Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:horrible idea (Score 1) 156

This is a horrible idea. This will just take money away from having decent public airports and reduce the incentive to provide them. We don't need more ways for the rich to separate themselves from everyone else.

Whilst I'm no fan of the uber wealthy (I'm not at the point of saying we should eat them, but we do need to tax and control them better before we are at that point) this is actually a more sound business move. Most large airports have a "hidden" private terminal that the wealthy can use to avoid the hoi-polloi. London Heathrow has one, it costs £2,500 a person and that's just paid to the airport. In effect it ends up subsidising the other airport operations (better than having overpriced restaurants and LHR is one of the few airports where eating there doesn't cost an arm and a leg).

LHR doesn't handle GA so that's 2,500 quid for getting on a commercial flight. Private aviation in London is served by other airports like Farnborough.

With SFO, I suspect the problem is that they don't have a lot of room to expand.

Comment Re:The RIch are Just People ... (Score 1) 156

America is a democratic society, and its rich are just ordinary citizens. They may have more $$$, but they are otherwise equal to others, not a separate noble caste.

In other words, they're "just like us" ... but they should never have to mingle with the peasant caste when they travel! That would be un-American!

However back in the real world, in the US deistically the rich count far more than the average person, when it comes to the government, hence why so many in the government kowtow to them.

They might only get one vote themselves, but enough money means you can buy the votes of others, by hook or by crook if necessary (The whole reason for Fox News' existence is to control who people vote for by limiting the information they receive). At that point, they also get to dictate policy.

Comment Re:I really wish RAM prices would come back down (Score 2) 47

anybody that can't 'afford' it buys a PC and pirates that games. No one is buying a PS5 on a budget unless they don't want to play games.

Thats the thing, people are buying consoles thinking it'll be cheaper... well at least they think they are.

With Consoles, you pay less for the hardware initially but then pay through the nose for everything else. Pay for multiplayer and online access, pay for replacement controllers (Sony can fix the stick drift, they just don't want to lose the extra revenue from £60 controllers), you pay more for games.

PC is the opposite, you pay full price for the hardware as no-one is subsidising it, then your savings start immediately, games are cheaper and go on sale more often, hardware actually lasts (I've a £30 mouse that's approaching it's 10th birthday and still going), you don't pay for online access and what's better is that we have actual competition, not one gatekeeping corporation.

If you play games, the price difference between a PS5 and a mid range gaming PC is made up in less than 2 years... and it's only that long if you don't play a lot of games.

However people are stupid, so they get suckered in by the low sticker price. Even when they're outright told this will be more expensive in the long run (years ago, UK stores had to put "per unit" pricing on the shelves, so £ per 100ml or similar, people still buy the more expensive option).

Comment Re:YMMV - But the knockoffs have a legit market (Score 1) 117

Sometimes I don't mind cheap chinesium. I just bought a pack of 60 dinner forks because my kids inexplicably loose dinner forks. I don't care about Bokon, Tinnin, ZXVFY, or whatever made up brand it is. I know I'm buying cheap chinese stuff. If I was buying life-safety equipment, well, Amazon might not be the place to start anyway.

This, sometimes I am looking for cheap, no-name products. I really don't care who made my bin bags as long as they fit in the bin and aren't a total PITA to open. It's going to be the same terrible quality as you get from the supermarket but saves me a trip.

What I'm concerned about is, is that Panaphonics TV I'm buying a genuine Panaphonics TV? That's when you have to check it's not being sold by Dongfeng or XSFCDWS.

Comment Re:"Unknown" risen to 20%, did Windows really decl (Score 1) 84

Meaning that browsers are getting better at obscuring their OS. I mean, User-Agent string probably doesn't give anything meaningful these days anyway.

Yep, could easily be a count of users running some kind of privacy extension like Privacy Badger or NoScript.

Also I certainly hope they're not basing this on the user agent string, that can be made to say anything. Also Android seems conspicuously absent.

However any decrease from the 99% Microsoft used to have is a huge improvement and any increase in Linux adoption is also worth celebrating. With Steam running Windows games on Linux I suspect I'm not the only gamer looking to move full time to Linux.

Comment Re:Learning another language is fun, too. (Score 1) 100

I spent 5 years learning German. Complete waste of time. I spent a week in Germany. Everyone spoke English. I was in a small town at a roadside convenience store and went in. I asked, in German, if they had any apples. The woman first corrected my pronunciation and then said, in English, "We don't sell apples." I found that to be the case throughout a lot of northern Europe. Outside of Germany and Scotland, the reason is that when Hollywood releases a movie in these areas, it's expensive to dub a movie in the native language. As a a result, they instead show the movie in English with subtitles in the native language. People pick up on English pretty quickly as a result. This is also part of why you can travel almost anywhere in the world and find somebody who speaks English, the other part being the British Empire. As for the Germans, after WWII, English became the language of business because of post-war occupation by 3 of the 4 powers. Finally, as for the Scottish, well, let's just watch this video.

