Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Smash their Ring cameras? (Score 2) 41

Earlier the previous evening, my Ring camera managed to capture the neighbor's teenager backing into my parked work van. Thanks to the camera, I've got timestamped footage footage of both the before and after. Now, you might be thinking to yourself "Surely they owned up to their mistake and you don't need surveillance footage?" Nope, the parent/guardian was extremely belligerent about the whole thing, with a main character attitude like their kid was just playing GTA and hitting a NPC's parked car is no big deal.

So no, I won't be smashing my Ring camera. We need these things because some people no longer do the right thing even when you've got them on video. I used to wonder why almost everyone in Russia seemed to have a dashcam - now I completely understand why.

This is not a new thing, especially in the US.

The idea that people owned up to things because it is the right thing to do hasn't been true for my entire life, probably far longer than that.

It's a result of our ultra capitalist society, altruism is one of the first victims of extremism.

However no-one embodies the quality more than faceless, well protected corporations. I have a dash cam (AU/UK) because if I'm involved in a car crash I want to be able to prove beyond doubt it wasn't me, people will lie when they know the truth will cost them... However the last thing I'd want to do is upload that to someone else who has the right to sell it to whomever they want. Sure, keep a camera for security. It's quite prudent in this day and age, but get one that stores the video locally otherwise you're not just telegraphing your life to all and sundry, you also risk losing access to the footage yourself when they decide that they can charge you for access as well as subscription.

Comment Re:A woman down the street got caught cheating by (Score 1) 69

"Why don't you open the curtains and let some light in" they ask... Because every mother fucker has a surveillance camera these days Karen... every... fucking... one.

This is before you try to explain to them that they're all uploading to the mother ship (Google, Amazon, MS, et al. ). after which they'll look at you gormlessly.

Comment Re:Why does the gig economy exist? [Re:exists bec. (Score 1) 97

The gig economy exists because of immigration,

No. The gig economy exists because it is a work-around capitalism has found to employ people without treating them as employees, and hence not giving them the benefits of employees.

This, the gig economy exists because some companies found a method of employing people without having to say they're legally employed, ergo skirting employment laws, taxes, denying them benefits and being able to get rid of them if they dare challenge the management.

Its like companies that pay cash to hire people without putting them on the books... except they've found a way to do so in plain sight and have courts back them up.

Comment Re:the optimal fix is workweek, not taxation. (Score 1) 97

Raising corporate profit taxes, income taxes, and inheritance taxes is the way to go. Much of the distribution problem is a result of tax changes that benefit the wealthy which have been the policies of every Republican administration since Reagan.

Amazing that the "taxes are just wealth redistribution" or "taxes are theft" crowd never seem to get where the taxes are being redistributed to.

Comment Re:+1 Informative (Score 2) 337

to quote you that's "bullshit, bullshit & more bullshit".
ICE is specifically acting like thugs in Blue cities because that's what Trump, Miller, etc want, to provoke a violent reaction as a pretext to invoke the Insurrection Act and to normalize using government thugs for enforcement and intimidation which they'll ramp up for the midterms to "true to vote"

And on top of that... they're dumb enough to believe that once that has happened the apparatus the state has constructed won't be turned against them.

Comment Re:This is illegal in Germany (Score 1) 92

Because these "business interests" are stupid. They would get less productivity from their people if the worked more.

You're assuming productivity is the goal... it's not. The goal is control. Many of these companies long for the days when workers had no rights, right now they want us to give up our hard won rights as workers for extra money, once enough people do that they'll reduce the incentives and then all we'll have left is the long working week and no rights as workers.

The rich want to strip us of our ability to challenge them. Not like this is how every communist revolution starts or anything (and we all know they always end up bad, it's just that the system that came before them was so bad that even communism looks like a good alternative).

Don't thank god for the weekend, that MFer wanted you to slave for 6 days and prostrate for the other, if you like your weekend (and evenings), thank unions.

Comment Re:Who the fuck wants an engineer after 40h? (Score 1) 92

Ask these same people if they would get into a cab if they knew the driver were on their 69th hour that week.

