Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Businesses

France Clamps Down on Delivery Depot 'Dark Stores' (bbc.com) 59

smooth wombat writes: France has taken steps to outlaw so-called dark stores - city-centre food depots used for instant home deliveries ordered over the internet. Faced by growing protests from local people as well as city authorities, President Emmanuel Macron's government has decreed that the stores be classified as warehouses, rather than as shops - meaning that in Paris and other cities most will probably be forced to close. Run by half a dozen competing companies such as Gorillas, Cajoo, Getir, Flink and Gopuff, "dark stores" have proliferated in France as elsewhere over the last two years after Covid confinement popularised internet food shopping. Advertising in Paris urges householders to get their food delivered in less than 10 minutes - or "quicker than a double by Benzema," referring to the French football star. A campaign by Cajoo shows "Alex" doing his shopping by smartphone while sitting on the lavatory. But residents of buildings where "dark stores" have replaced pre-existing grocery shops are angry about noise from early morning lorries and the disruption caused by squads of deliverers on electric bicycles and scooters. City officials - who spent millions to safeguard the high street against out-of-town shopping centres - are worried that the new threat from "quick commerce" will drain life from public spaces and hasten the trend to an "atomised" society of solitary consumers.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

France Clamps Down on Delivery Depot 'Dark Stores'

Comments Filter:
  • call them "photon-deprived stores".

    Then again, I'm also photon-deprived as my pale [censored] demonstrates.

  • Fighting what consumers want is a loosing battle, just look at how successful the War on Drugs has been.
    • by splutty ( 43475 ) on Thursday September 08, 2022 @04:20PM (#62864511)

      They open "Stores" in places that aren't zoned from them. They're getting banned all over Europe right now.

      Guess their run-around on zoning laws ran into the law finally.

    • by Neuroelectronic ( 643221 ) on Thursday September 08, 2022 @04:29PM (#62864561)

      Do consumers really want it? Or is it being subsidized by large holding corporations in order to price out local businesses?

      "3 billion in venture capitol"
      "Getir’s July valuation of $7.6 billion"
      https://www.bloomberg.com/news... [bloomberg.com]

        Maybe you're right, perhaps that ship may have already sailed thanks to visionary philanthropist billionaires looking to defeat obsolete nationalist identities and secularism. Their vision for open societies rests on installing a world government that will recognize and reward ($) their progressive ideals and huge investments in political power that will save us from global warming and racism.

      • Yep - they're "dumping" a service on the market under cost in an effort to destroy existing businesses.
    • by Anonymous Coward

      is a loosing battle

      Oh, I know about such things, believe me.

      Sincerely,

      Spelling Nazi

    • by rsilvergun ( 571051 ) on Thursday September 08, 2022 @05:18PM (#62864777)
      these delivery companies tend to be heavily subsidized by venture capital. So what could easily happen is they run the high street stores out of business then when the venture capital runs out they either collapse or jack their prices to absurd levels.

      It's all well and good to be "disruptive" but it pays to think things through too.
    • by HiThere ( 15173 ) <`ten.knilhtrae' `ta' `nsxihselrahc'> on Thursday September 08, 2022 @05:41PM (#62864875)

      Maybe. But "warehouses" seems a better description of them than shops. I suppose that store could fit either. My french isn't good enough to know how the french make that kind of distinction, but "warehouse" seems about right.

    • by fermion ( 181285 )
      But setting reasonable parameters that stops the race to the bottom, the greasy pole, is not.

      I donâ(TM)t want to pay huge delivery and service fees. But the crypto fascist bleeding heart liners say that we can just have people work for tips, we have to pay them. So it costs $10 more to have my groceries delivered. And millions are denied employment that meets their skill level.

      The fact is that these shops are often hidden, unregulated, and dangerous. In other countries the race to the bottom has le

    • by CrimsonAvenger ( 580665 ) on Thursday September 08, 2022 @05:52PM (#62864907)

      is a loosing battle

      You sure it's not a tightening battle?

    • Fighting what consumers want is a loosing battle, just look at how successful the War on Drugs has been.