Germany (and the Netherlands) are bad examples as they teach English to kids to be competitive on the world stage. They also didn't have large colonial empires so few other countries speak German or Dutch (nothing against the Germans or Dutch mind you, both great people). Spanish and French are more useful as there are more people who use these languages exclusively and a few former colonies that use the languages exclusively. Whilst in Spain you can get buy with little to no Spanish without a problem but try Colombia, Argentina or even Mexico where English is less widely learned and used.

Even if you're not fluent it is still useful as you can pick up on things said to you (or around you), read signs, menus so on and so forth. I used to be able to count up to 999 in Thai (I never learned the word for 1000) I did it mainly for shits and giggles whilst drinking but found it came in handy as I could walk around the markets and listen to what the Thais were negotiating and then realise how much I got ripped off for being Farang.

Comment Re:debit card rewards (Score 1) 52

Let us not be under the illusion that business owners would lower their prices if it wasn't for those 'dang fees'. Once they realized you'd pay the hire price, if the fees are gone, the businesses are just going to go 'yummy more money for me'.

Are you joking?

Merchants would love to lower their prices, they do it all the freaking time. Even if they only reduce the price by half the amount they save, it's still a win for you (in fact it's a win/win for everyone except Mr Bankster).

Comment I always use my debit card,... (Score 1) 52

...and use a credit card instead. Why?

A debit card is a direct line to your bank account. If someone fraudulently steals money from my account, that's my problem.

A credit card is a buffer (with a limit) between a thief and my bank account. If someone compromises my credit card, that's the bank's problem.

Which is why most civilised countries have a deposit guarantee scheme. So if your bank account is compromised you don't lose your money as the bank is supposed to guarantee it's security up to a given amount. In the UK that's £120,000 for individual accounts and double that for joint accounts. That is per account, so if you have £90,000 in one account and £110,000 in another account all £200,000 are covered (of course if I had that much just lying around I'd invest it but that is a different set of risks so I digress).

Banks want to keep you using credit as it makes you beholden to them. They want you to spend your entire wage paying off a credit card so you have to put all of next month on the card and repeat the cycle ad infinitum. Yes, a hell of a lot of people are in this trap because they thought like you that "the bank is my friend and will magically protect me if I use credit". That is blatantly false, there are a load of outs (the most common is blaming you for the problem so you then have to prove it's not your fault). When I was a lad (which was only a scant 25 years ago) doing my first proper job the phrase "I'm living payday to payday" was a sign you're doing it tough, now it's a sign you're doing well as many people are living debt payment to debt payment.

Comment Re:Looking at it the other way. (Score 1) 47

Look at this from the opposite direction. How much excess socializing was done in the past because people didn't have anything else or didn't own a personal time-occupying device that didn't require sharing?

All this shows is that when given the choice, people choose their own interests over shared socialization. If previous generations had phones and tablets they wouldn't have talked to their uncle about mundane shit on Thanksgiving either. I don't think people have changed all that much, we just have more options now and this is identifying our actual preferences.

Put simply, we have better things to do now. No longer do we need to waste time by just hanging out because we don't have anything else to do. Yes, that's what we had to do, we spent time with friends because we literally had no other form of entertainment and what little entertainment their was usually required going somewhere which would be boring on your own.

Now we don't have that problem and the places we used to go (theatres, pubs, clubs, sporting venues, et al.) have responded to this by becoming even more expensive which means we spend even less time planning to go out because it's so unaffordable.

The world has changed and the relics of the past appear to have chosen slow death over adaption.

Comment Re:This felony screams for hard punishment (Score 1) 153

Hard and harsh punishment was always the solution - without it, Australia wouldn't even be populated.

I get you're making a joke but the British never transported the hardend criminals to colonies (the whole reason they started Australia is that they couldn't send them to the American colonies any more), the reason for this is because Britain didn't want the people back after they finished their sentence so convicts when finishing their time would be given a parcel of land and permitted to work it, good land in the colonies seemed so abundant that there appeared to be no end of it.

