Slashdot Log In
Shaolin Monks May Sue Over Tale of Defeat by Ninja
Posted by
Zonk
on Sat Sep 01, 2007 04:22 AM
from the bit-of-a-switch-up-from-the-usual dept.
from the bit-of-a-switch-up-from-the-usual dept.
Socguy writes "A unique story on the CBC website details an even more unusual conflict. A Chinese Shaolin temple has demanded an apology from 'an Internet user who claimed a Japanese ninja beat its kung fu-practicing monks in a showdown.' A letter from the members of the temple, posted on the Internet on Thursday, denied the fight ever took place and called on the person who posted the claim under the name "Five minutes every day" to apologize to the temple's martial arts masters. Monks from the temple, which is located in the Songshan Mountain region of the Henan province, said they will consider legal action if he or she doesn't make a public apology."
Related Stories
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Shaolin Monks May Sue Over Tale of Defeat by Ninja
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 284 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Someone (Score:5, Funny)
Someone just won at Internet trolling.
Hear that, Slashdot trolls? When you get written up by Reuters, that's when you've arrived.
Re:Someone (Score:5, Funny)
The case (Score:5, Funny)
(http://finchworld.hopto.org/)
"I'm sorry but theres only one possible answer to all this"
Ninjas descend from ceiling and take a stance.
"Round one! FIGHT!"
[Much later]
And then, just as it seemed the fighting would come to a conclusion, a ship flying a skull and cross bones moored at the local pier...
In the words of Judge Kozinski... (Score:4, Funny)
"The parties are advised to chill."
On the other hand, Buddhist monks spend a decent amount of their studies on the subject of humor, so maybe this is simply the single greatest cultural practical joke ever perpetrated...a Zen masterpiece.
Wouldn't happen that way (Score:4, Interesting)
What happened with a Ninja, you would simply be found dead the next morning. Or perhaps never found. That was a successful Ninja. I train in a Japanese system based on fighting styles used in the 15th and 16th century and just for fun, we'll try a few simple techniques that are/were attributed to Ninjas. Now I suspect there really were never Ninjas, but I'll play along for 2 hours to have some fun.
Typical is that as you walk by somebody (opposite way), if you grab their arm and yank straight down, they will fall. It seems like it shouldn't work, but it does. And it only works if the person doesn't expect it. If you fall backwards quickly like that, you'll be stunned for a second or two. If the attacker has a knife, you could be dead within seconds. That's (to me) the essence of Ninja stuff. Quiet, and striking when your guard is down, and then they're gone.
Again, I think it's a lot of B.S. but I think the Ninja myth is to Japan what the Cowboy myth is to the U.S. or what the King Arthur myth is to England.
Re:Wouldn't happen that way (Score:5, Interesting)
And just like the cowboy myth, and probably Arthurian legend, there is some historical basis for the ninja legend as well. I have studied (in an informal manner) feudal Japanese samurai culture, and run across some material related to ninja. Ninja basically began as traditional samurai that operated outside the code of Bushido in order to defeat their enemy. One almost certainly apocryphal story I ran across related the origin of "ninja" as follows:
It was considered a great honor for a samurai in an army attacking a city to be the first one across the city walls. In order to be able to claim the honor of being the first across the walls when battle began, a couple of bright lads got the idea to sneak into the city the night before! It became a short step from there to sneaking inside a city before battle to plant units that would spring up behind a city's defenses, assassinate enemy leaders before battle began, etc. Eventually, a few groups or even clans became willing to hire themselves out to perform such "dishonorable" actions, which naturally became more sophisticated as the "ninjas" gained experience in this type of warfare. But just like any other criminal organization, they didn't exactly advertise; this secrecy is probably what began the myth of the ninja, which was then exaggerated by the clans themselves as a form of PR. But I don't think there is any real consensus on the origin, or even exact role, of the ninja in Japanese society. The very nature of the myth itself makes it difficult to disprove. "The fact that you know nothing about this secret society of invisible assassins merely proves how good they really were!"
In addition... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:In addition... (Score:5, Funny)
Allesged Ninja has started training to master the One-point forearm indestructible defensive shield of Heavenly protection technique to counter the five-point palm exploding heart technique attack!
Pirates have issued an official statement claiming "they will still manage to get both of the other parties, although they are not sure about the role of monks in the conflict! Arrrrr!"
Re:In addition... (Score:5, Funny)
Shaolin monks don't know the five point palm exploding heart technique, which is why Pai Mei was able to use it to massacre a Shaolin temple. Only Pai Mei knows the technique and he teaches it to no one. That is, except...
