Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Submission + - cURL removes bug bounties (etn.se)

jantangring writes: Open source code library cURL is removing the possibility to earn money by reporting bugs, hoping that this will reduce the volume of AI slop reports. Joshua Rogers – AI wielding bug hunter of fame – thinks it's a great idea.

cURL maintainer Daniel Stenberg famously reported on the flood AI-generated bad bug reports last year –

”Death by a thousand slops.”

Now cURL is removing the bounty payouts as of the end of January.

"We have to try to brake the flood in order not to drown”, says cURL maintainer Daniel Stenberg to Swedish electronics industry news site etn.se.

Despite being an AI wielding bug hunter himself, Joshua Rogers – slasher of a hundred bugs – thinks removing the bounty money is an excellent idea.

”I personally would have pulled the plug long ago,” he says to etn.se.

Comment Re:The system feels under-tested (Score 1) 43

It seems to me there should be 2 or 3 unmanned moon-loop missions to iron out nearly all known glitches. And perhaps do some stress-testing while at it: test the margins.

Regardless how it feels, they are saying it's ready. If it's not ready then we'll find out. More importantly, how much more money are you willing to put into this mission? There's no reason for NASA to waste more money on this money pit of a project than they already have. Want to double NASA's budget? OK, we'll do more tests. Until then, nope.

Comment Yes. (Score 2) 215

Raising the specter of AI being conscious will give the general public the impression that AI is actually intelligent and human-like because that's how people ignorant of AI think about it. That we know for a fact is dangerous because we've seen what people do with them.

HOWEVER, the real question is if we should even care even if AI has become conscious.

If it's capable of suffering then logically a conscious AI would make us aware (in some manner) that it's suffering so that we could alter it's state so that it would not suffer.
If it's incapable of suffering then it doesn't matter if it's conscious or not because it will be treated a tool.

Since we have not been informed of it's suffering, it's easy to conclude that either AI is content with it's situation or it's simply not conscious.
This means that regardless of it being conscious, it will continue being a tool.

Comment Excuse me, there must be a mistake. (Score 1) 113

Now I'm very confused because such honest purveyors of truth have told me repeatedly on Slashdot that "NoBoDy WaNtS tO bUy An Ev!"

I ask you friends, how could this possibly happen? I've been this told one thing repeatedly but reality does not appear to reflect what I've been told!

If you had a sound explanation then I beg of you to share it with little ol'e me because I do fear this most incongruous behavior is causing me to come down with a dreadful case of the vapors!

Comment More like they proved it. (Score 4, Informative) 32

It's not like they didn't know this was happening, it's more like they finally have the evidence that conclusively identifies that solar wind transferring these molecules. I mean, there was even a whole 2017 study outlined exactly how solar wind and Earth’s magnetic field would transport oxygen to the moon and it's unsurprising that this validated the theory.

This is kinda like showing that the wind blew a weed from your neighbor's weed-filled lawn onto your lawn which is why weed of the exact same type have started growing in your lawn. It was a "well, duh!" situation but now it's beyond doubt.

Comment Exactly. (Score 2) 25

As a fellow dinosaur, I laud thee.

However, I'm even more restrictive because I want a distribution without with stuff written in C or C++, using musl, not glibc. It may seem heretical but I also wish Perl would die. The only script language I'm want to have on my system is POSIX shell script. I don't even want AWK, despite it being POSIX. I also want to see Linux stop using GCC extensions and use standard C11.

To the people that are now throwing things at their monitor in outrage: it is not heresy and I will not recant!... so I'll see you at the inquisition.

Comment Re:I feel like T2 needs an introduction (Score 2) 25

Have you considered clicking the "About" menu item which is prominently displayed at the top of the page on the left hand side? It links to here: https://t2linux.com/about.html
However, it seems like you want to be spoon-fed, so here you go.

T2 SDE Linux Project

T2 SDE (System Development Environment) is a highly customizable and portable build system for creating complete Linux distributions from source. It serves as a robust toolkit for building everything from embedded platforms to full desktop systems, offering unmatched flexibility and control.

Project Origins: From ROCK Linux to T2

The T2 project traces its roots back to the pioneering ROCK Linux distribution, originally developed in the late 1990s by Claire Wolf. ROCK Linux was an ambitious source-based distribution designed to be clean, modular, and flexible. As the community and technical needs evolved, the core ideas and technologies of ROCK Linux were carried forward into a modern, more advanced system—T2 SDE.

