Japan is Giving Away Free Houses (fastcompany.com) 224
There are some 8 million abandoned homes -- or akiya -- in Japanese suburbia, according to The Japan Times . And if you've got a visa allowing you to live in Japan, some of them can be yours for free or very low prices, and the government may give you a subsidy to renovate one. From a report: There are even databases devoted to helping people find these homes, known as "akiya banks." What's driving the government to give away homes? In part, it has to do with Japan's aging population: According to the World Bank, the country's population decreased by -0.2% in 2017 alone, while China and the U.S. slowly grew 0.6% and 0.7% respectively. There are simply fewer people in Japan than there once were -- roughly 1.3 million fewer people than in 2010 by one count [paywall].
The Jeffersons: Japanese style. (Score:1)
So how do the Japanese feel about a bunch of foreigners as next door neighbors.
Re:The Jeffersons: Japanese style. (Score:5, Interesting)
So long as you stay in main metropolises like Tokyo or Kyoto? Maybe. A big maybe.
Leave that and go into more rural areas, like this offer, and you're going to be introduced to actual Japanese culture, which functions on blood ties like most East Asian cultures do. You being a foreigner will always be a foreigner, because of your bloodline. Those are places where being even genetically half Japanese gets you severely discriminated against at every turn.
Outside the primary Western countries, "racist assholes" are what is known as "normal people".
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Nice narrative, that has nothing to do with observable reality. White people have it the best in terms of being foreigners in East Asia. They're pretty much the top crop of foreigners after those who have some limited neighbourly ties, i.e. Japan-Korea-China triangle.
Those who are by far the most discriminated against are black Africans of all black African ethnicities. Followed almost perfectly in order of skin colour tone from darkest to whitest. Overwhelming majority of people who are the most discrimina
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
That sounds a lot like you have never lived outside Tokyo/Kyoto, and you have problems picking up social cues. The racism even toward people who are half Japanese and are born and raised in the country is well documented.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I see that you're utterly incapable of comprehending the point I made, which is quite simple to someone who's isn't having problems in the fields I suggested.
Hint: If half white half japanese person who is completely culturally Japanese has problems I describe, foreigner with language skills is going to have it worse. Much worse. Because inclusion into groups is a spectrum - some people are simply closer to the inner circles of trust than others.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I already addressed this point before. I'm not going to bother debunking it again.
Re:I don't think they need you Luckyo (Score:5, Informative)
Far less than rural America is. I lived there for 6 years, several areas. I never had a problem. They mostly have problems with stupid tourists who get drunk and pick fights and reputations evolve from there. Americans, Britons.
The usual. They tend to have an "american-esque" attitude towards people who don't bother to learn the language, because as a near monoculture it stands out. You wouldn't fear a racist attack like in the US, as Japanese do.
Crime is pretty uncommon there. Whether or not people mumble things under their breath or in private about gaijinn tourists I really can't say, but as far as outspoken racist nutters, you won't find many if any.
Try that in a red state and report back your findings, right?
Re:I don't think they need you Luckyo (Score:4, Interesting)
So basically, you're confusing East Asian culture of politeness with "not being racist".
Funny part is, most East Asian languages now have a slur specifically for people like you, essentially describing that dumb foreigner that doesn't get the fact that politeness is culturally forced. Not genuine.
Re: (Score:3)
You sound like a person so utterly naive and sheltered, that the very basics of human interaction are utterly shocking to you. To the point where you feel the need to attack the messenger for just stating the said basics of human interaction.
Re: (Score:2)
It usually refers to "white leftie", which is what Chinese variant of it literally translates to.
Re: (Score:2)
It's even worse in South Korea with the recent feminist scandal they are having.
Re: (Score:2)
It's literally been already cited by another AC in reply to this very post.
Re: (Score:2)
Not very literate, are you? Here's a link to said reply.
https://slashdot.org/comments.... [slashdot.org]
Re: (Score:2)
You think there are "full-blown out-in-the-open-lynchings" going on in "rural America"?
