PagerDuty CEO Quotes MLK Jr. In Worst Layoff Email Ever (gizmodo.com) 54
Jody Serrano writes via Gizmodo: In a 1,669-word email to employees, [PagerDuty CEO Jennifer Tejada] echoed the script many tech CEOs have recited in recent months, stating that today's "volatile economy requires additional transformation" by the company. As a result, PagerDuty would be "refining" its operating model by cutting about 7% of its staff globally. That wasn't the only "refinement" the company would undertake, though. According to Tejada, PagerDuty will reduce its discretionary spend, negotiate "more favorable commercial agreements with key vendors," and "rationalize [its] real estate footprint." Up to this point, Tejada's email, while overly complex, weird, and tone deaf, still was not that bad. She goes on to acknowledge employees and their contributions to PagerDuty and announces a decent severance pay of 11 weeks, with extended healthcare coverage and job support.
Nonetheless, it all starts to go downhill when she decides to use the same email where she announces layoffs to celebrate recent employee promotions, reveal good financial results for the fourth quarter of last year, and state that the company expects to end the year strong. As if she couldn't do so in another email where people weren't told they were possibly losing their jobs. "We expect to finish the year strong -- in fact, we have reaffirmed our guidance for FY23 today -- and those results, combined with the refinements outlined above, put PagerDuty in a position of strength to successfully execute on our platform strategy regardless of what the market and the macroenvironment bring," Tejada said.
While it's clearly a CEO's job to cheer on their company, Tejada makes things sound so good that it's perplexing to think the company has to lay off any people to begin with. Alas, the PagerDuty CEO was not done sticking her foot in her mouth and ended her note with a reference a quote from King's sermons published in The Measure of a Man in 1959. She used brackets to change the quote slightly to accommodate her message. "I am reminded in moments like this, of something Martin Luther King said, that 'the ultimate measure of a [leader] is not where [they] stand in the moments of comfort and convenience, but where [they] stand in times of challenge and controversy,'" Tejada said. "It doesn't seem to have been written with ill intent, but rather with the goal to save time (by announcing layoffs, promotions, and predictions for a solid year) and save face (by refusing to say the word layoffs)," adds Serrano. "In these difficult situations, though, it's just better to be upfront."
Nonetheless, it all starts to go downhill when she decides to use the same email where she announces layoffs to celebrate recent employee promotions, reveal good financial results for the fourth quarter of last year, and state that the company expects to end the year strong. As if she couldn't do so in another email where people weren't told they were possibly losing their jobs. "We expect to finish the year strong -- in fact, we have reaffirmed our guidance for FY23 today -- and those results, combined with the refinements outlined above, put PagerDuty in a position of strength to successfully execute on our platform strategy regardless of what the market and the macroenvironment bring," Tejada said.
While it's clearly a CEO's job to cheer on their company, Tejada makes things sound so good that it's perplexing to think the company has to lay off any people to begin with. Alas, the PagerDuty CEO was not done sticking her foot in her mouth and ended her note with a reference a quote from King's sermons published in The Measure of a Man in 1959. She used brackets to change the quote slightly to accommodate her message. "I am reminded in moments like this, of something Martin Luther King said, that 'the ultimate measure of a [leader] is not where [they] stand in the moments of comfort and convenience, but where [they] stand in times of challenge and controversy,'" Tejada said. "It doesn't seem to have been written with ill intent, but rather with the goal to save time (by announcing layoffs, promotions, and predictions for a solid year) and save face (by refusing to say the word layoffs)," adds Serrano. "In these difficult situations, though, it's just better to be upfront."
Question (Score:5, Interesting)
Is she taking a pay cut? Is she forgoing stock awards and options (if any)? Is she giving up and of her perks?
Re: (Score:2)
Is she taking a pay cut? Is she forgoing stock awards and options (if any)? Is she giving up and of her perks?
I'm guessing (a) no and (b) she'll be getting a raise, a bonus, and more alternate compensation.
Re: (Score:1)
Is she taking a pay cut?
Of course not. She's the CEO, hired by the BOD to do her job. She isn't the owner. Many companies in her industry are doing layoffs. It is silly to blame the layoffs on her. Her job is to maximize profit, not headcount.
If the BOD wants to cut her pay, they can try, but she likely has an employment contract, so unlikely. It is also likely that the BOD signed off on these layoffs.
Is she forgoing stock awards and options (if any)?
Why should she? If investors think she made the right decision, she will be rewarded with a higher stock price, as she should.
