Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

[ Create a new account ]

New Zealand Rejects Office For Macs

Posted by kdawson on Tue May 29, 2007 07:02 AM
from the my-word,-how-can-our-students-excel? dept.
An anonymous reader writes "The New Zealand Ministry of Education has declined to renew a licensing deal for MS Office on 25,000 Macintosh computers in the country's schools. The Education Minister has suggested that schools use the free alternative NeoOffice. The article quotes a school principal who pointed out that the NeoOffice website warns users to expect problems and bugs: 'That's not the sort of software we should be expecting kids in New Zealand to be using.'" Schools are free to buy their own copies of Office. A blog on the New Zealand Herald site argues that the Ministry should have paid Microsoft this time, but not renewed the deal and instead developed a transition plan to open source.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

New Zealand Rejects Office For Macs 50 Comments More | Login /

 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login
Keybindings Beta
Q W E
A S D
Loading ... Please wait.
  • by Ohreally_factor (593551) on Tuesday May 29 2007, @07:05AM (#19307433) Journal
    How about, expect problems and bugs with any software?
    • by rucs_hack (784150) on Tuesday May 29 2007, @07:11AM (#19307483)
      That's the trouble Open Source gets from being honest. Microsoft just hides the bugs and creates an illusion of problem free computer usage. Then they insist you keep windows update running all the time....

      In this case I think the fast transition will cause grumbles, but then again, if they waited the MSN (Microsoft Sales Ninjas) would be inbound, and before they knew it everyone would be parrotting the microsoft literature and the switch would be forgotten.

      [ Parent ]
      • by jimstapleton (999106) on Tuesday May 29 2007, @07:20AM (#19307549) Journal
        Except that NeoOffice seems to think they have more potential for bugs than MS office, and even go so far as to suggest that people use MS office instead for critical things. This is straight from their faq.

        Who should use NeoOffice?

        NeoOffice is not perfect. Although we try very hard to make NeoOffice free of bugs and crashes, our users still find new bugs and new cases that cause NeoOffice to crash. So, if you feel that you need software that has been heavily tested, we recommend that you use a commercially-supported product like Microsoft Office.
        [ Parent ]
        • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

          And yet in actual practice, we have yet to encounter said bugs where I work. NeoOffice works just fine on the couple of Macs we have, thank you and should be quite a bit more than what 99.9% of students need. In practice when I used to be stuck on Window
          • So you're basing your judgement on Office and Windows circa 10 years ago?
            [ Parent ]
              • by El Lobo (994537) on Tuesday May 29 2007, @08:16AM (#19307967)
                Great example.Both of them are produced by hardhare problems. The same problem in Linuzz would cause a Kernel panic. Not, not blue, but BLACK..
                [ Parent ]
                • by Zigg (64962) <matt@zigg.com> on Tuesday May 29 2007, @08:38AM (#19308165)

                  I've personally seen the IRQL error several times on machines that run Linux flawlessly (and more often!) If it's something that rears its head only when there's bad hardware, then Linux must be a magical operating system that can turn bad hardware into good.

                  [ Parent ]
                  • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

                    In the early days many machines would run fine with DOS and Windows but would crash with signal 11 on Linux, particularly when running gcc. As strange as it sounds this was usually a hardware problem - bad memory. There was even a FAQ on the signal 11 pr [bitwizard.nl]
                    • I can't rule out that Windows prints a meaningless complaint about IRQ levels when the real cause is a bug somewhere else.

                      You know, hardware that utterly fails under one operating system can work flawlessly under another. They have different drivers. In almost all cases, windows drivers are binary blobs that are developed by the device manufacturer or someone they have retained under contract to do so for them. Most Linux drivers are reverse engineered or developed from specs and are open source drivers which come with the kernel.

                      In practice, either one might be more reliable; if the Linux driver isn't very good, which is often the case (it can be hard to write a good, stable driver without specs) then it might not work under Linux properly, but be fine under Windows. If the Windows driver is a pile of crap, it might work better under Linux.

                      For example, my last desktop system was an Athlon XP 2500+ with a Radeon 9600XT. The system would bluescreen on boot if I had the catalyst control center installed. But once I booted up in safe mode and removed CCC, the driver worked "fine" (it still sucked - we're talking about ATI here. but no bluescreens.) Some people just can't write a fucking driver.

