Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop


Forgot your password?
Note: You can take 10% off all Slashdot Deals with coupon code "slashdot10off." ×

Comment Wait until the terrorists get hold of this tech. (Score 1) 179

It would be useful both for disrupting "business as usual" that they don't like and herding crowds into range of a more lethal device.

I can imagine several of them being flown into, and triggered in, sessions of a legislature that authorized them. But I somehow doubt that would actually happen, even in tyrannical foreign regimes. If the legislature is giving the tyrant and his security forces what they want, why use it on them? And if the opposition can get them in there with "less than lethal" weapons packages, "more than lethal" would be even easier, and have a more lasting effect on future legislation. (Realpolitik is a bitch.)

Comment Re:Not that far when you think "voltage" (Score 1) 96

It looks to me like the field-reversed configuration does the same sort of thing, compressing the plasma in a way that maps the electric fields (both directly applied and created by the magnetic field change) into particle acceleration during the compression, and thus into temperature.

Then again, this machine also builds TWO plasma donuts and crashes them into each other (where they combine) at "a million kph" - no doubt also by electrical-field acceleration. Another opportunity to scale up the heating by scaling up the voltage (or its magnetic equivalent).

Comment Re:Not that far when you think "voltage" (Score 4, Informative) 96

First off, there is a big difference between something like a fusor which is basically accelerating a beam of particles to some amount of eV that is similar to the applied voltage, and something going for a thermal distribution with same amount of eV spread out with a tail of the distribution that does most of the reactions

Fusors and polywells aren't about beams. They're about assembling a plasma object that is already hot, by compressing it during the assembly.

The fusor does this by having two concentric spherical electrodes, the inner one skeletal, with a large voltage between them. Positive ions fall inward essentially radially, accelerated by the field until they pass through the inner electrode, and fly on orbits that pass through the center of the spheres. They "pile up" as they pass through the center, thus mapping the acceleration voltage directly into compression temperature as well as high average density. (Unfortunately a small number of ions hit the inner electrode on each pass and are lost. So though it's a great fusion-neutron source breakeven isn't in the cards.)

The polywell does the same thing to electrons - with the added tweak that the inner electrode contains a set of magnet coils that get the electrons to travel in paths that mostly miss the electrode. As they orbit through the center the high average density there is effectively a third high-voltage negative electrode, producing a radial electric field between this "virtual electrode" at the center and the inner physical electrode. Positive ions fall in toward the virtual electrode (nearly neutralizing it) and again you get a high density and inward velocity, mapping the electric field into temperature.

It looks to me like the field-reversed configuration does the same sort of thing, compressing the plasma in a way that maps the electric fields (both directly applied and created by the magnetic field change) into particle acceleration during the compression, and thus into temperature. Unlike Tokamaks and similar devices, you don't "put a low-density plasma in a (magnetic) can" and then have to heat it up. You heat it by squeezing it when you initially assemble it, accelerating the particles toward each other, and that maps your compression forces into temperature - which turns a moderately high voltage into a relative particle speed that has a hysterically high number when expressed as temperature (at the same time that you're also raising the density) Hold it together long enough, don't let it interact with solid matter to cool it, and you've got the holy trinity for fusion. No ongoing heating required.

Also, you don't just easily scale up voltage past several 10s of kV, as you start reaching a lot of material limits for break down (even in vacuum), and engineering gets more difficult for 100+ kV in a small space.

  - Expand the space (which also gives you more plasma volume and thus more power output at a given density), and
  - Keep anything but ionized, under-control, gasses out of the working region

100+ kV is not all THAT difficult to handle in an industrial-sized volume. Air at atmospheric pressure has a breakdown of about 40,000 v/in (though this drops as pressure is lowered). A clean vacuum (except for the working plasma itself) isn't too tough either: Television picture tubes worked fine with no arc-over at acceleration voltages of about a kilovolt per diagonal inch (i.e. 25 kV for a 25" picture tube) and far more than a kV per inch inside the tube. A machine twenty feet across would have substantially lower electric field at 200 kV.

Which is not to say that there won't be issues trying to scale this. But I wouldn't expect anything insurmountable from what you've alluded to here.

Comment Re:This looks familiar from 37 years ago (Score 1) 96

As far as I can tell from the article this looks familiar from 37 years ago.

As I read the article in your (corrected) link, the project 37 years ago got the plasmid to form and last for 5 MICROseconds, then ran out of money and got mothballed for a couple decades and had their equipment reactivated in a (never heard from again) lab around the turn of the millenium.

