Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive


Forgot your password?
Trust the World's Fastest VPN with Your Internet Security & Freedom - A Lifetime Subscription of PureVPN at 88% off. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. ×

Comment Just Use Non-State Actors (Score 1) 142

Would this make any serious impact though? Vast majority of cyber attacks aren't the life-and-death ones like bringing down the power grid. They are the more gray areas, espionage and theft, that nation-states may not be as quick to sign up for. If anything, many nations, including Western ones, view economic espionage as a civic duty in a global economic zero sum game. Why would they sign up for that? In addition, you nation-states already tend to use "non-state" actors to give them plausible deniability. Oh those hackers who hit your grid - just some vagrant teenagers.

Comment More Incentives for Bandwidth Caps, Net Neutrality (Score 2) 148

Sadly, for those of us in the United States at least, this will just give additional motivation for domestic ISP's to start capping monthly data at home. Also, with net neutrality on the ropes, they can try and extract their "cut" by forcing streaming services to pay up so that they can bypass data caps and bandwidth limitations.

Comment Joy vs. Happiness (Score 1) 280

researchers found that the parents weren't nearly as happy as they claimed they were. Their kids caused them all kinds of stress and unhappiness.

Perhaps its a distinction between joy and happiness? Joy being the macro positive feelings associated with being a part of something bigger (i.e. raising a child, building a legacy through them, satisfaction of ego, that weird love thing) versus happiness which is focused on the general condition of the person day to day (sleep deprivation, resource sacrifice, emotional and psychological strain, etc.).

Comment Religion Replaced by Ideology (Score 1) 157

While I agree with you that any strong ideology or just general identity is fundamentally weaponizable, I disagree that we are somehow moving away from it. People have simply replaced religion with ideology, nationalism and other equally powerful forces. It's not as clear perhaps, but it's still very much alive and well. Western liberal democracy and human rights for example: in my opinion, it is not some universal view but an ideology that is accepted and driven by large numbers of people around the world. Yet that ideology has been used, like any other group think, to rally people to arms, sometimes justly (battling fascists), sometimes through questionable means (battling Marxists with brutality in the third world for "the greater good"), sometimes through questionable sincerity (US interventionism in the post Cold War era from Kosovo to Iraq). All these things done under the banner of the Western Liberal Order that is now being challenged by Islamists, the Chinese, the Russians and others.

If you want to take a less extreme example, you can just look at domestic politics in the United States: passionate people who believe they are engaged in a life or death struggle to "protect the nation" from the "others (the Donald, the religious, the gays, SJW, facists, communists, etc.)" to stop a perceived evil (massacre of the unborn! trampling of civil liberties! oppression of people of color!) with some believing that more and more extreme tactics are needed.

It's hardwired into who we are as humans, and it doesn't take much at all to nudge people into action.

Comment Just as anti-Trump "Half Truths" Ramp Up (Score 1) 470

The irony of all may just be that the anti-Trump "half truth" system is ramping up as speculation runs rampant on what Donald Trump will do as President. Trump has said a lot of crazy things, so it works because then you can start adding other things to take it a step further and make it sound even more extreme. A classic example of what I saw recently was one that Trump was going to start making Muslims wear yellow stars in public (a la Hitler and the Jews). The sourcing is false on that, it's "merely" going to be registering them and maybe given them ID cards, but why not just give it that extra nudge to give a cleaner Hitler comparison?

Comment Why not Fight? Cowardly and Selfish (Score 2) 1368

If you care about the country so much and you believe it fell into the wrong hands, then why not fight to take back the Congress in 2018 and the White House in 2020? That makes more sense than selfishly plotting secession which is guaranteed to break the back of the progressive movement you claim to love by withdrawing one of its core financial and political bedrocks from the system.

Comment Re:addressing the wrong problem. again. (Score 4, Informative) 140

If you read the article, that's exactly what they're exploring: time limits and other ways to prevent monopolization. The wifi services, free calls, and maps are still enabled. This is just a temporary measure until they come up with a better solution.

LinkNYC says that it's working with city officials to come up with potential solutions, like time limits, so that it can allow users to browse the web once more. In the meantime, people will still be able to use the tablets to make calls and look at maps.

Comment Humans Still Behind Algorithm Setting Wages (Score 1) 178

While the article is a good description of what's going on in the new gig economy, I don't think it fully fleshes out the fact that the labor terms like wages, fees, etc. are still being set by human beings. If Uber or UberEats changes the wages, it wasn't an algorithm that decided this, but it was a manager somewhere who set these numbers. This is really no different than if you had a traditional employer who hires you at a promise of one wage but then hides a little clause in your contract that allows him to lower your wage on his whim. Maybe its a necessity, like in the case where Uber can't seem to make any profit, but that doesn't mean it isn't exploitative or misleading at best.

Comment Big Difference - US Restraint vs Soviet Aggression (Score 3, Insightful) 243

No denying that the South was very nasty from the 1950s through the early 1982s, from Rhee to Park to Chun. Purges, massacres, and even a nuclear weapons program. However, trying to draw too many parallels doesn't work either because the patron states behind both regimes had very different approaches. Given Rhee's unsavoriness, fear of a Southern led invasion triggering global war, and the broader political instability in the late 1940s, the United States never really bothered to equip the ROK with the heavy weapons needed to wage an offensive campaign. At the start of the Korean War, their forces were pretty much a glorified gendarmerie, and the United States held the leash tightly to prevent a war. The Soviets on the other hand, had no restraints and fully equipped the North Koreans with the latest heavy weapons and green lighted an invasion.

Even as you go through the Cold War, the United States played a very careful balancing act, trying to prop up the South while actively constraining them from launching a reunification campaign (that could spiral into WWIII) and actively squashed any efforts by the South to become a nuclear state. The North has always been much more openly aggressive, maintaining a forward positioned posture and threatening invasion at every turn.

There's also still no overlooking that the South has evolved into a relatively liberal, democratic society that is a responsible global player. Whereas the North is still very much an old school totalitarian dictatorship which continues to flout international norms.

Slashdot Top Deals

Another megabytes the dust.