Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:How much do we care? (Score 1) 52

Is it tacky and salacious? Yeah, but I just don't see the victim here. The prostitutes are well paid and their clients know what they're buying. I don't see anyone as being exploited. IMHO, prostitution is a zoning issue, not a crime.

The problem comes in when it stops being entirely voluntary and starts becoming a requirement or a cudgel that they get beaten with.

This is literally what sex traffickers do. Entice young women in with promises of a big payday, then entrap them. Usually it's by pretty illegal means, literal bondage by holding their passports or violence. They're just legalising the bondage part by tying it to a non-imm visa that can be cancelled at any time. That way they can be forced to work, to give the majority of their earnings to their pimp and have no recourse because the law will be arrayed against them.

I'm not against prostitution, not being American I've never had any issues with anyone who pays for sex as long as it's entirely consensual. Never understood the raging hate boner the US has for sex, it's one of the most wholesome and natural things money can buy. What I am against trafficking, suffering and what amounts to the modern equivalent of slavery.

If you've got a thing for Asians, Latinas or Eastern Europeans, there are dozens of places for you to go where women are not forced into sex work.

Comment Re:Rich people don't tell their kids to skip colle (Score 1) 86

Duh, that's because the cost is trivial to them and they send their kids to schools where the main thing is to meet future cronies from other rich families.

It's mainly because they need something for their kids to do for a few years before they get parachuted into a cushy job by one of their contacts.

There's a joke (from comedian Ivo Graham) about the exclusive school Eton, "I received an Eton advent calendar, its the same as a normal advent calendar except all the doors are opened by your fathers contacts".

Comment Re:Failure (Score 1) 26

We should not be paying these private companies to run core government tech. Such things like this should be done in house and not for profit. Why pay more for less. They've proven themselves incompetent numerous times yet we throw taxpayer money at them constantly. Disgusting.

Because Torynomics says that the private industry is automagically better because reasons (something, something, something, the 70s, don't mention the last 15 years, something something).

Story time children.

Once upon a time in a land far away there was a council, this council was conservative. One day, the wicked witch of Sita came to speak to the council and said "give me your refuse and I'll make it go cheap". The conservatives shone with glee as they were greedy and this avarice was their weakness. They sold the contract to the wicked witch of Sita with reckless abandon and no though of future consequences for they were promised gold, the council dug too greedily and sacked all the bin serfs and sold off all the bin wagons. It did not take long before the tree of their avarice bore fruit for when the contract expired, the wicked witch of Sita knew that the council had no bin serfs, no bin wagons and no choice, "you will pay the higher price" said the wicked witch of Sita, the council looked in despair as they did not want to admit they got it wrong and said "what happened to our deal, we cannot afford this" and the wicked witch of Sita said "then we will only collect the refuse of the villages but once a fortnight and you will pay the same price". The council was eventually chucked out for their greed and stupidity, but it's too late as the damage was done and weekly bin collections became a thing of myth and legend.

Comment Re:Seems like this mostly hurts rural/minority are (Score 1) 157

Is that real?

Critical Race Theory, no, it's a conspiracy theory dreamed up by the far right to justify racism.

Antiques Roadshow, yes, it's a long running BBC reality series with 46 seasons since 1979 where antique appraisers are sent to various locations in the UK to value items bought in by the general public. Much loved by the elderly because to them, it's just Roadshow.

Comment Re: Your own prejudice is showing (Score 1) 93

Showing that there's a right-bias in guest selection only proves that there's a right-bias in guest selection. That can be offset by other sources of bias, such as story selection, story presentation, interviewer-guest interaction, etc.

Most of the interactions I've had with the BBC here in the US (mainly through the BBC News Hour on NPR in the morning and some occasional online stories) come across as pretty neutral anecdotally, and MBFC, my preferred watchdog for this sort of thing, seems to agree. So I think the original poster's conclusion that the BBC is left-biased is probably untrue and likely comes from his own place of bias. But it's important not to overstate the case here based on one metric. A news outlet disproportionately taking on right-leaning guests could very easily be offset by, for example, the host being disproportionately confrontational to those guests or conveying story information before or after in a manner intended to predispose the audience to the opposing viewpoint.

The BBC, being publicly funded (via the TV license, not general taxation) is constantly monitored for any sign of bias. So much so that the last conservative government abused this to try to place people in their to ensure there is a right wing bias under the guise of "eliminating left wing bias". Recent events from Trump and the right wing press in the UK have actually let the BBC clean out a few of those people the Conservatives put into managerial positions, which was fortunately the opposite of what they wanted to achieve.

