Comment Re:Justice delayed is justice denied (Score 1) 64
You would think that with a former-lawyer as the prime minister now it would get sorted
You'd think that with a former human rights lawyer as the prime minister, he wouldn't be so keen on shitting on human rights.
No for Starmer, everything was just a stepping stone on his career ladder.
It's weird but he's a vacuum. He doesn't appear to stand for anything in particular. This is why none of the decisions make much sense as a whole, why there's no coherence, why he has no articulated vision, why the policies are a complete mishmash.
But it's weirder. He doesn't even seem to stand for enriching himself beyond career climbing. He's somewhat non corrupt as these things go (I mean the glasses thing was dumb shit but small fry on the scale of these thing).
So sure he knows about the courts and human rights and etc but he doesn't stand for any of them.
Actually scratch that.
Judging him by what he's achieved, about the only thing he has been consistent on is a kind of petty authoritarianism with him in charge. This isn't even to say he hasn't done anything good (he manifestly has), but as part of a weird directionless morass (nationalise the trains, but repeat water company press releases about why that's impossible for water, for example).
Starmer is still better than the alternatives (Farage, Badenoch) but that's not saying much. The alternatives are just that shit.
Labour need to backtrack on the authoritarianism pronto, otherwise we'll be proper fucked the next time a real authoritarian gets in (like Trump bum buddy Farage). Some of the laws they're creating are made to be abused, even though Starmer isn't going to abuse them (he lacks the initiative, drive and imagination for that)