Comment Re:Not necessarily a bad thing (Score 1) 214
People on ALL social media NEED to see what the other side says just as much as their own.
Yes, but the question is how it's being represented. Are they being provided with the well articulated viewpoint shared by the vast majority of the other side they disagree with? Or are they being shown the most extreme, inflammatory edge cases of the other side which are incorrectly being portrayed as mainstream? The former can encourage debate, but the latter is just fueling an attitude of "those people are crazy, there's no way I can co-exist with them."
Comment Re:not it's not, it's because AI is a threat (Score 1) 90
What insight. Could it be because that's exactly what happens? Capitalism is literally defined by this.
Agreed, but I believe the entire "tech" industry is particularly notorious for this even by American capitalist standards. AI is emerging from a business culture that emphasizes "move fast and break things", launching half-completed, "minimally viable" products out quickly without real thought (or in the parlance of kids these days, "f--ks given") on security, privacy, or social impact. Society has figured this out, as we've seen the shift in perception of the tech industry from saviors to villains. So no one should be surprised when people have trust issues with AI firms that have emerged from that same ecosystem.
Comment Good Start but Far Short (Score 1) 67
Comment Re:Schools are designed to sort students (Score 1) 83
Our modern school system was initially designed to train good little workers for boring, repetitive assembly line work.
I mean, given that society's number one demand of the education system is to prepare students so they can find jobs, the school system is doing what's being asked of it.
Comment Re:Good, Bad, and Ugly (Score 1) 58
I still maintain that I've heard far more negative than positive anecdotes about the VA and their medical care in particular, but there you have it: Anecdotes.
Maybe that's more a condemnation of the American healthcare system overall. The VA may be better than private care, but perhaps there are so many complaints and horror stories about private care throughout society we've just tuned them out at this point.
Comment Re:Social engineering. (Score 1) 92
Personally, I feel like this is a lot of what the internet is used for these days, and it kinda depresses me. I remember when the internet was just people with their own little webpages posting random crap. Today, it's a sophisticated tool used for propaganda, conflicts between countries, disinformation, you name it. It's not just countries doing this sort of thing, but companies too. Everyone is trying to manipulate your opinion, and the opinions of entire populations. Gone are the days when the internet was by people, for people. Now it's just a tool used for stuff like this.
The problem is that the Internet was inevitably going to (d)evolve this way no matter what the techno-utopians promised in the 1990s. The moment any communications medium shows the ability to convince / manipulate humans to do something, and especially convince humans to send money or allocate resources differently, interests from across the spectrum from state actors (for both legitimate and illegitimate) to criminal organizations were inevitably going to flood in. It is human nature.
Comment Re:More detailed explanation (Score 1) 123
He finds "operating on a different radio channel" on the yacht a flimsy excuse as the request was broadcast on the standard emergency channel. Any vessel sailing should have at least one radio on the emergency channel at all times. That however does not explain why the support vessel did nothing.
I think it boils down to the classic dilemma: was it malice (intentionally ignoring a vessel in need) or incompetence (failing to properly monitor the emergency channels)? Both are equally bad looks. The former generates more negative publicity, the latter should be a firing event.
Comment Re:potentially criminal act (Score 1) 123
Nowhere does your link say "applies if it's a distress call".
The article actually spends a couple paragraphs explaining this:
When another ship is in distress, everyone in the area is obligated to respond as long as doing so doesn't put their own ship at risk. But maritime law expert Ian Ralby said this situation appears different, and the crew of Zuckerberg's yacht wouldn't face that legal obligation.
“It’s the difference between calling AAA and 911. You need an ambulance on site, that’s a distress call. You need somebody to give you a jump or to tow your car, you call AAA,” said Ralby, who is president of the nonprofit Auxilium Worldwide that focuses on promoting sustainable development and ocean governance, among other goals. It is a big difference in terms of the emergency type, he said. "Both concerning, both needing assistance, but the legal obligations to respond are very different...”
Retired Coast Guard Captain Aaron C. Davenport, who spent three decades with the branch of the military responsible for rescues on the water, said running out of gas simply isn't considered an emergency, and the Launchpad wasn't obligated to help.
So in summary, morally repugnant? Yes. Illegal? No.
Comment To quote my favorite Slashdot tag... (Score 1) 81
Comment Go to Court... then face Retaliation? (Score 3, Insightful) 87
Comment Patronizing Comments on Hawaiians Misses Point (Score 3, Interesting) 183
Mauna Kea should probably be more viewed as "sacred" in terms of a site of significant, deep cultural / identity importance rather than religious. So think of it roughly analogous to someone wanting to plow over Yellowstone or Arlington National Cemetery to build a telescope.