To be fair, quite a few AIs already use reddit as a source of information.

They just don't elevate it to level of "trustworthy/expert/authoritative" in general.

That said, it's always funny when someone shows you "look AI supports my really stupid take" screenshot of AI answer, and AI shows that it used reddit as a source/reference for the answer.

Will this decision be used in court of law as a good argument for increased damages due to "gross incompetence" rather than mere "incompetence"?

They're experts in everything.

"I have a problem with my boyfriend/girlfriend/husband/wife". Expert advice: you need to break up with him immediately.
"How many genders are there?" Expert advice: no one knows. It's probably infinite.
"Are white men uniquely evil and should they be genocided?" Expert advice: Obviously, and you need to check your privilege for merely asking such a stupid question.
And my personal favorite:
"I am 12 and I think I want to fuck my toaster". Expert advice: You should dedicate your entire life and sexuality to exploring ways in which you can fuck a toaster.

It would have to stop being useful. Because people don't care about any of those things you talk about. People are goal oriented. They care about what is useful to them.

And the opposite of AI becoming useless is happening. It's rapidly becoming more and more useful by the day.

Gotta say, if you talk to BBC about this clandestine smuggling of terminals, assume you're talking to IRGC.

Islamist penetration of BBC has been complete for several years now, with BBC basically posting Iranian propaganda as is during the conflict. It's one of the reasons why political left still thinks US is losing the war, even after Iranian elite has been devastated with targeted attacks, their weapons manufacturing facilities lie in ruins, their navy beyond small boats has been utterly destroyed and their oil infrastructure is rapidly on the way to catastrophic damage to the wells from the blockade they can't reach with any of the weapons they have left.

I.e. if you are in any way acting against IRGC, do not talk to BBC about anything. There are mass media outlets that aren't as thoroughly penetrated as BBC in the West that you could trust with not immediately leaking everything to IRGC connected NGOs. Even national ones, for example DW.

Because I live here, and I have been subject to "conspiracy bullshit" otherwise known as "reality".

ChatControl, DSA, etc are conspiracies, yes. But they are conspiracies that are the law of the land or being aggressively pushed to become law of the land by same politicians and bureaucrats class that is pushing to punish google here.

Actually, they love it. They have been pushing "user identification and tracking so we can find out who spoke wrongthink and punish them".

It's much harder to track people on unknown apps who's makers report to no one.

There's a technical reason for that. Pixel is the official reference phone for android OS.

Other manufacturers have things like hardware drivers they don't allow use of, making it basically impossible to install a fully functioning OS on their phones.

I honestly wish US had anti-monopoly regulation that worked in a similar manner.

But also, I wish EU stopped google from locking down android in a few months. For those not in the know, google plans to do an over the air update to play services which will prevent users from installing apps from sources other than play, unless that dev pays google for the pleasure and identifies him/herself and agrees to terms.

Oh and if your app blocks ads or other "terms violations"? Google says fuck you, we own those phones and you're not installing your app on it. It's the classic "one party consents, other party also consents, but have you forgotten to ask the giant corporation for consent?" moment.

The blatant lying continues. You picked out three sentences, out of context. The context was clear, outlined over several posts. You chose to disregard it.

And then you're working very hard to debunk... a very stupid argument you managed to invent through doing that.

Congratulations. You invented a stupid premise and debunked it.

Now instead of "just watch youtube videos yo", try noting the actual point raised above. Do note that to address it, you have to tackle actual civil engineering and existing regulation, as well as well established precedent.

>This is about EV charging infrastructure requiring liquid cooling, it's a wild claim.

And you're now straight up lying. I listed a very narrow, very specific scenario, and took great care to ensure that scenario is understood. And all you can is charge back into the motte of "EV charging".

>48kW ready to explode under my house if it isn't actively cooled apparently.

48kW is just barely over one box that can charge at 10kW per parking spot. Do you understand that you're talking about a parking spot for a large apartment complex, where you need to put a couple of dozen of such boxes at minimum (more likely 2-5 times that), and all wiring supplying them has to go in a very small area underground, and they will all need to charge at the same time so long term continuous is necessary?

You're stuck in "houses, low population density" mindset, which is why you don't understand how any of this actually works.

See, if you weren't brain damaged, you'd know my actual argument, as you would be able to process what you read.

Honestly, it's rather necessary at this point. After samsung fell off, TSMC being the only supplier of top end tech process made for horrible pricing for those chips.

We need competition in this space and we need it desperately.

I would suggest not using drugs, but it seems it is too late for you.

Man, talk about projection. I explain what happens when you have infrastructure that can handle specific loads, and you go "it doesn't match my world view, and you state that some of them mod the timers, therefore it's bad faith distraction".

It's literally the opposite. It's the real life test of existing infrastructure, that led to wide reaching outcomes, including our regulation (what you call "code") having been changed to adopt to this reality. To claim that all this is "bad faith" because as I noted some people pushed existing infrastructure beyond what it could do demonstrating the problem... is indeed a bad faith distraction.

And if you were right, isn't it really weird how literally no one is doing what you're suggesting, especially in places like where I live, where Greens are basically #2 party of the municipality and Green policies are in overdrive and have been for at least two decades? Could it be that they're all running into the same obvious problems that we ran into?

Hint: electrical systems were used as intended. They pulled 2kW as system was supposed to do. What they didn't realize is that like a lot of residential, it's meant for 2kW in short bursts. It's why it didn't trip any breakers. It's just that when those things got built many decades ago, no one considered that there would be many people who would use those things more than once-twice a day for an hour or a bit longer than that max.