Vivendi Takes Over Radionomy, Winamp Relaunch Now Possible (windowsreport.com) 117
SmartAboutThings writes: Winamp could once again be brought back to life after Vivendi Group took over the majority stake in Radionomy, the previous owner of the app who purchased it from AOL in early 2014. AOL originally planned to discontinue both Winamp and Shoutcast, but instead the company decided to sell the software to Belgian online radio service, Radionomy. The new owners initially promised that they'll keep Winamp alive, but no updates have been released since the takeover, which made most people think that Winamp era has ended for good. Vivendi Group, which owns or is involved in famous companies such as Dailymotion, Ubisoft, and Deezer, could help relaunch Winamp, although the press release announcing the acquisition offers no suggestion in this regard. The company, however, does mention Winamp and Shoutcast as two of the most important assets that will join its portfolio following the takeover.
Winamp (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
I'm a long time broadcast DJ, and I still use Winamp at home to preview music, and to play my radio shows (occasionally VLC).
I haven't found anything else that has the feature set that Winamp does for my application.
I've tried every player that I come across since Winamp "died", Win and Linux based anyhow (that Apple stuff is poison), and Winamp still does it all or me.
Sorry I couldn't log-in, hard drive crashed 10 years ago with my /. user ID password, I was in the 42,000 range, dammit (no neck beard here,
Re: Winamp (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I switched from Winamp to MusicBee. It handles my large music collection better than Winamp did (no sitting there for 15 mins while Winamp chews through the music library) and it also supports a single click to go from the library to the playlist.
The only downside is that the search in the now playing list is iffy and the now playing list can only sort by artist, OR title, not by artist AND title (from what I have found so far).
Sync is comparable (I am syncing to 1st gen iPod shuffle and a couple of flash d
Re: (Score:2)
Also, MusicBee lets me do bulk editing of ID3 tags (ie: I can grab a bunch of songs with the artist's name spelled 5 different ways and correct them to all be the same, or add the album tag to the while album at once).
Aaron Z
Re: (Score:2)
Love that intro. Its one of those things that burn into you mind for even and comes up when you think of the product. Like when SG1 was on and they would play a modem sound when the show started.
Re: (Score:2)
When it was on tv here right before it would play they would show the sfx of travelling through the stargate with a dial up modem sound during it. They had that for years.
Re: (Score:2)
This was in the Vancouver BC area (was Rogers Cable then Shaw). It was like that from like that from 1999+ I've been trying to find a video of it but can't seem to find one. That sound is burnt into my head now lol every time I watch SG1
Re: (Score:2)
Ak ok maybe it was at the end like you said it was many years.
Re: (Score:1)
Funny, yeah
BTW, Isn't Vivendi the corporation who ended up with mp3.com's decaying corpse propped up as their music store's url
The primary reason that I ever installed winamp was to listen to the endless stream of decent, original, unsullied by corporate money mongering music produced by the likes of 'The Laziest Men on Mars'.
mp3.com rocked because it was not controlled by suits trying to wring every penny of profit from every song, winamp rocked because it gave you a customizable means to access mp3.com
The
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It's on GOG.com as well. I think they just released a graphically enhanced version of it, even, though it's of course more expensive. I did love that game. Like Civilization, but in a fantasy setting. It's been a while, so I'm about due for a replay.
Re: (Score:2)
Could you point me at some kind of good strategy guide? I spent a year trying to get into HOMM3 Complete, but I couldn't nail down how to move my heroes effectively. I always wound up overextending my heroes and getting picked off, or moved far too slowly and got stomped mid-game. The rest of the game makes sense but I suck at that part. I'd really like to get into it, but it's the strategy game I'm the worst at and I'm not sure that just practice will help.
Re: (Score:2)
Mature Product (Score:5, Insightful)
Honestly, what more does Winamp need? For what most people who still use it want to do with it, it works just fine. Vivendi being involved in it means it'll probably promptly be ruined and made into some type of iTunes clone with a metric shit-ton of bloat and do half-a-million things in a mediocre fashion. As for Shoutcast, it also does what it's supposed to do: stream audio.