                      [ Parent ]
                  • by jimstapleton (999106) on Tuesday May 29 2007, @08:59AM (#19308439) Journal
                    I've seen Windows run flawlessly on machines that Linux isn't even borderline stable one.
                    I've seen Linux run flawlessly on machines Windows isn't even borderline stable one.

                    The fact of the matter is, there's a lot that stability depends upon, and even slightly different circumstances can lead to vastly different results.

                    In my personal experience, outside of really cheap computers, I've not had any stability issues with Windows. The exception being a computer with a SiL 2114 SATA controler, and using an IDE hard drive fixed that problem (Linux wouldn't even boot on that machine). I narrowed it down to the controller because all other machines tested work fine with the same SATA drives tested, and that machine runs fine with just IDE drives.

                    But I'm getting off track here. The point is that there is no "single" answer to achieving high stability, except putting in the effort to determine which (A) works with what (B), and some trial & error.
                    [ Parent ]
                  • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

                    If it's something that rears its head only when there's bad hardware, then Linux must be a magical operating system that can turn bad hardware into good.
                    "Program testing can be used to show the presence of bugs, but never to show their absence!"
                    -- Dijkst
              • by Hal_Porter (817932) on Tuesday May 29 2007, @09:00AM (#19308467)
                If you're trying to suggest BSODs are a thing of the past, I have just two things to say:

                PAGE_FAULT_IN_NONPAGED_AREA
                IRQ_NOT_LESS_THAN_OR_EQUAL


                Those are due to driver bugs. Page fault in non paged area means a bad pointer - you touched a page that was marked as not present, but since the area is unpaged the OS can't do anything to fix it.

                IRQL not less than or equal is more interesting. NT has a concept of IRQL. It's an abstraction, and it means which interrupts are enabled. The lowest level in kernel mode is PASSIVE_LEVEL which means the scheduler is enabled. The next highest level is DISPATCH_LEVEL where it is not. Above that are the hardware interrupt levels. Now consider a spinlock, an OS synchronisation primitive. These are to protect shared resources. Drivers call KeAcquireSpinLock() to get them, do some stuff and then KeReleaseSpinLock() to release them. On a SMP system, KeAcquireSpinLock needs to raise IRQL and then acquire the lock. On a single processor system it just raises the IRQL.

                http://ext2fsd.sourceforge.net/documents/irql.htm [sourceforge.net]

                So IRQL in Windows NT is very important thing. If the system is running at a raised IRQL, someone is holding a spinlock, or an interrupt is in progress.

                Lots of kernel routines are documented in the DDK as being only callable at a certain maximum IRQL. Typically, IRQL_NOT_LESS_THAN_OR_EQUAL is caused by touching paged data at a raised IRQL which can't work as the pager risks a deadlock when it tries to acquire spinlocks to page it in, or less likely by calling a function which is documented as not being callable at that IRQL.

                If you look at the stackframe, you can see which driver is to blame and either disable or update it. If the system has always been unstable, check the RAM.

                Interestingly enough, Microsoft are experimenting with static code analysis and automated test cases to catch driver errors like this

                http://www.inf.uni-konstanz.de/soft/teaching/ws05/ seminar/scpresentation.pdf [uni-konstanz.de]
                [ Parent ]
          • by CarpetShark (865376) on Tuesday May 29 2007, @07:55AM (#19307835)
            Sounds a lot like Debian's idea of "unstable", which other people think of as "stable", or their idea of "stable", which other people think of as "military grade".
            [ Parent ]
          • by klubar (591384) <ken@lubar.net> on Tuesday May 29 2007, @08:00AM (#19307865) Homepage
            Funny, I find the the open office always crashes if I remove the ram in the middle of anything. Must be buggy.
            [ Parent ]
        • by morgan_greywolf (835522) * on Tuesday May 29 2007, @07:45AM (#19307749) Homepage Journal
          Maybe that's true, but they also feel that NeoOffice is stable enough for everyday use. From the front page:

          Released as free, open source software under the GNU General Public License (GPL), NeoOffice is fully functional and stable enough for everyday use. The software is actively developed, so improvements and small updates are made available on a regular basis.

          also the same FAQ says:

          NeoOffice is a reasonably stable version of the OpenOffice.org office suite that has been engineered to run natively on Mac OS

          I've not used NeoOffice, but to me, this sounds like the software is in the stage Firefox was in just before hitting 1.0 -- stable enough for everyday use; maybe there are a few bugs, but they get fixed quickly so downloading the latest release is usually a good idea before filing a bug report.

