Slashdot

hypermicro is selling some very nice dual-processor 1U IBM servers for around two hundred bucks; both are xSeries eserver systems. I got the eserver 325 with dual Opteron 246s and 1GB for $189, and added two 512MB ECC DDR333 DIMMs for a total shipped cost around $230. The system now has a 120GB disk (included) and 2GB of DDR333 with Chipkill ECC. There is also an onboard Ultra320 SCSI controller even though this is an IDE model, it is unused. Rails are included for the second drive bay. The optical drive is a notebook CDROM but it is cabled using full size cables and an adapter board, so it should be trivial to switch. Finally, the system has two 100MHz 64-bit PCI-X slots; I actually had a dual-channel SCSI RAID controller lying around with a whopping 32MB of SDRAM on it, so I threw it in there. Quad USB, AMD chipset, Dual Linux-supported Broadcom GigE ports on the back along with a DB9 serial and a VGA port.

You can also get a Dual Xeon which is very similar; it's 2.8 GHz, has 2GB RAM, and has no VGA port. You need a C2T breakout cable (~$20-50 on ebay) or to add a PCI VGA card (supposedly) in order to get a console; C2T does include PS/2 keyboard and mouse connectors, however. This system is however $250 and is not advertised as including a hard disk. Because the types are not advertised I don't know if it's a SCSI model or not. The Xeon probably has slightly more raw processing power. The Opteron certainly has superior memory bandwidth (especially with four DIMMs.)

I am currently installing Ubuntu Hardy 8.04.1 Server for AMD64 on my system, and intend to provide report of how the install proceeded. I am using a Logitech Netplay USB keyboard and also have plugged in a Logitech Optical Wheel mouse. (I am amassing quite the collection of brand-name space heaters once again, what with my HP/Compaq "mobile workstation", ye olde IBM Thinkpad A21p, and Cisco Catalyst 3548XL. Nothing like the days when I had a stack of Apollos, some RT PCs and an Indigo, though... thank goodness.

Anyway, obviously I haven't completed an install yet, but so far there have been no snags whatsoever. None. I expect to have problems with lm-sensors, but who knows, it might be possible to get lucky. IBM offers some Linux-related downloads for this system, which not only was once the basis of a Linux-base cluster near the top of the Top500 running SuSe 8.

They originally started at $2,919, mind you that's one Opteron 240 and, IIRC, 512MB RAM and no disk (IDE cable is present, SCSI controller is present but no backplane.) Now yours for a much, much lower price.

The full fan speed would be fearsome, but I never expect to hear it except when cold-booting.

This morning I tried to buy a pack of DVD+R DL discs from Newegg and not only is there no shopping cart button (I had to find the cart in my history) but the cart wouldn't work - it just kept telling me it hadn't loaded completely. I refuse to enable three different sites' worth of javascript to make a shopping cart work, so I ended up spending five bucks more for the same thing on Amazon.

I had gone to Newegg this morning only because Geeks.com (with whom I have had better results in general) has been raising prices and is no longer all that compelling. They keep selling refurb laptops for more than I can find an equivalent product new (and usually from an equally or more reputable manufacturer) for example. If I can't stand Newegg or Computer Geeks, where the heck do I shop?

I would very much prefer it if their website were usable on slow connections. I was going to suggest IKEA as an example of the web done right, but they have gone to putting a big fat flash movie on their front page, which requires a newer flash than I have on Ubuntu Gutsy.

so I log in to check my messages today and I have five mods, all overrated, all in a row, no other moderation. The comments are: Re:Italian Radio * Re:Cooler... * Re:Software RAID * Re:Coming to Mac OS 10.5 * Re:Amiga beat them all

It's too bad people like this feel a need to contaminate my existence. What a waste of CHON.

Recently, the OSI announced that they were planning to "crack down" on people who misuse the term "Open Source". I found this particularly intriguing because I am well aware (as are most other long-time geeks) that the term 'Open' was around long before the OSI was even a dream. Another element of that conversation that was quite interesting is that Bruce Perens claims to have invented the term 'Open Source'. Can this possibly be true?

Bruce didn't give a date anywhere in the discussion as to when he might have invented the term, but his document The Open Source Definition does provide some clues. For example, he states that "The Open Source Definition started life as a policy document of the Debian GNU/Linux Distribution." [...] "I was the leader of the Debian project, at that time, and I addressed these problems by proposing a Debian Social Contract and a Debian Free Software Guidelines in July, 1997." He also states in relation to ESR's involvement that "Raymond and I had met occassionally at the Hacker's Conference, a by-invitation-only gathering of creative and unconventional programmers. We had corresponded on various subjects via e-mail. He contacted me in February of 1997 with the idea for Open Source."

These statements would seem to put the origin of the term, therefore, between February and July of 1997 — But Eric Raymond's recollection is different. In The Origins of `Open Source' , a portion of his book Revenge of the Hackers he writes "Hence the term `open source', which the first participants in what would later become the Open Source campaign (and, eventually, the Open Source Initiative organization) invented at a meeting held in Mountain View the offices of VA Research on 3 February 1998." That's right, Perens' ostensible source for the idea of the term Open Source himself places the event in February of 1998, not 1997.

This isn't the end of the claimants to the origin of the term "Open Source", however - and to find the next one, I don't even have to talk about a different group of people. In chapter 11 ("Open Source") of the book Free as in Freedom: Richard Stallman's Crusade for Free Software Christine Peterson, then-president (now the vice president) of the Foresight Institute, also claims to have invented the term - or at least to have a better claim to it than ESR. "Looking back, Peterson says she came up with the open source term while discussing Netscape's decision with a friend in the public relations industry. She doesn't remember where she came upon the term or if she borrowed it from another field, but she does remember her friend disliking the term." The book also quotes her as saying that she was "hesitant about suggesting it", adding "I had no standing with the group, so started using it casually, not highlighting it as a new term." The last relevant slice of the chapter claims that "Raymond says he didn't publicly use the term "open source" as a substitute for free software until a day or two after the Mozilla launch party, when O'Reilly had scheduled a meeting to talk about free software."

All of the events mentioned here happened during or after January of 1998. So it seems that ESR has the more correct interpretation of events than Perens; but in turn, Peterson's claim is shown to be the stronger.

However, none of these people has a better claim to the term "Open Source" than, of all places, Caldera - which we now know as the SCO Group. But back then, Caldera was a leader of the Open Source movement, as you can see from this mailing list archive entry which includes a press release from Caldera announcing their "Open Source" distribution of DOS, to which they had recently acquired rights. The title? CALDERA. ANNOUNCES OPEN SOURCE CODE MODEL FOR DOS The date? September tenth, 1996. That's right, over a year before the most reputable claims of invention.

To be absolutely fair, only ESR and Perens actually claim to have invented the term. Peterson says that she doesn't remember where she got the idea, which while potentially disingenuous is at the least not an outright lie, and at best is entirely true - assuming that there is any truth to the story to begin with. Believing everything you read is probably (to say the least) a mistake.

Regardless, we are left only with a mystery. Where did the term originate? Who out of these three — Eric Raymond, Bruce Perens, and Christine Peterson — is telling the truth? It can only be one of them, as each of them makes contradictory claims of one nature or another.

I formerly posted a comment asking these questions of Bruce Perens, in response to the comment in which he claims to have done the inventing, but he either did not see that I made the comment (ostensibly, a slashdot message should have been sent to him notifying him of a reply) or did not feel that it was worthy of response, so I am asking this question of the larger Slashdot community. Does anyone have any better information than I've already tracked down?