Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:You're proposing throwing the weak under the bu (Score 1) 79

Re: "The result of..." Let me stop you right there. Do you know the difference between "because of" & "despite"?

Essentially, you're arguing that the US empire's instigation & support of brutally oppressive regimes isn't as brutal & oppressive as other empire's instigation & support of brutally oppressive regimes. Not really much of an argument.

Comment Re:Your ignorance of Soviet Imperialism is impress (Score 1) 79

OK, have you got anything to offer other than stale cold war propaganda. This is getting tiring.

I'm not sure why you feel the need to posture the USA as the "good guys" defending the world from the "evil" Russian Empire/Soviet Union. They're both empires. They both do evil shit. Neither are on some higher moral mission or protecting the vulnerable from domination & exploitation, right? For the victim countries it's simply a matter of which empire they're gonna get fucked by, right?

So you'd prefer the spoils of imperialism to go to the USA. Understood. I'm arguing against imperialism itself.

Comment Re:Your ignorance of Soviet Imperialism is impress (Score 1) 79

WWI & WWII & the collapse of the British Empire were a unique opportunity to collaborate more & do things more diplomatically, e.g. founding the UN, updating the Geneva Conventions, establishing universal human rights, etc.. Within the limited scope that it had, it functioned impressively well & should've ushered in a new era of international diplomacy & relations. Instead, those in Washington decided the flex their muscles & their new found terror-weapons; nuclear bombs, & they showed the world that they were willing to use them.

What kind of effects do you think that had on geopolitics?

You seem to be stuck in the results of belligerent foreign policy rather than the policies themselves. Again, belligerence begets belligerence but it doesn't take much to change things. Wasn't that the original point of the Nobel Prize for Peace?

No. The USA chooses war.

Comment Re:London ain't Paris or Berlin (Score 1) 119

Re: "Adding trams and bus lanes will only make the problem of narrow streets even worse." -- Nope. It's already been demonstrated in several European cities, e.g. in the centre of Seville, Spain. Pedestrianise & restrict vehicle access to the centre & put in trams to move people around longer distances. It's transformational.

Re: 'The "congestion charge" is not about congestion, its about vehicle emissions' -- What do you think "congestion charge" means? Are you familiar with the concept of congestion pricing? I suggest you find out: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

Comment Re:War Hawk Harris? (Score 1) 79

To reiterate & clarify, it's mostly US imperialism that has led to these situations in the first place so it's up to US diplomacy to resolve them peacefully. In every case that I've heard the history & details laid out clearly, there's the US state department & diplomats sabotaging peaceful diplomacy & cooperation in favour of hostilities & threats of armed conflict. Don't forget that "regime change" is Washington's & CIA's foreign policy MO.

Belligerence begets belligerence. Decades of belligerent foreign policy has cultivated a world of hostile geopolitics, distrust, & aggressive, illegal behaviour. You have Henry Kissinger & everyone who followed his advice to thank for that. The US empire has made a mockery of others' attempts to cultivate a more peaceful, collaborative, & prosperous world.

You want to blame other powerful nation states' reactions to aggressive, belligerent US foreign policy, go ahead, but in well-informed, civilised societies that won't win you any friends.

Comment Re: Look both ways before crossing? (Score 1) 119

Yes. This. Please mod parent up. They did the same thing to make the buses run on time in Leeds, Yorkshire, many years ago. It was infuriating & pointless.

It's classic case of Goodhart's law: When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure. In this case, they're making the buses run faster by picking up fewer passengers which defeats the point of a public bus service. I bet they hired a bunch of "consultants" for £millions of taxpayers' money with no knowledge or experience of running buses.

Comment London ain't Paris or Berlin (Score 1) 119

London's particularly difficult city to drive in simply because its layout wasn't reformed like other modern European cities. The main streets are narrower, more irregular/crooked, full of bottlenecks, & generally less efficient, i.e. not designed to optimise traffic flow; not designed at all! Anyone wanting to travel by road there will have to get used to the idea that they'll mostly travel at the same speed that horses did back in the day, i.e. the average road speed hasn't changed. London is also the 2nd biggest city in Europe & mostly low-rise, i.e. lower population density, so there's a lot of ground to cover.

If they really want the buses to run more quickly, they need to address traffic congestion. One solution, the congestion charge worked at first, to the relief of taxi & bus drivers but soon turned out to be temporary as private drivers decided that they'd just pay more to drive around central London so it just became another form of taxation. What have they done in overly congested areas in cities elsewhere in Europe? They've beefed up public transport, e.g. introducing trams, pedestrianising many of the smaller streets, creating more dedicated bike & scooter lanes, & restricting private traffic, e.g. access for private cars only granted to residents of those areas. It seems to work pretty well. It makes city centres a lot quieter, safer, & more pleasant to hang out in too, e.g. more benches, green spaces, cafés, & events for public entertainment.

In the meantime, London's layout ain't gonna change, & bus passengers & companies will have to learn a little more patience & stop expecting quicker bus journey times. Transport for London is a public institution & shouldn't try to be like Amazon, FFS. Cut the poor drivers some slack!

Comment Re:Let's try again (Score 1) 79

The Soviet Union inherited the Russian empire so any hope of a communist state was doomed from the start. It was the perfect environment for one despotic regime, the Tzars, to be replaced by another, Stalin. Stalin carried on, business as usual.

Sorry but there's no "good guys" in this story. The US Empire is trying hard to catch up with the British Empire's toll of 55-70 million deaths (in the last 400 or so years) and the Russian Empire's 55-80 million (in the last 500 or so years). In 250-ish years, so far the USA has only managed 5-6 million. Amateurs!

I'd like to believe that the nature of military conflict has changed fundamentally since the two world wars & that we're seeing much reduced death & suffering. But any amount of death & suffering caused by our illustrious leaders' greed is indefensible in the contemporary world, i.e. We're at least supposed to have learnt our lessons from the past couple of centuries with things like the Geneva Conventions; If only the USA & UK & EU would obey them! Hopefully, that puts things into some kind of perspective.

Comment Re:so remove CLI, Linux apps, boot other os, etc? (Score 1) 22

Yeah, ChromeOS is a shitty version of Linux. Most of the apps are crappy versions of Android apps. If you want to do anything actually computery with it, e.g. install FOSS apps & utilities, you have to install & run a Linux VM on it. May as well wipe ChromeOS & run Linux.

Comment Re: Cue up (Score 1) 117

As an old Slashdoter I did frequently work more than 40 hours per week although rarely close to 80 hours. The difference might be I liked my job mostly and liked to work. And I believe you meant "queue."

Working unhealthily long hours is only OK when it's a personal choice with no coercion. Most people just want to work healthy hours so they can spend the precious hours of their lives with the people they really care about.

BTW, is a "slashdoter" someone who dotes on slashdot?

Slashdot Top Deals

"I got everybody to pay up front...then I blew up their planet." "Now why didn't I think of that?" -- Post Bros. Comics

Working...