The fact that a company owned the product and was doing nothing in particular with it was, to me, a good thing.
Re: (Score:2)
I use precisely that version myself. I believe that's the last version that allowed output to WAV file as part of the base package.
Re: (Score:2)
5.x had the WAV file output included in the base package as well. I've been using 5.63 on a daily basis for years and it's had that feature...
Re: (Score:2)
Oh nice. I didn't bother with 5.x because I have some nice plugins for 2.x so I just never made the jump after I uninstalled 3.
Re: (Score:2)
What I came here to say. 2.81 was everything I wanted out of a media player. 3.x was crap, everyone agrees upon that. 5.xx was an attempt to be 2+3, and it did fix most the glaring issues with 3, but was never compelling to much of anyone as end-game 2.x had already sealed the deal.
Re: (Score:1)
One doesn't have to install a new version. I sometimes think that not enough people consider that newer versions aren't necessarily better. Although sometimes it's rather obvious, uTorrent for example.
Re: (Score:2)
uTorrent is a server, running an old version of a server is a fast way to get pawned by a worm without any interaction required.
Re: (Score:2)
Honestly, what more does Winamp need?
More input plugins, always more input plugins. I don't think anything precludes people writing those now, but more interest would probably lead to more plugins.
Re: (Score:1)
What could it need?
Fixes for POODLE, HeartBleed, RSA-CRT key leaks, an update to support Windows 10, a port to Linux, a port to Android, a web site that works with IE10, a port to iOS, support for the Intel SSSE4.2 instructions on Intel, support for Intel's new AES-NI instructions, and any security vulnerabilities in the core software itself to be repaired.
Many of the above may be automatically sucked in with a recompile if you update to newer support libraries.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Fixing the video support would be nice. Winamp is still my preferred video player because it's about the only video player I've found with a good playlist editor (about the only other I've found is Zoomplayer). But the video player itself is a bit quirky. I can fix a lot of it by disabling the Winamp built-in support for things like MKV and Flash video and letting Winamp fall back on DirectShow, but it will still randomly choke on some files for no apparent reason.
Ummmm.....so? (Score:1)
This is about as relevant as someone resurrecting Trumpet Winsock. Sure, Winamp was great in its time, but there are so many other options now that are as good or better that it would just get lost in the shuffle.
Re: (Score:3)
Ohhh man. That brings back fond memories of MUSHing and painful memories of Trumpet Telnet silently hanging if new text came in while you had a selection highlighted.
Strange bedfellows (Score:3)
Vivendi also acquired UMG and most of EMI over the last decade or so.
Winamp, EMI and Universal Music Group under one roof... how times have changed.
Shoutcast is more important. (Score:3, Interesting)
I strongly believe that Shoutcast is the more important of the two applications here, and likely the reason for the acquisition. There are approximately a zillion interchangeable client players / music library managers, but Shoutcast and other compatible programs like icecast are dominant in the indie-scale internet radio space. There are tons of clients (one open source example - Butt) that can broadcast using the original Soundcast system. I liked Winamp long back in the day, but I do think Shoutcast is the more important news here.
I have experience: I co-founded http://houseofsound.org - and they are still using Icecast to broadcast their streams.
iTunes blows chunks (Score:2)
I would leave iTunes in a short minute if WinAmp provided syncing capabilities to my iPhone and iPad, without all that bullshit sales and marketing gimmickry.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
It works. I bought a used iPod years ago and didn't want to deal with iTunes. I've been using that plugin for years without any problems.
Re: (Score:1)
Whatever happened to shoutcast? And icecast? (Score:2)
I remember in 1997-98 or so, shoutcast + winamp was the latest greatest thing. Stream from your own connection! Have your own radio station! I did it, too. I had a reasonably popular shoutcast station that had around 20 people connected at any one time. Then, there was icecast, which was the open source version. What happened with that?
