Comment Fantastic! (Score 1) 20
I look forward to all the "pro-life" idiots choosing to death over these treatments... but we both know they won't because they have ideological consistency of a crayon.
I look forward to all the "pro-life" idiots choosing to death over these treatments... but we both know they won't because they have ideological consistency of a crayon.
This implies that given the proper care, we should be able to put 2024 YR4 back on track to impact the Moon! Humanity has really been half-assing this destroying the ecosystem and I feel like we can do better by annihilating with a well placed asteroid.
Now they just need to bad social media for people that are at least 16 and they will have fixed the problems with social media.
I looked at what is being offered and just like many other "Quantum Computing Operating Systems," it is merely an OS that runs on a classical processor but supports the use of a quantum processing as a peripheral device using software, not even as kernel component.
At best, this is a OS tailored for interfacing with a quantum processor.
Using carefully sited stations, the USCRN shows very little change over the past 20 years.
But when combine all the data instead of a few stations, it shows there has been a significant temperature increase. You should look at the study to find your answer: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary....
The companies that argued in favor of allowing the continued use of tetraethyllead in gasoline used a similar tactic in congressional testimony, omitting vital details.
While we keep discovering that near-Earth asteroids like these will not impact the moon, we have the technology to rectify such issues. NASA's DART project showed that we have the capability to deflect objects away from Earth. This implies that given the proper care, we should be able to redirect objects to an intercept path. While this opportunity has slipped through our hands this time, I believe with a significant investment, that we expand upon NASA's DART to bring forth a successful redirection of large objects like these to ensure the connection to either the Moon or Earth itself.
I'm not saying it's a good idea, I just feel that if we're going to fuck up the planet that we should stop half-assing it.
I still don't see your implication.
"If [ChatGPT came up with that answer], then I'm seriously worried about that (human) comic writer's career I never had."
Here you are worried about a hypothetical career choice.
"Worry not, your hypothetical career choice is safe."
My response is that your hypothetical career is safe which implies ChatGPT did not come up with the answer, since it was the potential danger.
But the question is - what terrible name will they give it for release?
Since they seem to like Microslop so much, I'm thinking they'll go with Xslop, Xslop 360, and then Xslop One.
I still don't believe you that "Sloppy Seconds" was ChatGPT's idea.
As was implied by my previous comment, it was not.
They also made a bunch of climate change related "pledges" and the second they became to inconvenient, they silently removed those pledges from their websites. If you think they will abide these pledges then you are as dumb as they think you are.
source: https://www.techtarget.com/sea...
VMware Aria Suite, formerly called vRealize Suite, is a software platform designed to help IT administrators build and manage heterogeneous, hybrid cloud environments. The suite was originally called the vCenter Operations Management Suite, but in August 2014, VMware rebranded the suite and its related products to vRealize. In April 2023, VMware changed the name to Aria.
Is anyone surprised that moving to "the cloud" is/was a bad idea that introduces unnecessary risk? Also, rebranding a product is something that should require regulatory approval because way too much of it which causes consumer confusion.
What's the "so what" of this article?
Sometimes it's important to simply be aware that problems exist as there are not obvious answers. By informing readers, you can effectively provide them with a problem that they may have insight and motive to solve.
How are you going to encourage countries that don't seem to care about the problem to not poison themselves?
If developed nations shift production away lead-acid batteries and toward sodium ion batteries then it will shift the economics (globally) toward the production of manufacturing sodium ion batteries, leaving lead-acid batteries a relic of the past. It's a win-win because lead is still hazardous even though it can be dealt with properly.
Happiness is twin floppies.