I meant that only they used them to tell the future. That is what toxicology is, looking at animal guts and trying to predict the future.
Oh, I thought that was what quants did. My bad.
Sure, by some value of "great" that isn't backed up by any objective measurement. I'm going to call it "it gets 10/10 on making you feel like you're driving a Jaguar." They set the standard:
My point is that his perception is positively fucked. It cannot be reconciled with reality- his feelings for his Jaguar have nuked his objectivity.
There are a lot of objective ways of measuring all sorts of things about car performance, including ride quality and track numbers. A car that gets great track numbers usually sacrifices comfort and, often, performance on the road. A Model 3 Performance is a great track weapon, one lap at a time. On the road, the one lap issue mostly goes away, but then the terrible design of Tesla suspension, which as far as I can figure goes into weird geometry issues on mid-corner bumps, raises its ugly head. Sure, you can put in stiffer springs and dampers to limit the travel away from those extremes, but then you have less wheel travel and a worse ride. I know from experience. I also have driven the I-Pace on the same roads, and it handles mid-corner bumps with aplomb, as does the i4. Hence, a stock I-Pace can be driven harder on questionable canyon roads than a Model 3 Performance can, but the M3P is faster objectively on track.
<< WAIT >>