Apple's Foldable iPhone Is 'On Track' To Launch In September 56
Bloomberg's Mark Gurman says Apple's foldable iPhone is still "on track" for a September unveiling alongside the iPhone 18 Pro lineup. 9to5Mac reports: The report notes that Apple's stock took a hit earlier today after Nikkei Asia indicated the iPhone Fold was having serious production issues. Clearly, sources within Apple were motivated to share positive news via Gurman. Not long ago, Gurman himself said that he was expecting an iPhone Fold release date that was a little bit later than iPhone 18 Pro. That's still very possible, but it sounds like Apple is internally feeling optimistic about its targeted September launch.
The report continues: "While the complexity of the new display and materials may limit initial supply for several weeks, Apple is currently operating with a plan to put the device on sale around the same time -- or very soon after -- the new non-foldable models, the people said." Gurman adds an important qualifier: "Still, the release is six months away and production has yet to ramp up. That means the timing isn't final."
The report continues: "While the complexity of the new display and materials may limit initial supply for several weeks, Apple is currently operating with a plan to put the device on sale around the same time -- or very soon after -- the new non-foldable models, the people said." Gurman adds an important qualifier: "Still, the release is six months away and production has yet to ramp up. That means the timing isn't final."
Can always get an iPhone SE (Score:3)
Apple's foldable iPhone is still "on track" for a September unveiling alongside the iPhone 18 Pro lineup
No problem, I was happy with the SE in the past. I can always return to that line if the options are only "fold" or "pro" among the newer models.
Or maybe a 17e (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
You probably don't know but there is another kind of phones, "Android" iirc.
Bad guess. I'm a developer and I also have a Google Pixel.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Replace the batteries if you want to keep using those iPhones?
Re: (Score:2)
Since they still work, I might do what I did with my iPad Air 2 - mount them to the wall plugged in and use them for playing music or whatever.
Unless it doesn't look like Apple will release a new SE or equivalent, in which case I may replace the batteries.
Re: (Score:2)
Most likely Apple won't be making any small newer iPhones since they didn't make a lot of money. :(
Re: (Score:1)
While I'm quite interested in hearing about and seeing the "fold" Apple phone.....from my early understanding, it will NOT have the camera specs they 18 Pro Max (or whatever they call it) phone will have.
I'm MUCH more interested in camera than foldi
Small iPhones... (Score:2)
... I loved small iPhones like 4s, minis, and SE. Apple doesn't make newer small iPhones anymore since they didn't sell well during modern times. :(
iPhone Fold 44 (Score:4, Funny)
I for one am waiting for the release of that specific version, because the name will allow me to impress potential mates, like so:
- hey babe, check out my iPhone Fold Fourty-Four!
*potential mate walks out, upset at my humor*
... OK, maybe I'll buy a Samsung S66 instead.
Re: (Score:2)
Can they land the use case? (Score:4, Insightful)
That’s what I’ll be interested in. Form following function and all that
Re: (Score:3)
The idea I think is an Ipad mini that you can stuff in your pocket. Seems like a good idea
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
true, ipad mini is only for those with deep pockets
Re: (Score:2)
Then you need to think harder
Re: (Score:3)
The use case is you have a decent size screen on a device that you can pocket. If you look at the latest foldables, they aren't much thicker than non-foldables. About as thick as an iPhone from a few generations ago.
They seem to have reached the point where the tech is reasonably mature and not excessively fragile. Now they just need to get the price down.
Re: (Score:2)
The use case is you have a decent size screen on a device that you can pocket.
One of the main problems that foldables have right now is their screen aspect ratio is square whereas a lot of content is either tall (YouTube shorts, TikTok shorts) or wide (movies, YouTube). Having more screen means little if most of it is used for black pixels.
Re: (Score:2)
Good for browsing and side by side though.
Re: (Score:2)
Sure: Make fancy thing, put Apple logo on thing, people pay lots for thing. Works every time.
I'm waiting to see how they're going to make the tech work though when every other attempt has failed.
Re: (Score:2)
or guys with phone in one hand and dicks in the other
Sometimes I hate the direction of tech (Score:5, Interesting)
It's funny, common tech. (phones, computers, laptops, wearables) has kind of hit a pinnacle for me.
The Neo is everything I wanted my ideated s10 to be like 15 years ago, or whenever that was.
Modern cell phones are marvels. Great battery life, fantastic cameras, dare I say, the internet in your pocket, basically anywhere...
I've got a super-computer in my home office, especially by the standards that got me into software, and back in the late 90s my computer was fast enough for me then.
Sometimes I feel like I'm the only sane person, which is a good indicator I'm the crazy one I suppose.
For me a foldable phone was the Motorola razor, the one with physical buttons. And in my opinion it was a great phone.
Every now and again something comes along that I really wish would be a shorter lived trend, but it never goes away. Foldable screens are up there with "the notch (in the Mac world)" and "The Ribbon UI ( in windows)". I have this feeling it's not going away...
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It's cheaper to move physical controls to a screen, so at least with those examples there was a profit motive in play. Folding phones, on the other hand, are always going to be more complicated to manufacture than a slab phone. There's no incentive make every phone a folding phone if people aren't going absolutely gaga over them. Most people find the crease and cheap plastic-y feel of the screen to be a bit objectionable, so it remains a niche thing.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
But you're right,
Re: Sometimes I hate the direction of tech (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
For me a foldable phone was the Motorola razor, the one with physical buttons. And in my opinion it was a great phone.
Yep. If it supported modern standards I'd still be using mine, and then hotspotting for a device with more screen when I needed that. Carrying two devices is nonoptimal, but so is holding a brick up to my ear, and fixing that with a headset would ALSO require carrying two devices.
Re: (Score:2)
Hell to the naw. I do not miss T9 texting.
Running out of ideas to steal. (Score:3)
Multiple manufacturers have tried the folding phone several times with little to no success. I can't see Apple succeeding (they'll pretend they are though).
What I can see is Apple presenting their most rigid phone ever as "the iFold 1billion and 2 PRO" with someone standing on stage showing us that it flexes slightly if measured with laboratory equipment... and when people break it in real life telling us "you're folding it wrong".
Pricing (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
That's 10 times more than I'm willing to spend on a phone.
Re: (Score:2)
That's fair.
But do remember, there are a LOT of people out there with a LOT of disposable income.....
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe cameras or new lenses (lenses can be $$)....or the odd cell from time to time.
I think last time I dropped about $1100 or so for my iPhone 12 Pro Max.....and I did pay it off 12 mos interest free with Apple Pay....
But that's just me using their money...in truth I almost NEVER buy anything I don
Wuhoo! Announcements! (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
How the turn tables (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Source is just the various rumour blogs on my RSS feeds, I'm no expert here.
Two screens? (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
I wonder if having two screens (which would show two different apps) wouldn't be better.
It would arguably be a better solution technically, but I suspect that most people want to use one app at a bigger size than two apps at once. And then you've either got content spread over two screens with stuff in the middle, or the app has to be designed around the screen layout. And that either won't be done or will be done poorly in the majority of cases.
Re: (Score:2)
Personally I'd prefer that format but it didn't sell very well for MS.
Re: (Score:1)
This one I agree with, adding the one caveat it would also have to be a Linux phone so I could use the screens in the precise ways that I want to use them. That would be a lot more convenient for me than one screen with a weird aspect ratio and a crease of dead pixels down the middle.
Re: (Score:2)
Heading for disaster (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Flamebait)
They're used to running the devices basically forever and having them hold up.
Hold up what? Your ability to do work with the device after the OS has been updated a couple of times and performance degraded to avoid drawing too much current from an under-specified battery?