Maybe if they'd had funding to keep going, and figured out what these guys did (or something else) to keep things stable for three orders of magnitude more time and beyond, we'd have fusion power by now. It's been the perpetual 30 years and then some. B-b

Comment Not that far when you think "voltage" (Score 3, Interesting) 96

to do what they want means they need 3 billion degrees to ignite and they are at 10 million

Each electronvolt is equivalent to 11,500 degrees Kelvin. So they need to run at about 200 kV instead of 870V. Piece of cake.

This is whyFarnsworth fusors are tabletop "gassy vacuum tubes" and the issues with polywell machines are things like geometry and electromagnet wiring rather than applying excitation energy.

Kelvin is the same size degree as celsius but offset by a couple hundred degrees so zero is absolute zero. At 3 billion degrees the difference between water freezing and absolute zero is noise. If TFA's degrees are fahrenheit the offset is still noise but scale the voltage back to 144 kV.

Comment Start expecting it in five. (Score 5, Insightful) 96

We have been expecting cold fusion in 30 years for about 50 years now.

Actually it's HOT fusion we've been expecting in 30 years for a long time. (Cold fusion, other than the apparently useless muon-catalyzed form, was a "maybe it's possible - no apparently not" flash in the pan)

But THIS one is big: It's not that it lasted 5 ms. It's that it lasted 5 ms WITHOUT DECAYING. That almost certainly means that:
  - either they've completely solved the instability issues and it's just a matter of scaling up (and using superconductors or adequate cooling so they can run continuously),
  - or they've solved them well enough to hold the plasma ball together until it's paid for itself several times over, then make another one (repeat continuously) and it's just a matter of scaling up (and using superconductors or adequate cooling so they can putt-putt-putt continuously).

Now if other problem show up (but aren't a fundamental refutation of this indication of stability) we might end up expecting fusion in five years for another fifteen or so. But I think the "30 years forever" thing has just been evicted from fusion and is living with its brother in copyright extension.

Comment Re:"Smokers" (Score 1) 102

Bird deaths caused by wind and solar are minimal compared to the bird deaths caused by traditional fossil fueled infrastructure.


I was already aware that wind power, despite the "bird kill" hype, was not all that large a problem. (I'd also thought it might be overestimated, too: Birds die where they live, and wind farms are good hunting sites for raptors and feeding sites for other birds.) It's good to have references to studies actually comparing it to other sources of power - and the comparison to power TRANSMISSION is a really big deal - and might swamp any bird-death issues with heliostats.

Unfortunately, that article seems to be addressing only wind power and not large central-focus collection systems.

I'd be happy to see a study estimating the magnitude of the problem (and whether it IS a substantial problem), and will be overjoyed if the problem is trivial, or at least no more than on a par with "traditional" power sources.

Meanwhile I just wanted to caution that there MAY BE a problem, which needs to be examined.

Comment Re:Autism claims appear to have been lawsuit fraud (Score 1) 94

Why people keep repeating that nonsense is beyond me.

Because rumor spreads fast, with screaming headlines, and retractions spread slower, are low-key, and often aren't believed or discounted.

A lot of people don't trust the "medical establishment" and won't believe "its pronouncements". If they've even heard that this is a fraud, they'll believe that the debunking research was comparable to the stuff the tobacco companies put out for decades.

Unfortunately, this has resulted in substantial numbers of uninoculated children. (The article I cited claims it's as high as 20% for measles innoculations in some areas.) This has lead to the resurgence of dangerous childhood diseases. (What counts for disease spread is not the percentage of uninoculated hosts, but the absolute density of susceptible individuals.)

Now you might think of it as evolution in action, with the children of those susceptible to the fraud being selectively infected, with a non-trivial number of them being crippled and/or killed. Unfortunately, immunizations are not 100% effective, by a long shot. If there is an infection hot-spot or an epidemic, some of the kids who got their shots (along with the immune-compromised) will still get the disease, and take damage.

Part of the drill is to produce "herd immunity" - reducing "k" in the exponential function to below one, so hot-spots of infection tie out, rather than explode into a calamity. The large number of people who don't let their kids be immunized have now prevented this, and (apparently thanks to a few starter cases that came in during the border crisis) we're now seeing a resurgence of measles and several other diseases.

Comment Autism claims appear to have been lawsuit fraud (Score 4, Informative) 94

Sure, having universal flu protection would be nice. But I don't know how I would feel about having THAT many autisms injected into me.