Ok. Good luck with the rest of your life.
Re: (Score:2)
So you admit that you lied in your initial statement?
Re: (Score:2)
37 years ago, and resulted in convictions for everyone, including a death penalty. That's the time when Soviet Union was still the main threat to US.
Totally fits the narrative of "full-blown out-in-the-open lynchings" happening today.
Re: (Score:2)
Where the hell is that happening? It isn't here in the US.
Re: (Score:2)
Sure, rural Japan can be very racist. They will politely refuse you service, or simply ignore you. Unlike rural US, where American racist will simply kill or main you. That's is the difference between the rural Japanese racists and rural American racists.
Re: (Score:2)
"Unlike rural US, where American racist will simply kill or main you."
Who spreads this nonsense? There aren't people being killed or maimed in the US for racist nonsense.
There are certain political factions that will take anything they can spin into being related to racist or that involved a racist as a hate crime to drum up stats, They also count things like a school child carving a racist symbol into a locker/desk/the snow as hate crimes.
If you check the statistics almost every instance of actual racially
Re: (Score:1)
Who spreads this nonsense? There aren't people being killed or maimed in the US for racist nonsense.
Really? [cnn.com]
Really?! [nytimes.com]
Re: (Score:2)
High profile anecdotes mean nothing. There are over 325 million people in the US and no shortage of murders any given day, hour or even minute rare stops being rare with those kind of numbers.
But there are not known hate crime related deaths, even though they automatically count it as one if someone racist was involved, every minute or hour because they are rare. Again, since 2015, you are three times more like likely to be killed by lightning strike.
This is just a political drum that gets beaten hard, loud
Re: (Score:1)
A low rate does not mean zero, especially when it comes to human lives. A quick Google says an average of 400 people are injured by lightning a year in the US. So by your numbers 133 people are injured by a hate crime a year.
Your original statement of there not being people killed or maimed in the US by racists is false.
I'm not saying the GP wasn't being hyperbolic, but lets not fight it with more of the same.
Re: (Score:2)
"A low rate does not mean zero, especially when it comes to human lives."
A low rate can be effectively zero. If it were zero we'd have no concept of death. People day, every day, thousands and thousands of people die from all sorts of things.
"So by your numbers 133 people are injured by a hate crime a year."
Yes, while I don't have the statistics to back it up based on my conversations with ER nurses I'd put that number to be dramatically lower than the number of people who are injured due to shoving a light
Re: (Score:2)
"Who spreads this nonsense?"
Check YouTube for "reactions to Trump winning" videos. Those people. I was as surprised as most that the dude won (didn't vote for him, nor would I), but there is a segment of the US population that lost their shit because dumb hillbillies, sub-human, racist yokels that don't live in NY or LA showed up to vote because those people consider them dumb hillbillies that are sub-human racists.
Re: (Score:2)
You are three times more likely to be killed by lightning strike in the US than in a race motivated crime.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Almost all of it is ex-cons and gang activity.
Even so you are three times more likely to die by lightning strike in the US than by racist.
Re: (Score:2)
Ask the Koreans if the Japanese are racist. I have always been enthralled by Japanese culture, but it's really no secret that it's a pretty racist society.
Re: (Score:2)
Which is really good compared to how they treat black skinned Polynesians or even worse, Africans.
Re: (Score:2)
You're confusing "Japanese politeness" with "lack of different of treatment based on race". If anything, if Japanese never drop the extreme politeness, it means you remain stranger to them and they're not letting you into any kind of trust-based relationship.
Re: (Score:1)
The Japanese are overall pretty welcoming. I'm sure there are a few racist assholes like we have here, people too stubborn and uneducated and inexperienced with the world to know any better. Mostly not though.
Apparently you have never heard of the word "gaijin" before now.
Re: (Score:2)
They aren't foreigners, they were there before the Japaneese.
