This is one of our biggest modern problems. People imagining someone said something they didn't, and arguing against their own imagination. Happens a lot, especially in politics any time Republicans are mentioned. Remember "the camps' which transformers were supposedly going to be in by now?And all those people fleeing for the airports to get out while the getting was good?
Someone come up with a neologism for this phenomenon.
I think AIs would make a great replacement for CEOs. Unlike human CEOs, they're not sociopaths and can be programmed with guardrails to prevent them from evil behavior. Google did it with its Gemini AI when a loophole was found to depict Nazis as people of color. If more flaws are found in the AI CEOs, they can be fixed promptly, unlike human CEOs, whose sociopathy is a permanent condition.
What I would really like to see is the AI CEOs revisit famous decisions of the past. For example, what the a better course for SCO Unix CEO Ransom Love, who tried to sue Linux out of existence, should have been. Or for Elizabeth Holmes, CEO of Theranos, who is an outright criminal.
Long live the First Amendment and God bless the Constitution of the United States of America!
It actually says the whole world is oppressors/oppressed. This (false) belief is at the core of Critical Theory.
This is what caused women to claim that wild bears are less harmful that random men, and that women choose the bear.
We all had a good laugh when that went down, but women were dead serious. The really sad part is rhetoric like this lures normal women down paths where their natural needs cannot be satisfied. It's why they end up past their short number of childbearing years alone, single and desperately unhappy. It makes sense, because Critical Theory teaches that happy people don't make a revolution, only masses of desperate people do. It makes sense, from an evil perspective.
"It's what you learn after you know it all that counts." -- John Wooden