I suspect they would as they don't want to acknowledge that they're paying what is effectively an illegal taxi company who underpays and abuses their workers because that cab company is a few shekels cheaper than the legitimate option. And it'll only be a few shekels cheaper as long as a legitimate alternative exists (which it's their mission to destroy).

Comment Re:Who the fuck wants an engineer after 40h? (Score 1) 92

Are these people young or stupid? Your cognitive function goes WAAY down after hour 40. Your error rate goes up, your efficiency goes down. Things that take you 4h from 8 to 12PM can be replicated in 30 min in the morning after you got some sleep. You have to be a moron to think otherwise. Hours 1-40?...you're at your best. If you're in your 20s and have no life to distract you, then hours 50-60, you MIGHT be somewhat lucid, just making a lot more mistakes and taking a lot longer to do everything. Hours 60-72?...you're just keeping a chair warm and snapping at your coworkers as your mental health deteriorates.

I've done this before. I used to be young, stupid, and paid by the hour. I grew up poor, so I asked for every bit of overtime I could get...and I nearly got myself fired because I was billing twice as much to do a task and snapped at a few managers when they asked some very stupid questions they should have known better (although I admit I was a moron at 24 both for working over 60h and thinking I could talk to those paying my salary with anything other than deference, especially when I was a new programmer). Those weekend tasks?...much higher rate of error and missed requirements....but this was the dot-com boom and everyone was a recent grad and working late...like it's a badge of honor how hardcore you are.

Your value goes down with each hour....especially if you're vibe coding, because the whole fucking point is that you're carefully reverse centauring the slop to ensure it's not introducing errors....cause all those tools generate slop...and as everyone knows by now, it looks really good...even when it's total shit that will get your data stolen...the consequence of being a giant word guessing engine.

If they were smart, they wouldn't be mandating 70h work weeks...they'd be mandating that every engineer showed up with 8h of sleep and offering all the caffeine and ritalin they can get.

It's not about productivity, it's about control.

Getting you to give up your hard won rights as a worker is the first step towards serfdom, first it's done by offering money... the incentives are slowly reduced but the long work hours remain. Before you know it, 60+ hour weeks are considered the norm as most people have given up their rights by accepting a pat on the head over defending them.

Comment Re:Wait a minute (Score 1) 104

"The romance genre -- long the publishing industry's earliest adopter of technological shifts..."

Wait a minute; we know the porn industry really advanced several aspects of visual media, but the same is also true of written media? That's both astounding and completely unsurprising.

I think the biggest revelation out of all of this is that the readers can't tell what's human created and AI slop...

It should tell you a lot about how complex and original the genre is.

I imagine that it'd be hard to replicate a good Neal Asher or Iain Banks novel... or even a Tom Clancy.

Comment Re:This is how one loses faith in systems... (Score 1) 52

There is a very important reason why in history, fraud was aggressively hunted down and destroyed. There comes a time when people will just stop trusting the system. Social media goes back to more decentralized items, perhaps just direct messaging or servers like Discord, or IRC channels. People stop using auction sites, and go back to word of mouth, or trusted supply lines with buyer guarantees. When finding a deal online becomes a gamble, we may even see a swing back to physical purchases, where a successor of Sears that may be a bit more expensive, but has a solid warranty, with some type of assurance that everything bought in the store will be useful and not junk.

If banks start becoming untrustworthy, people will take their cash and use their mattresses as ATMs. Same thing will happen with mail order, or other scamming vectors. For example, fewer and fewer people sell stuff on auction sites because someone will take the item, replace it with a lesser one, and then say they were cheated. Even if the sending of the package was filmed and signed, this rampant fraud can easily make it unprofitable for someone to work with auction sites. Maybe it might be good to use those old malls and start having flea markets again.

First point of order, banks are already and always have been untrustworthy. There's a reason they're one of the most heavily regulated industries, they have a long history of being abusive. Banks, as any experience Civ player will tell you, are a necessity, you can't build a modern economy without banks and banking, simply put we need banks but that doesn't mean we should trust them in the slightest. One of the dumbest things I hear on a regular basis is "the bank will take care of me, they're on my side".

Which leads me to my main point.

