Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Still not solid-state. (Score 1) 23

The problem is improperly managed (damage/overcharge/etc) cells self-inflate to become what what the internet refers to as a spicy pillow. If they have eliminated the possibility of creating a spicy pillow then I have overstated the danger. However, so long as battery damage results in thermal runaway that causes a total carbecue then it they need to keep pushing toward making it entirely solid-state. ICE has a higher chance of carbecues but facts be damned, people are sufficiently stupid to hold onto that concern.

When a battery can be damaged without presenting a damage to the car then the battery is sufficiently safe.

Comment Still not solid-state. (Score 1) 23

FTFA (minor clarification be me):

Semi-solid-state batteries significantly reduce the amount of liquid-that-immediately-bursts-into-flames-when-exposed-to-air-and-doesn't-stop-burning-when-you-douse-it-with-water inside the cell, improving thermal stability and lowering the risk of overheating, swelling, or fire.

I think it's fantastic that they are reducing the amount of hot sauce they are putting in batteries but I think they need to push until they completely eliminate it.

A slow burn is better but no-burn is best.

Comment Re: Life Expectancy Study. (Score 1) 111

In that context, yes, both types of cars can drive for the normal lifetime of a car. By this attribute, an EV the better economic choice. Should your car make it beyond the lifetime of the battery pack, it will be more economical to replace the battery pack rather than utilize an ICE car that you have maintained.

Comment Re: Life Expectancy Study. (Score 1) 111

The point is about how long a person could make a car last if they wanted to

That's also stupid because you can turn anything into the Ship of Theseus if you try hard enough.

If you aren't talking about the economics of it then you're just talking about your feelings. Economically, ICE is a failure.

Comment MIDA (Score 4, Insightful) 19

I was curious about MIDA and WTF "Stratos" was and they have a website that list their stated goals (numbers added for reference): https://www.midaut.org/stratos

1 Strengthen military readiness and national security by supporting energy resilience, compute power, and data storage for defense operations.
2 Advance major energy and technology investment in Northern Utah through the development of a large-scale data and energy campus.
3 Position Utah as a leader in next-generation infrastructure for artificial intelligence, cloud computing, secure data systems, and mission-critical national defense operations.
4 Support reliable, independent energy generation by including dedicated on-site power generation designed to meet the campus’s needs without placing additional demand on the existing electrical grid.
5 Generate long-term economic opportunity for Box Elder County through construction jobs, permanent careers, local hiring, and significant annual revenues.
6 Fund public infrastructure and municipal services without creating a burden on County taxpayers.
7 Support Hill Air Force Base and the Utah National Guard by generating revenues that can help fund critical infrastructure projects tied to military readiness.

Goal #3 is in conflict with #4, #5, #6, and #7.
* A data center consumes an obscene amount of power. Goal #4 is failed.
* A data center will not generate long-term economic opportunity. Goal #5 is failed.
* A data center will drive up energy prices. Goal #6 is failed.
* A data center will not generate much revenue. Goal #7 is failed.

About 79% of these residence voted Republican in the last two elections, so I'm not really surprised that they have been grifted under the guise of patriotism.

Submission + - Astronauts return to ISS after sheltering during air leak repair attempt (bbc.com)

fjo3 writes: Astronauts on the International Space Station (ISS) were ordered to shelter in an attached spacecraft after the structure suddenly started leaking more air.

Five of the seven crew were directed to go into the docked SpaceX shuttle Dragon "Freedom" on Friday afternoon and were braced for a potential evacuation.

Meanwhile, two remaining personnel — a pair of Russian cosmonauts — attempted to repair a part of the Russian segment of the ISS, where the leaks had started increasing on Monday.

The repairs were paused and the crew ordered back onto the ISS by Nasa on Friday afternoon.

Comment Re:Life Expectancy Study. (Score 1) 111

A modern internalcombustion engine (ICE) typically lasts 250,000–400,000 km with normal maintenance, and many reach 500,000 km or more depending on engine type and care.

Maybe in a laboratory setting. According to an extensive industry analysis by Auto Recycling World, the national average odometer reading for junked vehicles sits at 156,470 miles, with an average age of 16.58 years.
https://autorecyclingworld.com...
https://www.iseecars.com/car-l...

Comment Late to the party! (Score 1) 26

Microsoft is introducing a Windows-native version of the coreutils command line tools, so that commands or scripts made for Linux work within Windows and the other way around

Only a bit over two decades too late to be the first. I've installed these on every windows box because they are small and powerful.

Submission + - AI security's cost bottleneck isn't tokens – it's validation (scworld.com)

spatwei writes: A recent report by Axios claims a company accidentally spent $500 million in one month on Claude usage after failing to implement usage limits for employees. This extreme anecdote punctuates growing uncertainty about how token usage and API bills could become a major bottleneck for companies seeking to reap the productivity benefits of AI tools.

Even major tech companies are reportedly seeking to reel in their AI spending, with The Verge reporting that Microsoft is canceling its Claude Code licenses to steer employees toward its own GitHub Copilot and Uber CTO Praveen Neppalli Naga telling The Information the company used up its entire AI coding budget for 2026 within four months.

How does this fit into cybersecurity? With the landmark moment of Anthropic’s Claude Mythos’ release under Project Glasswing, AI-driven code review and vulnerability discovery are gaining interest, but an analysis by Contrast Security offers a sobering look at the “hidden cost of AI security scanners.”

Contrast’s research found that the biggest spend for organizations seeking to use AI to scan their code for vulnerabilities isn’t the API bill, but the cost of triaging and validating thousands of findings, including a huge number of false positives and inconsistent findings between runs and models.
For example, a simple scan of 1.8 million lines of code using Claude Sonnet 4.6 surfaced 3,560 findings and cost just $315 in token usage, but those 3,560 findings don’t triage and validate themselves. Contrast calculated that if a security engineer making $150,000 per year spent half an hour triaging each finding, the labor cost would come out to $128,000.

Slashdot Top Deals

"It may be that our role on this planet is not to worship God but to create him." -Arthur C. Clarke

Working...