I think you and I are in agreement.
In general I would assert that government regulation is absolutely the wrong solution.
This appears be no exception to that rule and driven by ulterior motives.
I am sure their is some incompetence on the law makers side, they do not understand how cloud computing works; but even if they did all they want is more power anyway.

According to https://4dayweek.io/countries it looks like the average work week is under 40 hours for most European countries.

Now sure you can stretch 32.5 hours out over 5 days working 6.5 hours a day, but I am assuming a minimum of 8 hour work days; so less than 40 hours is not filling 5 days.

My guess is that the US companies have data centers in Europe so an outage in the US would not affect Europe.

However I do not think that negates your point of being dependent on a foreign company or failing to have redundancy.
Your example of redundant Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) is a great example of redundancy benefiting everyone; I love having a GNSS chip that supports all three chips even if I am in the US.

Although cloud providers have always felt like they had pretty good interoperability and data portability to me; I just move my docker contain from AWS to Azure to Google Cloud to OVH; or have one on each cloud ready to go and one in my garage and my mom's basement just in case?

The issue is the services mentioned are centralized. My video streaming should be Bittorrent not Amazon or Netflix, my game server anyone can host not on Epic servers, and my communication pier-to-pier not all connected by a central host like Signal. Not sure why Docker made that list, just make a mirror of their repos and binaries? Really the list of services in the summary/article are kind of silly, most are not critical and the providers have a great incentive to make sure they are provided and redundant so not to lose customers.

Europe offers a progressive approach to work-life balance through widespread four-day work week initiatives and strict labor laws that make firing employees significantly harder than in the US. These rights prioritize job security and personal well-being over corporate flexibility. Who would have thought it had a side effect of being less productive?

Yeah the kid with no limit has their smartphone in their hand and is using it.

You should talk to someone about your violent fantasies before you hurt someone.

No, this will not be a Satanic Ozzy Dungeons and Dragon mistake, nor a big tobacoo like issue; this is like video games in the 90s!
Video gaming may be associated with better cognitive performance in children [https://www.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/video-gaming-may-be-associated-better-cognitive-performance-children]
The children denied smart phones will be stupid like the ones that did not play video games.

Huh, made me think about a strait in California with an iconic bridge over it.
But you know maybe there is something wrong with me?

Eh, I am no Apple fan, nor a Steve Jobs fan, but the little I know does not support the assertion that Woz made Jobs; nor that Jobs was irrelevant without Woz.

Woz left Apple because Jobs' Macintosh was getting all the attention.
Woz did not go with Jobs to create NEXT, which lead Jobs back to his throne at Apple.

While Jobs created the next generation of computing that is the foundation to Apple today, Woz made the first universal television remote.

Now I would probably pick hanging out with Woz nine time out of ten over Jobs, and not just because Jobs is a rotting corpse and also dead.
Because yeah, Jobs was at his core it seems a "business man", but I am comfortable in asserting his vision was far more revolutionary than Woz's evolutionary engineering.

Or in short, Jobs would have found another Woz to use; Woz was lucky or cursed to have been found by Jobs.

How about a projector aimed right into them that plays a fake video feed. You would only have to corrupt a little of the data to make it not trust worthy.

Yeah, I imagine that if we take away the distinctive license plate from every vehicle that it would make a simple camera system less effective at tracking individuals.
But then to be truly effective we would all need to drive 2008 Blue Honda Civics, where the same baseball cap and sunglasses as well.
Even then I imagine there are a dozen pieces of electronics in a vehicle at any time screaming to the surroundings their unique id that could be tracked.
Laws are to reactive for me, I would like something more proactive; making it illegal to shoot me is nice and all but I would rather have the power to avoid getting shot in the first place.
The main issue with license plates is that we are forced to post something on our vehicle that uniquely identifies us to the world.

How about this: we all slap a handful of eInk bumper stickers with numbers and letters changing on them on our cars to confuse the cameras. Your default license plate is in place, but the eInk display might confuse cameras not expecting other alphanumeric sources.

Yes it is a plate flipper, but a government approved plate flipper.

There is a database that matches the displayed license plate and date time to a vehicle.
However when this request is made the owner of the vehicle is notified and the person responsible for the request is logged.
So license plates can still serve their intended purpose for law enforcement of identifying a vehicle, however not without accountability.
It also removes private parties from tying a license plate to a vehicle, making the data their readers collect incomplete without access to the database.

I agree, however I do not have hope we can toss out license plates.
We need to make it more difficult, if not impossible for tracking to be automated by private entities.
Push the linking of license plate to owner as far from federal government and as close to local governance as possible.
And have strong transparency to who is accessing the information.
My proposal is the "Privacy Plate": https://invalidinventions.com/...

https://invalidinventions.com/...

The answer was of course in the summary.

Unless your home is floating on the node in the ocean the power has to be transmitted back to your land-based home.
The transmission is the impractical part that this solution resolves by using the power at the node itself.

No I am not new here, I just enjoy reading the summaries.

Legal violation is not morally superior to moral violation. That is courthouse idolatry.

“Illegal” only means someone with power wrote it down and attached punishment. It does not mean wrong. “Legal” only means the machine currently permits it. It does not mean good.

History is a graveyard of legal atrocities: slavery, the Fugitive Slave Act, Jim Crow, bans on interracial marriage, criminalized homosexuality, forced sterilization, Japanese-American internment, apartheid. All legal. All vile.

So when someone treats “Amazon asked for something illegal” as automatically worse than “Nintendo uses legal power immorally,” they are confusing obedience with ethics.