Question Time having predominantly right wing guests isn't news to most of us over this side of the pond though. The right still claims it's "left wing bias" though.

Also the guests are the main focus of the programme as they're usually government or opposition politicians or otherwise highly politically engaged people like top journalists, analysts, et al. so the guest selection having a bias is a bit of a concern as it means the BBC is giving more air time to one side.

Comment Re:Electric semis are not viable (Score 1) 175

Well, truckers who have driven EV trucks have preferred them - they are much easier on the body than diesel engines. The smoothness and quietness of EVs mean their backs and joints don't hurt as much after a long day of driving.

Spot the guy who's never driven in a lorry.

Or a sports car.

Vibration and harshness does not come from the engine. It comes from the road. This is why rail travel is often a lot smoother than road travel, you're not dealing with a poor road surface.

Try taking a car around a proper race track, the difference between that and street driving will be chalk and cheese, especially in a car with a hard suspension setup (which I strongly suspect, yours is not). Same car, same engine, same tyres, different surface.

Comment Re:Human-powered Ignorance. (Score 1) 38

According to the article, Reddit "believes it is also benefiting from shifting internet habits, as younger users seek out human-generated reviews and opinions."

According to human history, PT Barnum didn’t need a lick of help from non-human sources in order to prove there’s a sucker born every minute. 4chan is (mostly) human-generated too. Should we consider that a viable source of non-machine powered intelligence too?

Gotta love the circle-jerk logic of fallible greedy humans needing to create AI in business because of fallible greedy humans, who now seek out the advice of fallible greedy humans because of what fallible greedy humans have ironically done with AI.

PT Barnum was a hell of an optimist to think there's only one born every minute.

Comment Re:Reddit - AI bots, and Sad Basement Trolls (Score 1) 38

I use reddit. It can be good at times. The biggest problem there is no effective way to decipher crazies from normal people. The karma system is a joke. Most of the crazies (overly aggressive, angry, know-it-all, echo chamber weirdos) are the high karmas. Almost the opposite of what karma is supposed to be used for. This might be ok, but this same sort of fanatacism carries over to the mods. You go to some relatively normal sounding subreddit, and read some posts. Cool, so you respond to some posts. Ask innocent questions. Uh oh - the echo chamber jumps you with tons of downvotes. Then you respond (not being rude mind you - just sharing data to address the downvotes), and some snowflake mod decides they don't like your response and bans you. You can appeal but good luck - in their demented world the appeal is just so they can flex their basement troll "power". The mods violate their own rules, don't give you warnings (even though they say they have to), and repeatedly abuse their role. In all my years I've never seen such a poorly instrumented, and abused mod system. This even goes back all the way to BBS's.

If you know a way to cure tribalism, I'd love to hear it.

Until then, we'll just have to manage it as best we can.

I live in the UK and regularly read Reddit as an anonymous user (meaning I don't have an account) and it's fairly good. Most of the really nutty stuff gets filtered out relatively quickly and it doesn't seem to push anti-vax or other extremist propaganda to average people (read: those not expressly looking for it). Many of the UK centric sub-reddits are great examples of British humour, which is what brings me back and I suspect a lot of others. I suspect Tiktok like other forms of social media have just become cesspits of extremism, hate and their propaganda, much like TheAppFormerlyKnownAsTwitter and it's reached a point where it's so obvious and so bad that it's insulting the intelligence of even those who do not posses much of it to be insulted.

Also Reddit is still mostly text... not another bloody video site where you spend 2 minutes watching something you could have read in 12 seconds... if you were taking your time about it.

Basically, people are looking for socials with the least amount of obvious bullshit.

Comment Re:the last of us (Score 1) 63

We don't combat it, we die. That's why epidemiologists have been warning about the overuse of anti-biotics for decades.

Antibiotics do nothing against fungus.

True, but the same lesson is valid for broad spectrum anti-fungals like Amphotericin B.

It's an indictment of the poor way the US treats health care, not just the poor health care system but also the "quick fix" attitude of many Americans. If they get any illness they'll demand the doctor gives them magic pills (a broad spectrum cure, like azithromycin(zithromax)) rather than suffer through a minor illness and of course, the for profit health care system is more than happy to oblige (as is the greater corporate America, who don't want their serfs taking a week off to get better). Overuse of medication when the patient will get better with rest and isolation is why pathogens evolve to become resistant to them.