          [ Parent ]
        • Or new zealand, could... (Score:4, Insightful)

          by WindBourne (631190) on Tuesday May 29 2007, @08:43AM (#19308229) Journal
          hire several coders and help out on this. It keeps the money local and is still cheaper.
          [ Parent ]
      • by suv4x4 (956391) on Tuesday May 29 2007, @07:26AM (#19307605)
        That's the trouble Open Source gets from being honest. Microsoft just hides the bugs and creates an illusion of problem free computer usage. Then they insist you keep windows update running all the time....


        You know, I'm surprised at the Orwellian speak coming from both the likes of Microsoft and the anti-Microsoft crowd.

        We don't have Microsoft just "fixing bugs", oh no. We have Microsoft "HIDING bugs and creating the ILLUSION of problem free computer usage".

        How on Earth do you create the *illusion* of problem free computer usage? You let Word crash and popup a box "Calm down user, this was just a part of your problem free computer usage"?

        Office works fine enough, the sad part in all of this, is they don't have good enough competitors, because they have stagnated for years and years.

        Then Office 2007 which offered lots of innovation in the interface, features, wizard etc. But why? Is it because Open Source was picking up and MS Office were terrible at "hiding bugs"? No, it's because people just got stuck with Office 97: Microsoft's competing with their own software.

        It's sad.
        [ Parent ]
      • by jintxo (698154) on Tuesday May 29 2007, @07:17AM (#19307513) Homepage
        Well, they sort of DID choose Open Office, except that they chose the native MacOS X port of it instead of the "plain" version.

        http://www.neooffice.org/neojava/es/index.php [neooffice.org]
        [ Parent ]
      • by TheRaven64 (641858) on Tuesday May 29 2007, @07:42AM (#19307723) Homepage Journal
        There are two Mac ports of OpenOffice. The official one began by using X11 and is now using Carbon (and will eventually transition to Cocoa in places). This is a clean architecture, and will adopt the OS X look and feel, but is not yet ready for use. The other option is NeoOffice, which was a quick and dirty port that has then been refined significantly. At the moment, the choices are:
        1. OpenOffice in X11, which is ugly, and doesn't integrate with the rest of the system.
        2. OpenOffice for Mac, which is unstable and is only available in source form.
        3. NeoOffice, which is fairly stable, doesn't need X11, and works now.
        Unfortunately, the work done by the NeoOffice team is licensed under the GPL, and so can't be pushed back upstream to the OpenOffice, which is LGPL. NeoOffice is a fork, and will remain so unless they decide to change their license, and so will need to pull changes down from upstream periodically. The OpenOffice native port stays in sync with changes in the main tree automatically.
        [ Parent ]
  • MS Office has plenty of bugs too... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by baptiste (256004) <mikeNO@SPAMbaptiste.us> on Tuesday May 29 2007, @07:09AM (#19307457) Homepage Journal

    The article quotes a school principal who pointed out that the NeoOffice website warns users to expect problems and bugs: 'That's not the sort of software we should be expecting kids in New Zealand to be using.'
    Just because Microsoft doesn't include this disclaimer on their website doesn't make MS Office any less buggy. This guy's students have been using buggy software their whole lives, from MS and others. Welcome to the information age. At least NeoOffice is being upfront about it.
      • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

        NeoOffice can be quite tricky to use. Or - It used to be quite tricky to use. I believe they've updated the version since I used it. It used to bug out on me all the time. In the end, I shelled out on Apple Pages.

        Saying that though, there's no reason stude
  • How much? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by igny (716218) on Tuesday May 29 2007, @07:12AM (#19307491) Homepage
    How much do they save, and is there a way to invest some of this money into further development of NeoOffice?
    • Re:How much? (Score:5, Interesting)

      by Domstersch (737775) <dominics AT gmail DOT com> on Tuesday May 29 2007, @08:17AM (#19307977) Homepage
      It's unclear how much money they save. The total licensing deals the government has made with Microsoft are speculated to be worth about NZ$100 million (US$72m) over the next ten years. But the Maharey, the Minister of Education, said the dispute was regarding NZ$2.7m worth of Microsoft Office licenses that would not (otherwise) be used (because the macs in question aren't currently using Office) but which Microsoft insisted the Ministry pay for.

      So, we know they're saving more than $2.7m and less than $100m, but we're not told exactly how much.

