You're consuming content literally as we speak.
And I am seeing no ads at all. Which is the only way I will carry on consuming this content. Fuck ads.
Work smarter, not harder. But God help you if they catch you not working harder.
More importantly: appearing to do so. No wonder the vast majority of startups fold in short order. Bloody idiots.
I mean, that's Google's purpose, right? Pay as least as possible for everything, including people and talent?
Of course: Google is a for-profit organization, not a charity. They will do whatever it takes within the law to maximize their profit, and whatever they can get away without the law as long as they do not get caught, or as long as the cost of getting caught is not as high as the profit obtained. They do that all the time: when, say, the EU imposes a tens of millions of euros fine on Google, Google just pays up as part of the cost of inherent to maximizing their profit - such fines are to Google what a few dollars would be to most of us.
microsoft only cares about maximizing shareholder returns.
The same as all other for-profit organizations. The assumption is that providing excellent products/service will do it, but the truth is that companies in general have many avenues to maximize shareholder returns that do not involve providing excellent products/service. In fact, once a company acquires a dominance in their space equivalent to MS's in the desktop, providing excellent products/service essentially becomes a liability: something that puts a dent on their profits.
I think BO will be way ahead of Spacex with a manned lunar lander ( Starship will take a long time to man-rate ) so good job BO are pushing ahead with landers, although there isn't much overlap between building a lander and continuing with Shepard flights, so more lies there.
They have yet to put anybody in LEO. I don't see BO getting the capability to reach the Moon any time soon.
It's not an optical illusion, it just looks like one. -- Phil White