Comment "option" (Score 1) 16
This is how it starts, an option... right up until they steamroll you by making it mandatory and a dependency. I recall how systemd was "optional" until it suddenly wasn't.
This is how it starts, an option... right up until they steamroll you by making it mandatory and a dependency. I recall how systemd was "optional" until it suddenly wasn't.
Those diamond batteries were bullshit.
Sir, I am an expert in chemistry having had multiple minutes of experience in searching for information about it. As such, I defer to you because sure, like I would know.
It's not that I don't like chemistry, it's just that I think the reality needs to refactor it's lower level APIs, starting with mathematics. I'm not saying it's wasteful but too much computational power goes into Pi. They should make it a simple integer value like 3 and make e like... 2.
Chip-scale atomic clocks are a thing. The problem is that they aren't exactly low enough power to be wrist mounted as they need 115 mW constantly. You absolute can make it into a wristwatch (and people have) but it will need regular charging... unless you are using betavoltaic nuclear batteries. However to reach the power output needed with what is on the market, you would need about 120K of them.
The natural reaction to this is "what's the purpose of building up that kind of arm strength if the batteries are just going to die in 50 years?" and the answer is the diamond battery! This is a newer betavoltaic battery which is in the same power output range but lasts for thousands of years because it's based on Carbon-14.
Start doing those reps today because the watch of your dreams is 2400Kg.
Adobe will sue not because they are legally correct but because it is an effective tactic. They need only to make the case expensive until they bankrupt the defendant. Legality is not relevant to their case.
While the cable lobby is correct and I hope they prevail, I also hope they are forced to pay a huge fine for being a bunch of hypocritical assholes. We don't need to criminalize it, just make hypocrisy financially painful.
Yes but obviously getting banned was very upsetting. Just look, she soon went on to kill 8 other people and then herself!
Seems like a head-mounted camera is fine under this ban, though, as long as it isn't also covert?
FTFY. The issue at hand is that it's a hidden camera.
Why is it so easy to ask ChatGPT how best to kill people?
The interface is in natural written language which is the selling point of the whole thing. Additionally, it's not actually intelligent so it is not cognizant of anything much less the harm the information may cause.
Bottom line: it's just a machine.
In Canada someone used ChatGPT to plan a mass shooting. It was detected and the account was shut down, but it was decided not to report it to police. She went on to kill 8 people in a school shooting and herself.
We can't actually know if the scenario was a plan or a precautionary measure, you know, safety first.
However, what we know for sure is that she went on a mass shooting after her account was suddenly closed without explanation. This is exactly why they shouldn't shut down someone's account without providing them with a clear a rationale!
you end up with so many adjustable terms that your model could predict many things.
FTFY.
It seems wiser to identify what could be possible before claiming what is impossible.
it's slow as hell.
"Floggings will continue until morale improves." -- anonymous flyer being distributed at Exxon USA