Comment Re:Racist! (Score 1) 45
How dare they discriminate against us lizard people! : )
I never would have guessed the British Royal Family posted on
Shout out to King Chuck the Wingnut.
How dare they discriminate against us lizard people! : )
I never would have guessed the British Royal Family posted on
Shout out to King Chuck the Wingnut.
This has nothing to do with the speech clampdown, but the general gist of it is true. Most of the cases "cited" by the Telegraph article are several years older than the recent decline in industrialisation.
I put cited in quotes, but it's the usual misinformation bullshit. Niehoff never had his home raided. Two duty officers went to his house to execute a search warrant but on discussion with Niehoff just aborted the warrant realising it was issued for someone who wasn't a threat. Also the reason for the warrant was that Niehoff used far right hate symbols, it's just the shock media who reported it was due to calling the minister a dummy.
The lying fritz story is true, but it deeply divided the country and quite a significant portion of the political spectrum want the law abolished. The problem is the law was created in response to a politician being assassinated.
The problem the Telegraph is facing is that their bullshit isn't working any more. Bullshit is like a drug, not just in the fact it addles the brain but also in the fact that as you're exposed to it you build up resistance to it, much like the smack addict who needs more and increasingly powerful hits of heroin to get the same high, those who live off of the bullshit of sources like the Tele are resistant to the kind of BS it used to print, so they need even more powerful BS to get the same impotent rage.
Much like heroin, make it too strong and you'll flat out kill any new users, so you're not going to get new customers. This is the problem facing much of the right wing media. If they tone it down to get a wider base of readers/viewers they'll lose their hardcore audience to other dealers who serve up pure, grade A, uncut black-tar bullshit and if they don't they'll slowly bleed that audience off without anyone replacing them.
This article is just the US (on
The writer of the article says " unlike traditional workers, creators have no predictable paycheck or job protections, making career stability elusive."
Is this being written in the 1960s ? Traditional jobs have had no predictability, protections pay rises or promotions since the early seventies. Career stability went away about the same time as the Apollo programme.
Yep, the old social contract of your employer taking care of you in exchange for years of continued service was broken before I was even born. They created a world of fear where mercenary attitudes rule and are now surprised that people are acting like mercenaries. Sow the wind, reap the whirlwind.
Your employer will not hesitate to throw you under the bus for a minor bump on the quarterly P&L sheet... You owe them nothing and realistically, if you get a chance to get ahead at their expense you've got to be stupid not to take it. Welcome to a world where the only one who will look out for you is you. Altruism is well and truly dead.
You're engaged in the same kind of thinking the automakers are, and it's why they are struggling. Think less about the people currently buying trucks and more about the people who would be buying a truck if it didn't cost $70k.
It's about making a market, not chasing a market. Slate seems to have understood this. Ford seems to again be chasing, only caring about that gap in their lineup since Slate started threatening them.
A similar disease affects many markets in the US, but housing and automotive are obviously the most egregious. Everything has to be "luxury" now, and the demand is that you pay for it, whether you like it or not. Set up a space where that doesn't happen, people will run toward it. Anyone with a budget to consider, at least. Which is actually a lot of people. All abandoned by Ford.
It's not even as complex as that... Apple are paying Ford to foist this on their customers.
It wasn't inevitable, but it's true that the discs were just tokens at this point: full of outdated software that needed a multi-GB patch to get working, or just a stub containing some artwork and a license key. PC games haven't really shipped on discs in years, if not decades. Sure, you could buy the disc, but it would be useless once the "CD key" was bound to your account. At a certain point you just give up and buy the keys. The last PC game I bought on disc (DOOM in 2016) came with the discs in a nice Steelcase, but I didn't even use them, I just added the CD key to my Steam account and kept the discs as a display piece.
This isn't such a bad deal, but the difference here is Sony's user-hostile policies. We've seen multiple times that content that you allegedly purchased can just disappear from your library with only cursory warning because they failed to re-negotiate distribution rights. This should not be happening.