For this reason, only petty and lesser criminals were sent, crimes such as theft, burglary and larceny, fraud, being in debt, or sedition. This was to reduce the population the ruling class didn't like hence debts and sedition were being used to transport the poor and Irish/Welsh/Scottish as displaying an Irish flag was considered sedition. Hence there is an abundance of Irish surnames in Australia. A lot of the English came over in the interbellum period (See: the land of milk and honey), some 70+ years since transportation stopped (1856 for those who wish to know).

Hardened criminals like rapists, murderers, politicians and the like were kept in ol' Blighty.

The overwhelming majority of Australia's population came from colonists rather than convicts and most of the colonists arrived in the 20th century (notably the interwar and post war migration booms).

Comment Re:Surely (Score 1) 153

There is surely a better way to protect children.

There is, it involves parents doing *audible gasp* actual parenting and ensuring that kids are prepared to deal with things that they find difficult and/or uncomfortable. Seeing as the parent vote is a twofer (two votes for one policy) blaming parents for not parenting is a sure-fire way to get unelected.

So politicians of all stripes take the easy answer which inevitably doesn't work so they take the next easy answer which is to double down on the failed solution with even more failure.

I knew a kid back at high school (what Americans would call junior high) and his parents tightly controlled everything he saw and heard, because they were religious fundies and didn't want any of that blasphemy getting to their kid. So much so that he was shuffled off to churchie boarding school and never seen again, not even on school holidays, years later in adulthood I learned that, as was tradition in Australia he was pushed out the door at age 18 to make his own way in the world and quickly fell into hard drugs and subsequent suicide before his 19th birthday. Rumour had it that he fell into the obvious traps that those of us who experimented with drugs during our teens knew well to avoid. The parents being good, church going folk started to pretend they never had a son, expunged all evidence of him from their lives.

Pretty much the only solution is for parents to, well, parent. Kids are always going to find a way around any restriction parents put in, doubly so if it's one the government puts in. That's all part of growing up.

Comment Re:Nuclear is a dead and dangerous technology (Score 1) 200

there's no reason why the government can't do that and just give everybody free electricity.

It's not free. Someone has to pay for it. If you're saying the government will build it and then give the electricity away for free, where do you think the government got the money to build it?

This is as bad as Europeans crowing about "free" healthcare or higher education. It's not free. They paid for it with their tax euros.

You mean the systems that are cheaper and provide better results that the privatised systems of the US?

Unlike Americans, Europeans know exactly who pays for them, they do. What Americans don't get is that it's the same situation in the US, you pay, you just pay more for a worse product.

Comment Re:Too many to list (Score 1) 242

When any game that runs natively on Windows can also be
run -natively- ( read that: no emulators ) on Linux, then we can consider this problem
to be solved.

I'm curious as to why you put this requirement in there? Especially given that we have plenty of examples of games running under the Proton layer *BETTER* than they do on Windows natively. What do you do with games other than play them?

Yep, did some tests with Steam on Linux Mint a few months back with very good results, There was little to no discernable differences I could tell on Steam games, didn't get to try GOG but the one old game I installed via Lutris worked just fine.

Biggest problem was that Steam didn't support sharing drives between Windows and Linux (or NTFS under Linux) which means I need to reformat my games storage for Linux, which means I'll have to redo my mods (OK. Bethesda forced this with another pointless FO4 update) so I'm planning to go Linux on my new gaming box which I'll build as soon as I can find a decent video card that doesn't cost the earth.

Comment Re:Windows has the opposite problem (Score 2) 242

Linux software repos are so much more intuitive than the Windows store, as it is moderated by volunteers with incentives to keep it high quality while Windows just rakes in the coins.

OTOH, when it's not in a Linux repo installation can be a right PITA. Windows at least has that bit down to a tee when installing software that isn't in the abominable Windows store (I mean, who uses the Windows store anyway).

I'm struggling to find a replacement for Notepad++ on Linux, specifically to deal with large single line JSON files, most things either choke or refuse to open them, the closest I've got is Geany which will at least open the files but editing it is still a crapshoot.

Comment Re:How dumb do you got to be..unless you're old... (Score 1) 54

These scams have been reported over and over again and people still fall for them. Old people are more likely to fall for scams unfortunately.

Never underestimate the ingenuity of the average idiot.

Add greed to naivety and you've got a winning combination if you're a scammer.

I think a lot of the problem is that many people who grew up in nice, middle class burbs never had to encounter the kinds of scammers that I did growing up in poor neighbourhoods. You had fuck all as a 15 year old in a working class neighbourhood but you could guarantee that there was someone around every corner trying to relieve you of the fuck all you did have.

Slashdot Top Deals

Riches cover a multitude of woes. -- Menander

Working...