Better way to get the apology... (Score:2)
Re:Better way to get the apology... (Score:4, Funny)
Rest assured that if the internet posting was about a *LAWYER* singlehandedly defeating and laying waste to all of the shaolin temple, there would be no refutal at all!
A lawyer would simply get end up showing prior art and a patent-in-progress filed on all of their techniques and get an injunction against the shaolin monks practicing their kung-fu!
Fear the deadly powers of a *LAWYER*!!!
Re:Better way to get the apology... (Score:4, Funny)
Fear the monkeys!
Re:Better way to get the apology... (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.slashdot.org/)
Remember:
FACT - laywers are mammals
FACT - laywers totally flip out all the time
Uhh (Score:1)
(http://slashdot.org/~alzoron | Last Journal: Monday June 02 2003, @11:09PM)
The Year is 2007 (Score:5, Insightful)
(Last Journal: Friday October 19, @12:23PM)
Re:The Year is 2007 (Score:5, Funny)
(http://erikmartin.com/)
Re:The Year is 2007 (Score:4, Funny)
Of course it's untrue. (Score:5, Funny)
This is just a cover story to draw attention away from the fact that several Shaolin Temples, were in fact, recently plundered by pirates.
Pirates rule.
Re:Of course it's untrue. (Score:5, Funny)
Pirates (Score:4, Funny)
just a warning to others (Score:5, Funny)
Next time... (Score:5, Funny)
(http://tc.dk/ | Last Journal: Friday August 27 2004, @01:57AM)
2. Post on YouTube
3. Have Large TV network steal it
4. Post that on YouTube
5. Get sued by TV network
6. Now you are a Pirate and can surely kick Ninja ass...
7. Profit (if you win the lawsuit).
There's no way ... (Score:1)
I *so* have this one: (Score:4, Funny)
(http://www.emacswiki...iki/ChristopherSmith | Last Journal: Wednesday November 07, @07:35AM)
Re:I *so* have this one: (Score:5, Funny)
The beast at Tenagra.
Stallman, with the hippy hair and the odor at Tenagra.
The Beast and Ballmer and Stallman at Tenagra.
Ballmer in the stomach.
The Beast and Stallman on the Ocean.
Re:I *so* have this one: (Score:5, Funny)
Lots of BS in the martial arts world (Score:1, Insightful)
So, the question of the moment; could a single ninja beat a group of monks. It could happen. It depends on the ninja and the monks. Bear in mind though that the ninja are Japanese and the monks are Chinese so there's not a lot of opportunity for the match to happen.
What makes them look like bigger idiots? (Score:2)
(http://theboolean.blogspot.com/)
2. Suing someone for posting on the internet
Nuff said!
Some facts about Ninjas (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.o2sd.com/ | Last Journal: Thursday June 14, @02:41AM)
Facts:
1. Ninjas are mammals.
2. Ninjas fight ALL the time.
3. The purpose of the ninja is to flip out and kill people.
Especially note 3 above. The Ninjas probably just went to the Shaolin Temple to talk about tea n shit, and then they just totally flipped out and killed all the monks.
Anyway, here is some more things about Ninjas.
Q: Why is everyone so obsessed about ninjas?
A: Ninjas are the ultimate paradox. On the one hand they don't give a crap, but on the other hand, ninjas are very careful and precise.
Q: I heard that ninjas are always cruel or mean. What's their problem?
A: Whoever told you that is a total liar. Just like other mammals, ninjas can be mean OR totally awesome.
Q: What do ninjas do when they're not cutting off heads or flipping out?
A: Most of their free time is spent flying, but sometime they stab. (Ask Mark if you don't believe me.)
I'd hate to be "Five Minutes a Day" (Score:5, Funny)
why not ask a ninja? (Score:2, Funny)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ehQo7s_02sc [youtube.com]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OEmss2lg-ug [youtube.com]
The True Sequence of Events (Score:1)
2. Bill or Jason beats a Ninjutsu master
3. Human Weapon then does the Kung Fu episode.
4. Jason beats the Kung Fu master.
5. ?
