Slashdot Log In
How To Turn a Mini Maglite Into a Laser
Posted by
samzenpus
on Thu Aug 09, 2007 12:59 AM
from the a-thousand-tiny-burn-marks dept.
from the a-thousand-tiny-burn-marks dept.
Lucas123 writes "Using the laser from a DVD burner, this instructional video shows you how to create a hand-held laser that is powerful enough to light a match and pop a balloon. There's some soldering involved and the Maglite's bulb housing needs to be drilled out to fit the new laser diode, but with some basic skill, most people could do this. Just plain cool." Update: 07/09 12:23 GMT by KD : Warning, the device that results from following these instructions will blind you if you look into it.
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
How To Turn a Mini Maglite Into a Laser
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 605 comments
(Spill at 50!) | Index Only
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Uhhh... (Score:5, Informative)
(http://www.videoproductionsupport.com/ | Last Journal: Thursday August 02, @01:49AM)
Re:Uhhh... (Score:5, Funny)
Dangerous (Score:5, Informative)
(http://www.inter-sections.net/)
This is a very dangerous toy
IT WILL BLIND YOU IMMEDIATELY IF:
- You look at it
- You shine it on a reflective surface that shines it back into your eye
No joke, people. Don't try this at home. I'd actually argue that this video is irresponsible since it does not mention the dangers of the item being built at any point. It will probably be uploaded on Youtube and a lot of innocent, curious kids will end up with one fewer eye as a result of this video.
DO NOT USE UNSAFE LASERS WITHOUT WEARING THE APPROPRIATE PROTECTIVE GEAR (special goggles can be obtained for specific wavelengths, which will ensure that you cannot see the laser - and hence it can't hurt you).
Daniel (who was paying attention during the Physics Dept 'laser safety' lecture)
Re:Dangerous (Score:5, Informative)
TO EDITORS: PLEASE ADD SAFETY WARNING TO THE ARTICLE SUMMARY!
This is an irresponsibly dangerous video with no safety warning.
Re:Dangerous (Score:5, Funny)
(http://66.249.93.104/ | Last Journal: Monday November 20 2006, @09:27AM)
Next week on
Re:Dangerous (Score:5, Funny)
Jacking up the power like this make the ENTIRE BEAM visible, not just the point.
I still want a laser powerful enough to deface bumper stickers and write insults into the paint on cars...
Re:Dangerous (Score:5, Funny)
Visible means little when you're blind.
Re:Dangerous (Score:4, Insightful)
(http://205.205.253.95/Crackster | Last Journal: Wednesday September 22 2004, @09:57PM)
Re:Dangerous (Score:5, Insightful)
(Last Journal: Sunday August 20 2006, @01:37PM)
You mean to teach people with such crippled intellect and no social or emotional control that they would take from or harm people for their own fun ... well to teach them that there is no consequence to their actions? Good idea, that'll stop them.
Please, pull your head out of your ass. The lack of oxygen is causing brain damage. You are confusing a nice ideas with the reality of human nature. There will always be asshats who don't and won't care about others, will take from others or harm others to satisfy their own pleasures, and only avoid these avenues when they cause discomfort for themselves. So good idea, let's remove consequences for bad behaviour.
Re:Dangerous (Score:4, Insightful)
(http://www.offworldpress.com/ | Last Journal: Thursday October 31 2002, @12:57PM)
I'm with you. Beat and then neuter the fuckers.
Warning. (Score:4, Funny)
(Last Journal: Friday November 02, @02:49PM)
Warning: Do not look into LASER with remaining eye.
Re:Dangerous (Score:5, Informative)
(Last Journal: Saturday September 22, @12:45PM)
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/n
http://www.criminal-information-agency.com/firear
Re:Why use a BB gun? (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Dangerous (Score:5, Funny)
(http://stylus-toolbox.sf.net/ | Last Journal: Tuesday May 15, @11:50AM)
Re:Dangerous (Score:4, Funny)
(Last Journal: Thursday November 09 2006, @05:02PM)
Re:Dangerous (Score:4, Informative)
(Last Journal: Wednesday October 05 2005, @10:39AM)
Re:Dangerous (Score:5, Funny)
(http://slashdot.org/~Himring/journal/179579 | Last Journal: Saturday August 18, @11:20AM)
Re:Dangerous (Score:5, Informative)
I was in a foreign country. The company I worked for rushed me to hospital and this foreign doctor explains to my collegues that she needs to inject a needle in behind the back of my eye. You need to prevent the back of the eye from bruising and swelling up.
She takes out her book of english and says slowly "This will..... hurt". And it did.
Thankfully after 2 weeks my eyesight was back to normal.
So please everyone - do be very careful. And if anything happens, it is _vital_ to get to a _eye_ hospital as soon as possible.
Re:Dangerous (Score:5, Funny)
(http://thewaxwingslain.com/)
If I wet the bed, I'm sending you the laundry bill.
Re:Dangerous (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Dangerous (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Dangerous (Score:5, Informative)
As it turns out, my injury was severe but not nearly as bad as it might have been. I was not looking directly at the prism from which the beam had reflected, so the retinal damage is not in the fovea. The beam struck my retina between the fovea and the optic nerve, missing the optic nerve by about three millimeters. Had the focused beam struck the fovea, I should have sustained a blind spot in the center of my field of visions. Had it struck the optic nerve, I probably would have lost sight of that eye.
The beam did strike so close to the optic nerve, however, that it severed nerve-fiber bundles radiating from the optic nerve. This has resulted in a crescent-shaped blind spot many times the size of the lesion.