Take Steam as a counter-example. I own many titles that have been delisted, originally published by a company that went out of business, was purchased by someone else, re-published under a new listing... yet I still "own" the original title. It's still in my library. I can still download and play it, even if it's broken on Windows 11 and I need to start up a VM or spend hour applying mods to get it to work. I'm not privy to all the horse trading that goes on when they negotiate these contracts, but I have some trust in Valve that they won't screw over their users to save a few bucks.
I know I don't really own it--I never did--but I have my copy and a few implied rights that they won't take it away from me at a whim. That's all people ask, and nobody trusts Sony to deliver.
There's a couple of huge differences between PC and Playstation... the first and foremost that any console is a monopoly, everything you do on a Playstation, everything you're allowed to own is done via Sony and entirely under Sony's good graces. Sony says "No" and you're screwed. PC isn't a monopoly, even with Steam being the 362.87 KG gorilla in the room they are not the only game in town. Sure they're one of the best which is what keeps them the top dog but you've options for days (GOG may not be a 362.87 KG Gorilla, but it definitely is a weighty Orangutang in it's own right).
The second thing is, Steam and Gog are making money without shafting their customers so they have no need to.
The third difference is, both GOG and Valve are entirely private corporations. No shareholders to please means no drive for constant increases in profit which means there's no need to make customers suffer just to make the quarterly balance sheet a tiny bit larger.
Also as a side note, you can download the offline installers from GOG and Valve's Gabe Newell has said they have a contingency in place in case they ever have to shut down Steam.
Of course the long term solution for every platform is for sales and ownership laws to be updated to stop this "we're calling it owned, but you're really just renting because we can change the terms whenever we like". This is unlikely to occur in the US until it's forced to by the rest of the world.
...you could have a jar where you put, say, $20 a week. Or $10.
Even if you have a device now.
Let that jar fill. In 2 or 3 or 4 years, when you need a new phone, there'll be enough in that jar to buy that new phone outright without having to finance.
I understand if you can't do it the very first time. Fine. Finance that first phone. But immediately start on the saving $10-20 a week, for years.
You'll break the cycle, and it is liberating
(jar is metaphorical. You could open a savings account that you don't touch for anything except phones. And direct-deposit a tiny slice of your paycheck into it, and forget it exists until new phone time.)
Try it.
Whoa, whoa, whoa there Tiger...
Firstly you're suggesting people live within their means... are you some kind of Commulinst or something? Why do you hate 'Murica?
Most people are already so far beyond their means that $10 a month being saved would be a huge improvement. When I was a lad (I'm only just over 40) saying you were living "payday to payday" was a sign you had money troubles, now it's a sign you're doing well as most people are living debt repayment to debt repayment. They got into debt to get a shiny car, then the banks suckered them into putting their daily expenses on the card too, so when the money enters their account it immediately leaves to service their debts leaving them with nothing so next months expenses have to be financed on credit too...
It's hard to put $10 away per month when you're $3000 in the black to begin with before you get to your mortgage... And they thing is, they'll call you and I stupid for not paying for everything through credit.
BTW, I save enough each month that I could afford to buy a new phone from that alone. I never fell into the credit trap as a young fella so I'm not stuck in that trap in mid-life.
After raising prices significantly, we at Apple are now generously partnering with predatory financial companies to offer and induce our customers to become perpetual loan slaves for their basic computing needs. Our (l)usrs mean everything to us. And coming soon: additional optionalities with fantastic companies, including Payday Loans! The combined footprint of their thousands of shty little stores brings the financial abuse closer to your door than ever before. We're super proud of all that we're now able to do together.
With our high end products becoming overpriced, oversized phones the computing will be very basic indeed... and you'll still pay hundreds per month for it.
You will own nothing AND be perpetually in debt while not owning it.
That is blatantly untrue...
You'll own the debt, that you won't escape.
Ya, this is a BAD idea. If you can't afford the phone, don't buy it, and certainly don't rent it. In the majority of cases someone might consider this, I can only see it ending badly, and I can think of a few people who would jump at this opportunity.
The problem is, it'll work.
Same as most people don't own their cars any more. They just lease it and pay the monthlies.