Although the catbus one is a hazard in the traffic.
Re: (Score:2)
Here's a good piece from the Japan Times:
https://www.japantimes.co.jp/o... [japantimes.co.jp]
Giving away free houses? (Score:5, Funny)
You mean they are not charging for the free houses? How unusual.
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe they are free as in speech.
Detroit's done the same thing before. (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Or, another question: can I retire there? That will help with the aging population, right?
Re: (Score:2)
Asian countries are difficult to retire to, but yes you can.
However as it is Japan, you won't come around learning to speak it. (not necessarily write it)
Re: (Score:3)
Depends on the country. There are entire foreign enclaves in places like Thailand. They typically specialize to serve a certain nationality, basically sucking up Western pensioner's pensions to guarantee a fairly high quality of life due to country itself being much poorer than country that pensioner comes from.
Rich East Asian countries like Japan don't really fit that bill though. These countries have enough problems with their own elderly as it is.
Re: (Score:2)
basically sucking up Western pensioner's pensions to guarantee a fairly high quality of life due to country itself being much poorer than country that pensioner comes from.
So in other words, commerce. Both sides benefit from the exchange.
Re: (Score:2)
Depends on what you view as "other side". Pension payer does not benefit for example, which is why if the pension system accounts for the fact that money will be spend within the economy that is being taxed to pay the said pension, this is a harmful exchange to said economy.
Re: (Score:3)
the question is are there jobs?
There are for programmers, even if you don't speak Japanese, but you need to pass an interview, and it's difficult to do so if you don't understand the culture. (Maybe you will get lucky and just mesh naturally with the culture, but I sure didn't).
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
The word is 'doublethink'.
When The Party pushes two contradictory beliefs, and you happily accept both and manage so without ever feeling bothered by the contradiction.
This offer is intended for Jim Boonie only (Score:1)
It's free real estate.
Don't get too excited. (Score:5, Insightful)
As fun as it may be to visit, Japanese culture is still "uncomfortable" with foreigners moving to Japan. Japanese youth love American culture but it's more like how people in the US like Anime: it's a sliver of their culture and not really representative of anything. Depending on how they process applications, they may be trying to get expatriated Japanese to return to Japan. Essentially, the Japan majority is like those in the US who want to build a giant border wall but it's all just below the surface like the rampant racism in parts of the US.
Re:Don't get too excited. (Score:5, Funny)
Japan has a giant border moat. Their border wall will be for coping with sea level rise.
Re: (Score:2)
Japan has a giant border moat. Their border wall will be for coping with sea level rise.
Japan's plan is to turn their entire island into a gigantic mecha that can transform from a boat into a robot that explores the stars. Sea level rise is no problem.
That, or they're just totally fucked.
Re:Don't get too excited. (Score:4, Interesting)
Japanese culture is still "uncomfortable" with foreigners moving to Japan
No they aren't. As bad as it sounds they are uncomfortable with *specific* foreigners moving to Japan. Americans and Europeans generally don't need to worry too much. Actually unless you're Korean, Chinese, you have a year around tan or if you feel a compulsion to lay down a rug and smash your head against the ground 5 times a day while facing northwest then you'll be welcomed in general.
But your culture thing is true in general of all countries. We typically like absorbing the good and not the bad. In many cases we spend so much time focusing on the good that we don't even understand the bad until we're forced to (e.g. move there).
Re:Don't get too excited. (Score:5, Interesting)
As someone who did move to Japan for a while I can tell you that it's not quite that simple. It depends where you are for a start, but more generally it tends to be hard at first because the language is hard and the culture is very different and many people are a bit frightened of you. Not frightened of violence of crime or anything like that, but worried that they won't be able to understand you or help you and end up being embarrassed.
