I've had two 80-mile-range EVs, three with ranges over 200 miles, and one that supposedly could do 300 miles (a Tesla - it couldn't unless I drove slowly). I know EVs. We now have two that get to 60 in the low-3-second range
I never bought a light hybrid. Yes, they can regenerate power while slowing down, and yes, they are more efficient in every way. However, comparative compact cars can perform almost as well for less total cost to own. When faced between a 35 mpg Scion xA and a 45mpg Prius, it was easy to take the Scion. We'd have saved maybe $200 a year or gas with the Prius, maybe. Over the five years we owned the car, we'd never have made that money back, even after a higher resale value.
I never bought a plug-in hybrid either, and we never will. Yes, they're better than EVs for long car trips, which we almost never take. They're great for short hops around town, which we often take. They largely perform worse than and cost about the same as similar pure EVs. Even if you plug in every day, you still have to go to a gas station now and then, and you still have to get oil changes now and then. PITA. If I want a plug-in hybrid that accelerates as fast as my EVs in real world situations, I'm looking at 100k+ Porsche, BMW, or Mercedes. Even then, they respond slower to the gas pedal than my 80k BMW and 50k Volvo.