find missing children, monitor large events from the skies and scope out dangerous scenes before putting an officer in harm's way."
There, fixed that for you.
You know the video is going to be turned into a meme within minutes of it happening.
I predict that among the first memes will be Trump meme-ing it up by replacing the condemned man's face with that of Iranian leadership, saying "who wants to be next" or something like that.
... the Oscars not being shown live in theaters.
Rapidly iterating over other peoples math homework isn't impressive.
It may not be impressive, but it can be useful. If, by rapidly iterating over others' homework, you or your bot can prove X, then it can boost everyone's confidence of MY research that relies on X being true.
... until March 32nd.
If they cause fewer deaths than they prevent, then it's still a win, because though some people would die who otherwise would not have, MORE people would live who otherwise would not have.
This is basically what I said, but there are nuances. If a net of 100 lives are saved but there are a net of 100 more people who are put in a lifelong coma and have to be cared for round-the-clock in intensive care until they die of old age, and everything else is equal, I wouldn't count that as a clear-cut "win" or even a "win" at all. Depending on the net value you put on a life of someone living in a decades-long coma, you might count it as a win and that's fair. But I wouldn't.
we must make mistakes before we know how to mitigate damage
That's why you run pre-production-quality hardware/software in test environments, and you plan for failure even in production environments.
Who cares if it can be used to build bombs, nuclear and thermonuclear power are and natural so they must be good for you.
Save yourself! Reboot in 5 seconds!