6. Profiteering by the Pirates
7. Full cycle of Ninja/Shaolin Monk/Pirate debate is complete.
Selex
Not invincible (Score:2)
(http://www.apreche.net/ | Last Journal: Tuesday November 08 2005, @11:17PM)
Re:Not invincible (Score:5, Informative)
As an example - a friend of mine is an assistant Kung Fu trainer. His Sifu has somewhere around 20 generations of Shaolin Kung Fu training behind him (as well as a style of Kung Fu that his great-great-great-great-etc. etc.-grandfather created). He started training basically as soon as he could stand, and studied under Bruce Lee for some time.
Get in a ring with him, and he'll destroy you - but you'll still walk away. Bruised, battered, and damn near ripped limb from limb, most likely wishing you had never even considered the fight, but you'll walk away in one piece. Someone who didn't know of his training tried mugging him - pulling a knife on him. By the time his attacker hit the ground he had 3 broken ribs, a fractured skull, a broken jaw, a broken leg, and an arm broken in three places (if I'm recalling correctly. I may have mixed up an arm broken in 3 places for a leg broken in 3, but the injuries are in general accurate). That was his measured response to assure that he was no longer in any sort of danger, the man could have been dead before his body dropped.
It's very hard to judge the effectiveness of one fighting style versus another unless you're looking at two people who are really out for blood.
Competition destroys martial arts. (Score:5, Insightful)
However, the last hundred years many of them have turned into sports. You are no longer allowed to gouge out your opponent's eyes, fishhook their mouths or attack other dangerous points like the neck, throat, groin, back or stamp on them on the ground. Instead you score points, playing tag in the ring. This pretty much leaves you with punches and kicks. The original techniques that are encoded into the forms or kata are either hidden, forgotten or simply not trained.
Now, the concept that karate and Kung-fu are purely striking systems is utter, utter bollocks. The forms and kata of both systems have joint locks, chokes, strangles, throws, gouges built in for all to see, if you know what you're looking at. Yes, much of which can be used on the ground. You just have to recognise them and practise. Ju-jitsu originally had a fair level of striking in it as well.
If you're practising karate, kung-fu purely as a striking system then what you are practising is kickboxing, not karate, not kung-fu. Practising ju-jitsu without kicks and punches it's not ju-jitsu.
Re:Competition destroys martial arts. (Score:4, Insightful)
Now we have that out of the way, I agree, the more realistic the training the better the practitioner will perform. Hence things like "Animal Day [summersdale.com]". And other forms of non compliant training.
1. Butting with the head.
2. Eye gouging of any kind.
3. Biting.
4. Hair pulling.
5. Fish hooking.
6. Groin attacks of any kind.
7. Putting a finger into any orifice or into any cut or laceration on an opponent.
8. Small joint manipulation.
9. Striking to the spine or the back of the head.
10. Striking downward using the point of the elbow.
11. Throat strikes of any kind, including, without limitation, grabbing the trachea.
12. Clawing, pinching or twisting the flesh.
13. Grabbing the clavicle.
14. Kicking the head of a grounded opponent.
I'll stop quoting the UFC rules here, because it reads like a list of the "vital points" that a martial artist who's training for self defence will attack given the slightest opportunity. Eyes, throat, groin, my first three targets. And it isn't just me. Have a look at the Bubishi, hundreds of years old and they were aiming at the same targets then. Yes, I bite, gouge, fish hook, I strike down using my elbow with my full body weight and power on ribs, backs, necks, just anything I can reach.
As you should too if you want to defend yourself.
Re:Not invincible (Score:5, Informative)
Uechi-Ryu Karate (hard style, Japanese)
Kick Boxing
Hwa Rang Do (koren, has your normal stuff + pressure points, grappling, weapons)
5 years as a bouncer
Aikido
And a few other styles I did has my travels took me everywhere..
Grappling in a 1v1 controlled situation is VERY strong. If I faced the grappler the odds are I would lose, why? Because a lot of my moves are fingers to the eyes, strikes to the throat, kicks to knees, groin, palm strikes to the chins to snap the neck, etc. A normal response is well ya you are trying to have 2 guys fight not kill each other. Which is the point.
In a UFC type style competition they don't train to really defend themselves in the same as other styles. The rules are designed to favor those training just to compete in UFC.
As an ex bouncer of 5 years at a college bar (300+ people a night) if you grappled someone in real life you'd be dead. Got on top of someone and their friends WILL club you with bottles, or kick your head, stabbed, etc. I did see one guy grapple someone and see the guys friend pick up a chair and smash.
Grapple someone and land on the shitty floor on glass, cement, etc. you are very likely to hurt yourself also. Grappling also requires some room to mover and shot in. You don't have that in a crowded bar. You don't need room to take your fingers and jab it into someone's throat.