Most people already lease their phone, especially in the US, they just do it via the phone company. $100 per month for the IphoneDoublePlusGoodUUUBerValue plan + $10 per month handset rental fee + $20 per month service fee + $4.99 Fee fee + $2.99 Fee calculation fee. People now lease everything
At least over here in Europe there are more people like me who buy their handset outright (Motorola Edge 60 Neo for £300) and get a cheap no contract monthly plan (£5 per month). I can get a new phone each year and still be ahead of the iSheep.... and I don't upgrade that frequently any more, I'm not a "use it until it dies" person but phones last at least 2 years these days.
Given the kind of people who buy Apple products favour brand and image over everything else... It'll work, I suspect a lot of them already put things like this on some kind of finance, whether a third party lease agreement or the dodgy credit card shuffle (keep moving that debt between interest free deals... until they can't any more and get hit with a massive amount of interest because they haven't paid much of it off).
You assume rationality. GM hopes to repeat the behavior of APPLE corpse
And they're failing to remember that they're GM, not Porsche who might be able to get away with this shit because they make good cars and have a legion of fanboys (and they already do it, you're not even allowed to order the really high end Porkers unless you've previously bought several).
The problem the consumer faces is that they don't buy cars any more, so they don't own them... Meaning that all these subscriptions just get rolled into the monthly payments. This isn't so much of an issue for the person who leases the car initially, the problem comes when the lessor has to sell the car and either sell it sans subscriptions or take the hit themselves and pay for them... we both know it won't be the latter.
At this point I'm glad that GM has really become a US only company these days, sold off their European brands to Peugeot years ago and not selling anything in Oz either, I'm sure they would have sold off the Holden brand too but no-one wants it.
The ALP is doing fine. Albo is still topping the prefered PM ranks , surprisingly considering how far into government the ALP is, and theres no real dissention in the ranks. Its the LNP, the torries, that have fallen to pieces. Brutally so.
However if they want to keep Hanson out, and we'd do well to remember that there are LESS constitutional and procedural safeguards in Australia (we may live to regret the lack of a bill of rights. "Trust us bro" only goes so far) than the yanks do.
True.
That was me fat fingering. I meant to put in the LNP but accidentally put in ALP.... TLA Failure on my part good sir.
bunch of hype and greed.
I will literally be Visa/Mastercard as the card will be their product via an existing bank with a Samsung branding on it. Same as your Amazon card or any of the airline cards. Middlemen as powerful as Visa/MC won't be cut out of the loop, especially in a place like the Corporate States of America.
to all the incoming Florida robot stories.
There, fixed that for you.
The Republicans absolutely need to be sat in the naughty-boy corner for a bunch of election cycles till they flush the whackos that have commandeered the party. But its not enough
Australia and the UK are trying this... the Whacko's are making more noise than ever whilst the original party (ALP in Australia and Conservatives in the UK) are being slowly eaten from the inside out. The fact is we put up with the rot and corruption for far too long because some precious little souls didn't like the other party. It's those precious little souls who supported them that need to be held accountable, sadly they're all running to Hanson/Farage because they are so thick and thin skinned that they just don't ever want to accept that what they vote for always fails.
There's a group of people who consistently buy products that fail, in Sales and Marketing they're known as Harbingers of Failure and are considered an accurate predictor of whether a product will not succeed. I believe the same is true for politics, voted for Brexit, then for Johnson, then supported Truss and spent the last two years hating on anything Labour does... Heh, you're one of them, you voted for a failed Brexit, a corrupt Boris, an incompetent Truss and believed the total lies about Labour... you're a predictor of failure and guess what will happen with Farage too.
Called standard by who? I guess we shouldn't call the Imperial units, though. But I've *never* heard them called "standard" before.
What you've got to rememeber is that the Imperial system was first codified in 1824 in the Weights and Measures Act of 1824. This is some 50 years after their little rebellion. So it's accurate to say that the Americans are not even as advanced as the Imperial system.
The US uses US Customary Units and most of them are completely arbitrary.
The Imperial system was not just an attempt to standardise units for trade (I.E. someone couldn't shaft you by deciding to use a different gallon) it was also an effort to make measurements scientifically accurate and interchangeable, I.E. a gallon was defined as 10 pounds of water at room temperature (17C). It was an effort to move away from the kind of "this is a gallon, copy this" kind of arbitrary measurements.
13. ... r-q1