Hillary offers only disastrously bad interventionism. This is not an exaggeration -- look at her track record. Who among us can put destruction of an entire country on the resume?
What that really means is her interventionism is low-threshold. Trump's interventionism is high-threshold. The latter is a safer strategy for the world even if it misses a few false negatives.
What's interesting is that seems perfectly analogous to medical interventions. Would you rather have a doctor who sends you under the knife frequently, even for injuries that eventually self heal, or a doctor who prescribes surgeries very conservatively?