Comment Re:It's because they can't prevent them (Score 1) 55
This is necessary and important because if you put them in wealthy neighborhoods people there have time out of their day they can take to organize petitions to get them banned and removed. Poor people can't do that because they're too busy working three jobs to afford a one-bedroom apartment they share with five guys.
You have this entirely backwards. People in Florida's gated communities love their security. Every gated neighborhood I've ever been has security cameras pointed at the entrances and exits, and some even have an actual human making copies of the driver's licenses of everyone who enters. The residents with transponders or barcodes to enter? Yep, that activity is automatically logged, too.
Most of the people physically protesting Flock cameras are college (age) kids and this retired guy with a pool pole. They're generally not wealthy.
Wealthy people don't physically protest, that's just for the proles.
Wealthy people protest by calling their bought and paid for politicians (or merely rented if they're not wealthy enough) which is far more effective.
The rich would love to have everyone tracked except for them. What Nineteen-Eighty Four didn't mention is that the inner party members were not subject to the same rules as normal party members (or proles).