I just remember that my 20 users was enough to keep me high enough in the standings on the shoutcast.com web page, but what happened was these losers started creating t
Time to expand your narrow worldview. (Score:1)
Czech? Brazil? It seems you were the foreigner.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
You can't flex enough to realise the thousands of people listening to those streams are not listening to a foreign language.
Re: (Score:1)
Most went to Justin.tv and evolved into TWITCH.TV. Totalbiscuit started on shoutcast.
Re: (Score:2)
I still run a icecast station. It's listed by Tune-in and many android radio apps have it listed. Dude Suit Radio
I quit doing anything the the website as I had no ideas and blog was boring. But I keep the radio stream up. I wrote the script that DJ's it in perl, no ads on the stream.
been running several years
So what's the alternative? (Score:2)
So as someone who still uses WinAmp, what are those alternatives and how are they better?
I still use winamp because it's simple and efficient at what i want it to do. It works with the library of mp3 files i have (supposedly it also handles flac, but i my ears aren't good enough to require using up that much drive space) without requiring me to con
Re: (Score:2)
Seconded. Foobar2000 is an amazing player. Very powerful, fast and versatile.
It is especially great if you like customizing your interface in a functional fashion (versus a visual one).
Re: (Score:2)
i switched because around 2004-2005 winamp was beginning to be overwhelmed by my music collection, both in delays and with the UI being too hard to manage.
also tha "add to playback queue allows up to 64 queued plays without altering or creating playlists, and as playback proceeds from the last entry it can be used to temporarilly override order in one or more playlists or to create progressions between playlists, and it can have items right off the
Re: (Score:1)
I've been using WinAmp since 1999ish and have yet had any issues with it (even on my daily icecast radio stream playlist of just under 38,000 entries) it just works and unlike many newer media players, I can select the output device I want.
I really hope this sale doesn't ruin what's left of WinAmp. It would a
Re: (Score:2)
I'm joining with the crowd recommending Foobar2000; I got into it because I wanted something for my Linux box, and when WinAmp went down I switched entirely.
For video on Windows, though, try Media Player Classic--lightweight, and like Foobar2000 is quite portable though unlike Foobar2k no special installation is necessary. (I've run it on a system with a good codec collection installed--I use CCCP, and am hoping to find a Linux equivalent of it--with just the program file dropped into a folder.)
Still Rocking Winamp Daily Since 1997 (Score:1)
Winamp has taken me through Junior High, High School, College, and Beyond. I've seen countless media players come and go, but all I need is trusty Winamp with my personally-edited Receiver skin (original artist Timo Henke, year 2001). Sure the new programs do all this fancy stuff, but all I need is a nice simple player for my tunes with convenient Windows Explorer folder integration. Hard to believe it's been 18 years of near-daily usage. Keep on rockin' with Winamp in the Geek world!
Still use Winamp (Score:1)
I listen to pre-recorded radio shows and I like the fact that I can dock Winamp at the top of the screen with hiding it from view until the mouse comes close to the top of the screen. Can Foobar 2000 do that?
I like Audacious Media Player & Clementine (Score:1)
http://audacious-media-player.... [audacious-...player.org]
"Audacious runs on Linux, on BSD derivatives, and on Microsoft Windows."
"Audacious is an open source audio player. A descendant of XMMS, Audacious plays your music how you want it, without stealing away your computerâ(TM)s resources from other tasks. Drag and drop folders and individual song files, search for artists and albums in your entire music library, or create and edit your own custom playlists. Listen to CDâ(TM)s or stream music from the Internet. Tweak the
Not caring that much about Winamp, but... (Score:3)
I am a little concerned about the takeover of Radionomy. That's my main source of music on the intertubes and I'm hoping Vivendi doesn't decide that changes need to be made and eff that up.
