Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Priorities (Score 1) 104

Does Canada have a situation where people of a specific skin colour were effectively locked out of standard hospitals before the 1970s, and thus a sizable proportion of people do not have easy access to birth certificates and by extension ways to get IDs?

Regardess, while it's entirely possible it's changed in the last 25 years, when I lived in Britain I didn't have to show ID. Why would you? If two people turned up to vote claiming to be the same person, it'd become obvious as soon as the second person showed up. Chances of it being discovered there were bogus votes would be 100%, and the chances of you being caught illegally voting were 50%. Why is ID even necessary to do something when it clearly isn't going to do anything to prevent fraud, and will likely exclude swathes of people from exercising their civil rights?

Aside from airports, the only place I get asked to show ID is occasionally when I buy alcohol and at my age that is a complement.

The previous conservative government introduced the requirement for voter ID in the UK not because there was any voter fraud, repeated investigations found almost none, rather it was a half-arsed attempt at US style voter disenfranchisement and all it did was give the opposition a huge majority. Also this is how the British do non-compliance. People vote with any kind of ID, bank cards, work IDs, anything to comply with the letter of the law but giving a two fingered salute to the spirit of it.

Comment Re:seriously? (Score 1) 12

The world is still the same, but elona got the subsidies and ran to the place where it doesn't need to pay taxes on the profits they generated.

Elnor and his companies were always like this, it's just that they aren't even pretending like they're hiding it any more.

Comment Re:That explains it (Score 1) 54

"vranyo" is not some special concept, it is simply a colloquial term for a lie. Similar to the English word "bullshit" in this regard, but far less vulgar.

That would depend on which anglophone culture you're from. To Brits and Australians the word "bullshit" is not that vulgar, we've far, far more vulgar language.

Comment Re:That explains it (Score 1) 54

Possibly, but I don't think so. Russians have a very, very high tolerance for tyrants and corruption. It's in their culture, and has been for 800 years, ever since they began paying tribute to the Golden Horde. The lessons and values from the renaissance and the enlightenment mean nothing to them.

Russians do not mind a boot on their neck, so long as it's a Russian boot.

I've recently started to read a translation of Tsushima by Alexsey Novikov-Priboy. He was a sailor in the Imperial Russian Navy at the battle of Tsushima (1905 for those playing along at home) and it does a really good job of explaining why people supported Communism, it wasn't that Communism was good, even back then people knew it wasn't but the system in place was even worse. Unaccountable leaders, the wealthy being untouchable, no benefit and lots of burdens for the common man... Sound familiar?

Comment Re:multi-day? (Score 1) 167

500 miles is not a "multi-day" range. That's a day (300-600 miles) for local driving, or less than a day for OTR long haul. 12+ hour days are not common, most of it spent driving. Even a local fuel delivery route is going to exceed that in most cases.

I'm guessing these will be for close-to-terminal local delivery only, because they're not going to have much use beyond that, particularly with lengthy charge requirements and no sleeper.

To put that into perspective, an 8 hour shift at 60 MPH (maximum speed limit for a HGV in the UK) is 480 miles, that would be for an owner operator who, as you pointed out, often does more than 8 hours. Company owned artics and lorries are often run 24 hours a day as different drivers operate the same lorry in shifts. Especially for local delivery vehicles (which are the ones likely to be doing fewer miles in town), when the first driver finishes his shift and gets back to the depot, the next driver climbs into his farts.

Comment Re:*facepalm* (Score 1) 177

The failure is the point. They are trying to work up to getting VPNs blocked. I suspect they will have shrunk our economy by 60% before we manage to stop them. I only hope that, at that point, I will be able to get a legalized lynch mob up for them. The chances are reasonably good.

Brexit has already shrunk our economy by at least 60%.

Both major parties are in the pockets of big business and they'll put a stop to this nonsense before it gets that far. Yay corruption.

Comment Re:4Chan toy store? (Score 1) 177

Companies -- wherever they're based -- are not allowed to sell unsafe toys to children in the UK.

