The problem here is that he's failed to do the one thing he is supposed to do: work with congress. Who could make this happen? Congress. Who does he cooperate with? Nobody.

It's very clear the U.S. President doesn't know how ideas are made into laws because despite having a lot of leverage, he has yet to produce any original laws.

FTFY.

What's the difference? What they are looking for was a correlation between in the amount of time using social media and mental health problems in teens. At no point were they comparing teens who use social media to those who do not.

More importantly, AI companies are going to scrape the site regardless of it being allowed or not. What this does is gives them firm legal standing that companies doing so are causing them financial losses.

Yes, less lethal doesn't imply it won't kill you, only that it's less likely to kill you than being shot with a normal firearm. Consider that beanbag being fired from a shotgun is considered less lethal and that it absolutely can kill people. If you get hit in the eye with one of those then you're a dead. It's less-lethal but people still die from it. Same goes with tazers.

That's hemophilia, a rare genetic disorder. As a general rule, formal military forces require a certain level of physical fitness in order to join because medical issues (like hemophilia) make them a liability. Therefore, it can be inferred that this weapon will not be used on someone with unique medical conditions that would make them more susceptible to injury... unless you start targeting civilians.

Well to know that, we would have to first know how the weapon works. After a bit of consideration, I'm thinking that it may be an ultrasonic version of LRAD. I definitely would not want to be hit by something like that.

And people should know that before getting into it.

It is really hard to make nuclear fusion work at all and you want to turn it into a bomb? Good luck with that one, buddy.

Since the invention of the computer user, it has only been a matter of time before someone managed to find a way to make the drug dealer model applicable and we're most of the way there.

For the most part, a lot of people are most of the way there. Specifically, they will use an online office suite which keeps most of their data offsite. I had a friend who, through a series of poor choices, managed to lose access to his google account (and several years of data) after switching phone numbers. As he described it, "my whole life is on there."

One could say, "well that's just data, not compute" but features that rely on server-end compute aren't unheard and are only increasing with AI being pushed on everyone. When it's the easier option and your "whole life" is on their servers, it becomes unsurprising that people sign up for subscriptions.

There will always be people like us who resist these kind of entanglements but it's far from the path of least resistance.

This should immediately make it clear to applicants how badly you will be treated at McKinsey.

So I looked deeper into this malware and it's a framework with many components. One of those components is a web browser based control panel which is written using the React JavaScript framework. I believe within the source of this control panel is where they found the reference to it being named VoidLink.

Details on VoidLink from those who reverse engineered it: https://research.checkpoint.co...

Believe it or not, air pollution can be quite localized. I recently had to investigate and report on the issue of air pollution in various countries and you're not going believe how much it matters. In Turkey, 25% of all medical treatment expenses are to treat people that are slowly dying as a direct result of the extremely poor air quality.

The primary reasons for this poor air quality are:
* Erdogan went all-in on mining and burning lignite for energy production. (idiotic)
* They have stoves that burn some terrible fuel. (not great)
* They have a fleet of old shitty diesel trucks and no air quality restrictions. (not great)

So while air pollution is a global issue, it's also very much a local issue.

Yes, thus my accurate description as it being a "less-lethal" weapon.

The linked video just takes you to "supported browsers" page.

Language can and should change when there is a need. However, there is a vernacular for economics matters, yet despite the bountiful vocabulary for English readers, this article was positively unliterary in it's selection of terms. Colloquialisms and slang are not suitable for a global audience.

By closing the entire studio, this provides an opportunity for workers to form their own game studio(s). It's risky but you have a collection of people that have the skills to do the work needed to publish a game.

The source is to blame for this but "spend" is not a noun. Expenses, costs, expenditures, payment, bill, etc. are all nouns but "spend" is not a noun.