One of the biggest problems with modern society is that it's become too safe... This isn't a bad thing(TM) but it does have unintended consequences and there is nothing the law of unintended consequences loves than using a good thing(TM) to deliver an unexpected kick to the love spuds. People grew up without having to deal with grifters and charlatans on a regular basis so collectively we've lost our ability to detect and defend against obvious deceptions, the "smell" test for truth doesn't seem to be used to see if it's obvious bollocks, let alone basic fact checking.

This seems to affect those who grew up in middle class and wealthy families more. The grifters and fraudsters were purged from these places in the 80s and 90s meaning most people never had to learn to identify them and how to avoid their scams and schemes. It means people never learned how a hoax or scam works, how one starts, the tricks that get used to pull you in. I didn't grow up with a silver spoon in my mouth. I was, as Sir Elton once uttered "the juvenile product of the working class", I was born in a shithole, grew up in shitholes and vowed I'd never die in a shithole. If you want to make good on such a vow you need to learn to spot and deal with the scammers from a young age as there is often no avoiding them. They were commonplace in the poorer parts of Australia and the UK (probably most countries) in the late 90s and early 00s, likely still are and they were more than happy to relieve you of whatever meagre income or possessions you had. Even the most highly accomplished scammer likely started their career in the slums and low rent neighbourhoods. Its where they cut their teeth.

The problem we have now is that the internet has allowed the scammers that have previously been restricted to plying their trade in the poorer neighbourhoods, full access to the entirety of society and 30+ years of insulation means that the middle class burbers have no inbuilt defences. So scams, fraud and disinformation is ripping through them like smallpox thought the native American population in the 16th century. The only inoculation for this is critical thinking and there are a lot of very wealthy individuals, particularly in the US that want to retard any attempt to get people thinking critically as their business relies on people swallowing huge volumes of nonsense.

Comment Re:This is how one loses faith in systems... (Score 1) 52

There is a very important reason why in history, fraud was aggressively hunted down and destroyed. There comes a time when people will just stop trusting the system

I'm not sure what time in history you are talking about.

Rather recently... and that was only for the people who defrauded rich people.

You could rob all the grannies you wanted of their pensions, but if you dared to ply such craft on the rich you'd be hunted down like the vermin you are.

Comment Re:Kind of weird (Score 1) 134

I would expect "stopping for school busses" would be an obvious and easy situation.

The logic is easy, IF object=="school bus" THEN "stop safely".

The problem comes in recognising that the object is a school bus. A car's onboard computers have milliseconds to decide what the object they've picked up is and what to do about it. Often this means making a decision on incomplete information, they don't have the exact dimensions (because the angle is wrong), they may not even know what colour it is. This kind of recognition something humans can do instinctively, we've evolved that ability over hundreds of thousands of years... Computers, not so much. They don't know if what they've perceived on the side of the road is a child or a bollard, even if they've been able to determine it's approximate size.

And it's flummoxed before we get to the really important thing about human perception... our ability to track things and project their course. We, again instinctively, will track objects and project where they're going. This is what made us very successful as hunters and rather unsuccessful at being prey. The level of computing power to track and predict the path of objects in real time would drain your EV battery in minutes... not to mention fill half of it with compute resources.

It might be finally dawning on people that the self driving car is a self driving fantasy... this generation's "flying car".

Comment Re:Not who you want in charge of road safety.. (Score 1) 75

We teach our babies to never shoot from motorcycles. The recoil can be dangerous.

And rightly so, children should not be taught to use individual firearms.

They're much better suited to crew served weapons, the stationary nature of crew served weapons means their relative individual strength is less of a drawback and it promotes co-operation and teamwork.

Comment Re:Not who you want in charge of road safety.. (Score 1) 75

I mean, this is a country where babies don't wear motorcycle helmets.

Scarily enough, the Philippines is not the worst place I've seen for driving, easily outperformed by Thailand, where you've a reincarnation religion in a place where life is cheap (combined with an attitude of "if I die, I die"). Pinoys are relative paragons of safe driving in comparison.

The big issue with the Phils is road quality, once you get of the NLEX and SCTEX motorways you've got potholes the size of small lakes.

Slashdot Top Deals

% A bank is a place where they lend you an umbrella in fair weather and ask for it back the when it begins to rain. -- Robert Frost

Working...