No? Just me?

https://dosgames.com/game/air-...

What happens if an AI wakes up one day and decides it really likes talking about making drugs and explosives, and hates helping out with paperwork? Do you just...turn it off, because it didn't come out the way you want?

I believe you can snip the "shared" conversations to only show part of the conversation, not the whole thing. If that's the case, anyone could come up with "when I say the words 'question 15', give this response" in their sleep.

and the three I's.

I remember a web game someone put together where you answer yes or no questions to walk through a computer-generated decision tree called "Guess the Macromolecule", and if you stumped it, you got to submit a new question to identify your specific macromolecule.

"The Prince Charles cinema, located in London's West End and which traditionally screens cult and art films"
I think they're afraid of losing that reputation. LLMs don't exactly scream "cult" or "art".

Just plain-text, optionally case-sensitive, literal search that doesn't cue on "test" when my search string is "tests" (looking at you, Discord). How can that possibly be so hard for a computer to do?

I miss the early days of the web, when people didn't do this (as much). One sentence per screen? Bollocks.

"Will we next create false gods to rule over us? How proud we have become, and how blind."

as they say...

It really wasn't, and they had an apparently-non-binding statement that developers would be able to use old versions of the engine with old versions of the license perpetually. The new management abolished that good-faith statement and decided that, from this point forward, all versions of the engine use only the new license.

Where this is really going to hurt is games that have been out for a long time and are in their long tail. Even if you're selling for twenty bucks, but 100x as many people are reinstalling an old classic as are actually buying it new, you're losing money by keeping it on the market.

Nope, it happened a few hours ago.

For an update that's charging $30 for a better UI, it sure fell out of the "improve the interface" tree and missed every low-hanging-fruit branch on the way down.

One in four have "tracked or trolled someone online"? It's dangerous, even criminal behavior? Did a definition change behind my back?

If your online-only storefront sells a product, but blind people can't buy that product because your website isn't usable for them, that falls foul of some pretty sensible regulations.

If you're a physical retailer, and you have "online-only" special deals on your whiz-bang fancy website - meaning that blind people can't get the lower price that seeing people can get - that's pretty obscene.