Wait - 4chan is now a toy store?

The thing is, the UK safety laws don't apply in China where you can sell unsafe toys to children.

That's the crux of the matter, UK law applies in the UK only. #Chan is right to tell OfCom to go pound sand (with a 21" retractable baton).

By and large the UK gets laws right, safety without giving up liberty (despite what the far right propaganda says) however this is one of the cases where they've got it horribly wrong simply because they didn't understand the technology involved. The people who created these laws (previous conservative government, for those who didn't know) genuinely think that the internet is like broadcast TV and that people will regularly be accidentally exposed to "the porn".

Comment Re:uhh duh (Score 1) 63

So, a duopoly.

There are ways of dealing with monopolies/duopolies. Break them up. Probably can't do that effectively with Apple/Android. Then there's regulation. You place the entity(s) under the authority of some thing like a utilities commision. They want to make any changes to their pricing or terms of service, they have to seek approval from the commission. Such a situation is so onerous that those subject to it (even utilities) do everything in their power to weasel out from under it. And one obvious way would be to open up the platforms to third party app stores.

"But we can't! Muh security!" Wrong. There's nothing stopping the third party stores from implementing their own app vetting proceses. And allowing users to pick one tailored to their needs.

The problem isn't that there is not a way to deal with this, the problem is America, specifically the overriding belief that "government bad, company good" despite all evidence to the contrary.

They fail to understand why the EU regulating tech giants is so important and why Europeans agree with it... and that it's pretty much the only thing protecting them and still they'll rally against any attempt to reign in the unchecked power of large corporations.

Comment Re:Why not yearly? (Score 1) 66

Why not just switch to yearly reporting? Companies can still report more often, but if it allows companies to hire managers that aren't constantly chasing quarterly results at the expense of long term prospects, it's better for everyone other than investors that like to profit off of valuation swings from quarterly earnings reports. Those people aren't creating anything of real value anyway so why should I care if they have to find something more useful to do?

The problems are not being caused by the existance of quarterly reports, rather with what certain people demand of them. Ever increasing growth and profit at the expense of everything else.

Getting rid of the reporting won't make change this one iota... It just makes it easier to hide the poor state of the economy and potential wrong doings of rich people.

Comment Graphics don't matter. (Score 2) 123

DLSS (in its original AA/upscaling definition) is amazing. It looks infinitely better than whatever internal scaling your monitor can do. It gave us back something we lost in the transition away from CRTs, which is the ability to play games at something other than your monitor's native resolution.

Frame gen is more of a mixed bag, I tend to think of it as a motion smoothing effect rather than "free performance". It's only useful in a narrow range of scenarios. The marketing of "Turn 20 fps into 120 fps with 6x frame gen" is BS.

Now this new stuff sounds like AI content generation, i.e. slop, meaning it's totally useless.

I thought DLSS helped on Cyberpunk 2077 but didn't do a damned thing for STALKER2.

However I came to the conclusion years ago that graphics don't matter.

The most damning evidence came when I played Mass Effect Andromeda, the Mass Effect trilogy is beloved for many reasons and it's not necessarily the graphics (which were bad and highly consolidated even for 2007) however it had a story, an atmosphere, likeable characters and above all else, good gameplay. So good the gameplay still largely stands up today without mods. Mass Effect Andromeda had eye meltingly good graphics but everything else about the game sucked. The weapons were underpowered, enemies were bullet sponges, too much pointless running about/collecting... however that could be fixed with mods and it revealed that underneath all that were bland, unlikeable characters, a cliched and unimaginative story that dragged on for way too long, boring sidequests and far too many unmarked scavenger hunts. The graphics were phenomenal for 2020 but the gameplay would have been horrible for the late 90s and the story and characters were so design by committee that the game as well have been called Bland McBlandface in the I Don't Want Upset White Middle-Class Manchildren.

Hence I've come to the conclusion that graphics don't matter.