      By the way, macs aren't extensively used outside of primary (roughly, elementary schools) and intermediate (school years 7-8) in New Zealand. Every high school I can think of (many) have one or two macs at most, and classes full of PCs. So, to my mind, Le Sueur is wrong, and NeoOffice _is_ the sort of software we can expect kids to use. It's unreasonable to claim five to twelve year olds have a need for (supposedly) superior, high-class spreadsheets, databases and business presentations.
      [ Parent ]
  • Death Knell (Score:5, Insightful)

    by ehaggis (879721) on Tuesday May 29 2007, @07:17AM (#19307517) Homepage Journal
    Unfortunately the Ministry of Education has probably signed a death warrant for the adoption of an open source office package. Without planning, forethought, notice and buy-in, most projects will die on the branch. This is a poor introduction for many to open source software and will leave a sour taste.
    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      Agreed. I set up NeoOffice for my dad to use on his Mac Mini and it's fine for what he uses it for. But in a school environment you'll run across hundreds of teachers who simply don't want to re-learn how to use a word-processor. Somebody saw all these "En
      • Re:Death Knell (Score:4, Insightful)

        by TheRaven64 (641858) on Tuesday May 29 2007, @07:48AM (#19307765) Homepage Journal
        My mother was a primary school teacher until she retired recently, and had no problem using OpenOffice at home and MS Office at school (or, to be more accurate, the same problems using both). Schools are very light on the features they need from an office suite. Even an old version of AppleWorks would probably be okay for them.
        [ Parent ]
      • Re:Death Knell (Score:5, Insightful)

        by Chuq (8564) on Tuesday May 29 2007, @08:53AM (#19308371) Homepage Journal
        But in a school environment you'll run across hundreds of teachers who simply don't want to re-learn how to use a word-processor.

        That's funny, when I was at school I was taught on ClarisWorks on Apples and Win3.1 at school, and used MS Word 5 on DOS at home. Now I used MS Office 2k/2003 on XP at work and OpenOffice.org on XP/Ubuntu at home. I thought learning how to use a computer meant just that - learning how to use a computer, not learning how to use Microsoft software.
        [ Parent ]
  • It'll do the job. (Score:5, Insightful)

    I wouldn't trust NeoOffice to seamlessly handle a giant shared/published spreadsheet with lots of custom macros for dozens of users across a multi-office corporate WAN. OTOH, I'd trust it without hesitation to do anything a k-12 teacher or student would need to do with it.
    • Re:It'll do the job. (Score:5, Funny)

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 29 2007, @07:36AM (#19307691)
      That's what I was going to say -- for graphing a quadratic function or pasting plagiarized text out of Wikipedia, it'll be fine.
      [ Parent ]
  • They exaggerate (Score:3, Interesting)

    by bhima (46039) <Bhima.Pandava @ g mail.com> on Tuesday May 29 2007, @07:21AM (#19307555)
    I haven't been to the NeoOffice website in a very long time, since I started to use just plain Open Office. But... the last time I was there the website had the least friendly, over the top disclaimers found any on the web, save Microsoft's "Get the Facts" FUD page.

    OK so the NeoOffice developers have issues with their social skills, does this have much to do with the feature set and bugs of NeoOffice as compared with Open Office, Microsoft Office, or iWork?

    Personally I think all three are way overkill for students writing papers. Hell, I don't think I've ever used more than 10 or 20% of MS Office's features and I use it work nearly every day and have for over 10 years. Is there an Open Source project like Apple's 'Pages'? This, I think, would be closer to useful and a lot more fun.
      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        It was their "don't whine at us if you have a problem, we are only developers" disclaimer.

        I don't remember it exactly but it was blunt, over the top, and probably unnecessary.

        Emacs!? When I comment that OOO.org, MS Office, and NeoOffice are so feature ric
  • by malsdavis (542216) on Tuesday May 29 2007, @07:23AM (#19307575)
    If the experiences from U.K. councils and schools looking to ditch Office and Windows is anything to go by, Microsoft will probably return to the New Zealand government with an even better offer!

    Microsoft are terrified of the thought of educational and public authorities ditching MS products as they know that successful operation of non-MS products in these sort of institutions will lead others - and ultimately corporations (their biggest market) - to consider alternatives.

    Several U.K. local councils and schools pay virtually nothing for MS products to prevent them trialling Linux.