It be nice for an upgrade (Score:1)
But I am really interested to see how it will change if it does. I mean, a lot of the passion of Winamp development died out in 2004 when Justin Frankel, the creator left. I am not saying that the team after him hasn't done a good job maintaining it and adding upgrades, but it seems lik
Since they did such a fine job... (Score:2)
*starts archiving all the winamp content he can.*
Winamp's already said it'd take years to return (Score:1)
DEADBEEF for Linux (Score:2)
--If you like WinAmp on Windows, try the DEADBEEF player for Linux -- similar interface and features; comes with a large multi-band Equalizer, and plays .ogg files and .mod(.it, .s3m, .xm, etc) files out of the box.
http://deadbeef.sourceforge.ne... [sourceforge.net]
Re: (Score:2)
So what? WinAmp was great at the dawn of the MP3 era, but it's caveman primitive by today's standards.
Reviving WinAmp at this late stage is completely pointless, in my mind.
So it just will not be right until it has a new flat interface design? I think you need to read the UI/UIX thread. http://news.slashdot.org/story... [slashdot.org]
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
I guess it does demonstrate the enduring power of a marque though. Sure, WinAmp hasn't been relevant for ages, but people still remember it. I remember even making a skin for the music player I used on my PocketPC PDA (gsplayer I think it was) to make it look like WinAmp, mustv'e had way too much time on my hands.
Sure, it's hard to see how WinAmp could be brought back to prominence. Certainly not in the same form as it was; if you want that, just download the old versions. But it's not impossible; I can't s
Re: (Score:2)
Winamp remained relevant throughout the ages. Issue companies and shills take with it is that it's not monetizeable, simply because it's a perfectly working product that doesn't need any major updates and isn't dependent on developer's servers.
It just works on user's computer, and remains among the best if not the best audio player on windows to date.
Re: (Score:3)
It just works on user's computer, and remains among the best if not the best audio player on windows to date.
I'm using vlc to play music now. It plays everything that I want to play and then some. Very rarely but still occasionally I run into something that winamp won't play.
Re: (Score:2)
Dude! Foobar2000 for music! Best damn music player in existence (for Windows).
Re: (Score:1)
This: http://www.foobar2000.org/
Mod parent up. I loved Winamp, but ditched it for foobar2000 when it started becoming too much like Windows Media Player. foobar2000 Made by a guy who worked on Winamp stuff for a bit.
"foobar2000 is a freeware audio player for Windows developed by Piotr Pawlowski, a former freelance contractor for Nullsoft. It is known for its highly modular design, breadth of features, and extensive user flexibility in configuration. For example, the user-interface is completely customizable
Re: (Score:2)
I tried VLC for my mp3s awhile back (I still use it for videos, of course). I could never figure out why, but it always pinned my CPU, even if I turned visualizations off.
Switched to foobar after that, but I still miss WinAmp's simplicity.
Re: (Score:2)
That's like using a truck for daily commute. Uncomfortable, dysfunctional and way too costly.
If you need extra features in addition to playback, you use foobar2000. If you just want playback, you use winamp.
Re: So What? (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
That's like using a truck for daily commute. Uncomfortable, dysfunctional and way too costly.
You haven't driven a modern truck, have you? They drive like a car, and they've got very comfortable seats. The only problem is the mileage. Thing is, if we may shift out of that metaphor, my low-end machine is a septa-core with 8GB of RAM. VLC is not an undue burden. I have it installed already. I like the interface fine. So just like someone who already owns a nice truck and then gets a job a ways away, I'm going to use what I've got and what I already use rather than install another piece of software and
Re: (Score:2)
That's another beauty of winamp. It just works. It needs no updates. At all.
Most people clearly have forgotten what it's like, to have piece of software that is actually functionally finished and works just fine.
Re: (Score:2)
I have a basic media player using fmod that I designed but don't share. I've been using it for over a decade because I didn't like windows media player or winamp and there were really no other competition at the time.