Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. ×

Comment Re:Flood defenses? (Score 3, Interesting) 135

And then what?

They buy a device that's horribly insecure, the manufacturer sends out one security update, then abandons it, and it becomes part of a botnet. And you fine the person who bought it?

Actually, you're right. That's a great idea, because it will kill the whole 'Internet of Things' idiocy overnight. No-one will risk attaching anything to their network if they can't verify it's secure.

Comment Re:Rest of the world chimes in. (Score 1) 187

Many people who hail the gold standard ignore a simple fact: A gold standard for coins means constant deflation, which is bad in most economic situation, because it gives incentives for hoarding money instead of spending it.


Dude, we've had constant deflation in electronics prices since... well, forever, in electronics terms. Deflation is the norm in a free market, as productivity increases lead to lower prices.

Only governments think it's a bad thing, because they can tax inflation, but can't tax deflation.

Comment Re:Why is this even an issue? (Score 3, Insightful) 358

SJWs are pushing these 'code of conduct' policies on open source projects so they can infiltrate and take over, just as they've done on everything else. This is why you never, ever, accept any of them into an open source project, and laugh when they suggest that you need a 'code of conduct'.

Of course, it doesn't really work with an open source license, since the coders they kick out of their own projects can just fork and start a new one. Except they'll presumably ensure that GPL4 has a section which prohibits cisgendered whitemales from using the code.

Comment Re:Well, at least someone is willing to say it! (Score 1) 572

Yeah, but Jordan's already implied that FreeBSD will be going down a very similar path....

To be fair, I don't think people are complaining about the idea of systemd--getting rid of clunky old init scripts is a good idea--they're complaining that the implementation of systemd seems to be Pulseaudio 2.0.

I mean, my first experience of systemd was when I tried to install CentOS 7, and systemd crashed during the install. Not really a way to give me warm fuzzies.

Comment Re:The message in question: (Score 2) 572

Systemd does make things easier for some people and some tasks, which is why it's been adopted.

Systemd is funded by Redhat, isn't it? How does it make server administration easier?

I've had to work with a Redhat 7 server at work, and all systemd does is force me to learn new ways to do the things I've been doing for years.

Comment Re:I think it's a good idea (Score 1) 674

The usual object to this idea is that no one will want to work, but I would imagine that a stipulation that you're required to do so many hours of community service every week if not working would probably help balance things out a little bit.

'Work or starve'?

Why should I have to work to get my 'basic income'? I have rights!

(And you have just reinvented the huge government bureaucracy you just said you were getting rid of)

Slashdot Top Deals

Pause for storage relocation.