  • by bestinshow (985111) on Tuesday May 29 2007, @07:25AM (#19307589)
    I've been pleasantly surprised by the speed of NeoOffice 2.1 + the latest patch.

    It starts up almost immediately on a 2.0GHz Core 2 Duo iMac.

    Previous versions take ages to start up.

    They've also improved the GUI appearance no end from the primitive OpenOffice look and feel which is stuck in the mid 90s.

    This is a perfect solution for education as it will handle all educational needs without a problem, and save the education authority and schools a lot of money. This is a sound business decision for education.
  • What about Apple's own software? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by starseeker (141897) on Tuesday May 29 2007, @07:26AM (#19307607) Homepage
    If they don't want to fight it out with NeoOffice (no idea how hard that would be, I haven't used it) why not just work with AppleWorks? I assume Apple would be reasonable, since they are not the 800lb gorilla - and they have to know getting it used in Education could only help them. (Plus, they would want to keep the Macs there as well, and I'm sure someone will eventually suggest converting to all Windows PCs as a cost savings and getting Office everywhere...)

    I mean, this IS education we're talking about here. Their needs should be fairly basic - if not I would be suspicious of their teaching methods. If it were up to me I would build plans on AppleWorks but also introduce students to NeoOffice. Using both would force them to develop flexibility and the ability to learn new software. It is something they will need to do for the rest of their lives.

      • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

        It's clear you don't know what you're talking about. On Windows I love OO.o, but I tried NeoOffice and found it slow and not fun to use. That's not to disparage the hard work these folks have done on a very difficult project.

        But your blanket statements a
  • Teach Concepts, Not Apps (Score:4, Insightful)

    by EzInKy (115248) on Tuesday May 29 2007, @07:27AM (#19307617)
    I don't understand why schools let themselves get enslaved by proprietary software when kids could learn a whole lot more by experimenting with different solutions to problems.
  • by zerofoo (262795) on Tuesday May 29 2007, @07:46AM (#19307755)
    I'm the Network Manager for a small private school. Recently, our school was audited, and we found that we were short on our MS office licensing.

    I proposed Open Office as a viable replacement for most of our machines. Administration would continue to use MS Office alongside of Open Office. The school's administration tried Open Office, and after a short learning curve, they liked the software. The only real complaint was that the menus were different from MS Office. Administration assumed that teaching "professionals" would learn the new software and continue on with their jobs.

    It took an entire year, but the whole school was eventually migrated to Open Office, and it worked for most people. A few, very loud teachers, hated it.

    Those very loud teachers made lots of noise - so much so that administration finally coughed up $11,000 for MS Office 2007.

    After another lengthy deployment process, we had Office 2007 in place. Now the very loud teachers are complaining the new software is different from the old stuff.

    You can't win with Teachers.

    -ted
    • You can't win with Teachers.

      I think you mean "you can't win with people". In any sufficiently large population, there's going to be a few people who are dramatically more predisposed to griping and/or are dramatically less adaptive to change than the average person. So if it's any consolation, you'd have had to deal with the same idiots no matter what industry you worked in ;-)

      [ Parent ]
    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      My question is why purchase Office 2007 if you migrated all those other computers to OpenOffice? why not give the few who were bitching older copies of Office 2003 or whatever and leave the remaining (happy) users on OO?
  • by david.emery (127135) on Tuesday May 29 2007, @07:52AM (#19307789)
    Several times recently I've been handed a PowerPoint file (from a Windows user) with graphics in it, that either fail to render, or worse that crash Microsoft PowerPoint. The files open just fine in NeoOffice... I've also used an old version of Keynote (1.1) to work around Microsoft PowerPoint bugs opening PowerPooint presentations...

              dave
  • by simong (32944) on Tuesday May 29 2007, @07:56AM (#19307845) Homepage
    It just means that ac.nz won't be buying Office Mac 2008 (or whatever the next version for Mac is) and rolling out NeoOffice on new machines. I have to admit that I'm not a big office app user but I use NeoOffice on my Macs at home and the speed and stability improvements on version 2 and the regular patching regime have made it very usable, and it will be difficult for a native port of OpenOffice to OS X to catch up. I only hope that the NZ government will see their way to giving a tenth of their licensing costs for MS Office to Neooffice.org. It might stop them worrying about money so much.
  • by SplatMan_DK (1035528) on Tuesday May 29 2007, @08:12AM (#19307945) Homepage Journal
    I think it is a good thing that they will attempt to make a switch to NeoOffice. But sadly it is for the wrong reasons!