      FTS: "... residents of buildings where 'dark stores' have replaced pre-existing grocery shops are angry about noise from early morning lorries and the disruption caused by squads of deliverers on electric bicycles and scooters."

      Those unhappy residents are also consumers, so by your definition the stores themselves are "fighting what consumers want".

    • Fighting what consumers want is a loosing battle, just look at how successful the War on Drugs has been.

      Consumers want a paradox. They want everything instantly but insist no warehouses or industry is built with 20km of their house.

      You say "good luck with that", but this is very easy to solve. Unlike some drugs you can actually hide a large scale delivery operation. Netherlands has clamped down on dark stores recently and several companies have already just quit the market as a result. The result is nothing like the war on drugs.

      • *can't

      • I live in NYC. I have several grocery stores within 5 min walk of my apartment. I'm disabled, so I can walk there faster than any delivery chump can deliver. I'm also not an agoraphobe.
        • Yeah and that's even more relevant in this case. This is Paris we're talking about (or Amsterdam and Rotterdam, both who beat Paris to the punch). I live in the damn suburbs and have a choice of 3 grocery stores withing 7min walk (or literally 1-2min on a quick cycle).

      • by piojo ( 995934 )

        Consumers want a paradox. They want everything instantly but insist no warehouses or industry is built with 20km of their house.

        This isn't so complicated. Wanting fast/cheap/easy food is a want. It's a want because nobody is obligated to provide it--the free market will find a way if some entrepreneur can manage it. On the other hand, not having loud logistics activity happening in the wee hours of the night is a need. People are entitled to quiet during the night, and that right can't be traded away for fa

  • City officials are worried that the new threat from "quick commerce" will drain life from public spaces and hasten the trend to an "atomised" society of solitary consumers.

    This is ironic after the same officials stoked covid fears for 2 years and actually created "an "atomised" society of solitary consumers"

    • City officials are worried that the new threat from "quick commerce" will drain life from public spaces and hasten the trend to an "atomised" society of solitary consumers.

      This is ironic after the same officials stoked covid fears for 2 years and actually created "an "atomised" society of solitary consumers"

      It's not ironic in the least. In both cases they were / are doing the best they could to protect the well-being of their constituents. Your editorializing about stoking covid fears does nothing to change that.

  • Macron sure does seem to want his people to flee cities and march in the streets more. Things were bad enough when they wanted to lock everything down and people had had enough of it. Now, next time, they'll have had enough of it and they'll also be hungry. This sounds like a recipe for success.
  • Is a French national pass-time. The Arab corner shops owners will be happy, though.

    People mostly want to avoid human contact and the super-market shopping hassle. The virus lockdowns required it.

    And now that everything's open again, they again refuse to accept what people wants.
  • I thought this was going to be about the scheme where businesses "build something that is fundamentally useless to anyone but [themselves] [slate.com]" as a way to pay less property taxes on it.

    But anyway, warehouses belong in industrial areas. If you want to build an apartment building in a warehouse district, that should be fine (which unlike Japan [blogspot.com] isn't legal here in most of the USA, we're a lot like Communists that way) but it makes sense that building a warehouse in a residential district should not be ok.

    • by PPH ( 736903 )

      it makes sense that building a warehouse in a residential district should not be ok

      Who was there first? Doesn't matter in most liberal cities. Residents scream about the noise, dirt and traffic. Do you really think that the city will tell them to get out? It's a common ploy to get hold of valuable developable property. Entice some po' (usually colored) people in next to the manufacturing because cheap. Wait for the complaints. Close down the businesses, who sell to the residential developers. Nice, expensive condos go up. Colored folks get kicked out and moved to the next warehouse distri

  • by MpVpRb ( 1423381 ) on Thursday September 08, 2022 @05:02PM (#62864721)

    of politically connected companies using government to kill competition

    • Nope. Most of these places are being shut down due to a) breaches of zoning laws, and b) complaints from locals. It's a good conspiracy theory, but you don't need political connections when your opposition is already hated and are doing themselves out of business.

    • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

      They are like Uber. They think the law doesn't apply to them and they can subvert it to gain a competitive advantage.

Real Users never use the Help key.

Working...