Now I'm a PC gamer so this kind of AI slop is not for us, it's for the console gamers. Consoles have been more expensive than gaming PCs for years now, the difference being that you paid for the hardware up front with a PC and then the savings started in earnest. A console sold you hardware at below cost but then charged you for everything as much as they could. With new consoles approaching the price of an entry level gaming laptop (the new Playstation is £700, you can get an ACER laptop with a RTX5050 for £650). It's just a new way to lock something else away behind a paywall and get console peasants to pay for something PC gamers take for granted, consoles have always lagged behind PCs on graphics (everything really) but now they're not just going to lag, they're going to pay for it.

Comment Re:Just like Uber (Score 1) 65

Ride sharing is to taxi company as prediction market is to casino.

A casino is an entertainment venue where there is often a lot more to do than gambling. A better analogy is that this is a dodgy bookmaker in a piss stained alley but with even less legal protection for the punters when things go wrong.

Comment Re:About damn time (Score 1) 65

I am so tired of calling what are obvious gambling sites "prediction markets"

Blame Uber.

They decided that they weren't going to be called an illegal taxi company (or employer) and claimed they were a "ride sharing" company. As no lawmakers have bothered rumbling this obvious lie, other businesses have realised they can get away with it. You're not running an illegal brothel, it's "body sharing", don't call it a speakeasy, it's "drink sharing" so you're clearly not running an illegal betting ring... it's a "prediction market".

And those who demanded that Uber get a free pass because they wanted cheap taxis regardless of the cost are to blame... and this is just part of the cost.

BTW, this is not unprecedented, legitimate bookmakers have been taking bets on almost anything for decades now, it's never really been a problem as they were complying with laws. This is just an effort to skirt laws and regulations designed to stop and weed out dodgy operators.

Comment Re:Scams are a bigger problem (Score 2) 153

Scams have become way more convincing, which will lead to larger losses to theft. No longer can you identify scammers by broken English, or other obvious markers.

I had one recently that seemed legit until I went off script and he started dropping âoesirâ more than a normal conversation. Another hacked a friendâ(TM)s account and had a convincing post about how his uncle died and was selling cars and various items that heâ(TM)d hold for a deposit.

It will be much easier to scam grandpa when you can deepfake his grandkids

Shock horror, racism no longer a valid excuse.

I hate to break it to you, but scams didn't start with foreigners, locals were doing it long before anyone with a funny accent and broken English came onto the scene. We're going to have to go back to the tried and tested methods of being smart enough not to fall for obvious scams and for those who aren't... letting them suffer the consequences of their own stupidity.

Those of us who grew up poor in the 80s and 90s know full well that there are dozens of people around every corner who'll happily deprive you of your meagre possessions and income, some through violence, others through words. People who grew up safely ensconced in middle class neighbourhoods never experienced this, thus never learned if you don't want to die poor, you learn to spot and handle the scammers and swindlers (and you had to learn to handle them because there was no avoiding them). This is the only reason the far right has had any kind of success, modern society has become so safe that people no longer have a standard bullshit filter which enables them to spot and reject obvious bullshit.

Right now, the stupid are being protected from the consequences of their own actions. As long as this continues, scams and grifters will continue to enjoy unprecedented success.

Comment Re:The finding is not comprehensive (Score 1) 43

If the claim was all true then it's not just a misleading advertising. Customers paid for QLED quality and didn't get it. The company must be forced to pay back to all affected consumers worldwide, once all the lawsuits in various countries finalize.

This may come as some surprise to Americans but in most countries it's illegal to advertise something that isn't true, doubly so if you know it's not true.

And what may be even more surprising is that you usually don't need to start a class action to get your refund (besides, a class action usually results in you getting about $3.50 back because the lawyers hoovered up most of the settlement, especially after the appeal).

This is just part of those evil "consumer rights" that Americans seem so dead against.

Slashdot Top Deals

Many people write memos to tell you they have nothing to say.

Working...