Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
DEAL: For $25 - Add A Second Phone Number To Your Smartphone for life! Use promo code SLASHDOT25. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! ×

Comment Re: Liability (Score 1, Troll) 445

Libertarians believe that companies that oppress users will fail in the marketplace.

Can you show me a libertarian who believes that corporations should be able to show up with guns to enforce "intellectual property" like governments do?

Hint: libertarians believe in none of: corporations, intellectual property, or initiation of force. Nice strawman though.

Comment Re:Why is this news? (Score 1) 154

Isn't this obvious?

You knew about the interaction between the front and rear hippocampus and the prefrontal cortex? Heck, why did the researchers bother doing the fMRI study rather than posting an Ask Slashdot?

I presume here you're not simply reacting to the clickbait headline - that would be unkind.

Comment Re:Maps technology is lost... (Score 2) 154

apparently looking pretty is far more important than having accurate data.

yeah, most people believe that. People figure if they put very little effort into ease-of-use (aka aesthetics) they probably put very little effort into accuracy. It's not true, but humans are the desired userbase and humans use such heuristics.

Everybody has been telling OSM that for a decade but they refuse to accept that reality, so the userbase remains small. It's a shame to cede the territory to Google.

Comment Re:It's Double Bullshit (Score 3, Interesting) 151

I wonder how many young non-English speaking Asian hookers fall into that category?

Why wonder? Legalize it, have a $10 license, issue work visas and check their ID.

Boom, you've solved the trafficking problem. Only problem is the Puritans who will be offended by the "insult" to their religion (that other people don't believe in), but they should go move to a place with Sharia if they want to be coddled by religious laws -- it's far more important to rational people to end trafficking than to preventual consensual sex for money.

Comment Re:This is extortion (Score 5, Interesting) 226

Wish you critics would make up your fucking mind.

You expect the CIA to not have professional complainers on the Internet? Cute. Look above and you have a guy who admits he does work for the "Navy" calling Wikileaks extortionists already (that word does not mean what he thinks it means).

We can be quite sure Wikileaks isn't asking for anything for themselves for the disclosure (because they never have) - it seems like they must be asking for something for the users in return or they could just do a Project Zero type of disclosure.

MoFo obviously didn't have a problem with the terms, so it's not going to be something against user freedom (say what you want about Rust and WebExtensions, they get the freedom part mostly right). But MoFo doesn't have an ongoing private relationship with intelligence agencies, and that's what they claim the issue is about, so it passes the smell test. n.b. Wikileaks is apparently leveraging one disclosure for another disclosure.

Comment Re:Professionalize computer science (Score 2, Insightful) 84

Until there is liability for poor designs and implementation there will be changes to improve quality and security.

Show me the equations that show if a bridge will hold up. Fine, those are well-known.

Now show me the equations that prove that a computer system is secure, for a non-trivial algorithm, so that a Computer Science "Engineer" can place his professional stamp on one. And remember, nobody will buy Windows that takes thirty years to get out the door at six-thousand bucks a copy.

Really, though, do you even CS, bro? Besides the software-provability problem, a bridge engineer is not responsible for any shoddy work that is hidden from him by a lackluster construction crew (and no, inspections are not fool-proof if there is professional malpractice occurring).

You can't simply make a comparison between a static and a dynamic system and declare equivalene. That's as silly as Schnier thinking that regulators will save us from ourselves. He should look into real insurance, strict liability, and/or marketable torts if he wants a system that can actually provide better results.

Comment Re:Plenty of precedent! (Score 2) 101

Not just that:

"dumb and dangerous" and "unconscionably stupid.

Well, he's there in her courtroom.

There was nothing fantastic, fun or exhilarating about it...

That sounds like a normative claim. I betcha he had lots of fun and excitement.

There is no precedent for so foolish an escapade"...

Oh, c'mon - now she's just trying to damage Canada's hard-won reputation. They practically invented "here, hold my beer"! It's as if she doesn't know any actual Canadians.

Comment Re:expose them to man-in-the-middle attacks (Score 2) 99

My reaction to this story was "well, duh." Anyone who didn't already know this is someone who isn't familiar enough with the concepts involved.

Huh? There's no "concept involved" that leads to the inevitable conclusion that some HTTPS proxies won't do certificate authentication. It's an implementation error.

Of course increasing complexity will increase the programming error rate, but that's not at all specific to this vulnerability. And since the vendors have patched these flaws, they're not inherent to the concept of HTTPS interception.

Comment Re: I think that's bolocks! (Score 1) 124

Exactly this. Google seems to do a decent job of keeping spam out of my inbox.

You're arguing against a decentralized Internet because one example of a highly centralized Internet service has a competitive advantage, probably because there's no successful anti-spam cooperation protocol.

DCC/Razor/Pyzor do help, but somehow Google's spent a decade improving their detection AI and the open solutions have stalled. Our community seems to not chase diminishing returns, even when the 20% is ultimately more valuable than the 80%.

Slashdot Top Deals

Top Ten Things Overheard At The ANSI C Draft Committee Meetings: (7) Well, it's an excellent idea, but it would make the compilers too hard to write.

Working...