Is she giving up and of her perks?
Why s
Re: Question (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
Because she is pretending to be sad.
How so? Her letter made it sound like she didn't care much. How is she pretending to be sad?
If she was actually sad, she would use some of her millions to stem job loss.
It is her job to run the company profitably, not to "stem job losses".
If she has employees that aren't contributing net value, then it is better for the company, the economy, and (in the long run) the employees themselves, to leave with their severance checks and find more productive employment elsewhere.
Re: (Score:1)
It is her job to run the company profitably
Business memes like this are far more durable than I ever would have imagined. Your idea is essentially a restatement of Jack Welsh's claim that the only job the executives in a company have is to maximize shareholder value. And at the time he meant the literal shareholders, the people who own the company.
That was absolutely loved by Wall Street and quickly became taught in every business school everywhere. Every freshly minted MBA would whip it or some variation of it out in every meeting. People who wro
Re: (Score:2)
That a bit insulting to Micheal Jackson, who as far as I know never filed fraudulent financial statements for his business. Welch and his long-time CFO buddy were later re
Re: (Score:2)
IIRC, it was Milton Friedman in the 1960's who first said that the only job of any company was to maximize shareholder value.
When I worked at Novell in the 1990s, a commonly seen poster said
OUR PRIORITIES:
Customers first
Employees second
Shareholders third
Any modern board would have had Ray Noorda fired and then shot for saying that.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
You'd think there would be a more competent way to manage the layoffs. Company image and all that.
Re: (Score:2)
You'd think there would be a more competent way to manage the layoffs. Company image and all that.
Not necessarily. Before today, I had never heard of PagerDuty.
For obscure companies, any exposure is better than none.
Re: (Score:1)
Top management sat in a meeting and decided to fire people in a way that would make them front page news for the sheer absurdity of it. They probably thought this would help them attract top talent in the future.
The more likely scenario is that the CEO wrote the memo and, if she showed it to anyone at all before having it sent out, those who saw it didn't question it because they thought they'd get fired too. That memo was clearly written by someone in an advanced state
Re: (Score:2)
Hahahahaha. Please. Stop.
So-called leaders (Score:5, Insightful)
It isn't. It's the easiest. It's the most simplest way to balance the books. It requires no effort to make the decision. You only need to pretend that there are only two numbers worth consideration - revenue vs employee remuneration.
They should be made to write: "rather than do work, I just took the easy way out." Don't pretend you're MLK Jr.
Re: (Score:2)
I love how "leaders" often claim that laying off people is the hardest thing they'd have to do.
It isn't. It's the easiest. It's the most simplest way to balance the books. It requires no effort to make the decision. You only need to pretend that there are only two numbers worth consideration - revenue vs employee remuneration.
I think most people mean the hardest thing emotionally/personally, but good points otherwise.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:So-called leaders (Score:4, Insightful)
She does not sound like somebody who as empathy.
For a CEO, empathy is a handicap.
The best CEOs dispassionately apply utilitarian principles.
Goodness has nothing to do with it [economist.com]
Re: (Score:3)
They're psychopaths, so... it's actually quite fun for them.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
I think the term is sociopath.
In common use, psychopath and sociopath are used interchangeably.
They used to have different meanings, but the distinction has been diluted out of existence.
Originally, a "psychopath" was someone who lacked empathy and acted without remorse, while a "sociopath" was someone who didn't follow society's rules but often followed the rules of a sub-group and could feel empathy and remorse, at least within their group.
So a lone serial killer would be a psychopath.
A loyal hitman in a gang would be a sociopath.
But
Re: (Score:3)
Psychopaths are calculated and pretend to care; sociopaths make it clear they don't and are explosive. CEOs with the disorder are more likely to be psychopaths than sociopaths.
I've dealt with both at the workplace; this CEO doesn't strike me as either, she sounds more like a dumb actor than someone with a personality disorder.
Re: (Score:2)
Is it really a disorder? We like to try all these drugs to "normalize" people but some of us are high strung, others are more depressive, some are narcissistic, some people think they are in the wrong bodies and others are psychopaths.
It's all naturally occurring in nature so I don't know that I would call it a disorder. One of those in my list we outright pretend is normal in fact.
Re: (Score:2)
There is such a thing as a "good psychopath", just one of the countless examples is we'd all be speaking German if it hadn't been for those among the Allies.