Ha ha. But seriously... As I understand it:

A large number of researchers (many funded by sources with no connection to drug companies) attempted to reproduce the research claiming to find a link between vaccinations and autism. They were not able to do so.

It was discovered that the original researcher who claimed the connection was funded by a consortium of trial lawyers.

The journal (BMJ), in which the original research was published, retracted it, investigated the study, and concluded that the author had "misrepresented or altered" the medical histories of the 12 subjects in question, in what appears to be a deliberate hoax.

More in this CNN article.

Comment I've been waiting for this for several years. (Score 4, Interesting) 94

I've been waiting for this for several years - after reading of similar (perhaps the same) work in Europe.

As with this story, they went after a "conserved region" on one of the critical viral proteins. This is a region that doesn't change substantially as the virus evolves, because it's the way it has to be for the virus to work, so viruses with changes to this part generally don't reproduce . (The bulk of the antibody-accessible portion of the virus is structural or "deliberate" camouflage, and mutates rapidly, which is why the viruses and ordinary vaccines keep changing.)

They cloned the conserved region onto a plasmid and made a strain of bacteria that pumped out the artificial antigen by the bucketful, suitable for making vaccine on industrial scale.

Story was they got one that worked for ALL the "A" strains of influenza. But they were having a hard time doing the same for "B" strains and didn't want to go for approval and production until they had a mix that could get them both.

Perhaps this story explains the problem with the B strains - and announces the solution?

Comment "Smokers" (Score 1, Interesting) 102

One problem with industrial-scale central-focus concentrating solar systems is "smokers" - birds that were fried by the concentrated light.

  - The concentrated light isn't visible as a bright spot in the air from below and the sides. It IS visible from above, as is the small percentage reflected from the object at the focus.
  - This light attracts insects.
  - The insects attract birds wishing to eat them
  - The birds fly into the focus.
  - The large amount of focussed sunlight kills them quickly and ignites them.
  - The birds fall out of the air, trailing a plume of smoke, and are known a "smokers" by people in the trade.

Similarly with birds that see the object at the focus - typically the highest thing in the middle of a big flat region, and thus an especially attractive roosting place for predatory birds. - and decide to land on it..

It's like the cruel kid with the magnifying glass frying ants - but written large.

At 150 kW output (and substantially more input) it's not clear to me whether the birds would be instantly killed or merely blinded, badly burned, and left to suffer and die on the ground. But I bet even this village-scale heliostat system will suffer from this problem.

Comment it was the McCarthy era (Score 3, Interesting) 282

The government is taking the position that saying things that disagree with the official government position on things are subversive, anti-American, defeatist, comfort-to-the-enemony traitors? Color me surprised!

It was the McCarthy era - the American Inquisition. He wasn't hauled up in front of HUAC (The House {of representatives} Un-Ameracan Activities Committee), so I presume, if he was investigated, the FBI (and the other witch-hunters) didn't find any evidence of an actual association between Bradbury and any of the Communist regimes.

Having said that: Bradbury's dystopias always struck me as an attempt to transplant mainstream literature's techniques and biases into Science Fiction.

SF is the art of the technical class. The central message is "You can fix it or create wonders by applying intelligence and dilligence to the problem." Even the dystopias a subset of "cautionary tales", with the central message being "Be careful not the break it THIS way, because that could wreck it so badly you CAN'T fix it.

Mainstream fiction is the propaganda of control of the general population: The central message is futility: "Do what the authorities tell you to do. No matrer HOW badly they're doing and HOW bad things get, don't try to improve them. Anything you try will make them worse."

My impression of Bradbury is that he tried to use mainstream fiction techniques and in the process imported the mainstream fiction message.

Comment FDA approval process for new drugs and treatments (Score 1) 311

The process is too expensive, and takes too long, and incentive structure leads the bureaucrats to prefer "no flipper-babies" at the cost of "millions of dead bodies".

Better yet, make the FDA approval ADVISORY and ban the government from interfering in people putting anything they want into their bodies. This would both end the drug war and allow new drugs to reach people sooner, if the (and/or their insurance company) are willing to pay for them.

Anti-aging treatments will not get FDA approval, both because getting old is "not a disease" and because the government has a vested interest in the old dying off and not overloading the Social Security and other entitlement systems. (They have been saying, publicly, since the early '80s, that they have to get the death rate up to meet the birth rate in order to avoid the collapse of these systems.)

Prototype designs always work. -- Don Vonada