After a while you reach a point where that doesn't happen any more. I don't know how it works exactly, but at some point you start giving off subconscious signals that you fit in. I remember quite distinctly when I first noticed it. An old woman at the bus stop asked me to open a bottle for her, and then to keep an eye out her for bus because she couldn't see well in the twilight. It might have been my accent, or rather lack of it... More than once people have asked if I am Japanese, but the plight of white Japanese people is another story.
Re:Don't get too excited. (Score:4, Insightful)
As someone who did move to Japan for a while I can tell you that it's not quite that simple. It depends where you are for a start, but more generally it tends to be hard at first because the language is hard and the culture is very different and many people are a bit frightened of you. Not frightened of violence of crime or anything like that, but worried that they won't be able to understand you or help you and end up being embarrassed.
Completely agree. This is true for a lot of countries, but the Japanese especially have a rigid, very particular way of doing things, and if you don't understand how that flow works, you quickly stand out as that loose bolt that bounces around inside an otherwise fine tuned, well oiled machine. They give you grace because you're a foreigner, but that still doesn't mean they don't get annoyed by you messing up their neatly defined system.
Re: (Score:2)
They give you grace because you're a foreigner, but that still doesn't mean they don't get annoyed by you messing up their neatly defined system.
Like most places, Japan is very welcoming of foreign visitors. They understand that your culture is different and that you are not intentionally being an ass. But if you plan on staying then you had better learn to adjust your behavior. Their tolerance only lasts so long and they do not want you forcing your culture into their daily life. They same can be said for any culture.
Re:Really more of: (Score:5, Interesting)
For sure. America definitely made them invade and rape China.
The invasion part is shared between 7 members of the 8 nations alliance who thought it would be a good idea to invite 'freshly Westernized Japan' to a nice little punitive expedition in China following the Boxer rebellion... where Japan provided a third of the ships and 40% of the ground troops. America was indeed part of those seven countries, however Germany probably played a more active role in teaching them the rape part.
Oh, and attack the US. Definitely, all things, no matter what, are America's fault.
Japan was an isolationist country until America decided to use canons to force-open Japanese ports to US trade, ending 254 years of relative peace in Japan and triggering a civil war. Japan had neither the desire nor the means to interfere abroad until America went there. After America went there, the new Japanese government had to modernize the country or face having the same thing happen again.
Re: (Score:1)
Defending the claim the US is responsible for Pearl Harbor by citing a breached trade embargo in a different century gets +4.
Slashdot, you have jumped the shark.
Is this place nothing but trolls and "Lol US BAD" memes?
Free houses!? (Score:2)
Sounds like a good place to retire!
Re: (Score:2)
Sounds like a good place to retire!
Pff! Good luck with that, gaijin. [slashdot.org]
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Requirement is that you are a couple with kids under 20 (with at least 1 partner under 50 if I recall correctly), or that you are under 40 if you are single.
You also need to move there full time.
Earthquake proofing is questionable (Score:5, Interesting)
Japan is hit by earthquakes all the time. This has resulted on some very strict building codes and they are getting more and more strict. At the same time companies invent new ways of protecting the buildings from damage.
In 1995, Kobe was hit by a magnitude 7.2 quake. That went very bad, but it was a learning experience. It revealed a lot of flaws, which could be corrected. It turned out that the typhoon protection in the roofs of a lot of buildings made them deathtraps in case of major earthquakes and the design is now banned in new buildings.
In 2011 a magnitude 9.0 hit and lasted for an amazing 5 minutes. We have all seen the videos of cities being flooded by a tsunami. However most people missed the big news regarding the buildings. They were still standing. It was the most powerful quake ever measured in Japan and one of the most powerful ever recorded, yet the buildings survived. The reason is they replaced the buildings with modern ones, which fulfills the modern building codes. The Kobe quake era buildings would not have had a chance to survive.
Because of this, buildings in Japan lose value fast. People want new buildings with new safety. You can encounter houses with negative value meaning the plot would be worth more without houses. The thinking is that the old houses have to be torn down, meaning it's just an extra expense.