With fungal infections, prevention is almost always better and this comes in the tried and tested methods of hygiene and quarantine. First is to have a clean environment to prevent the fungus from having enough resources to establish itself, then keep the infected away from healthy patients.

Comment Re:likely to fail (Score 3, Interesting) 43

We can hope it will work. We will see just how far the long arm of California law reaches. The Do Not Call list really became a verified list to abuse.

Sadly that's all those lists become, a list of numbers that tell scammers and spammers that a line has a person behind it. One of their biggest problems are paying agents to talk to unattended lines (the people working for scammers are happy to scam their employers, you're shocked, I can tell).

What's needed is to go after the telcos and other businesses that permit this, especially as they're profiting from it, even though it's indirect profit they're still benefiting and permitting it. You want to curtail this kind of activity, punish those enabling it.

I've never joined a no-call list in my life, I've always figured that keeping my number as secret as possible is a better defence which means not handing it out to all and sundry. It's like underpants, they know I'm wearing some but not what colour or kind they are.

Comment Re:Two big reasons for the politeness (Score 1) 168

This means that the bottom socioeconomic 2/3 of society is mostly excluded.

I don't follow. How would limiting membership to stuck up self-obsessed narcissists that make up the rich population improve things? My experience is the rich people are the ones that are most likely to block the path.

It works for Apple....

Jokes aside, I don't think that's what Costco does. Costco (at least in the UK) limits membership to ether business owners or people in certain professions. From the UK website it's Banking / Finance, Local Government, Fire / Rescue Service, Post Office, Airlines, Education, Police Force, Civil Service / Armed Forces, Medical / Health Service, Insurance. Not exactly the bottom run, but a lot of those are not high paying careers either. Also your company can arrange to be added to the pre-approved membership list (my current employer is despite not directly being in any of those industries listed) so any of their employees can apply for membership. I believe Costco started as a store for (US) government employees, so definitely not trying to shut out the poor (surely you do that by just having high prices).

Not that your point isn't a very valid one good sir.

Comment Re:Two big reasons for the politeness (Score 1) 168

The membership requirement helps to keep out the riffraff not because of the financial burden but because they can cancel the membership of anyone who misbehaves. Other stores have to keep even cheap stuff locked up out of reach of shoplifters and that gets annoying for customers quickly. (Costco has a cage for small, high priced things but they always keep it staffed so there's never a wait.)

That wasn't the reason. It usually begins because they want to maintain some specific exclusivity, with Costco it began with US government employees (which is why Costco still discriminates on industry). Australians and Brits may be familiar with the style of store that costco is, we used to call them "Cash and Carry" stores which were large warehouse outlets that were often (and in some cases like Booker still are) limited to business customers, so you had to have a business to get membership to shop there.

Cash and Carry shops started to decline in the 90s because large supermarkets pushed out smaller stores and ran their own logistics, reducing the need to for warehouse stores selling in bulk and delivery became more viable for other business. So they started opening up to the general public but that wasn't enough to save most of them. Costco is a hybrid that combines the warehouse concept of a cash and carry with a normal supermarket.

Comment Re:It's a bubble (Score 3, Interesting) 29

Get out as soon as you can. The ultra rich are the one ones that are going to walk away unscathed.

I'm less concerned about getting out unscathed as I don't have a dog in that fight... However as I'm not a member of the ultra rich (just a peasant who's managed to do OK for their humble beginnings) I'm worried about the aftermath.

The AI bubble is the only thing holding the US economy above water. With Trump's tarriffs screwing everyone who's not a billionaire six ways from Sunday, his financial illiteracy destroying what little that isn't screwing over and his overlords more concerned with keeping the ultra rich onside as they proceed with their Great Re-Whitening... Once the AI bubble bursts it's going to be carnage, metaphorically with huge job losses (which have already started) and possibly literally with the huge amounts of guns in the hands of not so stable people.

As someone living in the UK, we'll be somewhat insulated from this as business flees the US, it'll come to the UK and EU first, with Canada, Japan, Australia and a few others getting some as well. This issue for me will come as aftershocks, a lot of British businesses have swallowed the Cloud and AI fads hook, line and sinker so they'll struggle to get away from large American tech corporations who will be desperate to fleece whoever they can (and it's not like I didn't warn them when they sold off their local infrastructure for "cheap" cloud). Also the fact that we'll see a lot of Americans immigrating over to Europe, meaning more competition for the good jobs.

Slashdot Top Deals

Invest in physics -- own a piece of Dirac!

Working...