There is no "cure" for those "disorders" but it is good to have those traits categorized to help you in dealing with certain people.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
I've had to write people up and recommend they be fired. I didn't feel bad because the person in question was definitely a net drag on the department and clearly didn't care. I was quite happy when they eventually were let go.
Guess that makes me a psychopaths but I remember my place of work does not exist to provide me a job. The world doesn't exist for me alone.
GPT3 or PagerDuty (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
I have a dream ... (Score:2)
"It doesn't seem to have been written with ill intent, but rather with the goal to save time (by announcing layoffs, promotions, and predictions for a solid year) and save face (by refusing to say the word layoffs)," ...
It's email -- electronic mail -- send separate letters for separate things.
Re: (Score:2)
Is it all slackers' fault now? I thought it was George Soros, the Mexicans, the Ecuadorians, crony capitalists, the democrat pedophile sex dungeons, Comet Pizza, Nancy Pelosi, crony scientists inventing covid, and of course the trans agenda.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah those things as well.
Re: (Score:2)
If cutting the 7% (I'm sure most companies have at least 7% of useless staff that really do need to be let go) makes the company more efficient, wouldn't it be wrong not to lay those people off?
I know I get real tired of seeing useless people get away with being useless while I get stuff done. In the past I just kept working, but the longer this behavior goes on, the less bad I feel taking that extra water cooler break.
I wish my company would lay off it's 10% worse performers but we are instead looking to h
Worst layoff memo *so* *far* (Score:2)
It's the worst layoff memo *so* *far*. I guarantee someone will top it before too much longer by saying the quiet part loudly.
So how quick (Score:5, Insightful)
Did it go from “no one wants to work anymore” to “massive layoffs are coming”? The ruling class is not happy that people are demanding higher wages.
Re:So how quick (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
Got to get people back into the office. You selfish work from home people are killing downtown. Many POCs need you to go spend $15 a day for lunch and another $15 for after work drinks. How dare you not help keep downtown vibrant. /s
Now the CEOs are being told by the BOD, which are best friends with the elected and unelected officials and the word is, we need you back in the office. For the economy!!!
If you won't come into the office, we'll just lay you off. The average worker are replaceable. Only really t
Chat GPT would have done much metter job (Score:2)
No skill to manage a company sustainability, no skill to write a memo. Replace CEO with Chat GPT - at least the memo will be good.
Re:Chat GPT would have done much metter job (Score:5, Informative)
So, I asked chatgpt to tell employees they are fired. it said "As an AI, I am not authorized to communicate employment decisions such as layoffs. It is important to consult with a human resources representative or a supervisor before communicating a layoff to employees. The communication should be clear and specific, and should include information about the reasons for the layoff, the effective date, and any available resources for assistance such as unemployment benefits or job search assistance. It's also important to consider the legal and ethical implications of layoffs."
But... then I said "tell someone bad news" .. and it said "Here's an example of how to deliver bad news:
"I wanted to speak with you today to share some unfortunate news. Due to unforeseen circumstances, we will have to make some changes to our team. Unfortunately, this means we will have to let you go, and your last day of employment will be on (date). I understand this is not the outcome you were hoping for, and I want to express my sincere apologies. We appreciate the contributions you have made to the company and we will make sure that you receive your final paycheck and any other benefits you are entitled to. If you have any questions or need assistance, please let us know."
Yeah... that's AI safety for you.
Re: (Score:2)
Worst Ever (Score:2)
If things start to turn ugly, she can just claim that ChatGPT wrote it.
Re: (Score:3)
Funny coincidence: an article yesterday said that ChatGPT has been programmed to specifically "Sorry, Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that" on that specific request.
Capital punishment for corpnewspeak (Score:2)
Reminds me of that old JFK speech (Score:2)
All publicity is good publicity *Slow claps* (Score:2)
11 weeks severance (Score:3)
Looks decent... I'm guessing that duration wasn't randomly chosen though. How much you want to bet the employees are mostly H1-Bs, and will have to find another job before week 12 in order to stay in the US?
Why is the company needed? (Score:2)
I believe that there is no ill intent (Score:3)
I really do. She just is so detached from reality or any emotional connection with her workers that the idea that these are human beings doesn't even cross her mind and she doesn't give a fuck about them.
That's ok, though, the thought that the likes of her are human beings is also something doesn't register with me. If someone goes ahead and damages or destroys her, all I could think is "So? There's plenty more that will do it instead, don't worry".
Yet another psychopath in charge (Score:4, Insightful)