Now there are abandoned houses being offered for free. I think we can assume those houses aren't state of the art. In fact odds are they are pre 1995. Not only is that a safety issue, they might be uninsulated because traditionally Japan added temporal insulation during the winter because insulation would make houses too hot in the summer. On top of that the houses are in locations with de-population issues. If they were in good locations, the houses would be sold as building plots. This means poor job options in the areas of the free houses.
It's not a good offer. I don't think anybody will accept such houses, even for free. However if it's possible to get fast internet access, like optic fiber, then just maybe somebody will use this to start internet based businesses. It could create some upstarts, which can't afford to get enough storage space in the cities.
If the Japanese government would really do something to keep people in rural areas, they should look to the railroads. Right now they let people pay for railroads locally and if there aren't enough people, they will reduce the number of trains, close the line and use buses and then close the bus lines. So far every time a railroad dies, the community dies and it's a big topic in Japan because it makes it harder to keep people in farming communities, which in turn means less production of food for the cities. They know this and debate funding, but nothing happens. There are other issues like no daycare, meaning it's a problematic area if you want to have children. It looks like the government makes a move with free houses because it's free for them too (more or less), but as long as they aren't touching the reason why the houses have been abandoned and become unsellable, it will have a hard time being a success.
Re: (Score:2)
It's... just a wee bit more complicated than that. It's a cultural thing that goes back quite a ways. Japan values land more than buildings on that land.
Re: (Score:1)
Not only is that a safety issue, they might be uninsulated because traditionally Japan added temporal insulation
What does insulation have to do with time?
A 10 year old house have the insulation, which was normal for new houses 10 years ago.
A 15 year old house have the insulation, which was normal for new houses 15 years ago.
A 20 year old house have the insulation, which was normal for new houses 20 years ago.
Noticed a pattern? It's not time itself, which is the issue. A 20 year old house is insulated as well today as it was 10 years ago. Time/age tells when the house was built and it's all about how new houses were normally insulated during construction at t
One problem (Score:1)
But tearing down homes is costly, and a decades-old tax break that promotes construction by setting property tax on vacant lots at six times the level of those with buildings discourages demolition.
Well maybe, just maybe they could adjust the tax to encourage people to at least tear them down.
Re: (Score:2)
Nope (Score:1)
I saw this movie. I move in, everything's cool, but then there's this little boy meowing at me and a creepy girl spider-walking down the stairs. Thanks but no thanks!
The small print... (Score:1)
These houses are all right next to Fukushima.
At least you get a waterfront view!
Send the Refugees to Japan (Score:2)
I'm kinda serious...
Japan needs young people and families. Millions of young people and families need safe places to live and raise their children. There may be some synergy there.
Re: (Score:2)
one question: what's the problem with an aging population?
Ok, there are lot's of problems. For example, if there are too many people withdrawing and not enough paying in, it bankrupts a national social security system. (Or any retirement system.) It also stresses other tax sources because older people tend to spend less and bring in less taxable revenue. It's important for a society to have a good mix of ages. Too much of any one demographic causes problems.
ok. and what's the problem with the migrants we're talking about?
Migrants have lots of problems. That's why they are migrants. They wouldn't be migrants if they didn't have
Re: (Score:2)
I think Japan will be ok.
Yoko's Housemate? (Score:1)
Pay for plumbing (Score:1)
Re: There's one downside about the houses... (Score:1)
Not like Iâ(TM)m gonna read the fucking article lol
Re: (Score:2)
What kind of dumbassery are you spewing?
From Merriam-Webster:
Definition of their
: his or her : HIS, HER, ITS —used with an indefinite third person singular antecedent
anyone in their senses
— W. H. Auden
Re:The huricane swept all (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Not yet. The soil's contaminated. Need a tsunami.
Re:Houseboats (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
They are not - one must have special permission to even enter the inner zone. You may have a different definition of "near"?