This isn't to put down grappling people. They are very strong, fit, skilled, etc. From my experience in the real world grappling is not what you want to use.
ninja's "calling out" shaolin monks? (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://verens.com/)
As for the past - why would a ninja be so stupid as to fight in a tournament? The way a ninja fights is not in the open - they sneak and kill in secret, and only fight hand-to-hand when there is no alternative.
Would a ninja beat an entire group of shaolin monks? You bet. Wait for them to go to sleep, then pick them off one by one. Easy as pie.
Fact Check (Score:1)
Compelled to reply by Nickname (Score:1)
In Related News (Score:2)
(http://www.zines.com/)
This is Barry (the Tick) reporting.
Well at least its Shaolin Monks... (Score:2)
(http://www.victors.ca/)
You might not be able to beat a Shaolin Master, but at least you will be likely to see them first
Bullshit (Score:2, Insightful)
Even if there is some truth to this, there's something else going on in the background, I seriously doubt any self-respecting monk would bother suing over some online comment. It doesn't make sense to me.
pirates (Score:1)
Ah, Grasshopper ... (Score:3, Funny)
I wonder what kind of process server Shaolin monks would use to serve notice to a ninja? I seems this might be the basis for a TV sitcom, with each episode having the hapless process server falling back to devise a new approach to sneak up on the ninja and serve the papers.
Ninja in Disguise (Score:1)
Humour (Score:2)
(http://www.pipingdesign.com/)
England used to be pretty good (Monty Python) but I think America has taken the lead unintentionally via Bushisms.
Now please slap me with a fish.
so what if we dont give a hoot (Score:2, Interesting)
(http://www.auction-blog.com/ | Last Journal: Thursday September 20, @09:21AM)
A Koga region ninja could very easily beat a shaolin monk , but might have problems with a white crane kung-fu master....why, diff. styles, and diff. combinations, certain regions are closer, therefor have seen the other styles or have had influence on them.
I could even let you know that the present day GrandMaster Ninja Hatsumi sensei, not only is a ninja, but comes from a long line of samurai masters...his family were samurai, and he learned the ways of the ninja. SO anything is possible in this world, I have heard stories of how demeaning a monk could be to fellow peasants, and I have seen myself how family oriented and
how much value for life certain ninjutsu masters have,
I would hate to generalize as so many people do in their ignorance (and as in this article).
If it were a real shaolin monk , there would be no lawyers, as the duel would take place immediately afterwards, with the monk seeking out the indivdual (as it would be his duty)
and "finishing" the duel.
Both sides take no sh*t and I think it sad that someone could start this whole thing as a media frenzy, where if asked I bet neither side would really care about such clames.
Oh well (Score:1)
(Last Journal: Sunday January 21 2007, @05:46PM)
Sorry
Mixed Martial Arts (Score:1)
I'd sue too (Score:2)
(http://slashdot.org/ | Last Journal: Friday June 29, @03:53AM)
More unusual that unique? (Score:1)
How can something happen and be more unusual than unique? There aren't that many integers between 0 and 1.
Legal action? (Score:2)
(http://mikebabcock.ca/slashdot/ | Last Journal: Sunday November 05 2006, @05:55PM)
Just think about it -- Shaolin monks gone Mafia -- "I hear you said bad things about us, (beatings) that's not going to happen again, (more beatings) is it?"
What's next? (Score:2)
* I'm embarrassed to have been able to cast this particular sentence as fast as I could type. Pardon me, I must now go freshen the tape on my glasses.
36 chambers (Score:1)
(http://oblonski.wordpress.com/ | Last Journal: Friday November 02, @12:44PM)
Honestly, I'm not surprised... (Score:1)
Pirates vs. Monks vs. Ninjas (Score:2)
we live in wierd time (Score:1)
(http://www.bloggers.ma/)
Shaolin Monk: I will sue your ass
Pirate: all your base are belong to us
Who Would Buddah Sue? (Score:1)
What happened to the times (Score:2)
Shaolin Challenges Ninja ... And Wins! (Score:1)
(http://kungfurious.com/)
http://imdb.com/title/tt0080172/ [imdb.com]
I own the actual fight footage and can attest that Chinese Gung Fu bested every style the Japanese could throw at it, and without Bruce Lee's help.
No legal defense technique was needed then, and still not now.
Confucius says:
If have sidekick in comedy act, funny har har
If receive side kick in kung fu, Yie Ar! Not funny, but still can be side-splitting