Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook


Forgot your password?
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. ×

Comment Re:Rape by fraud? (Score 1) 215

Thank you for the link. However, it's not clear whether that law merely covers pretending to be someone's SO, or covers other types of trickery, such as when a woman falsely tells a date she's single or a man says he's two inches taller than he really is. I think we can agree that if I lie about my height, it does not remove consent.

Secondly, I don't think your example about boxing holds up. Being punched in the face is not an active action--it is passive. The only way someone actively participates in getting punched in the face is by forcefully slamming their head into someone's hand, and in that case, they surely consented by their action.

I'll say it again. Sex is not a contract. Hugging is not a contract. Helping someone carry a box is not a contract. Sitting down on a chair is not a contract.

I think there should be laws to cover this sort of situation. It would still not be rape--it's more like theft of services or failure to perform one's end of an agreement. (She fully consented, but it was part of a larger agreement, and that larger agreement was fraudulent, not the sex.)

Comment Re:Rape by fraud? (Score 1) 215

Thanks for the correction. I'm all in favor of facts. However, it looks like that's a state law, and I'm not clear what the law actually says. Pretending to be someone's lover is way at one end of the spectrum (like having sex with a sleeping person), since they don't know they're having sex with you. At the other end, a someone says they're single but they really aren't, or that they're 2 cm taller than they really are. That article does not actually describe what type of deception would be considered rape.

Comment Re:Rape by fraud? (Score 0, Troll) 215

Fraud obviates consent. Or, to put it another way, if consent is obtained fraudulently, the consent is not legally effective. Accordingly, there was no legally effective consent to sex.

You didn't answer the question. Besides, sex is not a contract. Sex is an action. Legally speaking, there is no such thing as "fraudulent sex".

Comment Re:I'm afraid to click on any of this article's li (Score 1) 176

There's been some sort of growth change as of late (I blame the hormones-infested meat the industry pushes into supermarkets). During the last two decades, I'll be darned if I can reliably tell whether that hot chick I see on the street is 24 or 14.

That's true, but it's not the same thing as pedophilia. Our society has the bad habit of treating someone exactly the same whether they sleep with a kid or a 17 year-old. Media is partly to blame, because "child" is a highly inflammatory term in the context of sexuality, so they overuse that term. The result now is that someone with a healthy brain who is attracted to young adults can end up being treated the same as someone with an abnormal brain (who is attracted to children). Our collective enjoyment of outrage is removing the nuance and shades of gray from life.

Comment Re:Snopes picks strawmen to debunk when it suits t (Score 1) 203

> That would imply that the rape shield laws pervert the justice system.

No, if there are proper mechanisms for the justice system to be adjusted, by definition that's part of the system. (I'm not saying it's good or bad, but it's how the system was meant to function.) When lawyers decide to hold their punches, that's not part of the system. If I'm ever accused of a serious crime, I want my lawyer to do everything he can to make me look good and the prosecution look bad! If he doesn't, he's not doing his job. A lawyer's job isn't to be sweet. It's to follow the truth, obey the law, obey the current professional ethical guidelines, and to win the case. Otherwise justice isn't being served (according to the rules at the time).

Comment Re:Snopes picks strawmen to debunk when it suits t (Score 1) 203

No argument about old rape trials being horrible. Doesn't mean I'll excuse anyone else for putting rape victims through that. Lawful evil behavior is still evil.

That's quite a simplification. How about the fact that if a defense lawyer does not do everything within their capability to defend the client, it perverts the justice system? Our system is adversarial. Both sides are in a fight. Neither side of the American justice system is actually responsible for finding the truth. If one side holds their punches (doesn't do everything they can according to the legal standards at the time), it's a loss for justice. It's not an attorney's job to decide which tactics she is or is not willing to use. If she doesn't fight as hard as she can according to the standards at the time, she is perverting the justice system.

Comment Re:Western products (Score 1) 28

It's not the US that has better QA, it's the importer. If the item isn't purely generic (if it has a brand), nobody wants to bring a shoddy product into the market and tank their own business. If it's generic, then the global marketplace means it's very, very hard to get good quality from any source.

Comment Re:No Thanks, Google (Score 2) 116

Yep, my Nexus 4 was not fit for use. It barely worked, and actually did stop working after six months. I'm very hesitant to buy another Nexus phone. Though the Nexus 4 was made by LG, I found other LG phones aren't that bad. The G4 was a pleasure to use until the CPU died--I'm told the CPU dies on nearly all LG G4 handsets.

My conclusion from this admittedly small sample size: there is little Q/A on Nexus phones, and their design and build quality compares poorly to a phone whose production is entirely controlled by an established manufacturer.

Comment Re: Yeah, no (Score 1) 275

I'm not misunderstanding the information theory, but I may be misunderstanding the electrical/mechanical context. Does audio equipment use off-the-shelf microchips that are 32-bits, or does every extra bit require more circuitry? I was assuming this stuff is based on computer chips and thus 32 bits is natural--I was just arguing that it's harmless.

Because if your composite data is some infinite-precision data (signal) plus some low-magnitude data, clipping the data does not preferentially remove the noise. It simply changes the low bits to 0, which may or may not agree with the signal. Mostly what got me about your post was the idea that these extra bits are like adding a RNG to the signal. Well, that's true, but so is deleting them.

If making a 32-bit system is harder and more expensive than making a lower-bit system, then I'm fully with you. Either way, charging more for such a system is predatory.

Comment Re: Yeah, no (Score 1) 275

32bit systems are a joke. None of them have low enough noise. For high end systems the first 20 bits might be useful information , if you're lucky. After that the rest of thr bits are noise, and are, from a physics standpoint, hooked up to a gaussian random number generator.

Are you sure about that? If you use a 20 bit system, you're clipping the noise bits to "0", which won't necessarily be more accurate than letting them remain at their original value. Those bits don't go away--the system still deals with digital values, you've just limited it to fewer possible digital values. This is rounding, and I don't see why rounding away the noise is any more likely to round it in the right direction than wrong.

Comment Re:Translation: (Score 1) 203

At this point why wouldn't they just buy whatever the latest galaxy phone is instead? If you're going to be stuck with a phone full of bloat you might as well at least get a good one?

Bad buttons. If they want me to press and hold stiff hardware buttons before they take action after a 800 ms delay, they should pay me for that job. I'd use any phone before Samsung, possibly even an iPhone.

Slashdot Top Deals

Usage: fortune -P [] -a [xsz] [Q: [file]] [rKe9] -v6[+] dataspec ... inputdir