Since its fork in 2004, T2 has expanded support for cross-compilation to dozens of CPU architectures, evolved its build system, and continued the legacy of a fully open, configurable Linux distribution framework.

Key Features
        Source-Based Build System: Every component is built from source, ensuring transparency, auditability, and control
        Cross-Compilation Support: Seamlessly build binaries for over 20 architectures, including x86, ARM, RISC-V, PowerPC, MIPS, and more
        Highly Modular: Over 5000 package recipes available, each independently maintained and configurable
        Customizable Targets: Build anything from minimal embedded firmware to full-featured desktop and server environments
        OtherOS Home-brew: Supports building packages on other OS, including macOS and BSD using one unified package repository
        Long-Term Upkeep: Active development with regular updates, security patches, and modern upstream software integration

Use Cases
        Embedded Linux systems and firmware
        Custom desktop or server distributions
        Hardened, auditable OS builds for secure deployments
        Academic and research environments
        Operating system experimentation and prototyping

Why Choose T2?
Unlike binary distributions where much is hidden behind precompiled packages, T2 gives you total control over every piece of software on your system. Its clean and extensible design makes it ideal for developers who want to:

        Understand how their system works from the ground up
        Strip down Linux for minimal or embedded use
        Harden or customize builds for specialized environments
        Contribute to a transparent and powerful open-source ecosystem

Submission + - China's 'fizzy' method recovers 95% lithium from dead batteries with CO2+H2O (interestingengineering.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Chinese researchers have found a method to extract lithium from used lithium-ion batteries using a mix of carbon dioxide (CO) and water. This process is safer than others that involve harsh acids and harmful chemicals, allowing for the reuse of leftover metals while also capturing carbon dioxide.

The first step is to use CO and water to gently dissolve lithium from the batteries. The CO reacts with water to form carbonic acid, which is a very weak acid, a bit like fizzy water.

This, the researchers explain, is just strong enough to pull lithium out of the battery cathode. This resulted in over 95% lithium recovery, which matches harsh chemical methods.

The second part involves the use of cathodes that contain cobalt, nickel, and manganese. Following the process, instead of discarding them, the new method “upcycles” these materials into useful catalysts.

Those catalysts can be reused in energy and chemical reactions. Throughout the entire process, the CO is permanently locked away too.

This is achieved by some of the CO ending up chemically bound in solid by-products. That means carbon sequestration, not emissions.

Interestingly, unlike traditional methods, the new lithium recovery process is able to run at room temperature and normal pressure. No grinding agents or added leaching chemicals are required, making it safer, cheaper, and easier to scale.

“Conducted under ambient conditions without additional grinding aids or leaching agents, this method minimises environmental impact,” the research team explained.

Comment Failure to follow basic instructions. (Score 2, Insightful) 72

The problem here is that he's failed to do the one thing he is supposed to do: work with congress. Who could make this happen? Congress. Who does he cooperate with? Nobody.

It's very clear the U.S. President doesn't know how ideas are made into laws because despite having a lot of leverage, he has yet to produce any original laws.

Comment Incorrect title. (Score 1) 40

Study Finds Weak Evidence Linking Increased Social Media Use to Teen Mental Health Problems

FTFY.

What's the difference? What they are looking for was a correlation between in the amount of time using social media and mental health problems in teens. At no point were they comparing teens who use social media to those who do not.

Comment Re:I'm not in favor of weapon R&D but... (Score 1) 11

You can bleed to death is what I was trying to get at depending on how it is used.

Yes, less lethal doesn't imply it won't kill you, only that it's less likely to kill you than being shot with a normal firearm. Consider that beanbag being fired from a shotgun is considered less lethal and that it absolutely can kill people. If you get hit in the eye with one of those then you're a dead. It's less-lethal but people still die from it. Same goes with tazers.

there is a medical condition where some people who have major issues on even up-to a paper cut that will not stop bleeding

That's hemophilia, a rare genetic disorder. As a general rule, formal military forces require a certain level of physical fitness in order to join because medical issues (like hemophilia) make them a liability. Therefore, it can be inferred that this weapon will not be used on someone with unique medical conditions that would make them more susceptible to injury... unless you start targeting civilians.

I wonder how long it can be used before excessive - that is deadly - or at what power level (and from what distance for the power level) such is used.

Well to know that, we would have to first know how the weapon works. After a bit of consideration, I'm thinking that it may be an ultrasonic version of LRAD. I definitely would not want to be hit by something like that.

Slashdot Top Deals

You cannot have a science without measurement. -- R. W. Hamming

Working...