As of this writing I have been unable to find any news on the progress of the suit beyond its having been filed.
This strikes me as a contravention of anti-fraud and/or anti-trust laws, and should be the subject of criminal charges filed by various States and Federal attorneys. Sure, it's about Electronic Freedoms, and I'm glad the EFF is weighing in - but dammit, they shouldn't have to do so. Legal authorities should be doing their jobs.
16-bit @ 44 KHz was "good enough" for the average Joe.
And by that you mean "mathematically proven to capture everything the human ear can hear".
"Experimentally proven to capture everything the human ear can hear, and add some as well". Unfortunately, even the best 16b-bit 44kHz reproduction chains introduce uncorrelated high-order harmonics that fall in the audible range and can add a harshness to the sound that makes people tire of listening more quickly. Higher resolution and higher sample rates push these spurious components farther up in frequency, where they are inaudible, or at least less audible.
For the first time since I can remember, TFA was actually written more poorly than TFS. Of course, that wasn't not too hard; TFS only contained one paragraph from the article, while TFA itself went on and on and on in an a meandering, fuzzy-headed, buzz-word-filled fashion that said nothing and went nowhere. As a bonus, that 'coal' metaphor seems to have come straight from a cannabis-induced moment of "enlightenment".
Keeping Firefox cutting edge...
Well which one is it? It's like I don't do understand it!
Well, I'll be the first to risk Flamebait mods by saying it: this summary reads as though it was written by someone whose first language was Hindi or something similar. If you read the following sections aloud in the common stereotype of an Indian accent you'll immediately know what I mean:
"their privacy and those of other billion plus users"
"reneging from its original promise"
"approached Delhi High Court"
"the bench of chief justice"
"must delete data of users"
Palmer Luckey: "You can't fight the American elite without serious firepower. They will outspend you and destroy you by any and all means."
Gee, with a net worth of $700M, you yourself are in danger of being a member of the elite you profess to despise but secretly long to join.
It must truly suck to be a member of the 'nouveau nouveau riche', when the 'nouveau riche' won't even give you the time of day, let alone take you seriously, and I feel for you - NOT. The fact that you have to resort to shitposting to gain any audience at all probably has nothing to do with the newness of your wealth. I'm sure it has everything to do with the fact that you're an ignorant, whiny, petulant brat who can afford a seat at the 'grownup table' but who can't act or talk like an adult. (Come to think of it, that makes you the PERFECT Trump shill). If you ever grow up to the point where trolling, bitching, and crowing give way to reasoned, thoughtful discourse, (but I'm not holding my breath), then maybe you'll be taken seriously. Until then, STFU - adults are trying to have a conversation, and we don't need mini-Trump butting in when Big Trump is already making rude noises and sticking his tongue out at us.
I'm curious, how exactly did they prompt you?
After entering user name and password there is a screen that says "Make sure your account is secure! To secure your account, change your password and update your mobile number", followed by a large blue button with "Yes, secure my account" and small grey text below that saying "I'll secure my account later". Clicking on the latter asks for a mobile number, (hell no), and then proceeds to the Yahoo main page, from whence I click on the email link. Clicking on the former presents the usual two-field password entry, then proceeds to the mobile number prompt when matching new passwords are entered.
The behaviour I see may be different from what others see - I don't allow JS to run when I'm on Yahoo. Their email interface sucks, but it actually sucks a little less when it can't do all the cutesy client-side crap their code-monkeys thought was good design. When I have to attach files I enable JS, then quickly disable it again.
Two years ago was when the breach happened. Ergo, prompting a mandatory password change was the breach notification.
I just checked again, on a third Yahoo account I had almost forgotten about, and the password change is NOT mandatory. There may be a time-limited or login-limited period after which they force a password change, but for all I know users may be able to keep their compromised passwords until Yahoo implodes.
Just recently I was prompted to change passwords on my two Yahoo accounts. I've had both for about 10 years and this is the first time I've seen this, so yeah, they're visibly doing something about it. Unfortunately, they waited an unacceptably long time, and they still weren't forcing the password change. That's not surprising, given that it's Yahoo, but it's still kinda disappointing.
He complained that he reported stuff but nothing happened... It doesn't sound like he exhausted all of his options to legally raise attention.
He may have felt, (and possibly rightly so), that further attempts to "legally raise attention" would have marked him for some undesirable and dangerous 'special attention' of his own, while at the same time utterly failing to right the wrongs he was witnessing.
Somewhere along the way, he agreed to not disclose info and follow the process and precautions laid out.
That sounds rather like a contract. If the agency he worked for failed to materially disclose that he might be witness to the ongoing and institutionalized breaking of laws and/or the violation of the Constitution, then it strikes me that said contract was probably null and void. Hell, forget even contract law - any promises made to a criminal are entirely inconsequential when it comes to bringing said criminal to justice and/or surviving criminal intents and actions.
Third, if he truly believed what he was doing was right, then stick around and face the consequences. Hell, plead guilty and convince a jury you should get off.
The government says Snowden would receive a ‘fair’ no jury military trial in a secret location. So no, no opportunity there to be tried before a jury. That sounds a lot like a kangaroo court to me.
I have friends who were deployed, who (at least they firmly believe) were put in harms way and lost men directly because of the info Snowden released. These guys are more courageous and less selfish than any of the political scum running and people like them are the reason we can worry about phone call metadata collection instead of being shot if we disagree with the government.
I believe they are courageous and unselfish. But aren't they ultimately in the service of those 'political scum' you're talking about?
How about making electronics stuff that, you know, lasts? And that can be economically repaired? Why don't we, as a culture, forego the latest bit of shiny in favour of, I dunno, 4-or-5-year-old devices that still do what they're needed to do, even if they're slightly slower, slightly bigger or smaller, and a bit lower in resolution? And while we're at it, let's make it fucking illegal to sell products whose batteries can't be easily and readily replaced by the user.
The three R's of conservation are, in descending order of preference, Reduce, Reuse, and Recycle. We should make the first one the highest priority, followed closely by the second. If we're relying heavily on the third to save our asses from environmental destruction and material depletion, we've already failed. If we're tossing items into landfill when they contain precious metals and non-renewable petroleum products, (not to mention all the energy that went into making those items, from raw material to finished products), then we're committing a crime against the Earth and its future inhabitants. But hey, it's all good, because voodoo economics has almost totally removed environmental damage and resource depletion as cost factors in production, and my, those bonuses are going to be really sweet this year.
We've made a god of the giant Ponzi scheme we call the economy, and we're scared shitless of even acknowledging to ourselves, (much less pointing out to each other), that not only does this emperor have no clothes, he's on fucking life support, and we're mortgaging our descendants' lives to keep him going.
My apologies for the mixed metaphors.
It's easy to bash the incumbents but let's not just hand the keys to the city over to Google just yet.
Don't think of it as handing the keys to the city over to Google. Rather, see it for what it is - mandating the transfer of the keys from AT&T and Comcast over to Google. And after all, the municipality owns said utility poles, so it's their decision. Besides, as much as I hate and distrust Google, I don't believe they would do anything during their work on the poles to purposely disrupt AT&T or Comcast service. But I can certainly see AT&T and Comcast putting the screws to Google in any way possible, including 'accidental sabotage'.
In 1750 Issac Newton became discouraged when he fell up a flight of stairs.