    In reality, it seems like the Education Minister is just being plain old-fashioned cheap.

    If they were serious about using NeoOffice/OpenOffice, but have concerns about the stability of the software, they should consider contributing to the project. There are tons of ways an Education minister can make that happen. He could encourage the IT related universities in his country to make projects that contribute to the products. He could donate cash to the NeoOffice and/or OpenOffice teams - say a mere 5% of the money they would otherwise have spent on commercial licenses? Or he could have contracted a local software company to improve (contribute) to the software for a specified amount.

    Open and free software is good. But choosing it simply because the initial price tag is low (read: nil) is a bad motivation - especially for an Education Minister. And it doesen't really help the product or the community either.

    An Open Source product is only as strong as its ACTIVE contributors.
    • Here's a hint as to why this won't happen: it's not the Minister of Education's job to spend my (yep, I'm a kiwi) tax money on helping "the product or the community". But do you know what is his job? To ensure that children in my country get the best education they can. And that means that when he has the choice of donating money to a software development group or spending it on one of the underfunded schools throughout the country, he must spend it on the kids.

      You hear the "somebody, think of the children" argument a lot these days. But this is one case where it applies well. It is Maharey's job to think of the children. And they are best served by using the money elsewhere.

      [ Parent ]
  • donate to help make improvements (Score:3, Interesting)

    by xirtam_work (560625) on Tuesday May 29 2007, @09:36AM (#19308959)
    The New Zealand Government is going to save a bucket load of cash by using Neo Office instead of Microsoft Office. Plus they've got peace of mind that not going to get stung for going over their licences or be reported for piracy, etc.

    Why not donate a significant amount to the Neo Office project each year to encourage development and/or place a bounty on features that they'd like to see included or fixed.

    If every district/county/state/country did something like that we'd have the best of breed open source software in the world available for everyone to use for free.

    Even though some software is free as is beer, the reason for this is so that it can truely be free as in freedom. Free as in beer doesn't stop you contributing back whatever you can to benefit everyone.

    I'm no tree-hugging GPL/GNU beardy freak, but I do appriecate the efforts these guys have made for the Mac Platform and have been thinking about donating myself - even though I only downloaded and used it once to open a single document.
  • my prob with NeoOffice (Score:3, Interesting)

    by misanthrope101 (253915) on Tuesday May 29 2007, @10:11AM (#19309421)
    Is that it doesn't (as far as I know) replicate my single favorite feature of OpenOffice. With OpenOffice, I can copy/paste text from a webpage into it, and the hyperlinks will still be intact. Print-to-pdf, even in OS X, doesn't send the hyperlink information, so that's no option--OpenOffice is the only solution I've found. I can save the page, but the ability to copy/paste the sections I want and keep the links intact, and then export to PDF, is simply awesome, and is the "killer feature" of OpenOffice for me. If I just want to write a document, I'll use Abiword or LaTeX.

    When I copy/paste into Neooffice, I get just the plain text--no links are preserved. I looked through the options to try to figure it out, to no avail. Haven't opened up NeoOffice since then. If anyone knows a way to fix that problem, please tell me. You can even throw in some gratuitous "lame noob" insults if it makes you feel better.

    On a side note, I really wish someone smarter than me (is that a big enough labor pool for you?) would write a print-to-pdf type program that keeps the hyperlinks intact. I don't know what mojo OpenOffice uses to preserve the hyperlinks from text copied to the clipboard, but there is no doubt a way to make a one-trick application that prints a section of html to pdf while keeping the hyperlinks intact. Yes, I'd pay for it. Any ideas?

    • Re:Silly principal.... (Score:4, Insightful)

      by UnknowingFool (672806) <minh_duong@noSPam.yahoo.com> on Tuesday May 29 2007, @07:36AM (#19307685)
      I wouldn't say that MS is lying, just not actively disclosing that fact. It's just a reality that all software has issues and bugs. Unless you've been living under a rock, you would know that MS software also has serious security issues too. It's more like two different salesmen when you ask about the fuel economy of a car. Both will quote the correct figure but one of them may disclaim that the number may not reflect real world driving conditions. Unfortunately some people will get upset with the later as it shatters their insular view of things.
      [ Parent ]
    • MS *doesn't* lie at all (Score:3, Informative)

      They tell you out in front what to expect from their software.....

      You did read the EULA didn't you? No? Really?