The diagram is a Goldman-Fields scan of the damaged eye, indicating the sightless portions of my field of view four months after the accident. The small blind spot at the top exists for no discernible reason; the lateral blind spot is the optic nerve blind spot. The effect of the large blind area is much like having a finger placed over one's filed of vision. Also, I still have numerous floating objects in the field of view of my damaged eye, although the blood streamers have disappeared. These `floaters' are more a daily hindrance than the blind areas, because the brain tries to integrate out the blind area when the undamaged eye is open. There is also recurrent pain in the eye, especially when have been reading too long or when I get tired.
Re:Dangerous (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Dangerous (Score:5, Informative)
Re:MOMMY! (Score:4, Funny)
(http://erikmartin.com/)
That's why you should just stick with tin foil. Everyone knows that works. Believe me, if the government mind control was working on me, I'd know about it! But I have to go now -- I like to get my quarterly estimated income taxes paid nice and early.
Re:Dangerous (Score:5, Funny)
Pussy.
I've got one sitting right here on my desk, and I can shine it in to my eyes with absolutely no problems. Allow me to demonstrate...
Srr?
Sbao;utelu ni orpbkens,
Re:Dangerous (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.nullprogram.com/)
This is a very dangerous toy
IT WILL BLIND YOU IMMEDIATELY
Humbug! All my life they have been telling me masturbation does the same exact thing.
Re:Dangerous (Score:5, Funny)
- RG>
Re:Dangerous (Score:5, Insightful)
The only saving grace in this article and video is that the beam will hopefully not be that well collimated over a longer distance and when idiots shine it at other people, the damage will be less and the people will have time to look away before they get serious damage.
Also, a laser like this would probably leave lines or dots burned into the retina. It isn't as bad as a pulsed laser that can literally rip the retina off the back wall of the eye because of what are essentially sonic booms in the eye due to the fast rise times and heating pulses. But if it can burn a hole in a piece of paper, imagine what it can do to all your rods and cones when your eye focusses the beam into an even smaller and more intense spot in your eye.
I agree with all the other posters who say the video should be removed and that this article should be pulled.
Re:Dangerous (Score:4, Insightful)
(http://rc6.org/)
I was with you all the way on your comment until you said that.
Removing the article (or the video) won't make this go away, a clear warning however might at least stop some people from getting hurt.
Re:Dangerous (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Uhhh... (Score:4, Funny)
(http://www.fodors.org/)
"Bureaucrat Conrad, you are technically correct. The best kind of correct." [imdb.com]
Re:Uhhh... (Score:5, Funny)
Sounds like fun. (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Sounds like fun. (Score:5, Funny)
(Last Journal: Sunday October 07, @01:01AM)
This is cool, but can it... (Score:3, Interesting)
Cool isn't the word... (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Sure (Score:5, Informative)
One thing to note though is that green laser are more complicated. There isn't actually a single diode that does green, rather it is an IR light that's generated and then frequency doubled to make green. In fact one would probably get more energy per square mm by simply using the IR output. Of course that is even more dangerous since you can't see IR and thus could be lasing your eyes and not know it.
Before you do this, note three things:
1) You can buy lasers over 5mW commercially. Just search Google for it, it isn't illegal or anything.
2) To own and operate any laser over 5mW requires a license. You are responsible for getting it from the FDA.
3) Messing with high power lasers (and yes over 5mW is high power in the laser world) is rather dangerous. That's why there's the limits. If you have a 100+mW laser, which is around what you'd need to light a match, even the reflected light could damage your vision permanently if you hit your eye. Given that you don't seem to know much bout lasers, best not to fuck around with this. Consider that the sun provides about 1000 watts per square meter to the earth, and that looking right at it will damage your sight in a few minutes if you aren't protected. That works out to about 1mW per square mm. So take a laser, who's dot is only around a square mm or two, then consider its power. Yes, it really is brighter than the sun. When you are talking about some of these high power 3B lasers, they are MANY times brighter than the sun. Don't play with powerful lasers until you learn about them.
Re:Sure (Score:4, Informative)
(Last Journal: Wednesday October 05 2005, @10:39AM)
I haven't yet seen a straight green laser diode -- mine are all frequency doubled. However, many new green LED's are created using silicon nitride, essentially being blue lasers that emit at a longer wavelength, and it's not clear to me why they couldn't do the same thing with a blue diode.
Lasing your eyes with IR sucks, but not as bad as with visible, because the front of your eye is mostly (*mostly*) opaque to IR so you'll just fry your cornea, which can be replaced. Visible will go through the eye optics system, get even more focussed, and fry holes in your retina, which is not repairable. I've worked with people who have gotten big blasts of UV, IR, and green, and only the people who got hit with green had blind spots in their vision. The others had to wear glasses or have lens/cornea replacements, but they had reasonable vision despite that.
Great... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Great... (Score:4, Interesting)
(Last Journal: Sunday November 06 2005, @02:43AM)
Tiny Violin: Poor kids never know the simple pleasure of the laser
Re:Great... (Score:4, Funny)
At
Careful with this thing. (Score:5, Funny)
My eyes! The goggles do nothing!
yeah baby (Score:4, Funny)
(http://slashdot.org/)
Shark (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Shark (Score:4, Funny)
Mounting the laser could be a slight problem if the shark is conscious
Re:Shark (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://www.xenu.net/)
Just turn the shark upside down before mounting, that makes it go into tonic immobility for about 20 minutes.
Re:Shark (Score:5, Funny)
(http://slashdot.org/)
Re:Shark (Score:4, Funny)
(http://www.zebs.org.uk/)
Re:Shark (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Shark (Score:5, Funny)
To repeat an old warning (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.stox.org/)
Re:To repeat an old warning (Score:5, Informative)
(Last Journal: Friday October 25 2002, @11:31PM)